Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.402
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Agronomy) Biospecies Jurnal Pengabdian Magister Pendidikan IPA KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Sinteks Distilat: Jurnal Teknologi Separasi Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology Journal La Lifesci Journal of Agriculture and Applied Biology ( JAAB) JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND BUSINESS (JHSSB) MLJ Merdeka Law Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Journal of Soilscape and Agriculture JPLED Jurnal Ilmiah Plano Krisna JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Amicus Curiae Jurnal Research Ilmu Pertanian Jurnal Keprofesian Guru Keagamaan AMUYA: Indonesian Journal of Management Reviews
setiyono
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 58 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

 1   2 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TENTANG ALAT BUKTI KETERANGAN TERDAKWA YANG DISUMPAH SEBAGAI SAKSI MAHKOTA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 286/PID.B/2024/PN JKT UTR): Juridical Analysis Of The Evidence Of The Defendant Who Was Sworn As A Crown Witness (Case Study Number 286/PID.B/2024/PN JKT UTR) Ziansyah Attallah Rahmana; Setiyono
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i3.24019

Abstract

In the development of the judiciary, crown witness testimony often becomes a subject of debate as it contradicts the principle of non-self-incrimination. This study identification problem the evidentiary strength of testimony given by defendants sworn in as crown witnesses in the North Jakarta District Court Decision Number 286/Pid.B/2024/PN Jkt Utr. The research employs a normative juridical method with a descriptive approach, the data type uses secondary data with primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, and conclusions are drawn using deductive reasoning. The analysis results and conclusion show that the crown witness testimony provided in this case lacks valid evidentiary strength, violates the principles of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and contravenes the ICCPR, which has been ratified through Law Number 12 of 2005. This underscores the importance of adhering to the principle of due process of law in Indonesia's criminal justice proceedings.
PEMBATALAN PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA DALAM PERKARA DUGAAN TINDAK  PIDANA KORUPSI (STUDI PUTUSAN PRAPERADILAN  NOMOR 1/Pid.Prap/2021/PN KSN): Cancellation of The Determination of Suspect Status in A Case of Alleged Corruption (Study of Petrial Decision Number 1/Pid.Prap/2021/PN Ksn) Muhammad Fauzan Ridho Kanungga Rominton; Setiyono
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i3.24156

Abstract

In recent years, many corruption cases have had their suspect status revoked by the Pretrial Judge due to insufficient evidence. This study aims to provide an overview and analysis of the revocation of the determination of suspect status in alleged corruption cases by the Kasongan District Court with Number 1/Pid Prap/2021/PN Ksn. The main focus of the law discussed is whether the determination of suspect status by the Investigator has been based on the requirements in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), and whether the legal considerations and dictum of the Kasongan District Court Pretrial Judge’s decision stating the invalidity of the determination of suspect status are in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations. The results of the study indicate that the determination of suspect status by the Investigator is based on the requirements stipulated in Articles 16–19 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and the considerations of the Judge’s decision stating the invalidity of the determination of suspect status are in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations based on the juridical aspect, that there are not at least 2 sufficient preliminary evidence as stipulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This study concludes that both the Investigator’s determination and the Judge’s decision were based on existing legal requirements and provisions, despite some disagreement. This study recommends that regulatory agencies be more detailed in creating and formulating legal regulations to avoid multiple interpretations.
PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 98/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tab): Evidence In Narcotics Criminal Cases (Study Decision Number 98/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tab) Syakia Brafnasha Isabella Pambudi; Setiyono
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i3.24269

Abstract

Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics stipulates that abusers of narcotics category I for personal use shall be sentenced under Article 127 paragraph (1). However, in Decision 98/Pid.sus/2021/PN.Tab, the Panel of Judges imposed a sentence on a narcotics abuser for personal use under Article 112, which applies to intermediaries and dealers. This study identifies problems concerning whether the Panel of Judges’ legal considerations, which disregarded the consistency of evidence presented in court, were accurate and in accordance with the prevailing laws, as well as the evidentiary strength in Tabanan District Court Decision Number 98/Pid.sus/2021/PN.Tab. The research type is normative legal research using secondary data with a descriptive-analytical nature. The data were processed qualitatively, and conclusions were drawn deductively. With the results of the research and conclusion, it was found that the Panel of Judges’ reasoning, which failed to carefully examine the consistency of the evidence, did not align with the objectives of evidentiary law, rendering the decision inaccurate and inconsistent with existing regulations. Meanwhile, the evidentiary strength in the case was valid under Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code, proving that the defendant purchased narcotics for personal use and not for distribution.
Co-Authors Alexander Joshua Pratama Ammar Farras Fauzan Anggraini, Febri Anis Kristia Putri Arief Rahmatulloh Arif Widodo Arnaldo Vinerdi Arum, Ayu Puspita Audric Farell Nolan Ayuningtyas, Putri Larasati Azahra, Aura Azhar Dhika Winarto Bagus Bara Bobby Firmansyah Budianto Buldani Ridha Bustan, Josephine Kezia Candra Aries Priyendi Christina , Anggi Erika Ciptaningtyas, Ariesta Wulandari Danasari, Putu Angel Putri David Bueno Davita, Bunga De Rinus, Maria Filfrida Dewi Nadya Maharani Dewi Natasya Lestari Dinanti, Bernandia Hamsyah Dwi Erwin Kusbianto Dyah Ayu Savitri Erwin Kusbianto , Dwi Fotuhoaro Ndruru Gatot Efrianto Geovanni Ikram Gunawan Syahrantau Hadiyanto, Narissa Rafaputri Irwanto Sucipto, Irwanto Julian Daniel Maria Angelina Butar Butar Maulana, Juraisyki Iqbal Mega Mustika Noviyanti Meliala, Susan Barbara Patricia Sembiring Mohammad Ubaidillah Muhammad Fauzan Ridho Kanungga Rominton Muhammad Ghufron Rosyady Muhammad Noval Amaldy Nada Samyra Nahdiya Sabrina Nisak, Fauziatun Novendra, Dimas Ihza Nurul Kamaliya nurul latifah Partini Partini Patricia Sembiring, Susan Barbara Patricia SM, Susan Barbara Puan Dinaphia Yunan rachman winarto, Yudha Rahardianto, Trias Rama Wahyu Pratama Putra Reni Ambarwati Rifngatul ‘Atiqoh Rosita Dwi Chrisnandari Sandrina Aisha Devi Sari, Andini Permata Sawitri Yuli Hartati Sawitri Yuli Hartati S. Setyaningrum, Putri Imaniar Sholeh Avivi Subakti, Bawafi Syakia Brafnasha Isabella Pambudi Syifa Putri Aulia Victory Hengky Parinussa Vira Felinda Ayu Cahyani Virsa Faliolla Tasyakuranti Widiono, Fajar Kurnia Maulid Wildan Muhlison, Wildan Wiratama, Galih Putra Zaqinadevi, Amritha Suko Zefri Ziansyah Attallah Rahmana