Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.873
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum Jurisprudentie Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Santhet: (Jurnal Sejarah, Pendidikan Dan Humaniora) Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani (JPJ) UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Penelitian Indonesian Journal of Sport Science and Technology (IJST) FAIR PLAY conomics Learning Experience & Social Thinking Education Journal
Kurdi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
TRANSFORMASI PENEGAKAN DUE PROCESS OF LAW DALAM TAHAPAN PENYIDIKAN DI INDONESIA: ANTARA PERLINDUNGAN HAK TERSANGKA DAN EFEKTIVITAS PENEGAKAN HUKUM Kurdi; Ardhan, Adery; Dadek, Teuku Ahmad
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v10i1.12833

Abstract

This study analyzes the transformation of due process of law at the investigation stage in Indonesia, which has become an arena of conflict between the protection of suspects' rights and the effectiveness of law enforcement. Normatively, the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) adopts the Due Process Model that guarantees human rights. However, in practice, it is still dominated by the repressive Crime Control Model, creating a gap between das sollen and das sein. Using a legal-normative research method, this study examines the normative guarantees of suspects' rights and the effectiveness of their oversight mechanisms. The results of the study show that the implementation of fundamental rights, such as the right to legal assistance (Articles 54/56 KUHAP), is still very minimal , which correlates directly with the persistence of torture practices to obtain confessions. Internal (Propam) and external (Ombudsman) oversight mechanisms have proven to be “suboptimal” in preventing maladministration. The most significant transformation has come from judicial oversight through Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014, which expands the scope of pretrial hearings to examine the determination of suspects, searches, and seizures. This decision enforces accountability for evidence from the outset of the investigation. This study concludes that strengthening due process requires legislative reform (the Criminal Procedure Code Bill) to institutionalize the Commissioner Judge as a proactive judicial supervisor.
Co-Authors , Akhmad Ikraam Adelia, Syarifa Ahmad Ikhraam Ansar CS Arbani, Muhammad Ardhan, Adery Asep Sumaryana Awantano, Jems R. Rikson Bayu Insanistyo Budiman Rusli CS, Ansar Cut Zulfahnur Syafitri Dadek, Teuku Ahmad Dwipa, Bhakti Saka Evi Sinaga I Putu Eka Wijaya Putra Ibrahim Ibrahim Ibrahim Ipa Sari Kardi Irfan Polem Junalia Muhammad Kurdi Kurdi KUSTIAWAN, ANDRI ARIF Larung, Ermelinda Yersin Putri Ledoh, Cartika Candra Lewier, Meilani Paulina Mia, Chirtitia Miftah Fariz Prima Putra Nasruddin Nasruddin Nasruddin Prita Amalia Raden Muhamad Ibnu Mazjah Rizkie, Ricky Rodhi Rusdianto Hidayat Sirampun, Elsi Syafitri, Cut Zulfahnur Teuku Ahmad Dadek Wardhana, Yuki M.A Yahya Eko Nopiyanto Yamin Yohanis Manfred Mandosir