Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.092
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) JPMS (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains) EDUSAINS Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika JPPPF (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika) Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara Jurnal Eduscience (JES) Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Eduproxima : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF) Journal of Environment and Sustainability Education Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia
Efwinda, Shelly
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Design and Validity of STEM-EDP-gamification Worksheet: Ways to Improve Students' Perception of Their STEM Skills and Motivation Khoiriyah, Riva; Sukriadi, Sukriadi; Haerani, Rosita Putri Rahmi; Suhartini, Erna; Efwinda, Shelly
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jpms.v14i1.92031

Abstract

This article discusses the design and validity of STEM gamification worksheets as a means to improve students' perceptions of skills and motivation in STEM learning. This study encourages student motivation and engagement in STEM learning more engagingly and innovatively. This study uses a mixed-method approach with an Educational Design Research (EDR) approach. The EDR method consists of three phases: the first phase is analysis and exploration, the second phase is design and construction, and the third phase is evaluation and reflection. The STEM gamification worksheet was designed using the EDP (Engineering Design Process) learning model designed for four meetings. The worksheet obtained an average assessment for all aspects, namely the content and feasibility aspects of the STEM gamification-based worksheet product of 89.3% which is included in the "Very Valid" category and can be used in science learning. With an overall Aiken's Test value of 0.845 with a very high interpretation. The worksheet also received suggestions and input from game experts and practitioners for improvement and has been revised. The appearance of the worksheet is very important because it can make students, as users, more motivated and interested in learning. This STEM gamification worksheet is expected to be a breakthrough for the world of education in the future, especially in the application of sustainable development principles, SDGs 4, including innovation in improving STEM, SDGs 11, gamification of innovation and infrastructure with engineering design learning methods, and applying environmentally friendly principles in learning.
Content Analysis of The Quality of Engineering Education (QEE) in The Indonesian Junior High School Science Curriculum Zahidsyahtya, Muhammad Amiq; Nur'aini, Anugrah Putri; Sulaeman, Nurul Fitriyah; Nuryadin, Atin; Efwinda, Shelly
Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan Vol 17, No 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/paedagoria.v17i2.37318

Abstract

In Indonesia, the engineering component in STEM education is critical yet remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the representation of engineering education using the Quality of Engineering Education (QEE) framework within the Science Curriculum Phase D. The method employed is content analysis using a descriptive quantitative and qualitative approach within the QEE framework developed by Moore (2014). The study reveals that 10 out of 12 QEE elements are identifiable within the curriculum, with the Engineering Tools (Etool) element being the most dominant. However, two elements remain absent: the Process of Design (POD) and Concepts of Engineering and Engineers (CEE). These findings indicate that the quality of Engineering Education at Phase D in Indonesia remains limited. The results suggest that the Indonesian Science Curriculum for Junior High Schools still needs further development so that STEM components are explicitly represented and can serve as a firm reference for teachers to begin implementing STEM-based learning.
Co-Authors Abdul Hakim Ahmad Zaki Dzulfikar, Ahmad Zaki Anamta, Mega Hajraini Anggara Duta Medika Anggraeni, Bening Annisa Nurul Hidayah Aprillia, Aprillia Aryaputra, Akmal Raiky Atin Nuryadin Damayanti, Puardmi Dinurrohmah, Syayidah Evanita Mutang Falentino, Charlos Farida, Saphira Devina Widya Putri Habibah Habibah Haerani, Rosita Putri Rahmi Hafitri, Mona Lisa Khatima, Huscnul Khoiriyah, Riva Malisan, Rinilva Muhammad Junus MUHAMMAD SHOLEH Muliati, Muliati Muttaqin Muttaqin Norsaputra, Ary Nur'aini, Anugrah Putri Nurhayati Nurhayati Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman, Nurul Fitriyah Palian, Yolanda Oktavia Pasaribu, Dian Rachel Putri Dwi Sundari Putri, Dinda Ar-Rizalah Pujie Rahmayana Putri, Sevia Tasya Ramadiana, Ehza Ayu Riskan Qadar, Riskan Sari, Siska Nilam Suhartini, Erna sukriadi sukriadi Syafi’i, Ahmad Takebayashi, Tomohiro Tanlianto, Alphero Wulandari, Etrica Damayanti Zahidsyahtya, Muhammad Amiq Zeni Haryanto Zulhijjah Zulkarnaen Zulkarnaen