Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : VOKAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia

EDUKASI MENGENAI INFORMASI BOHONG (HOAKS) DI KALANGAN GURU BERBASIS LITERASI Brillianing Pratiwi; Mohammad Adning
Vokal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Terbuka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (272.162 KB) | DOI: 10.33830/vokal.v1i1.3098.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the educational needs of teachers regarding hoaxes and provide preventive measures to prevent hoaxes among teachers. This study uses a qualitative method with a case study approach. The results of this study indicate the importance of education programs regarding hoax information among teachers so that teachers do not immediately conclude the contents of the news without reading in detail about the contents of the news. In addition, teachers have more literacy awareness in seeking clarification of the truth about a hoax, reducing the rapid spread of hoaxes, and being able to spread digital literacy skills to students. Teachers as professionals have a strategic role to realize the vision of learning implementation. The development of science and technology brings logical consequences to the orientation of the development of teacher professionalism. The conclusion of this study is that a teacher needs to have digital literacy skills so that they are able to disseminate correct information.
KARYA TULIS ILMIAH SISWA DALAM KURIKULUM 2013 DAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA Dewi Hartati, Rahma; Pratiwi, Brillianing; Yunianika, Ika Tri
VOKAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Terbuka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33830/vokal.v3i1.7574.

Abstract

When learning Indonesian in high school (SMA), scientific writing is one of the outcomes that students must be able to apply in the form of writing. In fact, scientific writing is difficult material for students. According to the 2013 curriculum, the scientific writing material should enable students to effectively compile and communicate their findings. On the other hand, in the merdeka curriculum, scientific writing serves as a report for each project to enhance the Pancasila students' profile (P5). The purpose of this study is to compare the process of writing scientific papers between the 2013 curriculum and the merdeka curriculum and analyze the resulting learning outcomes. The research conducted revealed the following findings: 1) there were differences in the outcomes of scientific writing learning between the 2013 curriculum and the merdeka curriculum, 2) the scientific writing learning process varied, with the 2013 curriculum only including Indonesian language subjects for scientific writing in class XI, while the merdeka curriculum scientific writing allowed collaboration with other subjects, and 3) the scientific writing guidance system in the 2013 curriculum solely focused on learning Indonesian during class, whereas in the merdeka curriculum, students received special guidance outside of class hours.