YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Artikel yang diterima dan diterbitkan dalam Jurnal YUDISIA harus masuk dalam lingkup keilmuan bidang hukum dan hukum Islam. Bidang hukum mencakup (tapi tidak terbatas pada bidang) : hukum materiil dan formil, tinjauan hukum dari aspek politik, sosial, ekonomi, antropologi, psikologi. Bidang hukum Islam mencakup (tapi tidak terbatas pada bidang) : fiqh, ushul fiqh, masail fiqhiyyah serta masalah fiqh kontemporer.
Articles
246 Documents
EFEKTIVITAS PENANGANAN KASUS KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP PEREMPUAN PERSPEKTIF MAQASID ASY SYARIAH DI KEPOLISIAN RESOR DEMAK
Dania Saferina Ifada
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 1 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.19412
Acts of sexual violence experienced by women in Indonesia still show high numbers. This figure is only a handful of the many cases of sexual violence because in reality there are still many women victims of sexual violence who do not report it to the police or service agencies such as the National Commission on Violence Against Women. This research was conducted with the aim of finding out how effective the handling of cases of sexual violence against women is, to find out what are the inhibiting factors and find out the solutions that can be used to prevent cases of sexual violence against women and to find out the effectiveness of handling sexual violence against women from the maqasid Asy-Syariah perspective. The method used in this study was a field search method. In this study, the researcher obtained information from the field and signed various informants in order to obtain correct results. The subjects of this research were the Demak Resort Police and the Women's and Children's Services Unit in providing explanations about women who were victims of sexual violence. The data analysis process was carried out by analyzing the effectiveness of the handling of cases of sexual violence against women by the Demak Resort Police in reducing the number of sexual violence against women in the city of Demak, analyzing the inhibiting factors and providing solutions in handling cases of sexual violence against women as well as the effectiveness of handling cases of sexual violence towards women from the maqasid asy-shariah perspective. Based on the findings and results of the analysis, it was found that the Demak Resort Police had made every effort to reduce the number of sexual violence against women. there are obstacles in dealing with cases of sexual violence against women such as limited funds, lack of human resources, limited facilities, and the presence of victims' families who do not want to report incidents of violence experienced by victims. The handling of the Demak Resort Police in dealing with cases of sexual violence from the maqasid asy-shari'ah perspective must be in line with the objectives of Islamic law, namely the protection of life, mind, lineage and property. In Islam, women must be treated special and get protection from a man. This is where a woman has the right to get self-protection, get respect and get proper treatment from a man so that women are not easy to become victims of sexual violence.
Mediator Judge In Court: Approach To Local Wisdom In Banyumas Community
Indriati Amarini;
Marsitiningsih Marsitiningsih;
Ratna Kartikawati
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 1 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.18066
Court mediation is regulated in the Civil Procedure Code under the term peacemaking. Court mediation is a concept developed by the Dutch which is still used in the settlement of civil disputes in Indonesian courts. However, the implementation of mediation in court is not optimal. This research aims to analyze the causes of the unsuccessful implementation of mediation in court. The research method used is doctrinal research sourced from legislation, literature and scientific journals. The results showed that the success of mediation in court in resolving civil disputes lies in the role of judges as mediators. Judges serving in Banyumas must have sufficient knowledge about the philosophy of dispute resolution in Banyumas society. There are four types of Banyumas local wisdom that become the internal capital of dispute resolution to keep it running lightly, honestly, and firmly, egalitarian, traditional, deliberation and these five principles become the basis for Banyumas people to live in harmony and horizontal harmony, so as to create a safe and peaceful life.Mediasi pengadilan diatur dalam KUHAP dengan istilah perdamaian. Mediasi pengadilan merupakan konsep yang dikembangkan oleh Belanda yang masih digunakan dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata di pengadilan Indonesia. Namun pelaksanaan mediasi di pengadilan belum optimal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penyebab tidak berhasilnya pelaksanaan mediasi di pengadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian doktrinal yang bersumber dari peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur dan jurnal ilmiah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberhasilan mediasi di pengadilan dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata terletak pada peran hakim sebagai mediator. Hakim yang bertugas di Banyumas harus memiliki pengetahuan yang cukup tentang filosofi penyelesaian sengketa dalam masyarakat Banyumas. Ada empat jenis kearifan lokal Banyumas yang menjadi modal internal penyelesaian sengketa agar tetap berjalan ringan, jujur, dan tegas, egaliter, tradisional, musyawarah dan kelima prinsip tersebut menjadi landasan bagi masyarakat Banyumas untuk hidup rukun dan harmonis secara horizontal, sehingga tercipta kehidupan yang aman dan damai.
PENJATUHAN SANKSI DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
Asmui - -
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 1 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.16237
Nowadays, the development of perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption is not only perpetrate by individuals, but is also often committed by corporations. This behavior can be categorized as a corporate crime, so it has a very broad impact on society. Due to having such a broad impact, the Government began to regulate criminal sanctions for corporations involved in corruption cases. But in reality, there are still decisions that contradict the regulations that have been issued by the Government. One of them is in Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI, which is the focus of this research. In this study, the author uses the concept of accountability and the imposition of criminal sanctions against corporations. Based on the researcher's analysis, the verdict of the decision that imposes criminal sanctions on the management and the corporation may be carried out even though the corporation is not prosecuted by the Public Prosecutor. This was confirmed by the Supreme Court judge's conviction regarding Article 20 paragraph (1) of the Law. No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law. No. 20 of 2001. When using the theory of corporations that act, the management and corporations are responsible, the verdict of Decision No. 3/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PT.DKI can also be justified.
Analisis Fatwa Haram PUBG Mobile Oleh Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh
Auliya Lathifah;
Shofiyullah Muzammil
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 1 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.18427
The purpose of this article is to examine the haram fatwa of the Aceh Ulama Consultative Assembly against PUBG Mobile. The type of method used in this writing is a literature study with a qualitative approach. The data sources come from secondary data in the form of books, magazines, and journal articles that are still relevant to the theme of this article. The collected secondary data were then analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. The results of the study show that the Aceh Ulema Consultative Council has the authority to issue decisions in the form of fatwas and considerations on governance issues, community development, and the Islamic economy to the government. PUBG Mobile's haram fatwa was issued by the Aceh Ulema Consultative Assembly with consideration mudharat The benefits of this game outweigh the benefits because it contains elements of violence that can have implications for changing the behavior of players and turn them negative, has the potential to cause aggression and addiction to dangerous levels, and contains elements of insulting Islamic symbols.Tulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk menelaah fatwa haram Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh terhadap PUBG Mobile. Jenis metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah studi kepustakaan dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Adapun sumber data berasal dari data sekunder yaitu berupa buku, majalah, dan artikel jurnal yang masih ada relevansinya dengan tema artikel ini. Data sekunder yang terkumpul selanjutnya dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis deskriptif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh sesungguhnya memiliki otoritas untuk memberi ketetapan berupa fatwa serta pertimbangan terhadap isu-isu pemerintahan, perkembangan komunitas, dan ekonomi Islam kepada pemerintah. Fatwa haram PUBG Mobile dikeluarkan Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama Aceh dengan pertimbangan mudharat dari permainan ini lebih besar daripada manfaatnya karena mengandung unsur kekerasan yang dapat berimplikasi terhadap perubahan perilaku pemainnya dan mengubahnya menjadi negatif, berpotensi menimbulkan agresif dan kecanduan level berbahaya, dan mengandung unsur penghinaan terhadap simbol Islam.
RELEVANSI KONSEP PEMISAHAN HARTA DALAM PERJANJIAN PERKAWINAN DI INDONESIA (STUDI LITERATUR PMK NO. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 DAN KHI)
Muhammad Nabih Ali
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 1 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i1.18845
Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 and the Compilation of Islamic Law is one of the main foundations in marriage negotiations. MK Decision No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 becomes a forum for positive law, and the Compilation of Islamic Law becomes an interpretation that makes it easier for people to understand marriage agreements in accordance with Islamic law. The purpose of this study was to determine the relevance and legal consequences of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 and the Compilation of Islamic Law regarding marriage agreements. This research method uses normative juridical, with a traditional review approach to analyze data. The results of this study indicate, 1) The relevance of the two rules, namely the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 and the Compilation of Islamic Law have the same goal, namely to have a positive impact on households. The agreement was also made as an effort to respond to negative impacts if a bad possibility occurs, namely divorce in the household. 2) Separation of assets that are part of the marriage agreement is permissible as long as it does not conflict with applicable law. The legal consequences proposed in the marriage agreement, if the agreement is made according to the applicable provisions, then it has binding consequences and must be obeyed.
Realization of Restorative Justice Resolution for Illegal Fishing Perpetrators in The Karimunjawa Conservation Area
Ariyani, Wiwit;
Sajidah, Graha Salma Nafa;
Utomo, Aldi Priyo;
Tara, Erlinda Dwi;
Assakhiy, Herfiana Putri;
Fahmi, Mujab;
Azlina, Nor
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 15, No 1 (2024): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.22912
Resolving illegal fishing through penalties does not necessarily result in justice for the parties. Theoretically, legal experts state that there are weaknesses in resolving cases using penalty measures. The typology of this research is sociological juridical. The data source comes from the primary data and is supported by secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method was carried out using directed interviews with sources and literature study. Data processing and analysis was carried out qualitatively using inductive methods. The urgency of using restorative justice in resolving illegal fishing is to minimize the weaknesses of penalty efforts which emphasize the element of retaliation solely for mistakes that have been made by providing suffering so that the perpetrator will repent. The concept of restorative justice places greater emphasis on restoring damage to be repaired by the perpetrator based on the agreement of the parties. Apart from that, it will also be able to lower the accumulation of cases in law enforcement agencies so that it will also reduce the overcapacity of correctional institutions which become a problem in Indonesia. The model for resolving illegal fishing using restorative justice in the Karimunjawa conservation area can be implemented with the criteria that the perpetrator is a local resident of Karimunjawa whose citizenship is an Indonesian and the losses incurred are not too large, both in terms of the number of fish and in terms of environmental damage and this is the first time this criminal act has been committed.
MUI Fatwa in Responding to COVID-19 Prevention in Indonesia: The Maqashid Sharia Perspective
Kasdi, Abdurrohman;
Farida, Umma;
Adim, Fauzan;
Muslihun, Muslihun;
Putra, D.I. Ansusa
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 2 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i2.23186
This paper examines the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) fatwa in responding and tackling the spread of COVID-19 in Indonesia using the Maqashid Sharia perspective. Maqashid Sharia is the objective of Islam contained in every enforcement of religious rules. The approach used is juridical-phenomenological. Juridically, a fatwa can be an alternative law in dealing with the spread of COVID-19. The phenomenological approach seeks and discovers the meaning of essential phenomena regarding handling COVID-19 cases in Indonesia. The result shows that Maqashid Sharia applied in the MUI fatwa in avoiding COVID-19 appear in four aspects: First, maintaining health and avoiding everything that may cause exposure to the disease. Second, people affected by the COVID-19 disease are obliged to isolate themselves so that transmission does not occur to others. Third, it prohibits activities involving public gatherings and worship at home to break the chain of distribution of the COVID-19 virus. Fourth, prohibit all actions that cause panic and cause public harm, such as buying up and hoarding necessities, hand sanitizers, and hoarding masks. These four aspects relating to the Maquashid Sharia, follow its core values, which ultimately guard the soul.
Exploring Legal Istinbāt̩h in the Construction of Disability Fiqh : Insights from Nahdlatul ‘Ulama Advisory Board (LBMNU)
Asep, Mohamad
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 15, No 1 (2024): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.22103
The aim of this article is to analyze and uncover the legal istinbāt̩ methodology used by the Nahdlatul ‘Ulama Advisory Board (LBMNU) in constructing the book of disability jurisprudence. To the best of the author's knowledge, there has been no prior article discussing this matter. This discourse is highly significant for discussion, as the book serves as a reference for Muslim individuals with disabilities in the field of jurisprudence, encompassing matters of worship, transactions, and law. The methodology employed in this research is library research, utilizing a content analysis approach. The research findings indicate that LBMNU constructs disability jurisprudence using three methodologies: Qouliy, Ilḥaqiy, and Manhajiy, with some fatwas found to employ a collaborative (mixed) method. The Qouliy method remains the most frequently utilized, followed by the Manhajiy, collaborative, and Ilḥaqiy methods. These three methodologies stem from the decisions of the National Assembly of Islamic Scholars and the National Conference of NU in Bandarlampung regarding the legal decision-making system in the Nahdlatul Ulama Advisory Board. Thus, in formulating the book of disability jurisprudence, LBMNU continues to utilize these three methods, while still considering the welfare of individuals with disabilities.
THE AMBIVALENCE OF REGIONAL ELECTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INDONESIA: The Dynamics of the Constitutional Court's Interpretation of Dispute Resolution Designs on Regional Election Results
Humaidi, M Wildan
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 14, No 2 (2023): YUDISIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v14i2.22742
The design of the regional elections (Pilkada, Pemilihan Kepala Daerah) court as a mechanism for resolving disputes over the results of the regional elections is experiencing changing dynamics. The dynamics of these changes are due to the different interpretations of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) on the regional election provisions in the 1945 Constitution. This study seeks to elaborate in depth on the inconsistencies in the Constitutional Court's interpretation of the constitutionality of regional elections, which caused ambivalence in the design of regional election dispute resolution. It employs a normative legal research model and a case approach. This research also shows the Constitutional Court's process and articulation of constitutional interpretation in constructing regional electoral justice. Based on the analysis, this study concludes that the shift in the constitutionality of regional election dispute resolution is caused by the constitutional interpretation of the phrase "democratically elected" in Article 18 paragraph (4), which has been interpreted dynamically and differently by the Constitutional Court. This is proven in several decisions, including Constitutional Court Decision No. 072-073/PUU-II/2004, No. 97/PUU-XI/2013, and No. 85/PUU-XX/2022. In line with developments in the constitutionality of general elections (Pemilu, Pemilihan Umum), the Constitutional Court has reconstructed regional elections as part of the general election. The Constitutional Court will always have the ability to settle regional election disputes. As a result, to protect electoral justice, it is vital to improve legislation and enhance the institution.
Islamic Law Study of Persuasive Communication After The Occurrence Of Polygamy in Kauman Society
Ibrahim, Malik;
Al Mamun, Abdullah;
Jarong, Koree;
Bouaoune, Djihad;
Mubarrok, Muhammad Agus Wahid;
Ramadhonah, Indah Siti;
Dharojah, Rakhma Widya
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 15, No 1 (2024): YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v15i1.24989
Polygamy is one of the actions that many men even desire even though many women refuse to be polygamous, but there are also some women who are willing to be polygamous with certain guarantees and conditions. Polygamy is very influential in the division of the household, this problem can be solved by using persuasive communication even though this is not the main factor to increase the harmonious family after polygamy. This study aims to analyse what efforts are made by married couples in re-improving family harmony after disputes due to polygamy, what models and principles of persuasive communication are used by husbands in persuading wives after quarrels due to polygamy. This research uses descriptive qualitative research. This research uses data collection techniques of observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques use data reduction and conclusion drawing, and data validity with triangulation. The results of the study show that efforts to improve family harmony after polygamy can be done by persuading and convincing the wife, making a stamped agreement letter to divorce the second wife, asking for prayer and guidance from a kyai, and a husband arguing how his children will fare when fighting and divorcing. In the persuasive communication model, a husband uses probabilogical persuasiveness, and in the principle of persuasive communication, a husband uses the principle of hope.