Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.413
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Meta-Yuridis Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Awang Long Law Review Kosmik Hukum Law, Development and Justice Review Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Journal Of Business, Finance, and Economics (JBFE) Journal of Education Research Bacarita Law Journal Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia AL-SULTHANIYAH JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum CONSTITUO: Jurnal Riset Hukum Kenegaraan dan Politik Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Unizar Law Review
Surahman Surahman
Program Studi Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Mifftahur Rizky; Surahman Surahman; Rio Arif Pratama
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 8 (2024): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v4i8.842

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujukan guna mengetahui faktor - faktor yang menyebabkan anak terlibat dalam tindak pidana, serta untuk memahami dan menganalisis bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana percurian dalam perkara putusan Nomor 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/Pn Bpp. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dipenelitian ini adalah metode penelitian normatif dengan sifat preskriptif dan terapan untuk menemukan aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, maupun teori – teori hukum yang berkaitan terhadap perlindungan hukum terhadap anak sebagai pelaku tindak pidana. Penulis melihat masalah hukum ini melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Bahan hukum primer dan sekunder adalah sumber data yang digunakan dipenelitian ini. Hasil penelitian penulis yaitu faktor – faktor penyebabnya tindak pidana pencurian yang dilakukan oleh anak antara lain faktor ekonomi, faktor pendidikan, faktor lingkungan, dan majelis hakim dalam memberi sanksi pada Nomor 6/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/Pn Bpp. Masih kurang tepat karena anak mendapat sanski penjara, jika dilihat dari pasal pencurian 362 KUHP yang maksimalnya adalah 5 tahun. Sedangkan syarat pidana penjara pada anak adalah anak yang melakukan tindak pidana dengan ancaman 7 tahun atau lebih. Seharusnya penegak hukum dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak lebih mengutamakan diversi. Memastikan hak – hak anak agar dapat hidup, berkembang, tumbuh, dan berpartisipasi merupakan tujuan perlindungan anak dan juga menerima perlindungan terhadap kekerasan maupun diskriminasi.
THE LEGAL UTILITARIANISM APPROACH IN THE REGULATION OF AGE VERIFICATION FOR FINTECH USERS: CASE DATA ANALYSIS AND STUDY ON UNDERAGE MISUSE BASED ON INDONESIAN REGULATION Aditya Nur Tio Sanda; Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati; Surahman; M. Nurcholis Alhadi
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i2.2018

Abstract

The rapid growth of financial technology, fintech in Indonesia has brought significant benefits in expanding financial inclusion, particularly for communities underserved by traditional banking. However, this progress also presents serious challenges, especially regarding user age verification. The ease of registering with only an uploaded ID card and selfie has enabled minors to misuse their parents' identities to access online loans or pay later services, resulting in financial, psychological, and legal risks for families and fintech providers. Through the legal utilitarianism perspective, strict age verification is seen as a policy that produces the greatest benefit for society by reducing identity misuse, minimizing default risk, and strengthening public trust in the digital ecosystem. Challenges such as cybersecurity, data leakage, weak internal supervision, and illegal fintech proliferation indicate the need for integrated biometric systems, validation with the national population database, Dukcapil, and digital literacy within families. Therefore, strengthening the legal framework for age verification becomes an essential foundation toward a safe, inclusive, and socially beneficial fintech industry.
Penguatan Pengaturan Corporate Social Responsibility terhadap Perusahaan Platform Digital dalam Mendukung Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan UMKM Digital di Indonesia Alviani Maulida; Surahman Surahman
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 12 (2026): Tema Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i12.4358

Abstract

The rapid growth of the digital economy has positioned digital platform companies as key actors influencing the sustainability of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). However, Indonesia's Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) framework remains limited to companies operating in or related to natural resources, making it insufficient to address the characteristics of the digital economy. This article analyzes the regulation of CSR for digital platform companies and proposes a regulatory strengthening model to enhance the protection and empowerment of MSMEs. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings reveal that the existing CSR framework still adopts a sector-based approach, which is no longer aligned with the development of digital platforms and MSME protection. Therefore, regulatory reform should adopt an impact-based approach, expand the scope of obligated legal subjects, adjust CSR implementation to the characteristics of digital platforms, and strengthen supervisory mechanisms to promote a fair and sustainable digital economy.
Abuse Application Bankruptcy as a Deterrent Strategy Business Competition in Indonesia Surahman Surahman; Siti Zulfa Masruroh
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i3.32181

Abstract

Bankruptcy proceedings in Indonesia are designed as an instrument for fair and effective debt settlement. However, the simplicity of bankruptcy requirements under Law Number 37 of 2004 creates opportunities for abuse, including the use of bankruptcy applications to pressure, weaken, or eliminate business competitors. This study aims to identify the modes and characteristics of bankruptcy applications used as anti-competitive instruments and formulate an ideal legal framework integrating bankruptcy and business competition law. This normative legal research employs statutory, case, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively and normatively through legislation, judicial decisions, legal doctrines, and comparative legal frameworks. The findings identify three modes: tactical bankruptcy petitions based on disputed debts, bankruptcy threats as negotiation leverage, and exploitation of the simple evidentiary standard to transfer complex disputes into bankruptcy proceedings. Six cumulative indicators characterize such abuse: the respondent's solvency, unresolved debt status, disproportion between debt and resulting harm, absence of prior genuine collection efforts, the applicant's position as a direct competitor, and procedural irregularities. The study concludes that the existing framework lacks sufficient safeguards against anti-competitive bankruptcy applications. It recommends five measures: an insolvency test, prima facie good-faith disclosure, pre-trial screening, effective sanctions and recovery, and institutional coordination between the Commercial Court and the competition authority.
Co-Authors Abisha, Dziqry Irga Achmad Yogi Pramana Aditya Nur Tio Sanda Aditya Nur Tio Sanda Akhmad Sobyan Aldi Pebrian Almatirahasti Almatirahasti Alviani Maulida Anatasyah, Clerine Clarisa Andayani, Ana Dana, Robin Dhaifa Nisrina Elviandri, Elviandri Enny Kartini Febriyandi, Hardiki Gilvina Grace B.A. Hasmiati, Rahmtullah Ayu Herman, Akhmad Sobyan Khayrul Rizal Khayrul Rizal LUKMAN, LUKMAN M. Jordi Primasakti M. Nurcholis Alhadi M. Rezy Abdurrahman Marwah M. Idris Meylinda Putriani Mifftahur Rizky Muaini Muaini Muhammad Ananda Muhammad Kholil Muhammad Mirza Rohadi Muhammad Muhammad Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi Muhammad Viqran Muhammad Wahyudi Mulyana Mulyana Ngazis, Muhammad Nurul Zahwany Oktastika Badai Nirmala Paturu', Reny Oktaviani Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Rahmatullah Ayu Hasmiati Ria Wanda Karmelia Noor Rio Arif Pratama Sadam Kholik Safira Dina Fakhirah Sayid Muhammad Riziq Siskawati Melinda Rifiyanti Siti Zulfa Masruroh Sri Kandy Sulastri Sulastri Syarief Hidayatullah Tri Aulia Akbar Umi Fitria Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi