Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Analisis Putusan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Pengadilan Pasaman Barat Tentang Putusan Arbitrase Bpsk Nomor 1409/ARB/BPSK-BB/IX/2016 Suhairi, Mhd Arbi Bayu; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat  Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Intitut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/elmujtama.v4i5.3590

Abstract

The great interest of the public today regarding Islamic economics, in line with the increasingly massive number of people who become customers in all Islamic Banks, which is likely to have an impact on the emergence of disputes. As an example at this time is the matter of sharia economic disputes, initially a consumer protection complaint was made through BPSK Batu Bara Regency, which then the BPSK Decision was made a Legal Objection to the West Pasaman District Court with Decision Number 55/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Psb by Bank Syariah Mandiri Pasaman Barat, and was appealed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia with Decision Number 622 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent to which the law enforcement of dispute resolution is in accordance with the provisions and its application seen from the contents of the decision number Case Number 622 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017; and Decision Number 55/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN Psb. While the location of the Dispute is in West Pasaman, West Sumetara. The result of this research is that it turns out that there is still a limited understanding of the actors of Islamic banking business activities who do not fully understand the regulations.
Konsekuensi Hukum Wanprestasi (Muta’khortu Alduyun) VS Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Almumatholah), Biaya Rill Dan Penyelesaiannya Pada Perbankan Syariah. Azhar, Azhar; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
Al-Sharf: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Rahmat Islamiyah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56114/al-sharf.v5i1.11464

Abstract

A binding agreement will produce certain laws that bind performance and default. Default dispute resolution can be resolved in two ways, namely by litigation and non-litigation. Resolving defaults on sharia banking products can be resolved by applying for credit restructuring carried out by the bank with the following conditions: The debtor experiences difficulty in paying the principal or interest on the credit. The debtor has good business prospects and is considered capable of fulfilling its obligations after credit restructuring. In contract law, if the debtor does not carry out his obligations after being summoned, then the debtor has defaulted on all legal consequences. In judicial practice, default cases committed by debtors are generally debtors who do not fulfill their obligations to pay debts/installments to the bank. As a result, the creditor confiscates the collateral and the debtor must pay interest, fees and court costs. In Islamic law regarding the law of Unlawful Actions (PMH), the solution requires responsibility (dhamân) or compensation. To find out what compensation solutions are carried out by Sharia Financial Institutions (LKS) when acts against the law occur, the author conducted a study on this matter to enrich knowledge. related to resolving business disputes in sharia economicsAbstract is a brief review of the reasons the research was conducted, discussed or the method chosen, important results, and main conclusions. Ideally abstracts that contain the main problems and / or research objectives, as well as discuss or methods used to solve them, and present important findings, conclusions, and implications of research results.
Dispute Resolution of Marriage Cancellation through Religious Court Decisions in Indonesia Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Vol. 5, No. 2, April 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jua.v5i2.22473

Abstract

The provisions of Article 22 of Law no. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage that a marriage can be annulled if the parties do not meet the requirements to enter into a marriage. Unlike the case with a marriage that does not fulfill the pillars of marriage, the consequences of the marriage are invalid and null and void, meaning that the marriage is considered to have never existed. In the context of Islamic law there is a typology of types of marriage. First, a marriage is considered valid if the conditions and pillars of marriage are met. Second, if one of the pillars of marriage is not fulfilled then the marriage is considered invalid. Third, if one of the conditions for marriage is not fulfilled, the fasid marriage can be annulled. How is the resolution of the dispute over the annulment of marriage and the legal consequences of the annulment of the marriage. Empirical research methodology is a method used to answer the above questions, using a statutory and case study approach. While the data sources used consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials using qualitative descriptive analysis. There are at least three legal consequences of resolving disputes over marriage cancellations, namely: the position of the child remains as a legitimate child, joint property can be divided if the marriage is based on good faith, and the husband is not obliged to provide a living for his wife during the iddah period.
Civil Liability of Airport Managers for Consumer Losses from The Perspective of The Compilation of Sharia Economic Law Rangkuti, Zivana Tiara Amanda; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Agustus 2024
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v7i2.11323

Abstract

Consumers often require effective and convenient air transportation to carry out their daily activities, both for work and personal purposes. Air transportation offers a fast and efficient solution to reach their destination. This research aims to evaluate the consequences of the negligence of Kualanamu Airport officers and managers and to examine how their responsibilities towards consumers based on the perspective of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law. The method used is normative juridical legal research, which refers to international law and relevant legislation, and uses the Statute Approach (reviewing all regulations relevant to the legal issues discussed) and Conceptual Approach (based on views and doctrines developed in legal science). The results show that many airport facilities have not met functional standards, which causes negligence of officers to still threaten the safety and comfort of consumers. This negligence includes the operationalization of facilities that are not fit for use. In the context of KHES, responsibility includes providing compensation in accordance with the principles of Islamic law governing loss and compensation. Compensation or 'dhaman' aims to overcome the losses suffered by the injured party, both material and immaterial. This is regulated in Book II of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law article 20 paragraph 37, which states that 'ta'widh' or compensation is reimbursement for real losses paid by the party who committed an unlawful act.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PERKARA PENCEGAHAN PERKAWINAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 301 K/AG/2012 Nasution , Saphira Husna; Sukiati, Sukiati; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Vol. 7 No. 4 (2024): Vol. 7 No. 4 Tahun 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jrpp.v7i4.34372

Abstract

Tulisan ini merupakan hasil penelitian studi kasus yang bertujuan untuk menjawab pertanyaan mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hakim pemeriksa perkara pada tingkat kasasi dalam kasus No. 301 K/AG/2012, serta analisis yuridis terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah salinan Penetapan Kasasi Perkara No. 301/K/AG/2012. Penulis kemudian menganalisis pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh majelis hakim untuk menolak permohonan pencegahan perkawinan, yang didasarkan pada peraturan hukum yang berlaku, seperti Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, Kitab Hukum Undangundang Hukum Perdata, dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata. Pemohon Kasasi didasarkan pada fakta bahwa Pemohon telah diberi kesempatan untuk membuktikan dalilnya namun tidak dapat menguatkan dalil tersebut dengan bukti surat maupun saksi. Analisis penulis juga menyoroti bahwa pertimbangan hakim mungkin tidak tepat karena tidak mempertimbangkan fakta bahwa anak pemohon belum mencapai usia kecakapan hukum saat memberikan kuasa kepada advokat untuk mengajukan penetapan wali adhol. Meskipun demikian, berdasarkan analisis penulis yang mengacu pada Pasal 1865 KUHPerdata, pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut dianggap tepat karena sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku.
Nusyuz Wife as a Result of Transferring Child Custody Rights from Wife to Husband from the Perspective of the Compilation of Islamic Law Said, Raja Anggun Kusuma; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi; Fatimah, Fatimah
JURNAL AKTA Vol 11, No 1 (2024): March 2024
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v11i1.34561

Abstract

Marriage is a physical and mental bond between a man and a woman with the aim of forming an eternal and happy family according to God Almighty. In a marriage bond, husband and wife have the responsibility to fulfill each other's needs to build a harmonious and peaceful family. Divorce is the breakup of a family because one or both partners decide to leave each other so that they stop performing their obligations as husband and wife. The existence of divorce between husband and wife raises new problems, especially for children, which include the problem of caring for children's rights (Hadhanah). The concept of Maslahah mursalah, the main purpose of this concept is to realize benefit and eliminate harm, this principle aims to keep the child physically and mentally protected from his divorced parents. The first decision is, with Number 361/Pdt.G/2018/PA.Dps, in this case the Plaintiff in his lawsuit dated November 27, 2020 has filed a child custody lawsuit registered at the registrar of the Denpasar Religious Court with Number: 400/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Dps. Analysis in terms of benefit, in the Denpasar Religious Court Decision, the Judge not only decides and transfers child custody based on the law, but also in the interests of the child, which is better and greater if the four children are cared for by their mother rather than their father, as for the form of transferring custody of children who are not yet mumayyiz to the biological mother (nusyuz) shows that the legal basis of the Panel of Judges in handling this case is based on Maslahah and justice for the benefit of the child.
Implementasi Peraturan Daerah Pasaman Barat Nomor 9 Tahun 2017 Tentang Larangan Meminta Sumbangan di Jalan Raya Perspektif Siyāsah Dustūriyyah Maiza; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
Borneo : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): BORNEO: Journal of Islamic Studies
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Sultan Muhammad Syafiuddin Sambas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37567/borneo.v6i1.4472

Abstract

The implementation of West Pasaman Regency Regional Regulation No. 9 of 2017 regarding the prohibition of soliciting donations on public roads has not been fully effective, as a clear gap remains between legal norms and community practices. Although the regulation aims to maintain public order and ensure road safety, roadside fundraising continues, especially for mosque construction and religious social activities. This study analyzes the implementation of Article 24 in Dusun binjai, Sungai Aur District, and examines the policy through the perspective of siyāsah dustūriyyah. The research uses an empirical juridical method with a socio-legal approach, employing interviews, observations, and documentation. The findings show that several factors hinder the regulation’s effectiveness, including low legal awareness, strong cultural traditions of mutual assistance, economic limitations, weak supervision, and insufficient government socialization. Many residents still perceive collecting donations on the road as an expression of social solidarity rather than a legal violation. However, supporting factors also exist, such as legal awareness among mosque administrators, the involvement of religious and local leaders, and the availability of legitimate fundraising mechanisms. From the siyāsah dustūriyyah perspective, the policy aligns with the principles of public welfare (al-maslahah al-‘āmmah) and the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah), particularly the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) and property (ḥifẓ al-māl). The prohibition aims to prevent harm and uphold social order. Nonetheless, the regulation’s success requires a persuasive and humanistic approach, along with accessible legal fundraising alternatives. The study concludes that effective implementation depends on collaboration between government authorities, religious leaders, and the community to create a safer and more orderly social environment.
Marital Property as Debt Collateral without Spousal Consent in Indonesia: Legal Validity, Execution, and Judicial Interpretation harahap, Mhd. Yadi; Turatmiyah, Sri; harahap, Mhd Syahdani
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v12i2.12907

Abstract

One of the issues frequently debated in family law concerns the legal status of marital property. Conceptually, property acquired during marriage constitutes marital property unless otherwise stipulated in a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. Legal problems arise when marital property is used as collateral for debt without the consent of one spouse, particularly with regard to the validity of such collateralization, the enforceability of its execution, and the settlement of marital property execution in the event of divorce.This study aims to analyze the legal status and execution of marital property pledged as collateral for debt without spousal consent, with reference to Supreme Court Decision Number 209 K/PDT/2000. This research employs a normative juridical method using a statute approach and a case approach. The findings indicate that marital property used as collateral for debt without the consent of both spouses lacks legal validity and cannot be lawfully executed by creditors, as such actions violate the principle of joint ownership and involve third-party interests. The Supreme Court decision affirms that neither spouse may unilaterally perform legal acts over marital property for the purpose of debt settlement through execution. This study contributes to the development of family and property law by clarifying the legal consequences of unauthorized collateralization of marital property and by reinforcing the principle of joint ownership protection. The findings are expected to provide normative guidance for courts and creditors, while also encouraging regulatory reform to ensure legal certainty and fairness for all parties.
RAHN VERSUS PAND PERKEMBANGAN DAN PENGATURAN DALAM KUHPERDATA, KHES DAN FATWA DSN MUI PERBEDAAN, PEMANFAATAN OBJEK, RISIKO DAN EKSEKUSI Hasanah, Uswatun; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi; Lubis, Fauziah
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4894

Abstract

Abstract: The legal and economic systems in Indonesia continue to develop alongside the growing need to balance legal certainty with moral and religious values, particularly in the practice of debt collateral institutions. In this context, two systems coexistconventional pawn (pand) and Islamic pawn (rahn)which, although serving the same purpose as debt guarantees, differ in their legal principles and value orientation. This study aims to analyze and compare the regulation, utilization of collateral objects, risks, and execution mechanisms between rahn and pand as stipulated in the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES), and the Fatwa of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council (DSN-MUI). Using a normative-comparative method with a qualitative descriptive approach through library research, the study reveals that while rahn and pand share similar objectives, they differ significantly in legal basis, economic orientation, and operational mechanisms. Rahn is founded on the principles of mutual assistance (tabarru) and sharia justice without interest, whereas pand is profit-oriented with an interest-based system. Overall, rahn reflects a more balanced integration of legal, moral, and socio-economic justice.Keyword: rahn, pand, KHES, civil code, DSN-MUIAbstrak: Sistem hukum dan ekonomi di Indonesia terus berkembang seiring dengan meningkatnya kebutuhan akan keseimbangan antara kepastian hukum dan nilai moral keagamaan, khususnya dalam praktik lembaga jaminan utang. Dalam konteks ini, terdapat dua sistem yang berjalan berdampingan, yaitu gadai konvensional (pand) dan gadai syariah (rahn), yang meskipun memiliki tujuan sama sebagai jaminan pelunasan utang, berbeda dalam prinsip hukum dan orientasi nilai. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan pengaturan, pemanfaatan objek, risiko, serta mekanisme eksekusi antara rahn dan pand dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata), Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES), dan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI). Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif-komparatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rahn dan pand memiliki tujuan yang sama sebagai jaminan utang, namun berbeda dalam prinsip hukum, orientasi ekonomi, dan mekanisme pelaksanaan. Rahn berlandaskan prinsip tolong-menolong (tabarru) dan keadilan syariah tanpa bunga, sedangkan pand bersifat profit-oriented dengan sistem bunga. Secara keseluruhan, rahn lebih mencerminkan keseimbangan antara aspek hukum, moral, dan sosial ekonomi yang berkeadilan.Kata kunci: rahn, pand, KHES, KUHPerdata, DSN-MUI
KEKUASAAN ORANG TUA ATAS HARTA ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR DAN ASPEK PIDANA ATAS PENYELEWENGANNYA Suryani, Dewi Ervina; Lubis, Fauziah; Harahap, Mhd. Yadi
Law Jurnal Vol 6, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dharmawangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46576/lj.v6i2.8334

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan mengkaji kekuasaan orang tua atas harta anak yang masih di bawah umur di dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata/Burgelijk Wetboek/BW) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan (UU Perkawinan) serta aspek pidana atas penyelewengannya berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) dan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak (UU Perlindungan Anak). Masa kini menjadi hal yang lumrah ketika anak yang masih di bawah umur memiliki harta sendiri. Namun, di sisi lain secara yuridis anak dianggap belum mampu bertanggung jawab atas harta miliknya. Oleh sebab itu, hukum perdata memberikan kekuasaan kepada orang tua untuk mengurus harta anak yang masih di bawah umur. Namun kekuasaan ini berpotensi diselewengkan sehingga merugikan anak. Jenis penilitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui pendekatan kasus dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak di dalam pasal 48 UU Perkawinan selaras dengan UU Perlindungan Anak sebagai lex specialist, sehingga menjadi dasar pertanggung jawaban pidana bagi orang tua yang melakukan penyelewengan kekuasaan atas harta anak yang masih di bawah umur. Hal ini merupakan bentuk perkembangan hukum perdata, meskipun tidak diikuti dengan perumusan sanksi hukum. Oleh karena itu, penulis menyarankan kepada pemerintah dan badan legislatif untuk menambahkan satu pasal baru di dalam UU Perlindungan Anak yang mengatur tentang sanksi pidana bagi orang tua yang melakukan penyelewengan kekuasaan orang tua atas harta anak yang masih di bawah umur.