Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Audiens

Analisis Wacana Kritis pada Malaka Podcast: Implikasi RUU TNI dan Kontrol Sipil Tamami, Sulthan Zaidan; Muktiyo, Widodo; Anshori, Mahfud
Jurnal Audiens Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammdiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jas.v6i4.729

Abstract

The government is endeavoring to establish policies that legitimize the participation of TNI (Indonesian National Armed Forces) and Police personnel in practical politics. This endeavor is undertaken without adherence to democratic principles, and the legislative process is also non-transparent. Malaka Podcast, a discussion platform and learning medium for youth, produced an episode titled “Don’t Let Indonesia Regress to the Dark Ages.” The podcast featured legal experts to discuss the re-emergence of the ABRI dwifungsi (dual function) discourse, an attempted revival under the current regime. This research aims to deconstruct the dialogue within this podcast using Teun A. van Dijk's critical discourse analysis (CDA). The dialogue content was thematically coded, derived from the podcast transcript and the researcher's thorough engagement with the entire audio. Subsequently, these thematic codes were analyzed within the dimensions of context, social cognition, and ideology, in accordance with Van Dijk's CDA framework. The findings conclude that the podcast dialogue is imbued with pro-democracy messages, the importance of civil society solidarity, and critiques of the law-making process.
Konflik Diskursif Netizen Terkait Tragedi Jatuhnya Juliana Marins di Gunung Rinjani di Kolom Komentar Akun Instagram @sar_nasional Duhri, Moh Khodiq; Hastjarjo, Sri; Anshori, Mahfud
Jurnal Audiens Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammdiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jas.v6i4.731

Abstract

The tragedy of a Brazilian tourist’s fall on Mount Rinjani in June 2025 triggered discursive conflict in the comment section of Instagram account @sar_nasional, shifting the space from sympathy to a site of narrative clashes between Indonesian and Brazilian netizens. This qualitative case study examines how the two groups constructed competing narratives by analyzing 56 relevant comments using Framing Theory and Symbolic Interactionism. Brazilian netizens framed the incident as “systemic negligence” by highlighting delayed response and infrastructural weaknesses, while Indonesian netizens countered with a frame of “volunteer heroism in extreme terrain,” emphasizing geographical challenges and the dedication of SAR teams. The interactions did not evolve into dialogue but instead functioned as rituals of identity affirmation that deepened polarization. This study demonstrates how a humanitarian tragedy can transform into a cross-national narrative conflict at the grassroots level. Practically, the findings underscore the need for rescue institutions to apply crisis management strategies grounded in cross-language communication to prevent escalation, and to develop digital “micro-diplomacy” practices through rapid clarification, contextual explanations, and empathic responses to ease tensions in digital platform comment spaces.