cover
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
+6282242226898
Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26214105     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2266
Core Subject : Social,
Journal USM LAW REVIEW (JULR) is an academic journal for Legal Studies published by Master of Law, Semarang University. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. The focus and scope of this journal are legal problems in the fields of Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; International Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Business Law; Medical Law; Environmental Law; Adat Law; Agrarian Law; Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 561 Documents
Pertanggungjawaban Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara Dalam Penyelenggaraan Tata Pemerintahan Nadhir, Nabiyla; Sinaga, David Parlinggoman; Syawal, Muhammad; Patola, Innayah Maghfirah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i1.8117

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the form of accountability of the Archipelago Capital Authority after the passing of the Archipelago Capital Law. The relocation of the country's capital will be based on social, economic, political and geographical conditions in the region that create new governance dynamics. The existence of structural changes in the implementation and governance of government in the new national capital has given rise to urgency in research related to the accountability mechanism of the Archipelago Capital Authority, which is something new in Indonesian state affairs. Through literature and theoretical studies as well as a doctrinal research approach, it is stated that the Nusantara Capital City Authority functions as a ministry-level institution that administers the Special Regional Government for the Archipelago Capital City. The position of the Archipelago Capital Authority then became an anomaly because the concept of authority was not appropriate for special regional government units. Then the responsibility of the Archipelago Capital Authority is carried out in two dimensions, namely legal and political responsibility. Apart from that, the authority obtained by the Archipelago Capital Authority through the Archipelago Capital Law is an attribution which causes responsibility to lie with the recipient of the authority (attributeary). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk pertanggunjawaban Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara pasca disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang Ibu Kota Negara. Pemindahan ibu kota negara dilatarbelakangi atas kondisi social, ekonomi, politik dan geografi wilayah yang menciptakan dinamika tata pemerintahan yang baru. Adanya perubahan struktur dalam pelaksanaan dan tata kelola pemerintahan di ibu kota negara baru menimbulkan urgensi dalam penelitian terkait dengan mekanisme pertanggungjawaban Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara yang menjadi hal baru dalam ketetanegaraan Indonesia. Melalui kajian pustaka dan teoretik serta dengan pendekatan penelitian doktriner, dinyatakan bahwa Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara berfungsi sebagai lembaga setingkat kementerian yang menyelenggarakan Pemerintahan Daerah Khusus. Kedudukan Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara tersebut kemudian menjadi anomali karena konsep otorita tidak tepat dengan satuan pemerintahan daerah yang bersifat khusus. Kemudian pertanggung jawaban Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara dilaksanakan dalam dua dimensi yaitu pertangggungjawaban hukum dan politik. Selain itu, kewenangan yang didapatkan oleh Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara melalui Undang-Undang Ibu Kota Negara merupakan atribusi yang menyebabkan pertanggungjawabannya berada pada penerima wewenang (atributaris), atau dalam hal ini adalah Otorita Ibu Kota Nusantara itu sendiri.
Tindakan Hukum Konflik Pengadaan Tanah untuk Kepentingan Umum Debora, Agnes; Rizkianti, Wardani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7899

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to study the legal efforts to resolve the agraric conflict regarding land acquisition for the general interest by analyzing the case that occurred between the PT Farmers of Nusantara III with the Gurilla Society, New Village, Siantar Pematang. This research is needed to look at the fast-growing infrastructure development trends in Indonesia. Behind all of this, there are families who lose their homes and jobs with uneven costs and forms of damages. Therefore, it is felt necessary for the urgency to analyse the arrangements, rights and obligations, as well as the related laws in the case of land acquisition for the public interest. This paper uses a normative jurisprudential approach that is carried out by studying library material or secondary data as the basic material to be studied by conducting a search of the rules and literature related to the problem being studied. This study analyses the violations committed by PTPN III against the Gurilla community that have not been in previous studies. The results of this study show that there are different ways to resolve the dispute. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisis upaya hukum penyelesaian konflik agraria mengenai pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum dengan menganalisa kasus yang terjadi antar PT Perkebunan Nusantara III dengan masyarakat Gurilla, Kampung Baru, Pematang Siantar. Penelitian ini diperlukan melihat tren pembangunan infrastruktur di Indonesia yang berkembang pesat. Dibalik semua itu, ada keluarga yang kehilangan tempat tinggal dan pekerjaanya dengan biaya dan bentuk ganti rugi yang tidak setimpal. Dirasakan perlu adanya urgensi untuk menganalisa tata cara, hak dan kewajiban, serta perundang-undangan terkait dalam kasus pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum. Tulisan ini memakai pendekatan yuridis normatitif yang dilaksanakan dengan mempelajari bahan pustaka maupun data sekunder sebagai bahan dasar yang diteliti dengan melakukan pencarian terkait kaidah-kaidah dan literatur-literatur yang bersinggungan dengan permasalahan yang diteliti. Penelitian ini menganalisis terkait pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh PTPN III terhadap masyarakat Gurilla yang belum dijabarkan dalam penelitian terdahulu. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa ada berbagai cara untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tersebut.
Legal Protection Against Lender in Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending Sharia Yuspin, Wardah; Nurrachman, Alfan Dzikria; Fauzie, Ata; Hakim, Lukman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i2.9064

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the legal protection of lenders in Sharia P2PL, which is trying to offer an improved concept of legal protection at POJK No.10/ OJK.05 / 2022. The novelty of this research is the aspect of legal protection from the lender's perspective. This research method uses empirical juridical research through primary data interviews with lenders and observation of providers, including Dana Syariah, Alami Syariah, Ammana, Duha Syariah, Qazwa, Ethics, Investree Syariah, and Papitupi Syariah. The results of this study indicate that financing by lenders in Sharia peer-to-peer lending, the organizers have implemented article 100 of POJK Number 10/POJK.05/2022, including the principles of transparency, fair treatment, as well as confidentiality and security of consumer data. Several factors, such as facilities, community, and culture, support this. This indicates efforts to improve legal protection from lender perspective. However, other consumer protection principles, including the principles of reliability and complaint handling and simple, fast, affordable consumer dispute resolution, still need to be improved. Eventually, there are suggested concept that can increase legal protection for lenders in terms of the obligation to use insurance and also the use of fiduciary guarantees to further increase legal protection for lenders. 
Optimizing the Role of BNPT in Preventing Terrorism Financing Using Cryptocurrency in Indonesia Ariani, Okta; Ibrahim, Aji Lukman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i1.8027

Abstract

The development of cryptocurrency technology is the latest innovation in the financial sector. The purpose of this study is to determine the efforts made by BNPT and to assess the ideal regulations in addressing this issue in the future. Through the use of blockchain technology, users can transact anonymously. This research is considered as a normative juridical research equipped with interviews using a statutory approach. Sources of data obtained from secondary data which includes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials.  The novelty of the study shows that the BNPT establish the CTF Task Force which aims to combat terrorism financing through cryptocurrency and based on several previous studies and after looking at the above-mentioned examples of the phenomenon of terrorism financing, it is undeniable that many terrorists are trying to utilise cryptocurrencies to fund criminal acts. This has resulted in the issue of a legal or regulatory vacuum regarding the use of cryptocurrencies, in this case, the Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Agency Regulation No. 6/2019 on Implementation of Anti-Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing Prevention In its future endeavors, there is a need for specific regulations to ensure that the implementation process of the CTF Task Force with other agencies can be carried out more optimally.
Analisis Regulasi Pada Tanaman Transgenik dalam Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman Bagi Pemulia Tanaman Batrisyia, Briana; Haryanto, Imam
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7433

Abstract

This research aims to study how transgenic plant protection has developed for plant breeders in Indonesia. Then, it is hoped that this research can be used as a reference to find out the development of transgenic plant protection for plant breeders in Indonesia in response to the development of existing transgenic plants and to come up with solutions to similar problems. Transgenic plants are products that are formed from intelligent human thinking and require a lot of time and money in the research process. There is a need for protection for initial breeders whose seeds are taken by inventors to be used as material for their inventions. This research uses normative research methods with a comparative approach. The results of this research lead to the conclusion that considering current developments, there needs to be modification and improvement in the effective protection of innovation in the field of transgenic plants, especially for plant breeders in Indonesia. This protection should be balanced between the rights of plant breeders and the interests of the wider community, including food availability, genetic diversity, and the environment.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari bagaimana perlindungan tanaman transgenik telah berkembang untuk pemulia tanaman di Indonesia. Kemudian penelitian ini diharapkan dapat dijadikan acuan untuk mengetahui perkembangan perlindungan tanaman transgenik bagi pemulia tanaman di Indonesia dalam menyikapi perkembangan tanaman transgenik yang ada dan memunculkan solusi-solusi untuk dapat menyelesaikan permasalahan yang serupa.Tanaman transgenik adalah produk yang terbentuk dari pemikiran cerdas manusia dan membutuhkan banyak waktu dan uang dalam proses penelitiannya dan perlu adanya perlindungan bagi pemulia awal yang benihnya diambil oleh inventor untuk digunakan sebagai bahan invensinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan (comparative approach). Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa melihat perkembangan zaman yang ada, perlu adanya modifikasi dan peningkatan dalam perlindungan yang efektif terhadap inovasi dalam bidang tanaman transgenik khususnya bagi pemulia tanaman di Indonesia yang seimbang antara hak-hak bagi pemulia tanaman dan kepentingan masyarakat luas, termasuk diantaranya ketersediaan pangan, keanekaragaman genetik, dan lingkungan.                                       
Urgensi Mediasi Terhadap Sengketa Pembagian Harta Bersama Saputra, Muhammad Alvin; A’dawiyah, Robi’atin; Erwansyah, Tomy; Sari, Sri Jati Ratna; Hadayatullah, Syeh Sarip
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i2.9012

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to highlight the importance of mediation as a more effective alternative method for resolving joint property disputes compared to conventional litigation approaches. Joint property disputes have become an increasingly pressing issue in the realm of family and civil law. These conflicts often arise in the context of divorce, which can cause tension and uncertainty for the parties involved. According to the decision directory of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, there were 2,316 cases of joint property disputes in 2023, indicating that joint property conflicts are widespread. This underscores the urgent need for a more effective alternative solution. The formal legal approach traditionally used in resolving joint property disputes has various limitations. One major constraint is the lack of integration among the various relevant approaches in the mediation process. This study employs three approaches: psychological, economic, and philosophical. Data collection is based on a literature review and utilizes a qualitative descriptive method for data analysis. The study's findings indicate that mediation offers significant advantages over conventional litigation for dispute resolution. The integrated mediation model developed in this study, which combines psychological, economic, and philosophical approaches, is expected to address the weaknesses of existing mediation approaches. With a holistic and adaptive approach to the complexities of joint property disputes, this model has the potential to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of dispute resolution and provide tangible benefits to the involved parties. Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah menyoroti pentingnya mediasi sebagai metode alternatif yang lebih efektif untuk menyelesaikan sengketa harta bersama dibandingkan dengan pendekatan litigasi konvensional. Sengketa harta bersama telah menjadi isu yang semakin mendesak dalam ranah hukum keluarga dan perdata. Konflik ini sering kali timbul dalam konteks perceraian yang dapat menimbulkan ketegangan dan ketidakpastian bagi para pihak yang terlibat. Berdasarkan Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Indonesia pada tahun 2023 terdapat 2316 kasus sengketa harta bersama, ini menunjukkan bahwa persengeketaan harta bersama ada sacara masif. Hal ini menunjukkan kebutuhan mendesak untuk solusi alternatif yang lebih efektif. Pendekatan hukum formal yang selama ini digunakan dalam penyelesaian sengketa harta bersama memiliki berbagai keterbatasan, Salah satu kendala utama adalah kurangnya integrasi antara berbagai pendekatan yang relevan dalam proses mediasi.  Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga pendekatan yaitu pendekatan psikologis, ekonomis dan filosofis. Metode pengumpulan data berbasis studi kepustakaan, dan menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dalam menganalisis data. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Mediasi menawarkan keuntungan signifikan dari pada penyelesaian sengketa secara litigasi konvensional, Model mediasi terintegrasi yang dikembangkan dalam penelitian ini, yang menggabungkan pendekatan psikologis, ekonomis, dan filosofis, diharapkan dapat mengatasi kelemahan dari pendekatan mediasi yang ada saat ini. Dengan pendekatan yang holistik dan adaptif terhadap kompleksitas sengketa harta bersama, model ini berpotensi meningkatkan efektivitas dan efisiensi penyelesaian sengketa, serta memberikan manfaat nyata bagi para pihak yang terlibat.
Pemanfaatan Sisa Embrio Beku Program Bayi Tabung Sebagai Terapi Transplantasi Sel Punca di Indonesia Sari, Jayanti Purnama; Santosa, Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi; Winata, I Gde Sastra
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i1.8286

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the latest phenomenon in the development of sources of embryonic stem cells in the world, as a criticism of the Health Act that closed Indonesia's opportunity to undertake health transformation. Now many countries have begun to legalize embryonic stem cells by exploiting the remains of the in vitro fertilization embryos left just by their owners. It responds to earlier debates about the method of embryonic stem cells that originate in a fetus or embryos taken from a mother's womb. Some research sources say that embryonic stem cells have more potential than non-embryonic. On that basis, it is interesting to study how the Indonesian Health Act responds to these developments and the commitment to transform in terms of health. The innovation in this research focuses on responding to existing research that more categorizes embryonic stem cells as violating the ethics of living beings and strictly prohibits the use of embryonal stem cell. This research method is normative, using statutory and comparative approaches. The results of this research are, first, that embryonic stem cells have greater potential than the adult stem cells currently used and countries around the world are starting to legalize the use of embryonic stem cells by utilizing leftover embryos from in vitro fertilization. Second, Indonesia is still unable to carry out health transformation by utilizing legal instruments, such as the preamble to the Health Law and Development Legal Theory.Tujuan penelitian ini ialah memberikan gambaran fenomena terbaru perihal perkembangan sumber dari sel punca embrionik di dunia, sebagai kritik terhadap Undang-Undang Kesehatan yang menutup rapat kesempatan Indonesia untuk melakukan transformasi kesehatan. Saat ini banyak negara-negara mulai melegalkan sel punca embrionik dengan memanfaatkan sisa embrio in vitro fertilazation yang ditinggalkan begitu saja oleh pemiliknya. Hal ini menjawab perdebatan dahulu terkait metode sel punca embrionik yang bersumber pada janin atau embrio yang diambil dari rahim seorang ibu. Beberapa sumber penelitian mengatakan bahwa sel punca embrionik lebih memiliki potensi besar dibanding sel punca non embrionik. Atas dasar itu, menarik untuk dikaji bagaimana Undang-Undang Kesehatan Indonesia menanggapi perkembangan ini dan komitment untuk bertransformasi dalam hal kesehatan. Pembaharuan dalam  penelitian ini berfokus pada menjawab penelitian yang sudah ada yang lebih mengkategorikan sel punca embrionik sebagai hal yang melanggar etika makhluk hidup dan melarang keras penggunaan sel punca embrionik. Metode penelitian ini adalah normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang- undangan dan komparatif. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini ialah pertama, sel punca embrionik lebih memiliki potensi besar ketimbang sel punca dewasa yang saat ini digunakan dan Negara-negara di dunia mulai melegalisasi penggunaan sel punca embrionik dengan memanfaatkan sisa embrio in vitro fertilazation. Kedua, Indonesia masih belum mampu melakukan transformasi kesehatan dengan dengan memanfaatkan instrumen hukum, sebagaimana konsideran Undang-Undang Kesehatan dan Teori Hukum Pembangunan.
Perbandingan konsep Hukum Kepailitan Amerika (Chapter 11) dan Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia Fatahillah, Faishal; Winanti, Atik
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7906

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the differences in the implementation of a legal system between the Bankruptcy Law system in America and in Indonesia, specifically regarding PKPU in Indonesia based on Law no. 37 of 2004 and Company Reorganization based on Chapter 11 US Bankruptcy Code in America. This research needs to be carried out because there are several opinions that the bankruptcy law in Indonesia does not provide sufficient protection to debtors who have good intentions, because currently there is a tendency to interpret bankruptcy as the same as liquidation. The method used in this research is juridical-normative with a conceptual approach and a comparative approach. The research is more focused on comparing the effectiveness and application of the United States bankruptcy law system and the Indonesian bankruptcy law system, which has not been explained comprehensively in previous research. The results of this research show that there are differences between PKPU as a concept in Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia, and the concept of Company Reorganization in Bankruptcy Law in America. From the research results, it is explained that company reorganization is also part of debt restructuring in the PKPU concept, where by reorganizing, companies can analyze the causes of their financial difficulties so they can immediately find the best solution. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis terakit perbedaan pelaksanaan suatu sistem hukum antara sistem Hukum Kepailitan di Amerika dengan di Indonesia tepatnya mengenai PKPU di Indonesia berdasarkan UndangUndang No. 37 Tahun 2004 dan Reorganisasi Perusahaan berdasarkan Chapter 11 US Bankruptcy Code di Amerika. Penelitian ini perlu dilakukan karena terdapat beberapa pendapat bahwa Undang-Undang kepailitan di Indonesia belum memberikan perlindungan yang cukup kepada debitur yang beriktikad baik, karena yang berkembang sampai sekarang ini terdapat kecenderungan mengartikan pailit sama dengan likuidasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berbentuk yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan pendekatan perbandingan. Penelitian lebih difokuskan pada perbandingan efektivitas dan penerapan sistem hukum kepailitan Amerika Serikat dan sistem hukum kepailitan Indonesia yang mana hal ini belum dijelaskan secara komprehensif dalam penelitian terdahulu. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan terdapat perbedaan antara PKPU sebagai sebuah konsep dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia, dengan konsep reorganisasi perusahaan dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Amerika. Dari hasil penelitian dijelaskan bahwa reorganisasi perusahaan juga menjadi bagian dari restrukturisasi utang dalam konsep PKPU yang mana dengan reorganisasi, perusahaan dapat menganalisis penyebab kesulitan keuangannya sehingga bisa dengan segera menemukan solusi terbaik.    
Penerapan Asas Geen Straf Zonder Schuld Dalam Penindakan Terhadap Kejahatan Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Deepfake Hapid, Fasa Muhamad; Suntana, Ija; Royani, Muhammad Yayan
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9686

Abstract

This research aims to find out the role of criminal law in responding to the development and abuse of deepfakes through the application of the geen straf zonder schuld principle as a basis for prosecution. Deepfakes, which are increasingly developing with the number of users continuing to grow, present various threats of abuse such as fraud, misuse of personal data, and the increasingly massive spread of hoax news which can clearly threaten the security and peace of society and this shows that it is important for the criminal law to take action against deepfake abuse. The analytical descriptive method with a normative juridical as approach was chosen to conduct this research. The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of the application of the geen straf zonder schuld principle in the context of criminal prosecution for misuse of deepfake technology, which has not been widely discussed in previous literature. The research results show that the application of the geen straf zonder schuld principle can be used as a guideline in dealing with and taking action against deepfake abuse and is supported by the Circular Letter of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 9 of 2023 concerning the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence which also makes it clearer that criminal action can be carried out. If we analyze the construction and substance of the crime, basically deepfake abuse is almost the same as criminal acts that we are familiar with and have existed before, but are influenced by and take advantage of technological developments. In conclusion, criminal law can play an adaptive role in dealing with deepfake abuse through the application of the geen straf zonder schuld principle. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana peran hukum pidana dalam merespons perkembangan dan penyalahgunaan deepfake melalui penerapan asas geen straf zonder schuld sebagai dasar  bagi penindakannya. Deepfake yang makin berkembang dengan jumlah penggunanya yang terus bertumbuh menghadirkan beragam ancaman penyalahgunaan seperti penipuan, penyalahgunaan data pribadi, hingga makin masifnya penyebaran berita hoax jelas dapat mengancam keamanan dan ketentraman masyarakat dan hal itu menunjukan bahwa penting bagi hukum pidana untuk melakukan penindakan bagi penyalahgunaan deepfake. Metode deskriptif analitis dengan yuridis normatif sebagai pendekatannya dipilih untuk melakukan penelitian ini. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis mengenai penerapan asas geen straf zonder schuld dalam konteks penindakan pidana penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake, yang belum banyak dibahas dalam literatur sebelumnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penerapan asas geen straf zonder schuld bisa dijadikan pedoman dalam menanggulangi dan melakukan penindakan penyalahgunaan deepfake dan didukung oleh Surat Edaran Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 tentang Etika Kecerdasan Artifisial juga makin memperjelas bisa dilakukannya penindakan pidana. Jika dianalisa secara konstruksi dan substansi kejahatannya pun pada dasarnya penyalahgunaan deepfake hampir sama dengan tindak pidana yang telah kita kenal dan ada sebelumnya namun terpengaruh dan memanfaatkan adanya perkembangan teknologi. Kesimpulannya, hukum pidana dapat berperan adaptif dalam menangani penyalahgunaan deepfake melalui penerapan asas geen straf zonder schuld. 
Independence of The Honorary Board of Election Organizers After The Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021 Ulya, Zaki; Fuadi, Fuadi; Putra, Aldi Syah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i2.8353

Abstract

This study aims to find out what the independence and integrity of the Honorary Board of Election Organisers (DKPP) are after the enactment of Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021. After the enactment of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 32/PUU-XIX/2021, DKPP experienced problems related to its independence, including limited authority, lack of independent supervisory functions, and rampant political intervention. All of these problems affect DKPP's role in carrying out its duties as a supervisor of election administrators. It is crucial to keep in mind that even with the changes in the DKPP's jurisdiction following the Constitutional Court's ruling, the organization's responsibility as a defender of morality and integrity in election administration is still crucial to maintaining a free, transparent, and democratic electoral process. This research uses normative juridical research methods, with a library research approach. To obtain secondary data related to this title so that valid and accountable data can be obtained, the approach used in this research is the statute approach. The findings of this research support the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 32/PUU-XIX/2023 which cancelled Article 458 paragraph (13) of Law No. 7/2017. This makes the decision of the Election Organiser Honour Council legally binding as a concrete, unique, and final decision made by a state administrative official, which can be challenged in the state administrative court. This decision has legal consequences because it confirms the final and binding nature of the Election Organiser Honour Council, which distinguishes it from judicial decisions; and opens up the possibility of testing the decision of the DKPP through the State Administrative Dispute procedure at the State Administrative Court.