Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR DAN KONSEP MILKUL YAMIN : KRITIK PENAFSIRAN PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIQH Hadi, Mukhammad Nur
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 10, No 1 (2019): Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (7176.878 KB) | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v10i1.5057

Abstract

The Scholars stated that occurring verses of milkul yamin (slave ownership) had been stoped because of its locus which was disappeared. Meanwhile, the trademark of al-Qur’an as the book of revelation which is always relevant unlimitedly to dynamic of era has been paradox. On the other hand, through Syahrur verses of milkul yamin uniquely can be interpreted with the new locus. Syahrur assumed that nowadays the context of milkul yamin can be compared with ‘aqdul ihshan (commitment of sexual intercourse) as the way to legitimate sexual intercourse outside marriage that is happening in the Western tradition. This concept was based on sexual intercourse between man and his slave which was taken from three chapters; al-Ahzab: 50, al-Mu’minun: 5-6, and an-Nur: 31 as a consequence of the view of Syahrur’s limit theory to the comprehnsive norm of al-Qur’an. However, the problem is that is reinterpretation of Syahrur relevant accordance with the principal orinentation of al-Qur’an (maqashid al-Qur’an). Ideally, the recontextualization should considered general benefits (mashlahat) for human because not all traditions can be accommodated by Islam. It shows that living Qur’an to verses of milkul yamin on Syharur’s perspective ignored the dialectic between mashlahat (benefit) and ‘urf (tradition).  In this position, reexamining Syharur’s thought of his reinterpretation to milkul yamin by considering the ideal of human-social reality does not find base paradigm.
Modin dan Otoritasnya; Studi Kasus Larangan Kawin Hamil Di Kelurahan Temas Kota Batu Nur Hadi, Mukhammad; Khiyaroh, Khiyaroh
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 11, No 1 (2020): Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (721.095 KB) | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v11i1.7352

Abstract

This study discusses the Modin and its authority as the officers of the marriage registrar in Temas village. The focus of this study is the idea of banning pregnant marriage by Modin. Pregnant women who want to marry are prohibited from doing marriage until she gives birth. This study is an empirical research of law by placing sociology of law as its approach. This research puts the theory of legal authority and reasoning in anlyzing data. Related to the theory of legal authority, the theory of Freidman and Khaled Abou el-Fadhl was chosen for legal sociology analysis. The three things which are focus of this study are about why did Modin issue the policy, how is the policy authority position, and how did Modin terpretarticle 53 KHI related to the prohibition of pregnant marriage. First, this study shows that there are two major narratives (sociological reasons) of why Modin should implement the idea; these are preventing stigmatization of free sex and preserving the lineage. Second,through the theory f autorithy, Modin got three authorities at once;persuasive authority, traditional authority, and charismatic authority. Therefore, that policy automatically had the authoroty. Third, in constructing his idea, Modin applied three interpretation methods; authentical interpretation, sociological interpretation, and historical interpretation. AbstrakKajian ini membahas tentangModindan otoritasnya sebagai Pegawai Pembantu Pencatat Nikah di kelurahan Temas.Fokus kajian ini adalah ide pelarangan kawin hamil oleh Modin. Wanita hamil yang hendak menikah dilarang melaksanakan pernikahan sampai ia melahirkan. Kebijakan ini berlaku di seluruh keluruhan Temas. Kajian ini merupakan kajian hukum empiris dengan menempatkan sosiologi hukum sebagai pendekatannya. Penelitian ini menempatkan teori otoritas hukum dan penalaran sebagai pisau analisisnya. Terkait teori otoritas hukum, teori Freidman dan Khaled Abou el-Fadhl dipilih untuk analisis sosiologi hukum. Tiga hal yang menjadi fokus kajian ini adalah tentang mengapa Modin mengeluarkan kebijakan tersebut, bagaimana posisi otoritas kebijakan tersebut, serta bagaimana penafsiran Modin atas pasal 53 KHI terkait larangan kawin hamil. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, ada dua narasi besar (alasan sosiologis) mengapa Modin harus mengimplementasikan idenya, yaitu; untuk mencegah stigma legalisasi perzinaan dan menjaga kesucian nasab anak. Kedua,melalaui perspektif teori otoritas,Modin menempati tiga otoritas sekaligus; otoritas persuasif, tradisional, dan kharismatik. Oleh karena itu, kebijakan yang digagasnya secara otomatis memiliki otoritas. Ketiga,dalam mengkontruksi pemikirannya, Modinmenggunakan tiga jenis penafsiran hukum; penafsiran secara otentik, sosiologis, dan historis.
Nalar Fikih Penghulu di Kota Malang dalam Saksi Nikah Tuli Mukhammad Nur Hadi
INKLUSI Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : PLD UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ijds.080206

Abstract

This article discusses the paradigm of penghulus (the marriage registrants at the office for religious affairs, KUA) in Malang City regarding the status of marriage witnesses. This study uses a philosophical normative approach to find several important points. It turns out that fiqh is dominantly used by the penghulu to limit the rights of witnesses to marriages with hearing disabilities. This is related to the internalization of maslahat in the fiqh paradigm of the penghulu which is manifested in the form of concerns about leaving fiqh, on the one hand, and the stability of following fiqh and the opinions of local ulama', on the other. Nevertheless, fiqh is still a representation of the “advocative paradigm” of the penghulu in terms of the rights of deaf marriage witnesses by elaborating on sociological aspects and the development of science. It is safe to say that the continuing reference to traditional fiqh among the penghulu is related to the failure of the Malang City government in promoting their vision of creating an inclusive city. Artikel ini membahas nalar fikih penghulu di Kota Malang dalam status saksi nikah. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif filosofis untuk menemukan beberapa poin penting. Fikih ternyata dominan digunakan penghulu untuk membatasi hak saksi nikah Tuli. Hal ini terkait dengan internalisasi maslahat dalam nalar fikih penghulu yang termanifestasi dalam bentuk kekhawatiran meninggalkan fikih, di satu sisi, dan kemantapan mengikuti fikih dan pendapat ulama’ lokal, di sisi yang lain. Meskipun demikian, fikih masih menjadi representasi “nalar advokatif” penghulu dalam hal hak saksi nikah Tuli dengan mengelaborasi aspek sosiologis dan perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan. Di sini dapat ditemukan bahwa dominasi nalar fikih lama di kalangan penghulu terkait dengan lemahnya pengaruh gagasan pemerintah Kota Malang yang ingin mewujudkan kota yang inklusif.
MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR DAN KONSEP MILKUL YAMIN : KRITIK PENAFSIRAN PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIQH Mukhammad Nur Hadi
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 10, No 1 (2019): Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v10i1.5057

Abstract

The Scholars stated that occurring verses of milkul yamin (slave ownership) had been stoped because of its locus which was disappeared. Meanwhile, the trademark of al-Qur’an as the book of revelation which is always relevant unlimitedly to dynamic of era has been paradox. On the other hand, through Syahrur verses of milkul yamin uniquely can be interpreted with the new locus. Syahrur assumed that nowadays the context of milkul yamin can be compared with ‘aqdul ihshan (commitment of sexual intercourse) as the way to legitimate sexual intercourse outside marriage that is happening in the Western tradition. This concept was based on sexual intercourse between man and his slave which was taken from three chapters; al-Ahzab: 50, al-Mu’minun: 5-6, and an-Nur: 31 as a consequence of the view of Syahrur’s limit theory to the comprehnsive norm of al-Qur’an. However, the problem is that is reinterpretation of Syahrur relevant accordance with the principal orinentation of al-Qur’an (maqashid al-Qur’an). Ideally, the recontextualization should considered general benefits (mashlahat) for human because not all traditions can be accommodated by Islam. It shows that living Qur’an to verses of milkul yamin on Syharur’s perspective ignored the dialectic between mashlahat (benefit) and ‘urf (tradition).  In this position, reexamining Syharur’s thought of his reinterpretation to milkul yamin by considering the ideal of human-social reality does not find base paradigm.
Modin dan Otoritasnya; Studi Kasus Larangan Kawin Hamil Di Kelurahan Temas Kota Batu Mukhammad Nur Hadi; Khiyaroh Khiyaroh
YUDISIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Vol 11, No 1 (2020): Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/yudisia.v11i1.7352

Abstract

This study discusses the Modin and its authority as the officers of the marriage registrar in Temas village. The focus of this study is the idea of banning pregnant marriage by Modin. Pregnant women who want to marry are prohibited from doing marriage until she gives birth. This study is an empirical research of law by placing sociology of law as its approach. This research puts the theory of legal authority and reasoning in anlyzing data. Related to the theory of legal authority, the theory of Freidman and Khaled Abou el-Fadhl was chosen for legal sociology analysis. The three things which are focus of this study are about why did Modin issue the policy, how is the policy authority position, and how did Modin terpretarticle 53 KHI related to the prohibition of pregnant marriage. First, this study shows that there are two major narratives (sociological reasons) of why Modin should implement the idea; these are preventing stigmatization of free sex and preserving the lineage. Second,through the theory f autorithy, Modin got three authorities at once;persuasive authority, traditional authority, and charismatic authority. Therefore, that policy automatically had the authoroty. Third, in constructing his idea, Modin applied three interpretation methods; authentical interpretation, sociological interpretation, and historical interpretation. AbstrakKajian ini membahas tentangModindan otoritasnya sebagai Pegawai Pembantu Pencatat Nikah di kelurahan Temas.Fokus kajian ini adalah ide pelarangan kawin hamil oleh Modin. Wanita hamil yang hendak menikah dilarang melaksanakan pernikahan sampai ia melahirkan. Kebijakan ini berlaku di seluruh keluruhan Temas. Kajian ini merupakan kajian hukum empiris dengan menempatkan sosiologi hukum sebagai pendekatannya. Penelitian ini menempatkan teori otoritas hukum dan penalaran sebagai pisau analisisnya. Terkait teori otoritas hukum, teori Freidman dan Khaled Abou el-Fadhl dipilih untuk analisis sosiologi hukum. Tiga hal yang menjadi fokus kajian ini adalah tentang mengapa Modin mengeluarkan kebijakan tersebut, bagaimana posisi otoritas kebijakan tersebut, serta bagaimana penafsiran Modin atas pasal 53 KHI terkait larangan kawin hamil. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pertama, ada dua narasi besar (alasan sosiologis) mengapa Modin harus mengimplementasikan idenya, yaitu; untuk mencegah stigma legalisasi perzinaan dan menjaga kesucian nasab anak. Kedua,melalaui perspektif teori otoritas,Modin menempati tiga otoritas sekaligus; otoritas persuasif, tradisional, dan kharismatik. Oleh karena itu, kebijakan yang digagasnya secara otomatis memiliki otoritas. Ketiga,dalam mengkontruksi pemikirannya, Modinmenggunakan tiga jenis penafsiran hukum; penafsiran secara otentik, sosiologis, dan historis.
Interpretasi Progresif Hadis-Hadis Tema Perempuan: Studi Aplikasi Teori Qira’ah Mubadalah Yulmitra Handayani; Mukhammad Nur Hadi
HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Juli - Desember 2020
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.3462

Abstract

This study departs from a compilation of women-themed hadiths that were interpreted progresively by Faqihuddin in his book “60 Hadis Hak-Hak Perempuan Dalam Islam:Teks dan Interpretasi”. Another starting used to study this topic is because women-themed hadiths tend to affrim men’s superiority over women. Of the sixty hadith that have been interpreted, the researcher only chose a few hadiths, which are categorized in four major themes; the principle of male and female relations, women’s dignity, women’s choices and rights, and the relations of husband and wife. This study tries to learn and analyze how Faqihuddin applies the theory of qira’ah mubadalah (reading reciprocally) to these selected hadiths. The approach of this study are conceptual approach and content analysis approach. This study finds that qira’ah mubadalah is a progressive interpretation theory that relies on two things, the universal value of Islam and the substantial understanding of a text. Dialecting both things will be able to produce interpretations that carry the value of equality holistically. In the application level, Faqihuddin has internalized Islamic universalism in facilitating the substance of the text. When interpreting the hadith, Faqihuddin uses three types of interpretation; grammatical interpretation, historical interpretation and sociological interpretation. The first two types of interpretations are used to find the main text; the ground idea of the text. Meanwhile, sociological interpretations are used to reduce main thoughts and expand the meaning egalitarian. Kajian ini berangkat dari kompilasi hadis-hadis bertema perempuan yang diinterpretasikan secara progresif oleh Abdul Kodir dalam bukunya 60 Hadis Hak-Hak Perempuan Dalam Islam:Teks dan Interpretasi. Titik tolak lain yang digunakan untuk mengkaji topik ini adalah karena hadis-hadis bertema perempuan cenderungmeneguhkan superioritas laki-laki atas perempuan. Dari enam puluh hadis pilihan yang telah diinterpretasikan, peneliti hanya memilih beberapa hadis, yang terkategorikan dalam empat tema besar, yaitu prinsip relasi laki-laki dan perempuan, martabat perempuan, posisi dan hak-hak perempuan, dan relasi suami istri. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Abdul Kodir mengaplikasikan teori qira’ah mubadalah-nya terhadap hadis-hadis pilihan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan analisis isi (content analysis). Kajian ini menemukan bahwa qira’ah mubadalah adalah teori interpretasi progresif yang  bertumpu pada dua hal, nilai universal Islam dan gagasan substansial sebuah teks. Mendialektikan keduanya akan mampu menghasilkan interpretasi yang mengusung nilai kesetaraan secara holistik. Dalam tataran aplikasi, Abdul Kodir telah mengintegrasikan universalisme Islam dalam memahami substansi teks.
Mahar Produktif dalam Penalaran Ta’lili Mukhammad Nur Hadi
Qolamuna : Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 4 No. 2 (2019): Februari 2019
Publisher : STIS MIFTAHUL ULUM LUMAJANG PRESS (STISMU PRESS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (927.633 KB)

Abstract

Sometimes, Islamic dowry is assumed as a form of formalistic and symbolic in fulfilling marriage requirement. As a result, the orientation of dowry is identical to consumptive, economic, or esthetic orientation, by ignoring productive orientation. Therefore, this article attempts to explore how to understand the dowry of marriage as productive dowry. Based on ta’lili method, exploring ‘illat will be the key to verify the essence of dowry. Through this method by considering various probability of ‘illat, in truth the dowry of Islamic marriage is productive oriented, neither consumptive nor economic oriented, even esthetic oriented. In fact, this dowry orientation is actually able to complete realization of marriage direction which is madaniyyah oriented; building human civilization. Keywords : Productive Dowry, Ta’lili.
Interpretasi Progresif Hadis-Hadis Tema Perempuan: Studi Aplikasi Teori Qira’ah Mubadalah Yulmitra Handayani; Mukhammad Nur Hadi
HUMANISMA : Journal of Gender Studies Vol 4, No 2 (2020): December 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (332.559 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/humanisme.v4i2.3462

Abstract

This study departs from a compilation of women-themed hadiths that were interpreted progresively by Faqihuddin in his book “60 Hadis Hak-Hak Perempuan Dalam Islam:Teks dan Interpretasi”. Another starting used to study this topic is because women-themed hadiths tend to affrim men’s superiority over women. Of the sixty hadith that have been interpreted, the researcher only chose a few hadiths, which are categorized in four major themes; the principle of male and female relations, women’s dignity, women’s choices and rights, and the relations of husband and wife. This study tries to learn and analyze how Faqihuddin applies the theory of qira’ah mubadalah (reading reciprocally) to these selected hadiths. The approach of this study are conceptual approach and content analysis approach. This study finds that qira’ah mubadalah is a progressive interpretation theory that relies on two things, the universal value of Islam and the substantial understanding of a text. Dialecting both things will be able to produce interpretations that carry the value of equality holistically. In the application level, Faqihuddin has internalized Islamic universalism in facilitating the substance of the text. When interpreting the hadith, Faqihuddin uses three types of interpretation; grammatical interpretation, historical interpretation and sociological interpretation. The first two types of interpretations are used to find the main text; the ground idea of the text. Meanwhile, sociological interpretations are used to reduce main thoughts and expand the meaning egalitarian. Kajian ini berangkat dari kompilasi hadis-hadis bertema perempuan yang diinterpretasikan secara progresif oleh Abdul Kodir dalam bukunya 60 Hadis Hak-Hak Perempuan Dalam Islam:Teks dan Interpretasi. Titik tolak lain yang digunakan untuk mengkaji topik ini adalah karena hadis-hadis bertema perempuan cenderungmeneguhkan superioritas laki-laki atas perempuan. Dari enam puluh hadis pilihan yang telah diinterpretasikan, peneliti hanya memilih beberapa hadis, yang terkategorikan dalam empat tema besar, yaitu prinsip relasi laki-laki dan perempuan, martabat perempuan, posisi dan hak-hak perempuan, dan relasi suami istri. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana Abdul Kodir mengaplikasikan teori qira’ah mubadalah-nya terhadap hadis-hadis pilihan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach) dan analisis isi (content analysis). Kajian ini menemukan bahwa qira’ah mubadalah adalah teori interpretasi progresif yang  bertumpu pada dua hal, nilai universal Islam dan gagasan substansial sebuah teks. Mendialektikan keduanya akan mampu menghasilkan interpretasi yang mengusung nilai kesetaraan secara holistik. Dalam tataran aplikasi, Abdul Kodir telah mengintegrasikan universalisme Islam dalam memahami substansi teks.
Metode Ijtihad Kolektif Progresif di Indonesia Sebagai Media Proyeksi Nalar Kemanusiaan Mukhammad Nur Hadi
Ma’mal: Jurnal Laboratorium Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): April
Publisher : Laboratorium Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/mal.v4i2.247

Abstract

This study photographed the ijtihad method of two organizations Rumah KitaB Bersama (Rumah KitaB) and the Indonesian Women Ulema Congress (KUPI). The two points examined are the framework of the ijtihad method and the extent to which it can advocate for the rights of women and children. This study is a normative study by utilizing conceptual and philosophical approaches. Rumah KitaB and KUPI have a basic ushuliyyah approach, but differ in the construction of the paradigm and framework of ijtihad. The House of Book makes maqashid al-Islam a medium of dialogue between text and context. When linked to maqashid al-Islam, the text should be read with a critical paradigm while context with a spiritual paradigm. Then, the relationship of text and context should be read with a framework of alignments. Meanwhile, KUPI makes the rules of ushuliyyah and fiqhiyyah as methods elaborated with maqashid ash-sharia and Islamic universal values, such as humanity, justice, equality, interconnectedness, kindness, benefit, nationality, and universality. The main approaches used are mubadalah, makruf, and ultimate justice. This article finds that the ijtihad framework both contribute significantly to the strengthening of women's rights. It proves that both have created a new current of progressive, responsive, and inclusive collective ijtihad methods in Indonesia without having to abandon the classical texts. In fact, they have fought against Indonesia's established collective ijtihad framework but tend to be less responsive to marginal issues.
The Reality of Violence Against Wives: Dynamics of Social Settlement and Support in Lamongan, East Java Sabri, Fahruddin Ali; Rohmah, Linda Farihatur; Ghufron, Muhammad; Hadi, Mukhammad Nur; Musafa'ah, Suqiyah; Nadhifah, Nurul Asiya
Mazahib Vol 23 No 1 (2024): VOLUME 23, ISSUE 1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UINSI Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/mj.v23i1.7512

Abstract

As a hidden crime, violence against wives is considered a disgrace to be discussed in public, especially reported to state and non-state actors. At first, victims feel able to resolve violence without outside intervention from outside their household, but repetition after repetition of violence requires them to choose what kind of resolution is right for them. This choice should be made after they have the support of individuals in their social environment. This study aims to explore the knowledge and experience of victims of violence against wives in choosing one among legal norms favorable to them. This study uses a critical realist approach by collecting qualitative data with dialogue techniques and observations of three women who were victims and six people who provided support to victims. We conclude that victims experience a dynamic psychological state, where initially, they always try to maintain the integrity of their household. The dominance of men and the subordination of women as a reality of cultural norms are essential factors in choosing ways of resolving conflicts at the community level, and we consider that the community has succeeded in providing social support to victims so that victims feel they get help and defense. However, we hope that this social support can be carried out through structured, systematic, and massive protection of victims of violence from State and non-state actors while considering the cultural norms of the community and supporting the identification of violence.