Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.355
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dialektika Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar Auladuna MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini Jurnal Studi Komunikasi k@ta Martabe : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Basicedu JKKP (Jurnal Kesejahteraan Keluarga dan Pendidikan) Jurnal Riset Komunikasi JIPD (Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar) Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Jurnal Membaca Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Journal Civics and Social Studies Dakwatuna: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi Islam Tsaqafatuna: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam Rabbani: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Journal of Education Research Jurnal Basicedu Linguisic, Literature, and English Education Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research JPLED JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK SIYAR (Social Issues by Academic Researhers) Journal Al-Qalam: Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Pendidikan QAZI : Journal of Islamic Studies QOUBA : Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Education Journal Piwulang : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa
Rosyidi, Zudan
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 35 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Dialektika

 1 
Kognisi Sosial Dalam Narasi Terstruktur, Sistematis, dan Masif (TSM) di Persidangan Pemilu Pilpres 2019 Melalui Uji Linguistik Forensik Atiq Mohammad Romdlon; Murni Fidiyanti; Ahmad Syaikhu; Zudan Rosyidi
Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 9, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Department of Indonesia Language and Literature Teaching, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/dialektika.v9i2.24722

Abstract

Studi ini menganalisis kognisi sosial pada narasi TSM (terstruktur, sistematis, dan masif) yang dibuat oleh tim pengacara pasangan calon (paslon) Pilpres 2 selama persidangan sengketa hasil suara Pilpres 2019 di Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK). Representasi dari kognisi sosial merupakan pengetahuan yang didalamnya memuat prinsip-prinsip “keadilan substantif”. Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan mengacu pada forensik linguistik dengan mendasarkan pada ancangan Analisa Wacana Kritis (AWK) Teun A. van Dijk. Data yang digunakan adalah transkrip percakapan persidangan yang dibuat oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK). Studi ini menemukan bahwa kognisi sosial tim pengacara paslon Pilpres 2 adalah representasi dari prinsip keadilan substantif. Prinsip ini terdiri atas empat pengetahuan yaitu rasionalitas pengadilan substantif, kejujuran dan abuse of power aparat pemerintahan, objektifitas mahkamah konstitusi, imparsialitas pemerintah dan penyelenggara pemilu. Prinsip ini dipergunakan oleh tim pengacara paslon Pilpres 2 untuk mendorong supaya hakim MK tidak sekadar melakukan penghitungan ulang suara namun didorong untuk menyelidiki pelanggaran TSM yang diduga dilakukan oleh paslon Pilpres 1. Kata Kunci: kognisi sosial; TSM; pilpres 2019; linguistik forensik
Kognisi Sosial Dalam Narasi Terstruktur, Sistematis, dan Masif (TSM) di Persidangan Pemilu Pilpres 2019 Melalui Uji Linguistik Forensik Romdlon, Atiq Mohammad; Fidiyanti, Murni; Syaikhu, Ahmad; Rosyidi, Zudan
Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol 9, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Department of Indonesia Language and Literature Teaching, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/dialektika.v9i2.24722

Abstract

This study analyzes social cognition on TSM (structured, systematic, and massive) narrative created by the lawyers of the presidential election pair (paslon) 2 during the 2019 presidential election dispute hearing at the Constitutional Court (MK). The representation of social cognition is in the form of knowledge which includes the principles of "substantive justice". The research method used refers to linguistic forensics based on Teun A. van Dijk's Critical Discourse Analysis (AWK) approach. The data were transcripts of court conversations made by the Constitutional Court (MK). This study found that the social cognition of the team of lawyers for the 2nd presidential candidate pair is a representation of the principle of substantive justice. This principle consists of four pieces of knowledge, namely the rationality of substantive courts, honesty and abuse of power by government officials, the objectivity of the constitutional court, the impartiality of the government and election organizers. This principle was used by the team of lawyers for the presidential election pair 2 to encourage MK judges not only to recount the votes but also to investigate TSM violations that were allegedly committed by the presidential election candidate pair 1. 
Co-Authors Abdur Rohman Abu Fanani Ach. Muhibbin Zuhri Achmad Muhibin Zuhri Achmad Zaidun Ahmad Syaikhu Anggraini, Miranti Apriliya, Erika Putri Arif, Uswatun Khasanah Assyifa, Habibah Shofiyah Atiq Mohammad Romdlon Atiqoh, Laili Ida Auliya, Difa Rif'ah Azizi, Muhammad Rafi Dorotea Moni Stelmachowska Efendi, Rachmat Eka Andini, Risky Fidiyanti, Murni Halidah, Fitri Husni Abdillah Imam Hanafi Intan Mauliana Alifia Putri Irsyadi, Achmad Naufal Jauharoti Alfin Lailiyah, Nishfatul M. Bahri Musthofa M. Salim M.Bahri Musthofa Mujaroh Putri, Alvia Amalani Nur Laili Ratnawati, Yuyun Dwi Romdlon, Atiq M Romdlon, Atiq M. Salsabila Laili Ramadhanti Septi Ariadi, Septi Sugihartati, Rahma Syaikhu, Ahmad Tsania HM, Arina Putri Utami, Faricha Ajeng Mega Vira Maulidafi Chusniyatin Yuma Fardiya Handien Zaidun, Achmad Zayanni Hilmi, Rusyda Izzana Zumatul Atiqoh