Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Safety Net of The Financial System in The Perspective of Indonesian Banking Law Zulfi Diane Zaini
International Conference On Law, Business and Governance (ICon-LBG) Vol 1 (2013): 1st ICon-LBG
Publisher : UBL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (475.995 KB)

Abstract

The world’s economic conditions has shown a tendency of recession to re-occur in particular indeveloped countries, it is caused due to the worsening global economic and financial conditions thatcould have been worse than the crisis conditions of the last 2008. Related to that global financial crisis,it’s very likely that they have an impact on economic conditions in Indonesia, and the most highlyvulnerable is in banking sector. If this condition (Safety Net) is not anticipated and dealt with seriouslyand comprehensively by the Government, it could have an impact on a deep financial crisis. Thecondition does not only affect the poor aspects of banking liquidity, but also on the solvency andprofitability of the banking institutions.Financial Safety Net is one of the main pillars of economic activity, so that with the specific andexplicit arrangement, the occurrence of bank runs can be pursued and prevented, it can minimize thepossibility of a financial crisis, and it can reduce the frequency and impact of economic contraction inIndonesia.Given the large number of costs that must be borne by the State in the management and resolution ofcrises and the breadth of the impact of the crisis, we need a fine and effective crisis management. A goodand effective crisis management must be supported by a legal framework in the form of legislation andpolicies to deal with the crisis that clearly distinguished set of roles, responsibilities and effectivemechanisms of coordination from each related institution to some monetary authorities in the Safety Net.Crisis management also needs to be supported by the organization and effective leadership so that theycan develop strategies and crisis management measures quickly and effectively in the event of a crisis.
LEGAL STANDING OF FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (FSA) AS SUPERVISION OF BANKS INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA Zulfi Diane Zaini; Tami Rusli
International Conference On Law, Business and Governance (ICon-LBG) 2016: 3th IConLBG
Publisher : UBL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (990.652 KB)

Abstract

The presence of Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the development of the financial sector in Indonesia is expected to help the activities of financial institutions, especially in banking, so that the regulation of financial services activities can be implemented well and have a positive impact for economic development in Indonesia. The weakness of bank supervision is one of the main causes of mismanagement bank that eventually led to bank failures. Bank has a special position as an institution of trust as its main business is to funding from and lend to the public. The problem in this research is how the legal standing of FSA in performing its functions as the National Institute of Banking Supervisors of the economic development of Indonesia? and How Legal Relationship between the FSA and Bank Indonesia as the Central Bank in Indonesia?.The research method used is Juridical Normative and Empirical Approach, The data used is secondary and primary data,analysis of the data used is Juridical Qualitative. Based on the results of research it is known that, Legal Standing of FSA is an Independent Institute, organized regulation and supervision of banking macroprudentialsystem. Regulation and supervision of the institutional, health, aspects of prudential and bank checks is a scope of the regulation and micro prudential supervision of the duties and authority of the FSA. Legal Relationship between the FSA and Bank Indonesia as the Central Bank in Indonesia, perform coordination and cooperation with Bank Indonesia, especially in terms of handling Problem Bank in line with Bank Indonesia function as a lender of last resort, in the case of the FSA indicates certain banks experiencing liquidity difficulties and/or worsen health conditions, FSA inform the Bank Indonesia to take steps in accordance with the authority of Bank Indonesia.
Bank Indonesia Law Relations With The Financial Services Authority (FSA) in Indonesian Banking Supervision Zulfi Diane Zaini
International Conference On Law, Business and Governance (ICon-LBG) Vol 1 (2013): 1st ICon-LBG
Publisher : UBL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (472.593 KB)

Abstract

With the presence of FSA, the supervision function of financial institutions, banks and nonbanks,will be taken over by FSA. Meanwhile Bank Indonesia as the Central Bank only acts as a regulatorto keep monetary policy for monetary stability. The formation of FSA will thus have an impact tochanges on four laws and regulations related to insurance, capital markets, banking, as well as the CapitalMarket Supervisory Agency and other financial institutions. Substantially the presence of FSA mustbridge the importance of each monitoring regulator at this moment.The duty of FSA in accordance with Article 6 of Law Number 21 Year 2011 regarding FSA ie:To carry out regulation and supervision of financial services activity in the banking sector, activities offinancial services in the Capital Market, activity in the financial services in insurance sector, pensions,funding agencies and other financial services institutions.Institutionally, FSA is outside the Government which means that FSA is not part of thegovernment authority. However there is a possibility of government representation elements existencebecause in reality FSA is the authority in the financial services sector that has strong relationships andlinkages with other authorities, in this case the fiscal authority (Minister of Finance) and the monetaryauthority (Bank Indonesia).The provision of Article 69 paragraph (1) letter (a) of Law no. 21 year 2011 asserts that the taskof Bank Indonesia in regulating and overseeing banks that are moved to FSA is a job of arrangements andsupervision related with microprudential, while Bank Indonesia still has a job related to macroprudentialbanking arrangements. Associated with it, the task of banking regulation is not fully implementedindependently by FSA because microprudential and macroprudential regulation would be highlyrelevant. Thus it can be seen that FSA still has a "special relationship" with Bank Indonesia, especially inbanking regulation and supervision .
PERSPEKTIF HUKUM SEBAGAI LANDASAN PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI DI INDONESIA (SEBUAH PENDEKATAN FILSAFAT) Zulfi Diane Zaini
Jurnal Hukum Vol 28, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Hukum Volume XXVIII No. 2 Tahun 2012
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v28i2.220

Abstract

The role of law in economic development of a nation is something that cannot be ignored its existence. So it is very obvious, if the law of a nation is effective, economic development would be easy to implement. But otherwise if the law has not effective function, it can definitely be an adverse impact on economic development. This condition also exists to Indonesia as a country which is still developing the economic area. Moreover, when Indonesia declared in its constitution as a legal state (rechtstaat). From this it is also implied that Indonesia wants two things: Firstly, the law is expected to function, and secondly, the law can serve, then economic development would be easy to be realized.The economic nationalism spirit in the globalization era shows increasing realization of the urgency to be the national economy which is strong, tough and independent. Economic Democracy is based on the popular and family, as well as cooperative efforts animates economic behavior of individuals and communities. Thus Indonesia Economic Law in the form of the Margin of Appreciation becomes benchmark for the justification of the legal norms which is enforced so the core values of Pancasila as the national ideology is kinship with the community life ideal form in society, is society kinship, so in the field of economics, Pancasila ideology wants kinship (familial Economic Democracy Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution), which is realized through the welfare state.Keywords: Law, Basis, Economic
Analisa Yuridis Pelaku Pemalsuan Data Untuk Mendapatkan Paspor Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 TPI Bandar Lampung Zulfi Diane Zaini; Luki Oktaviani Brillian
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 6 NOMOR 1 OKTOBER 2021
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35973/jidh.v6i1.2615

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui, memahami dan menganalisis pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan data untuk mendapatkan paspor Republik Indonesia pada kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 TPI Bandar Lampung dan untuk menganalisis sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan data untuk mendapatkan paspor  yang tidak valid. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian yuridis normative dan empiris. Pemalsuan paspor merupakan kejahatan yang dilakukan dengan cara mengganti, mengubah sebagian atau secara keseluruhan dari sebuah paspor atau menggunakan informasi palsu untuk menerima paspor. Permasalahan penelitian mengenai bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan data untuk mendapatkan paspor Republik Indonesia pada kantor Imigrasi Kelas 1 TPI Bandar Lampung dan sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan data untuk mendapatkan paspor yang tidak valid.Hasil penelitian bahwa Pertanggungjawaban dalam hukum pidana apabila perbuatan memenuhi unsur-unsur tindak pidana maka kepada yang bersangkutan dapat dimintakan tanggungjawab pidana secara yuridis. Sanksi pidana terhadap pelaku pemalsuan data untuk mendapatkan paspor yang dilakukan oleh pelaku setelah memperhatikan unsur-unsur Pasal 126 huruf c Undang-Undang  Nomor 06 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian unsur “Barang siapa”, unsur “Memberikan data yang tidak sah atau keterangan yang tidak benar”; unsur “Untuk memperoleh Dokumen Perjalanan Republik Indonesia bagi dirinya sendiri atau orang lain”.
Prevention and Handling of the Crisis of Financial Systems in Banking Institutions Zulfi Diane Zaini; Lukmanul Hakim
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no2.1567

Abstract

Handling of troubled banks currently carried out has been carried out coordinated by related institutions including the Ministry of Finance, Bank Indonesia, the Financial Services Authority and the Deposit Insurance Corporation, as mandated by Law Number 9 of 2016 concerning Prevention and Handling of the Financial System Crisis. Where the handling of troubled banks can be more complex and integrated not only the impact of micro and macro. So that the community can maintain its trust in banking institutions and greatly help economic activities, especially banking entrepreneurs. The problems in this research are as follows: 1) How is the Application of the Precautionary Principle in Minimizing the occurrence of Problematic Banks in Indonesia? and; 2) How is Legal Certainty in the Settlement of Problem Banks in Indonesia?The research method used to answer the problems in this study is to use a normative legal research approach which is also called theoretical legal research or dogmatic legal research because it does not review the implementation of legal implementation. The results of the research and discussion show that the application of the precautionary principle carried out by these banking institutions can make a very impactful contribution, especially in order to minimize the occurrence of good problem banks that have systemic or non-systematic impacts. In addition, legal certainty in the context of handling this troubled bank has been stated in the PPKSK Law as an attempt to resolve troubled banks.
The Completion of Misdemeanor through Rembuk Pekon in Lampung Province Zulfi Diane Zaini; Lintje Anna Marpaung; Zainab Ompu Jainah; Thia Remona Febrianti; Sija Putra Rulanda
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 14 No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1880

Abstract

The resolution of a criminal offence does not have to be carried out through legal channels. Still, it can be done in the spirit of restorative justice, one of which uses the principle of ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) or (win-win solution) through the Rembuk Pekon which means through consensus agreement. This study aims to determine what crimes can be resolved with the Pekon consultation, how the process is resolved, and what the legal consequences are. This study uses an empirical normative method by examining the methods, norms, rules and primary data through observation and interviews, the results of the study indicate that the types of criminal acts that can be resolved with Rembuk Pekon include minor criminal offences Article 302, Article 352 paragraph (1), Article 364, Article 373, Article 379, Article 482, Article 315, Article 407 paragraph 1, and the criminal offence of complaint Article 284 of the Criminal Code. So in this study will discuss how the process of resolving minor criminal cases through the Rembuk Pekon and the authors have a suggestion that the police should implement the Rembuk Pekon to prioritize the principles of professional, modern and reliable, this so that the implementation of the Rembuk Pekon can run optimally.
HUBUNGAN HUKUM BANK INDONESIA SEBAGAI BANK SENTRAL DENGAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN (OJK) PASCA PENGALIHAN FUNGSI PENGAWASAN PERBANKAN Zulfi Diane Zaini
Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 20, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v20i2.276

Abstract

Dibentuknya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) guna mengantisipasi kompleksitas sistem keuangan global dari ancaman krisis. Pembentukan OJK dilandasi motivasi yang baik yaitu untuk meningkatkan kualitas pengawasan lembaga Keuangan secara terintegrasi, antara lain : Lembaga Perbankan, Pasar Modal, Dana Pensiun dan Lembaga Keuangan Non Bank. Kehadiran OJK dalam perkembangan sektor keuangan di Indonesia diharapkan dapat membantu lancarnya kegiatan lembaga-lembaga jasa keuangan, sehingga pengaturan terhadap kegiatan jasa keuangan dapat terlaksana dengan baik, dan pada akhirnya memberikan dampak yang positif bagi perkembangan perekonomian di Indonesia pada umumnya. Sementara Bank Indonesia sebagai Bank Sentral hanya berperan sebagai regulator kebijakan moneter untuk menjaga stabilitas moneter.Permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah : Bagaimanakah hubungan hukum antara Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dengan Bank Indonesia sebagai Bank Sentral di Indonesia?. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan pendekatan empiris. Selanjutnya data yang digunakan Data Sekunder dan Data Primer, kemudian data tersebut diolah dan dianalisis secara yuridis kualitatif yaitu mendeskripsikan permasalahan berdasarkan penelitian dan pembahasan dalam bentuk penjelasan atau uraian kalimat demi kalimat yang disusun secara sistematis, selanjutnya ditarik kesimpulan secara deduktif untuk menjawab permasalahan penelitian.Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 69 ayat (1) huruf (a) UU No. 21 Tahun 2011 menegaskan bahwa tugas Bank Indonesia dalam mengatur dan mengawasi bank yang dialihkan ke OJK adalah tugas pengaturan dan pengawasan yang berkaitan dengan microprudential, sedangkan Bank Indonesia tetap memiliki tugas pengaturan perbankan terkait macroprudential.  Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, tugas pengaturan perbankan tidak sepenuhnya dilaksanakan secara independen oleh OJK, karena pengaturan microprudential dan macroprudential akan sangat berkaitan.  Kata Kunci : Hubungan Hukum; Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
Analisis Yurisdis Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Bank terhadap Kerahasiaan Bank di Indonesia Zulfi Diane Zaini
Recital Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Volume 1, Issue 1, Januari 2019
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (587.553 KB) | DOI: 10.22437/rr.v1i1.6066

Abstract

In order to avoid financial abuse, the customer made a special rule that prohibits banks to provide recorded information to anyone related to finance customers, deposits and its depositors except in certain cases mentioned explicitly in in the Banking Act. Based on such matters, the issues to be studied in this research is how the bank's efforts in maintaining the security of bank secrecy. Based on the research results revealed that public confidence on banking institutions to grow and thrive because in the presence of an element of the institution in the form of bank secrecy. Bank secrecy is everything related to finances and other things from the customer's bank in the ordinary course of banking should not be publicly disclosed to the public. The Banking Act Number 10 of Year 1998 has required the application of bank secrecy for the sake of maintaining public confidence in the banking institutions. But in practice it is still difficult to implement because there is no uniformity in the determination of categories including bank secrecy
Kedudukan Hukum Pengawas Bank Syariah yang Dilakukan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dan Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI) Sija Putra Rulanda; Zulfi Diane Zaini; Melisa Safitri
Jurnal Supremasi Volume 10 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Balitar, Blitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v10i2.1148

Abstract

Perbankan memiliki peran penting dalam pembangunan khususnya dalam menunjang pertumbuhan ekonomi negara. Bank adalah salah satu lembaga pembiayaan yang menghimpun dana masyarakat dan menyalurkan kembali pada masyarakat. salah satunya adalah Bank Syariah. Bank Syariah adalah bank yang menerapkan sistem perbankan dengan berlandaskan dengan Syariat islam yaitu Hadist dan Al-Qur'an. Dalam prakteknya perbankan syariah perlu di awasi agar produk atau kegiatan perbankan yang dilakukan tidak melanggar aturan hukum dan syariat islam. pengawasan perbankan syariah dilakukan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia (DSN-MUI) dalam melakukan perannya sebagai pengawas perbankan syariah perlu di ketahui Fungsi Pengaturan Pengawasannya dan Hubungan Hukum antara OJK dan DSN-MUI dalam melakukan pengawasan Lembaga Perbankan Syariah. Penelitian menggunakan metode Yuridis Normatif dan Yuridis Empiris. Hasil dari penelitian pengaturan fungsi pengawasan Lembaga Perbankan Syariah oleh OJK berlandaskan pada Pasal 34 Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2009 tentang Bank Indonesia serta Pasal 55 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Dasar Hukum Fungsi pengwasan DSN-MUI pada Pasal 32 Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah dan Hubungan Hukum antara OJK dan DSN-MUI memiliki hubungan kemitraan dimana dalam hal pengawasan lembaga perbankan syariah OJK melakukan pengawasan eksternal sedangkan DSN-MUI melalui DPS melakukan pengwasan secara internal.