p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.997
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora JURNAL DOKTRIN DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Conference of ASEAN Prespective and Policy (ICAP) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Journal of Social Responsibility Projects by Higher Education Forum Fox Justi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Proceeding International Seminar of Islamic Studies Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum International Conference on Health Science, Green Economics, Educational Review and Technology (IHERT) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) SASI Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy International Journal Of Synergi In Law, Criminal And Justice International Journal of Society and Law International Journal of Management, Economic and Accounting INJURLENS Open Access DRIVERset
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERAN BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILU (BAWASLU) DALAM MENCEGAH DAN MENANGANI PELANGGARAN PEMILU DI KABUPATEN ACEH TENGAH TAHUN 2024 Munardi, Rizky; Rafianti, Fitri
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i3.3627

Abstract

Pemilihan umum yang bebas dan adil merupakan landasan utama bagi sistem demokratis yang kuat. Dalam konteks Indonesia, Badan Pengawas Pemilu (Bawaslu) memegang peran sentral dalam memastikan integritas proses pemilihan umum. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi peran Bawaslu dalam mencegah dan menangani pelanggaran pemilu, dengan fokus pada Pemilihan Umum 2024 di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif, data dikumpulkan melalui observasi partisipatif, wawancara, dan analisis dokumen. Analisis dilakukan dengan memperhatikan kerangka kerja konseptual yang melibatkan peran Bawaslu dalam melakukan pencegahan pelanggaran pemilu, jenis-jenis pelanggaran pemilu, dan dampaknya terhadap integritas pemilihan umum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Bawaslu Kabupaten Aceh Tengah telah aktif dalam mencegah dan menangani berbagai pelanggaran pemilu, termasuk penanganan pelanggaran kode etik ad hoc dan manipulasi data. Studi kasus Pemilihan Umum 2024 di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah menyoroti tantangan unik yang dihadapi dalam menjaga integritas pemilihan umum di tingkat lokal. Meskipun demikian, langkah-langkah yang diambil oleh Bawaslu, seperti pengawasan yang ketat, pelatihan pemilih, dan kerja sama dengan pihak terkait, telah membantu mengurangi dampak dari pelanggaran tersebut. Kesimpulannya, peran Bawaslu dalam mencegah dan menangani pelanggaran pemilu sangat penting untuk memastikan proses pemilihan umum yang transparan dan adil. Rekomendasi diberikan untuk memperkuat peran Bawaslu dalam menghadapi tantangan yang berkembang, termasuk peningkatan kapasitas, penguatan kerjasama dengan lembaga terkait, dan penegakan hukum yang tegas terhadap pelanggaran pemilu.
Nusyuz as the Cause of Domestic Violence: A Comparative Study of Islamic Law and Criminal Law Fitri Rafianti; M. Hary Angga Pratama Sinaga
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.45

Abstract

This article aims to explain the dynamics of Nusyuz as one of the reasons why domestic violence (KDRT) is allowed in the perspective of Islam, and further elaborates with a comparative study in the context of Criminal Law. This research uses a qualitative method with an approach to Islamic Law and Criminal Law in Indonesia. The data was obtained through in-depth exploration of regulations contained in the Qur'an, Hadith, laws, and other necessary legal sources through literature review and documentation. There are three main questions that this research seeks to answer: First, how is the legal regulation of Nusyuz in the context of Islamic Law; Second, how is the correlation between Nusyuz and domestic violence cases; Third, how is the settlement of Nusyuz cases related to domestic violence cases in the perspective of Criminal Law. This research shows that, first, the regulation of Nusyuz is very clearly stated through legal sources in the context of Islamic Law, but there are often misunderstandings in interpreting commandments, prohibitions, and choices of verses. Second, the correlation between Nusyuz and KDRT requires awareness of experiences of violence against women and close people in the household environment, although the phenomenon of violence against women is always identified with the nature of private space where the Nusyuz of husband and wife is a private space that, when known publicly, becomes a shame that must be hidden without considering the applicable legal provisions. Third, Nusyuz is often associated with cases of domestic violence if a wife who is nusyuz gives her husband various rights in treating her. Starting from the right to hit her, distance her, not provide her with good material and spiritual support, and finally the husband also has the right to divorce her. Of course, the wife remains the victim of exploitation, both physically, mentally, and sexually. This is exacerbated by the absence of clear rules in limiting the husband's rights, making it very possible for the husband to act arbitrarily in this matter. The solutions to prevent domestic violence include: First, understanding the obligations and responsibilities of both husband and wife in the household. Second, always being with the wife and inviting her to chat. Third, always saying good words and making her happy. Fourth, not hurting or hitting the wife in the face. The above things will not happen if the husband and wife understand their duties and responsibilities in the household and do not interpret verses as legal evidence for justifying domestic violence due to the inability to understand legal evidence that is sometimes only partially read.      
Nusyuz as the Cause of Domestic Violence: A Comparative Study of Islamic Law and Criminal Law Rafianti, Fitri; Pratama Sinaga, M. Hary Angga
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v3i1.45

Abstract

This article aims to explain the dynamics of Nusyuz as one of the reasons why domestic violence (KDRT) is allowed in the perspective of Islam, and further elaborates with a comparative study in the context of Criminal Law. This research uses a qualitative method with an approach to Islamic Law and Criminal Law in Indonesia. The data was obtained through in-depth exploration of regulations contained in the Qur'an, Hadith, laws, and other necessary legal sources through literature review and documentation. There are three main questions that this research seeks to answer: First, how is the legal regulation of Nusyuz in the context of Islamic Law; Second, how is the correlation between Nusyuz and domestic violence cases; Third, how is the settlement of Nusyuz cases related to domestic violence cases in the perspective of Criminal Law. This research shows that, first, the regulation of Nusyuz is very clearly stated through legal sources in the context of Islamic Law, but there are often misunderstandings in interpreting commandments, prohibitions, and choices of verses. Second, the correlation between Nusyuz and KDRT requires awareness of experiences of violence against women and close people in the household environment, although the phenomenon of violence against women is always identified with the nature of private space where the Nusyuz of husband and wife is a private space that, when known publicly, becomes a shame that must be hidden without considering the applicable legal provisions. Third, Nusyuz is often associated with cases of domestic violence if a wife who is nusyuz gives her husband various rights in treating her. Starting from the right to hit her, distance her, not provide her with good material and spiritual support, and finally the husband also has the right to divorce her. Of course, the wife remains the victim of exploitation, both physically, mentally, and sexually. This is exacerbated by the absence of clear rules in limiting the husband's rights, making it very possible for the husband to act arbitrarily in this matter. The solutions to prevent domestic violence include: First, understanding the obligations and responsibilities of both husband and wife in the household. Second, always being with the wife and inviting her to chat. Third, always saying good words and making her happy. Fourth, not hurting or hitting the wife in the face. The above things will not happen if the husband and wife understand their duties and responsibilities in the household and do not interpret verses as legal evidence for justifying domestic violence due to the inability to understand legal evidence that is sometimes only partially read.      
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pendaftaran Merek Dalam Usaha Kuliner Bakso Hebat Mataram Di Pekanbaru Zales, Rabina; Nurhayati, Siti; Rafianti, Fitri
Jurnal Ilmiah Muqoddimah: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Vol 10, No 1 (2026): Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jim.v10i1.2026.162-170

Abstract

Perkembangan usaha kuliner di Indonesia semakin pesat, namun masih banyak pelaku usaha yang belum memahami pentingnya pendaftaran merek sebagai instrumen perlindungan hukum. Sistem hukum Indonesia menganut prinsip first to file, yaitu hak atas merek hanya diberikan kepada pihak yang pertama kali mendaftarkannya. Hal ini menyebabkan usaha kuliner yang tidak melakukan pendaftaran merek berada pada posisi yang rentan terhadap peniruan, pemalsuan, maupun gugatan hukum dari pihak lain. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap pendaftaran merek dalam usaha kuliner, dengan mengambil studi kasus Bakso Hebat Mataram di Pekanbaru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif yuridis dengan pendekatan kualitatif, melalui telaah terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum terhadap pendaftaran merek diwujudkan dalam bentuk perlindungan preventif melalui hak eksklusif pemakaian merek, dan perlindungan represif melalui gugatan perdata maupun tuntutan pidana terhadap pelanggaran merek. Studi kasus ini menegaskan bahwa keterlambatan atau kelalaian dalam pendaftaran merek dapat menimbulkan kerugian besar bagi pelaku usaha, baik secara hukum maupun reputasi bisnis. Oleh karena itu, pendaftaran merek perlu dipandang sebagai strategi hukum sekaligus strategi bisnis yang penting bagi keberlangsungan usaha kuliner.
The Halal Capsule Shell in the Perspective of Comparative Islamic Law and Health Law: Opportunities and Challenges Rafianti, Fitri; Risdawati, Irsyam; Andafi, Muhammad
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.3890

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and compare the perspectives of Islamic law and health law regarding the use of halal capsule shells. This study is a comparative research that explores legal, ethical, and health aspects in the use of capsule shells that meet halal criteria. Using a qualitative approach, this research collected data from various relevant sources, including Islamic legal texts, health regulations, and related scientific literature. The results show that there are both similarities and significant differences in the standards and interpretations of halal between Islamic law and health law. From the perspective of Islamic law, the halal status of capsule shells is determined by the source of materials and the manufacturing process, while health law focuses more on the safety and effectiveness of the product. The study also identifies opportunities, such as a large market potential for halal products, and challenges, including the need for standardized and integrated halal certification. This research provides new insights into the importance of harmonizing the principles of halal in Islam with health standards, which are crucial not only for Muslim producers and consumers but also for broader social and economic integration. Recommendations for further research and related policies are presented to support the sustainable development of the halal capsule industry.
Advocacy Model for Combined Process (Med-Arbitration)-Based Resolution of Industrial Relations Conflicts Between Trade Unions and Businesses Nurhayati, Siti; Rafianti, Fitri; Wakhyuni, Emi; Hutabarat, Willyam Lorencius
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4146

Abstract

In the process of settling labor-management conflicts, trade unions play a crucial role for employees, employers, and trade unions themselves. According to Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, disputes about labor relations are settled through Bipartite, Tripatrit (labor relations mediation, conciliation, and arbitration), and if non-litigation legal remedies (apart from arbitration) fail, the matter is then brought before the Industrial Relations Court. Due to its proven effectiveness in resolving commercial conflicts, the combined process (med-arb) idea is thought to facilitate dispute resolution in industrial relations problems. Two issues are addressed in this research: the idea of combined process (med-arb) as it applies to the resolution of labor-union disputes with employers and the idea of legal certainty in the process of using combined process (med-arb) to resolve labor-union disputes with employers.
The Challenges of Implementing the Online Single Submission (OSS) System in Business Licensing (NIB) and Halal Certification Processes Rafianti, Fitri; Nurhayati, Siti; Wakhyuni, Emi; Andafi, Muhammad
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5427

Abstract

This article examines the implementation of the Online Single Submission (OSS) system in business licensing in Indonesia, particularly concerning Business Identification Numbers (NIB) and halal certification. OSS, designed to streamline the licensing process electronically, aims to improve efficiency and accessibility in public services supporting business activities. However, this study finds that in practice, the OSS system encounters multiple challenges, both technical and regulatory. Key issues identified include limited technological access for micro and small business operators, unclear regulatory standards, and concerns regarding data security and information management. Additionally, OSS presents difficulties in the halal certification process, such as complex criteria and the need for accurate data verification. The government is encouraged to take adaptive steps, including enhancing transparency, simplifying bureaucratic procedures, and providing technical support for business operators. These adjustments are anticipated to optimize the OSS system, fostering a better investment climate and increasing the competitiveness of SMEs in Indonesia. This research adopts a normative juridical approach with qualitative analysis based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The study’s findings recommend that the government be more responsive to the challenges faced by business operators to realize an inclusive and effective OSS system
CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF HOLDING COMPANIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMES COMMITTED BY SUBSIDIARIES Arman Candra; Fitri Rafianti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19464482

Abstract

The structure of multinational corporations has created fundamental juridical challenges regarding criminal liability. The principle of separate legal personality has traditionally insulated holding companies from liability for environmental crimes committed by their subsidiaries, notwithstanding the parent company's dominant operational and economic control. This research examines how various legal systems address this accountability issue through doctrines such as piercing the corporate veil, vicarious liability, and systemic fault models. Furthermore, this study analyzes the effectiveness of the Indonesian legal framework, specifically the Law on Environmental Protection and Management (UUPPLH, Article 116) and Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 of 2016 (Articles 4(2) and 6), while identifying the causes of implementation gaps. Comparative analysis reveals a global evolution from the restrictive identification doctrine toward a pragmatic organizational fault model. It is found that Indonesia's legal framework is de jure adequate, having adopted functional liability (UUPPLH) and organizational liability (Perma). However, the key finding highlights the absence of de facto jurisprudence due to structural barriers, particularly evidentiary challenges and institutional capacity. In conclusion, this research recommends the adoption of a hybrid prosecution model combining the functional instruments of the UUPPLH and the organizational instruments of Perma 13/2016 as an effective solution to combat holding company impunity.
Ambiguity Of The Verdict On The Position Of Multiple Certificates On The Object Of Land Disputes Veronika T; Fitri Rafianti
LITERACY : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): December : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities
Publisher : Badan Penerbit STIEPARI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56910/literacy.v2i3.1020

Abstract

In Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration Article 3 the purpose of land registration is to provide legal certainty and protection to holders of rights to a plot of land, apartment units and other rights registered in order to easily prove themselves as the holder of the rights concerned, to provide information to interested parties including the Government in order to easily obtain the necessary data in Conduct legal actions regarding land parcels and units of flats that have been registered and for the orderly implementation of land administration. The problem that often arises in the community is the existence of a Certificate of Land Rights issued on the same land object. In this case, the issuance of the Certificate of Land is the authority of the Ministry of Agrarian and Spatial Planning / National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as the Ministry of ATR / BPN RI). The issuance of more than 1Certificate of Land Rights on the same land object causes problems, so there is a need for the role of the judiciary to solve the problem. The object of the lawsuit is SHM Number. 531 Ds. Buluh Pancur covering an area of approximately 44,365.m2 in 1983. The result of the decision states that the Inadmissible Lawsuit (niet ontvankelijke verklaard / NO) is a formal defective decision which means that the lawsuit is not followed up by the judge to be examined and tried so that there is no object of the lawsuit in the decision to be executed. While in the 2nd Judgment in the lawsuit to PT. TUN (High Administrative Court number 166/B/2020/PT..TUN-MDN). In the lawsuit it was inadmissible, so the plaintiff filed an appeal legal remedy which resulted in a Level 1 Judgment being canceled by the panel of judges and declared void and required the defendant, namely the National Land Agency (BPN). In the Supreme Court decision No. 610 k / tun 2020, the plaintiffs and intervening defendants filed cassation on the result, namely canceling the appeal decision, adjudicating itself, accepting the exception of the subject matter, stating that the lawsuit was not accepted so that overlapping overlaps could be resolved along with cancellation.
Halal Drug Supervision from the Perspective of Maqasid Syari'ah and Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health Fitri Rafianti; T. Riza Zarzani; Arif Sahlepi
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.609

Abstract

The issue of drug halal certification has become a crucial concern for Muslims, especially given the vital nature of drugs for the preservation of life (hifz an-nafs), which is one of the main objectives of Sharia law (Maqasid Syari'ah). The majority of drugs on the market still use raw materials or production processes whose halal status is questionable, such as the use of pork gelatin or alcohol. The government has responded to this challenge by issuing regulations, including Law No. 33 of 2014 on Halal Product Guarantee (JPH) and, most recently, Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health. Law No. 17 of 2023 brings significant changes, containing provisions related to the supervision of medicines and pharmaceutical preparations. However, the emergence of various problems in the implementation of halal certification for drugs—including the testing process, the availability of alternative halal raw materials, and the urgency of drug availability for emergency conditions—requires in-depth analysis. This study aims to examine how the harmonization and implementation of halal drug requirements can be effectively realized without compromising the guarantee of drug availability and accessibility for the public, as mandated by the Health Law. This study formulates two main issues: (1) How can the issue of the halal status of medicines in circulation be analyzed and resolved within the framework of the five basic objectives of Maqasid Syari'ah, particularly in terms of protecting life (hifz an-nafs); and (2) How the synchronization, implementation, and urgency of halal drug procurement are regulated and guaranteed based on the provisions of Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health, as well as the legal challenges that arise in its implementation. This study uses a normative legal method with a conceptual approach and a statute approach. Primary data sources include Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health and Law No. 33 of 2014 concerning JPH, as well as various related implementing regulations. The results of the study show that the obligation of halal certification for medicines is in line with the principle of protection of life (hifz an-nafs) in Maqasid Syari'ah, which guarantees the safety and spiritual confidence of users. The issue of halal often centers on raw materials that come from unclean or haram sources, but from the perspective of Maqasid Syari'ah, exceptions (rukhsah) can be granted for drugs sourced from non-halal ingredients if there are no halal alternatives (darurat syar'iyyah), as long as it is necessary to save lives, in line with the fiqh rule on the priority of preserving life. Law No. 17 of 2023 strengthens the role of the state in ensuring the availability of quality medicines and health services, including safety and halal aspects through an integrated monitoring mechanism, although the main focus is on safety and clinical benefits. The biggest challenge in implementation is creating an integrated and rapid halal pharmaceutical raw material supply system, as well as ensuring that the certification process does not become an obstacle to the availability of essential medicines. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and incentive policies are needed to encourage the pharmaceutical industry to switch to halal raw materials without disrupting market stability and public access to needed medicines