Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Social Research

Obstacles to the Consumer Protection Dispute Settlement Process Can Not Work Effectively (Case Study of BPSK District of Tangerang) Pardamean Harahap; Faisal Santiago
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i2.605

Abstract

Everyone has been a consumer to fulfill their life needs, both primary and secondary needs in order to obtain goods and services, although not everyone has become a business actor, therefore as a consumer, it is not spared from various problems that may occur such as fraud by business actors, fraud and so on, it is necessary to settle consumer disputes properly and correctly, through the courts and outside the court such as the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) as a new institution that provides opportunities for consumers and business actors to choose one of three consumer dispute resolution mechanisms, namely: Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration. This research uses several methods, namely: first, the literature study consists of (a). types of normative legal research or secondary data document studies; (b). the nature of the research in this study using descriptive analysis research; and (c). the types of data consist of primary legal data, secondary legal data, and tertiary legal materials. The second was to interview two members of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) in the Tangerang district and one of the administrators at the BPSK secretariat in the Tangerang district.
Theoretical Review of Experiments (Poging) in the Criminal Code Pardamean Harahap; Suparji Ahmad
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i6.918

Abstract

Probation Institute regulated in the Criminal Code called poging according to doctrine is a crime that has been started, but has not been completed or is not perfect, the Criminal Code can threaten an act in order to prevent the occurrence of victims. The Problem Formulation is: How is the Criminal Law Review related to Experiments (poging) in Indonesia?, while the Research Method used is Normative Research, which is obtained from documents or library materials. The objective probation theory that the basis for the conviction of probation is because the act has endangered a legal interest, and the subjective theory of probation that the basis for the conviction of probation is the harmful nature of the perpetrator.
Consumer Protection Against Final Decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body is a Quasi-Court Harahap, Pardamean; Sulaiman, Abdullah
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i12.1612

Abstract

The position of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body in the judicial power law is not as a court institution but carries out an adjudicating function called a Quasi Court with resolution through mediation, conciliation, and arbitration, the decisions of which are final and binding.  The formulation of the problem in this paper is: Why is legal protection needed for consumers as a Quasi Court from the Final Decision of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK)? Meanwhile, the method used in this research is the normative method, using a statutory and analytical approach, then the legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials.  Consumers are weaker in existence than business actors, because business actors often carry out actions that can harm consumers to gain profits, therefore consumers need to receive legal protection, even though UUPK has been formed to resolve disputes through the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK), but the BPSK decision which is final and binding has not been fully implemented consistently as stated in the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), because there is still an opportunity to submit objections for parties who object to the BPSK decision.