cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Izzat Pratama
Contact Email
jurnal.seikat@gmail.com
Phone
+6285239778771
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.seikat@gmail.com
Editorial Address
LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram Jl. Tawak-Tawak Karang Sukun, Mataram e-mail: jurnal.seikat@gmail.com or seikat@45mataram.ac.id
Location
Kota mataram,
Nusa tenggara barat
INDONESIA
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram
ISSN : 29640962     EISSN : 29640962     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat
Core Subject : Art, Social,
Arts Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum (SJISPH) is an open access, and peer-reviewed journal, with the online registered number E-ISSN 2964-0962. Our main goal is to disseminate current and original articles from researchers and practitioners on various contemporary social, political and law issues: gender politics and identity, digital society and disruption, civil society movement, community welfare, social development, citizenship and public management, public policy innovation, international politics & security, media, information & literacy, politics, governance & democracy, radicalism and terrorism. It includes but is not limited to various fields such as philosophy and theory of law, comparative law, sociology of law, international law, constitutional law, private law, economic law, environmental law, criminal law, administrative law, cyber law, human rights law, and agrarian law. SJISPH is published every two month a year. Submissions are open year-round. Before submitting, please ensure that the manuscript is in accordance with SJISPHs focus and scope, written in Indonesian or English, and follows our author guidelines & manuscript template.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Sosiologi dan Ilmu Politik
Articles 604 Documents
 49   50   51   52   53 
Rekonstruksi Penegakan Kewajiban Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian di Indonesia: Pendekatan Hukum Responsif terhadap Kepatuhan Putusan Pengadilan Suci Ramadhani Putri; Deva Yulinda
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4143

Abstract

Religious Court rulings that oblige child support after divorce frequently remain mere paper judgments devoid of meaningful enforceability, leaving the economic and caregiving burden to fall entirely on mothers. This article examines the problem through two complementary lenses: Nonet and Selznick's responsive law theory and an Islamic family law perspective that positions child support as huquq al-walad, a fixed (luzum) right of the child that does not lapse upon the dissolution of the parents' marriage. Using normative legal research supported by statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this article analyses the City of Surabaya's administrative innovation of flagging the Population Identification Number (NIK) of former husbands in arrears as a starting point for formulating a more responsive national enforcement model. The findings show that oversight built on the integration of civil registry data and Religious Court rulings can drive compliance without resorting to protracted forced execution, yet its effectiveness remains confined to formally registered marriages, leaving a protection gap for children born of unregistered (siri) marriages. The article recommends reconstructing a national enforcement model that combines institutional synergy among Religious Courts, Civil Registry Offices, and local governments with strengthened access to marriage ratification (itsbat nikah) as a precondition for inclusive justice.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kerugian Materiil Korban Peredaran Obat yang Merusak Kesehatan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen Dadan Herdiana; Hana Nabilah
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4147

Abstract

This research is motivated by the prevalence of serious health issues among children in Indonesia caused by the circulation of syrup medicines containing hazardous chemicals. Although court rulings have imposed criminal sanctions on the parties involved, these rulings have not restored the financial rights of the affected consumers. The issues examined are the legal protection regarding consumers' material losses resulting from the circulation of health-damaging medicines—viewed through the lens of the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK)—and the mechanisms for recovering such losses. This study aims to identify the forms of legal protection and formulate measures for recovering victims' material losses based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK). It employs a normative legal research method utilizing statute, case, and conceptual approaches, with a descriptive-analytical analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that while the UUPK provides for both preventive and repressive consumer protection, current law enforcement focuses primarily on penalizing business actors, often neglecting victims' rights to compensation. Article 19 of the UUPK, which establishes the principle of strict liability and the class action mechanism, serves as the legal basis for victims to claim civil compensation. The study concludes that consumer justice remains incomplete if it stops at criminal sanctions against business actors; therefore, there is a need to standardize mass compensation amounts and synchronize procedural laws so that evidence from criminal cases can be directly utilized in civil lawsuits, thereby accelerating the restoration of victims' rights.
Restorative Justice Pada Tindak Pidana Merek dan Indikasi Geografis (Pendekatan Normatif terhadap Perlindungan Pemegang Hak, Konsumen, Persaingan Usaha, dan Kepentingan Publik) Zakky Ashidqi; I Made Kantikha; Wasis Susetio; Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4149

Abstract

The development of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal justice system reflects a paradigm shift from a punitive approach to a restorative approach. However, its application to trademark and geographical indication crimes raises legal concerns because these offenses involve not only the interests of rights holders but also consumer protection, fair business competition, and broader public interests. This study examines the regulation and limitations of restorative justice in resolving trademark and geographical indication crimes within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The study employs the Theory of the Objectives of Law developed by Gustav Radbruch and John Rawls, as well as the Restorative Justice Theory proposed by Howard Zehr and Tony Marshall. This research adopts a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that the regulation of restorative justice under Indonesian positive law remains general in nature and has not specifically established limitations for its application to trademark and geographical indication crimes. Unlike restorative justice in ordinary criminal offenses, which primarily focuses on restoring individual losses, its application to trademark and geographical indication crimes must also consider consumer protection, fair business competition, product reputation, and the public interest. The study concludes that restorative justice may be applied on a limited basis to certain trademark infringement cases but should be subject to stricter limitations in geographical indication cases due to their broader public interest implications. Therefore, more specific regulations are required to establish clear limitations on the application of restorative justice in trademark and geographical indication crimes in order to ensure legal certainty, justice, and legal expediency.
Analisis Yuridis Status dan Hubungan Kerja Pilot: Studi Sinkronisasi Hukum Ketenagakerjaan dan Hukum Penerbangan di Indonesia Horadin Saragih; Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring; Idris Wasahua; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4150

Abstract

Employment relationships in the aviation industry constitute a unique legal phenomenon because they exist at the intersection of two regulatory regimes with distinct objectives: labor law, which is grounded in the principles of worker protection and social justice, and aviation law, which focuses on technical standards and public safety. The tension between these two legal regimes has generated considerable legal debate, particularly regarding the validity of applying Fixed-Term Employment Agreements (Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu/PKWT) to pilots, who functionally occupy a central role in sustaining airline operations. This study aims to delineate the regulatory boundaries between general and special legal frameworks, assess the legal validity of the current employment agreement scheme, and formulate a harmonious and legally certain regulatory framework. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study examines legal norms through the perspectives of the theory of legal certainty and the theory of legal protection. The findings demonstrate that the nature of a pilot's work—being a core, continuous, and indefinite activity—objectively satisfies the legal requirements for an Indefinite-Term Employment Agreement (Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tidak Tertentu/PKWTT) under Article 59 of Law No. 13 of 2003, as amended by Law No. 6 of 2023. Accordingly, the application of PKWT arrangements or bonded-service schemes disguised as service contracts constitutes a legal deviation, resulting, by operation of law, in the conversion of the employment relationship into permanent employment status. Aviation law does not possess the authority to override labor law with respect to employment status; rather, it serves only to complement the technical aspects of work performance. This study concludes that restructuring pilots' employment relationships under the PKWTT framework is both a legal necessity and a prerequisite for ensuring aviation safety. It further recommends regulatory harmonization to eliminate ambiguities in the interpretation and application of the relevant legal norms.
Kedudukan Wartawan dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Pers Infotainment dalam Industri Media Penyiaran di Indonesia Wiwin; Malemna Sura Anabertha Sembiring; Markoni; I Made Kantikha; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4151

Abstract

The development of the broadcasting media industry has positioned infotainment programs as part of modern journalistic practice. However, the legal status of infotainment journalists and the legal protection afforded to infotainment press workers remain uncertain due to the absence of explicit legal regulations. This study aims to analyze legal certainty regarding the legal status of infotainment journalists and the legal protection of infotainment press workers within Indonesia’s press legal system. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, analyzed through Gustav Radbruch’s Theory of Legal Certainty and Philipus M. Hadjon’s Theory of Legal Protection. The findings indicate that infotainment journalists substantively fulfill the elements of journalistic activities and therefore qualify as journalists. Nevertheless, they have not yet obtained legal certainty due to the existence of vague legal norms. Furthermore, legal protection for infotainment press workers remains inadequate because of the unclear employment status, which affects the fulfillment of their statutory employment rights. This study concludes that explicit legal regulation concerning the status of infotainment journalists and certainty regarding their employment status is necessary. It further recommends harmonizing press law, employment law, and broadcasting law, as well as establishing clear legal provisions to ensure comprehensive legal protection for infotainment press workers.
Kekuatan Perjanjian Pemegang Saham Sebelum Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Melindungi Hak Pemegang Saham Minoritas : (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No.2035 K/PDT/2018) Julian Radjali; Markoni; Zulfikar Judge; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4152

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal force of a pre-incorporation shareholders’ agreement as a preventive legal protection instrument for minority shareholders in Indonesian limited liability companies. The issue is important because Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies provides minority shareholder protection, yet most remedies operate after loss or dispute has occurred. This study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly Supreme Court Decision Number 2035 K/Pdt/2018. The findings show that a pre-incorporation shareholders’ agreement is valid and binding upon the parties if it satisfies Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Shares to be issued by a company not yet incorporated may become a valid contractual object as future goods under Article 1334 of the Civil Code. However, the agreement does not automatically bind the company after incorporation unless it is ratified, incorporated into the articles of association, or restated after the company obtains legal entity status. Its preventive force depends on clear clauses, including tag-along rights, veto rights, board nomination rights, rights of first refusal, anti-dilution protection, and efficient dispute resolution mechanisms.
Dampak Perubahan Peraturan Gubernur dan Keputusan Gubernur Terhadap Pengenaan Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah dan Bangunan Agung Dharu Trihasto; Markoni; I Made Kantikha; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4153

Abstract

The Land and Building Acquisition Duty (Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah dan Bangunan/BPHTB) is one of Indonesia's regional taxes, the regulation of which has undergone significant changes through Governor Regulations and Governor Decrees in the Province of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta, particularly concerning the provisions on BPHTB reductions and exemptions in the transfer of land rights. This study aims to analyze these regulatory changes and examine their impact on the imposition of BPHTB in the transfer of land rights. The research employs a normative and empirical juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were collected through library research and interviews and analyzed using a descriptive qualitative method. The findings indicate that the amendments to the BPHTB regulations have changed the tax imposition mechanism, the eligibility criteria for tax incentives, and the procedures for granting BPHTB reductions and exemptions. These changes have resulted in legal uncertainty, particularly during the transitional period following the implementation of the Governor Decree of the Special Capital Region of Jakarta Number 840 of 2025, which was applied before its official date of enactment, thereby affecting the legal rights and obligations of taxpayers. This study concludes that amendments to BPHTB regulations should be accompanied by regulatory harmonization, clear transitional provisions, and the implementation of the principles of legal certainty and non-retroactivity in order to ensure legal protection for taxpayers.
Konstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pihak yang Berkedudukan Sebagai Saksi Fakta dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi : (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 25/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst) Andre Ismangun; Markoni; Helvis; I Made Kantikha; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4154

Abstract

Corruption offenses involving State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are inherently complex due to the involvement of organizational structures, authority relationships, and multiple parties performing different roles. A legal issue arises when an individual is formally designated as a factual witness during criminal proceedings, while the evidence presented at trial indicates potential involvement in the commission of the corruption offense. This study aims to analyze the construction of criminal liability for factual witnesses whose involvement in corruption is indicated by the facts established during trial under Indonesian criminal law. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, with analysis focused on Decision Number 25/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN.Jkt.Pst. The study applies the theories of criminal liability and criminal participation (deelneming). The findings demonstrate that the status of a factual witness does not preclude criminal liability where the constituent elements of a criminal offense, a substantial contribution to the commission of the offense, and culpability can be established. Within the doctrine of criminal participation, such involvement may be classified as medepleger where conscious cooperation, common intent, and significant participation are proven. Accordingly, criminal liability should be determined based on an individual's substantive role and proven involvement in the offense rather than solely on the formal procedural status as a witness or defendant.
Analisis Yuridis Konflik Hak Guna Bangunan dan Hak Pengelolaan dalam Penguasaan Tanah Oleh Negara : (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 208/Pdt.G/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst) Ane Jessyca Ramadena; Markoni; Annisa Fitria; Dyah Permata Budi Asri; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4155

Abstract

This research is motivated by the conflict between the Right to Build (Hak Guna Bangunan/HGB) and the Right to Manage (Hak Pengelolaan/HPL) in state land administration, which raises issues concerning the limits of state authority and legal protection for rights holders. This issue is reflected in the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 208/Pdt.G/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst. The research aims to analyze the limits of state authority in land control over the Right to Build and to examine the legal protection afforded to rights holders from the perspectives of the principle of legality and the General Principles of Good Governance. This research employs the Theory of Authority, the Theory of Legal Protection proposed by Philipus M. Hadjon, and Gustav Radbruch’s Theory of Legal Certainty. It adopts a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources, which are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that the state's authority exercised through the Right to Manage is not absolute but is limited by the Basic Agrarian Law, Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, Law Number 6 of 2023, the principle of legality, and the General Principles of Good Governance. It is concluded that the exercise of state authority must be carried out proportionally while respecting the private rights of Right to Build holders. Therefore, it is recommended that the Government provide clearer regulations governing the relationship between the Right to Manage and the Right to Build in order to ensure legal certainty and legal protection in the administration of land affairs.
Prinsip Good Corporate Governance Sebagai Instrumen Mitigasi Risiko Hukum dalam Pengelolaan Kontrak Bisnis Developer Perumahan : (Studi Kasus Pada PT X) Eclesia C. Siahainenia; I Made Kantikha; Annisa Fitria; Noviana Tansari; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i5.4156

Abstract

The housing development industry involves complex contractual relationships among developers, contractors, vendors, and consumers, making it highly vulnerable to legal risks. This condition is reflected in 3,872 consumer complaints filed against PT X in 2025, indicating a gap between the legal certainty provided by contractual provisions and their implementation in practice. This study aims to analyze the potential legal risks in the management of housing developers' business contracts and to formulate a model for implementing Good Corporate Governance (GCG) as a legal risk mitigation instrument. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by empirical data using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis is based on Contract Law Theory, Good Corporate Governance Theory, Agency Theory, Stakeholder Theory, and Legal Certainty Theory. The findings reveal that legal risks at PT X consist of contract performance risk, contract monitoring risk, and contract governance risk, which primarily arise from weaknesses in contract implementation, supervision, and documentation rather than from deficiencies in contractual clauses. This study proposes the Contract Governance Based on GCG Principles model, which integrates four stages of contract management: Contract Planning, Contract Performance, Contract Monitoring, and Contract Protection Governance. The proposed model serves as a preventive instrument for mitigating legal risks while strengthening consumer protection and promoting contract management that is effective, accountable, transparent, sustainable, and oriented toward legal certainty.

Page 51 of 61 | Total Record : 604

 49   50   51   52   53 

Filter by Year

2022 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2026 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, April 2026 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Februari 2026 Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 4 No. 6 (2025): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Desember 2025 Vol. 4 No. 5 (2025): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Oktober 2025 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2025 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2025 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, April 2025 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Februari 2025 Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Desember 2024 Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Oktober 2024 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2024 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2024 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, April 2024 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Februari 2024 Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Desember 2023 Vol. 2 No. 5 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Oktober 2023 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2023 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Juni 2023 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, April 2023 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Februari 2023 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Desember 2022 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Oktober 2022 More Issue