Arinata, Firdian Setiya
Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : KONSELOR

The Protective Factors of Bullying Victimization Experiences on Mental Health among Adolescents: A Decade of Systematic Review Munawaroh, Eem; Sutoyo, Anwar; Arinata, Firdian Setiya; Karomah, Anggun; Damayanti, Silviana; Nitami, Luvieta Zulgya
KONSELOR Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/0202413262-0-86

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the mental health consequences of bullying victimization, there is limited information on the protective factors that may mitigate these negative outcomes. This systematic review seeks to identify factors that can buffer the impact of bullying victimization on adolescent mental health. Articles were selected from the Scopus and Pubmed databases, covering studies published between 2014 and 2024. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 studies were found that focused on protective factors against the mental health effects of bullying among adolescents. The review reveals two major categories of protective factors: personal strengths and social support. Personal strengths include traits such as resilience, forgiveness, and religiosity, while social support involves factors such as student connectedness, parental psychological control, increased autonomy support, strong parent-child attachment, and the presence of multiple supportive adults. The findings suggest that schools should focus on building personal strengths and enhancing social support systems as key strategies to protect students from the adverse mental health effects of bullying, particularly through the improvement of counseling services and the creation of support programs.
The Protective Factors of Bullying Victimization Experiences on Mental Health among Adolescents: A Decade of Systematic Review Munawaroh, Eem; Sutoyo, Anwar; Arinata, Firdian Setiya; Karomah, Anggun; Damayanti, Silviana; Nitami, Luvieta Zulgya
KONSELOR Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/0202413262-0-86

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the mental health consequences of bullying victimization, there is limited information on the protective factors that may mitigate these negative outcomes. This systematic review seeks to identify factors that can buffer the impact of bullying victimization on adolescent mental health. Articles were selected from the Scopus and Pubmed databases, covering studies published between 2014 and 2024. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 studies were found that focused on protective factors against the mental health effects of bullying among adolescents. The review reveals two major categories of protective factors: personal strengths and social support. Personal strengths include traits such as resilience, forgiveness, and religiosity, while social support involves factors such as student connectedness, parental psychological control, increased autonomy support, strong parent-child attachment, and the presence of multiple supportive adults. The findings suggest that schools should focus on building personal strengths and enhancing social support systems as key strategies to protect students from the adverse mental health effects of bullying, particularly through the improvement of counseling services and the creation of support programs.
Psychological Interventions for Enhancing Marital Commitment: A Systematic Review Wasono, Andy; Sugiharto, DYP; Nuzulia, Siti; Arinata, Firdian Setiya
KONSELOR Vol. 14 No. 4 (2025): KONSELOR
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/02025144147-0-86

Abstract

Declining marital commitment weakens family stability and psychological health, increasing the need for evidence-based couple interventions. This systematic review consolidates empirical studies on psychological interventions aimed at strengthening marital commitment among married couples. Searches in Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar covered publications from 2018 to 2025 using keywords related to marital commitment and psychological couple interventions. From 151 records, 15 duplicates were excluded, 136 titles and abstracts were screened, and 46 full texts were evaluated. Thirty-seven studies were discarded because they either did not measure marital commitment or did not meet design criteria. Seven studies met all the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The diversity in study designs, formats, samples, and outcome measures precluded meta-analysis, so a narrative synthesis was conducted. Five categories of interventions were identified: cognitive-behavioural therapy (three studies), skills-based training in communication and conflict resolution (two randomised trials), acceptance and commitment therapy (one study), emotion-focused therapy (one study), and solution-focused brief therapy (one randomised trial). Cognitive-behavioural therapy and skills-based approaches showed the most consistent improvements in marital commitment, mainly through cognitive restructuring and enhanced communication. Acceptance-based and emotion-focused therapies showed some benefits but have limited replication; additionally, trials involving motivational interviewing were ineligible. Overall, current evidence most strongly supports cognitive-behavioural therapy and skills training. However, small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and varied measures of commitment limit the ability to generalise findings, highlighting the need for large, longitudinal studies using standardised instruments across diverse cultural populations. Future research should focus on standardised commitment measures, transparent randomisation processes, and more extended follow-up periods beyond 12 months to evaluate long-term effectiveness and mechanisms across different contexts.