cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zul Khaidir Kadir
Contact Email
punggawalc@gmail.com
Phone
+6287812232291
Journal Mail Official
punggawalc@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Racing Centre Perum UMI Blok H/18, Kec. Panakkukang, Kel. Karampuang, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90231
Location
Kota makassar,
Sulawesi selatan
INDONESIA
Punggawa Law Review
Published by Punggawa Legacy Center
ISSN : -     EISSN : 31250580     DOI : -
Core Subject :
Punggawa Law Review is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes high-quality original research, conceptual analyses, and critical reviews in the field of legal studies. The journal aims to provide a rigorous scholarly forum for the development of legal knowledge, legal theory, and legal practice in both national and international contexts. The journal focuses on the study of law as a normative system, a social institution, and a mechanism of governance. It welcomes contributions that examine law from doctrinal, theoretical, comparative, empirical, and interdisciplinary perspectives. Particular attention is given to research that explores the interaction between law, society, public policy, and justice. Punggawa Law Review covers, but is not limited to, the following areas: Criminal Law and Criminal Justice Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Civil Law and Commercial Law Human Rights Law and International Law Legal Theory, Philosophy of Law, and Legal History Socio-Legal Studies and Law in Society Comparative Law and Transnational Legal Studies Legal Policy, Law Reform, and Governance Law and Technology, Law and Economics, and other interdisciplinary legal studies The journal encourages submissions from scholars, practitioners, and researchers across jurisdictions. Articles may address contemporary legal issues, emerging challenges, and critical debates in law, provided they demonstrate methodological rigor, analytical depth, and scholarly originality.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 51 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
Artificial Intelligence as a New Challenge for Law and Legal Professional Ethics in Indonesia Muhammad Fadhil Fahrezi; Nurul Fatimah; Andi Aryani R Chairiani; Ahsandy Rizky Fadhlansyah; Amiril Hamsi
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought about significant changes in the practice of the legal profession through its application in legal research, document analysis, contract drafting, and legal consulting services. While offering benefits such as increased efficiency and effectiveness, the use of AI also raises various legal issues due to the absence of specific regulations governing its application within the Indonesian legal profession. This study aims to analyze the legal framework regarding the use of AI in the Indonesian legal profession and to examine the associated legal challenges. It employs a normative legal research method utilizing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Data collection was conducted through a literature review, examining relevant academic literature, scholarly journals, policy documents, and other scholarly sources. The analysis was performed using a descriptive-analytical method involving the inventory, reduction, categorization, and interpretation of research materials. The findings indicate that Indonesia lacks comprehensive regulations governing AI; consequently, AI is currently treated as a legal object, with its operations remaining under human responsibility. Furthermore, the use of AI presents various legal challenges, including regulatory gaps, unclear legal liability, risks of privacy violations, algorithmic bias, and a lack of system transparency. Therefore, specific, adaptive regulations are required to ensure legal certainty, the protection of public rights, and the professionalism of the legal practice in the digital era.
Assessment P2TP2A sebagai Mekanisme Advokasi dan Perlindungan Hukum Preventif terhadap Anak dalam Perkara Dispensasi Kawin di Pengadilan Agama Mojokerto Safiatus Zahro
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkawinan anak masih menjadi persoalan hukum dan sosial di Indonesia yang berdampak terhadap pemenuhan hak anak, terutama hak atas pendidikan, kesehatan, perkembangan psikologis, dan kesejahteraan sosial. Setelah berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 serta Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019, pemeriksaan perkara dispensasi kawin tidak lagi hanya menitikberatkan pada aspek formal pemberian izin perkawinan, tetapi juga mengedepankan prinsip kepentingan terbaik bagi anak (best interests of the child). Dalam konteks tersebut, keberadaan assessment yang dilakukan oleh Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak (P2TP2A) menjadi salah satu mekanisme penting untuk menilai kesiapan anak dari aspek psikologis, emosional, sosial, kesehatan reproduksi, dan kondisi keluarga sebelum hakim menjatuhkan penetapan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode socio-legal dengan pendekatan normatif dan empiris melalui wawancara, observasi, serta studi dokumen untuk menganalisis peran assessment P2TP2A dalam perkara dispensasi kawin di Pengadilan Agama Mojokerto. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa assessment P2TP2A tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat terhadap hakim, tetapi memiliki nilai strategis sebagai sumber informasi profesional yang memperkaya pertimbangan yudisial. Lebih lanjut, fungsi assessment mengalami transformasi dari sekadar instrumen administratif menjadi mekanisme advokasi preventif melalui proses konseling, edukasi, pendampingan, serta identifikasi risiko yang dapat memengaruhi kehidupan anak setelah perkawinan. Dengan demikian, keberadaan assessment mencerminkan perubahan paradigma pemeriksaan dispensasi kawin menuju sistem peradilan yang berpusat pada anak (child-centered justice) dan memperkuat perlindungan hukum terhadap kepentingan terbaik bagi anak.
Causative-Based Integral Policy As A Response To Criminogenic Factors In The Distribution Of Subsidized Fuel Muhammad Abdul Azis; Siti Fadila Nuramelia; Muhammad Thufail Ariiq; Alya Synthia Kurniawati; Riski Ananda Kusuma Putri; Misshouw Meilany Putri; Dafirly Salsadilla Dosanto
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines how non-adaptive oil and gas regulations function as criminogenic factors in the distribution of subsidized fuel and formulates an integral policy recommendation to address the misuse of subsidized fuel. This research uses a normative juridical approach with doctrinal legal research. Legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively within a normative framework. The findings show that the misuse of subsidized fuel is not solely caused by individual wrongdoing, but is also triggered by the mismatch between regulation, socio-economic conditions, and public access to energy. This disharmony creates criminogenic conditions that encourage various forms of distributional deviation. Effective countermeasures require a combination of penal, non-penal, and social policy approaches.
Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kredit Fiktif BNI Terhadap Terdakwa Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perbankan Lestari Victoria Sinaga
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines criminal liability in the corruption case involving fictitious credit at Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI), with a particular focus on the legal accountability imposed on the defendant as reflected in Supreme Court Decision Number 1590 K/Pid.Sus/2015. The case illustrates how irregularities in the banking sector, particularly fictitious lending practices, can result in significant financial losses and undermine public trust in financial institutions. The objective of this research is to analyze the form of criminal liability imposed on the defendant, the legal considerations employed by the judges in reaching their decision, and the application of Indonesian criminal law and anti-corruption legislation in resolving the case. This research adopts a normative juridical approach using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The primary legal materials consist of the Supreme Court Decision Number 1590 K/Pid.Sus/2015, Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001, Law Number 7 of 1992 concerning Banking as amended by Law Number 10 of 1998, and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code. Secondary legal materials include legal textbooks, scientific journals, and other relevant scholarly publications. Data were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical methods. The findings indicate that the defendant's criminal liability was established based on the fulfillment of the legal elements of corruption, supported by sufficient evidence demonstrating intentional unlawful conduct, abuse of authority, and financial losses suffered by the state. The court's legal reasoning emphasized the existence of unlawful acts, the defendant's active participation, and the causal relationship between the defendant's conduct and the resulting state financial losses. This study contributes to the development of criminal law, particularly in understanding the application of criminal liability principles in banking corruption cases involving fictitious credit schemes. Furthermore, the findings provide practical insights for law enforcement agencies, banking institutions, and policymakers in strengthening legal enforcement and preventing similar offenses within Indonesia's banking sector.
Tindak Pidana Aborsi Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ilmannafia Azhar
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67707/plr.v1i3.68

Abstract

Kehidupan merupakan anugerah dari Tuhan Yang Maha Esa dan setiap manusia memiliki hak hidup, bahkan sejak masih dalam kandungan, sehingga hak tersebut tidak dapat dirampas oleh siapa pun, termasuk orang tuanya sendiri. Dalam praktik pengguguran kandungan yang disebut abortus, orang tua janin kerap merasa berhak mengakhiri kehamilannya dengan berbagai alasan, padahal dari perspektif hukum aborsi dikategorikan sebagai tindak pidana terhadap nyawa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk mengkaji pengaturan tindak pidana aborsi berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 346 sampai Pasal 349 KUHP menegaskan larangan aborsi tanpa pengecualian, sehingga pelaku maupun pihak yang membantu prosesnya dapat dikenai sanksi pidana. Di sisi lain, Pasal 75 UU Kesehatan pada dasarnya juga melarang aborsi, namun ayat (2) memberikan pengecualian bagi kedaruratan medis dan kehamilan akibat perkosaan. Pertentangan norma antara kedua peraturan tersebut diselesaikan melalui asas lex specialis derogat legi generali, sehingga ketentuan UU Kesehatan berlaku sebagai aturan khusus yang mengesampingkan KUHP sebagai aturan umum bagi tindakan abortus provocatus medicalis.
Pancasila as a Legal Ideal: Reconstructing Indonesian Legal Philosophy Ahmad Mubarak; Euis Madiihatul Khuluqiyah
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examined Pancasila through legal philosophy and reconstructed its function as the legal ideal of Indonesia. The study employed normative legal research using philosophical, conceptual, statutory, and case approaches. It found that Pancasila should not be reduced either to a formal source placed mechanically above positive law or to a political slogan invoked without argumentative control. Pancasila operates as an integrated normative horizon that grounds, interprets, criticises, and transforms law. To operationalise this position, the article proposed a Layered Pancasila Philosophical Test consisting of a legality and constitutional frame, five substantive dimensions derived from the principles of Pancasila, and safeguards of coherence, proportionality, public reason, and contestability. The model requires law-makers and judges to demonstrate how a legal measure respects religious freedom, human dignity, plural national unity, deliberative democracy, and social justice as an indivisible unity. This reconstruction preserves Pancasila as an open legal ideal while preventing its authoritarian, selective, or merely symbolic use.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pelaku Usaha atas Penggunaan AI Chatbot dalam Transaksi E-Commerce: Analisis Perlindungan Konsumen terhadap Kesalahan Informasi Clara Cleoney Lyareekha
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence dalam bentuk chatbot pada platform e-commerce telah meningkatkan efisiensi pelayanan informasi kepada konsumen, tetapi juga menimbulkan risiko kerugian apabila informasi yang diberikan tidak akurat atau menyesatkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban hukum pelaku usaha atas kerugian konsumen yang timbul akibat kesalahan informasi chatbot berbasis Artificial Intelligence serta mengkaji bentuk perlindungan hukum yang tersedia dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual melalui analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, dan bahan hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaku usaha tetap bertanggung jawab atas kerugian konsumen karena chatbot merupakan bagian dari sistem layanan yang disediakan dalam kegiatan usahanya. Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen dapat didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum perlindungan konsumen, hukum perdata, dan hukum transaksi elektronik. Belum adanya pengaturan khusus mengenai pertanggungjawaban atas kesalahan chatbot berbasis Artificial Intelligence menyebabkan kekosongan norma sehingga diperlukan regulasi yang mampu menjamin kepastian hukum, akuntabilitas, dan perlindungan konsumen dalam transaksi elektronik.
Keabsahan Label Halal pada Produk Minuman Berbahan Baku Karmin: Kajian Hukum Positif dan Fatwa Lembaga Bahtsul Masai'l Nahdlatul Ulama' Jawa Timur Sa’niatul Mahbuba
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Maraknya penggunaan karmin sebagai pewarna alami pada minuman berlabel halal memunculkan perdebatan mengenai kesesuaiannya dengan hukum positif dan fatwa keagamaan. Riset ini berupaya mengkaji: (1) legalitas pencantuman label halal pada minuman yang menggunakan karmin mengacu pada UU No. 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal; dan (2) konsekuensi hukum dari Keputusan LBM NU 2023 Jawa Timur dalam konteks perlindungan konsumen Muslim. Pendekatan penelitian yang dipakai adalah yuridis normatif, dengan fokus pada aspek hukum dan konseptual. Bahan hukum utama yang dianalisis terdiri dari UU No. 33 Tahun 2014, PP No. 39 Tahun 2021, UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, serta Keputusan LBM NU 2023 Jawa Timur. Temuan penelitian mengungkap bahwa: pertama, terdapat ketidakselarasan antara label halal yang diterbitkan secara administrasi dengan status kehalalan karmin menurut fatwa LBM NU Jawa Timur, yang berisiko melanggar hak konsumen Muslim atas informasi yang tepat; kedua, fatwa LBM NU Jawa Timur yang melarang karmin karena berasal dari serangga cochineal yang tidak mengalami perubahan total (istihalah tammah) menuntut produsen untuk lebih terbuka dalam penyebutan bahan baku. Studi ini merekomendasikan pengetatan pengawasan sertifikasi halal serta peningkatan literasi konsumen terkait bahan tambahan pangan yang berasal dari serangga.
The Effectiveness Of Government Supervision In Controlling Alcoholic Beverages Based On Merauke Regency Regional Regulation Number 8 Of 2014 Riez Kifli Kolewora; Rendie Meita Sarie Putri
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The control of alcoholic beverages constitutes one of the efforts undertaken by local governments to maintain public order and protect society from the adverse impacts arising from the circulation of alcoholic beverages. Although Merauke Regency has enacted Regional Regulation Number 8 of 2014 as the legal basis for regulating and controlling alcoholic beverages, the implementation of its supervisory mechanisms continues to encounter various challenges. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of government supervision in controlling alcoholic beverages under Merauke Regency Regional Regulation Number 8 of 2014 and to identify the factors influencing its effectiveness. This research employs an empirical legal research method using a socio-legal approach. Data were obtained through literature reviews and documentary studies and were subsequently analyzed qualitatively using descriptive-analytical techniques. The findings indicate that government supervision has not been implemented effectively due to limited institutional capacity, suboptimal inter-agency coordination, low levels of public legal awareness, and inconsistent enforcement of sanctions.The novelty of this research lies in the development of a collaborative supervision model that integrates inter-institutional synergy, community participation, and strengthened legal education as strategic measures to improve the effectiveness of the implementation of Merauke Regency Regional Regulation Number 8 of 2014.
Harmonisasi Hukum Islam dan Kebijakan Kesehatan Nasional: Analisis Maqashid Syariah terhadap Regulasi Skrining Pranikah Ahmad Zaki Muntafi
Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review
Publisher : Punggawa Legacy Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Interaksi antara hukum Islam dan kebijakan kesehatan publik di Indonesia kerap memunculkan dinamika pada ranah implementasi, salah satunya terkait kebijakan skrining pranikah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis harmonisasi antara hukum Islam dan kebijakan kesehatan nasional melalui pendekatan Maqashid Syariah terhadap regulasi skrining pranikah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, mengevaluasi bahan hukum primer seperti regulasi kesehatan nasional dan literatur hukum Islam klasik maupun kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa regulasi skrining pranikah tidak bertentangan dengan syariat, melainkan selaras dengan prinsip dasar Maqashid Syariah, khususnya aspek Hifzh an-Nasl (perlindungan keturunan) dan Hifzh an-Nafs (perlindungan jiwa). Skrining medis berfungsi sebagai langkah preventif (sadd adz-dzariah) untuk meminimalkan risiko penularan penyakit menular serta kelainan genetik pada calon pasangan dan keturunannya. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan status skrining pranikah dari sekadar imbauan menjadi persyaratan administratif yang terintegrasi menjadi sangat penting untuk membangun ketahanan keluarga secara holistik. Harmonisasi ini mempertegas bahwa hukum Islam dan regulasi kesehatan nasional dapat saling melengkapi demi mewujudkan kemaslahatan umat (maslahah ammah) dan kesejahteraan masyarakat secara berkelanjutan.

Page 4 of 6 | Total Record : 51

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2026 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 1 No. 4 (2026): Punggawa Law Review: September - October Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Punggawa Law Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): Punggawa Law Review