Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

A Functional Typology Perspective on Exclamative Sentences in Sundanese Folktales Wida Mulyanti; Eri Kurniawan; Rinaldi Supriadi
JL3T (Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching) Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): JL3T Vol. XI No. 2 2025
Publisher : UPT. Pengembangan Bahasa IAIN Zawiyah Cot Kala Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jl3t.v11i2.11414

Abstract

This study analyzes exclamatory constructions in Sundanese folktales (narrative genre), 9,005 tokens from 30 texts through corpus-driven and functional-typological frameworks. Findings reveal that directive particles (hayu), intensifiers (pisan, teuing), and interjections (duh, yeuh)—not generic emotional terms—dominate exclamatory usage, reflecting communal pragmatics. The particle hayu (7 instances), as in “Hayu urang buru embe!” (“Let’s chase the goat!”), merges mobilization with collective urgency through syntactic patterns: direct action, metaphorical appeals (“paganteng-ganteng tunangan!” = “most handsome fiancés!”), and elliptical structures. Intensifiers like pisan (29 instances) amplify affective states (“Haus pisan!” = “So thirsty!”), while reduplication (alus-alus teuing = “so beautiful!”) heightens emotive emphasis. Interjections (duh, yeuh) anchor climactic moments through performative incompleteness (“Duh, Gusti...” = “Oh, God…”). Hybrid interrogative-exclamatives (“Naha anjeun teu éra...?!” = “How dare you?!”) and imperative-exclamatives (“Kudu make akal!” = “Use your brain!”) blur grammatical boundaries, prioritizing cultural intent over syntax. These constructions challenge Eurocentric mood models, instead encoding communal ethics, moral critique, and oral tradition aesthetics. The study underscores exclamatives as cultural-linguistic acts vital to sustaining Sundanese narrative identity, advocating context-sensitive approaches in indigenous language pedagogy and folklore preservation.
INTEGRATING INTENTION ATTRIBUTION INTO HATE SPEECH CORPUS IN THE INDONESIAN CONTEXT: A PRAGMATIC FRAMEWORK FOR NLP FOUNDATIONS Fauzan Novaldy Pratama; Eri Kurniawan; Andika Dutha Bachari; Siti Sopiah; Zainul Muttaqin
Linguists : Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching Vol 12, No 1 (2026): July
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/ling.v12i1.10932

Abstract

This study develops a hate speech corpus by integrating Searle’s Speech Act theory to identify the illocutionary intentions behind offensive utterances, elaborated in two research objectives: 1) identifying illocutionary points within the corpus containing social identity content by employing Searle’s speech acts approach, and 2) evaluating corpus quality from a natural language processing perspective. Achieving these objectives requires a methodology that integrates linguistically qualitative description with quantitative machine learning measurement. The data was obtained from a readjusted corpus, with a focused annotation on 3,315 data points containing social identity markers. The study employed a qualitative linguistic framework for intention attribution, followed by a quantitative evaluation using a hybrid BiLSTM-IndoBERT algorithm to assess corpus consistency and model predictability. The findings indicate that hate speech in the Indonesian context is predominantly manifested through negatively expressive utterances, with religion being the most frequent target, followed by ethnicity-based directive attacks. The hybrid model achieved an F1-score of 87%, demonstrating the viability of the annotated corpus for automated detection. Integrating intention attribution provides a more granular linguistic foundation for language models compared to purely semantic-based approaches. This study offers a framework for stakeholders to map hate speech patterns, though future work should incorporate more diverse sociopolitical contexts.
Exploring Linguistic Distinctions: A Comparative Analysis of Baduy and Priangan Sundanese Lexical Choice Sri Rahayu; Eri Kurniawan; Retty Isnendes; Ramadani Ramadani
Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Vol 14, No 2 (2025): Ranah: jurnal Kajian Bahasa
Publisher : Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/rnh.v14i2.8425

Abstract

This study aims to analyze lexical variation between Baduy and Priangan Sundanese and to explain how sociocultural factors shape lexical choices, language use, and speaker identity. A qualitative approach with a descriptive–comparative design was employed. Data were collected through observation, interviews, natural conversation recordings, and document analysis involving native speakers in Kanekes (Baduy) and the Priangan region (Bandung, Tasikmalaya, Garut, and Cianjur). The data were analyzed through data reduction, comparative data display, and lexical analysis using theoretical frameworks from contact linguistics and ecolinguistics to examine the influence of isolation, modernization, and language contact.The findings reveal that Baduy Sundanese preserves archaic vocabulary (e.g., kula, kakang), distinctive particles (mah, pan, teh), and specific semantic distinctions, such as the meaning of saung as a primary dwelling. In contrast, Priangan Sundanese reflects modernization and codification through the use of more standardized forms and stronger influence from Indonesian. Additional differences were observed in phonology (vowel lengthening), morphology (retention of traditional derivational forms), syntax (frequent subject/object omission), and levels of Indonesian interference. Sociocultural factors underlying these variations include the geographical isolation of the Baduy community, strong adherence to tradition, politeness norms, and the Priangan community’s openness to modern education and external contact. Overall, lexical choices function as markers of linguistic identity: the Baduy community demonstrates linguistic conservatism as a form of resistance to homogenization, whereas Priangan speakers exhibit adaptation to modernity. These findings contribute to studies on Sundanese variation, contact linguistics, and ecolinguistics, while supporting efforts to preserve endangered dialects. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis variasi leksikal antara Bahasa Sunda Baduy dan Priangan serta menjelaskan pengaruh faktor sosiokultural terhadap pilihan leksikal, penggunaan bahasa, dan identitas penuturnya. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif-komparatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, perekaman percakapan alami, dan studi dokumen yang melibatkan penutur asli di Kanekes (Baduy) dan wilayah Priangan (Bandung, Tasikmalaya, Garut, dan Cianjur). Data dianalisis melalui reduksi data, penyajian data dalam tabel komparatif, serta analisis leksikal berbasis teori linguistik kontak dan ekolinguistik untuk menelusuri pengaruh isolasi, modernisasi, dan kontak bahasa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Bahasa Sunda Baduy mempertahankan kosakata arkais seperti kula dan kakang, partikel khas seperti mah, pan, dan teh, serta sejumlah perbedaan semantis, misalnya makna saung sebagai rumah utama. Sebaliknya, Bahasa Sunda Priangan memperlihatkan kecenderungan modernisasi dan kodifikasi melalui penggunaan bentuk baku serta dipengaruhi lebih kuat oleh Bahasa Indonesia. Ditemukan pula perbedaan fonologis (pemanjangan vokal), morfologis (penggunaan bentuk turunan tradisional), sintaksis (penghilangan subjek/objek), serta tingkat interferensi bahasa Indonesia yang berbeda antar kedua komunitas. Faktor sosiokultural yang memengaruhi variasi ini meliputi isolasi geografis Baduy, keterikatan pada tradisi, norma kesantunan, serta keterbukaan Priangan terhadap pendidikan modern dan interaksi eksternal. Secara keseluruhan, pilihan leksikal berfungsi sebagai penanda identitas: komunitas Baduy mempertahankan konservatisme linguistik sebagai bentuk resistensi terhadap homogenisasi, sedangkan komunitas Priangan menampilkan adaptasi terhadap modernitas. Temuan ini berkontribusi pada kajian variasi Sunda, linguistik kontak, dan ekolinguistik, sekaligus mendukung upaya pelestarian dialek yang terancam punah.
EKSPLORASI NUANSA SEMANTIK DARI رحمة DAN رحمت DALAM WACANA AL-QUR’AN: SEBUAH STUDI BERBASIS KORPUS Muhammad Ibnu Pamungkas; Eri Kurniawan; Rinaldi Supriadi
Ta'lim al-'Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab & Kebahasaaraban Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Ta'lim al-'Arabiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jta.v10i1.44977

Abstract

The Qur'an contains numerous near-synonymous lexical items whose meanings vary according to their linguistic and contextual environments. However, corpus-based investigations of these subtle semantic distinctions remain limited. This study examines the lexical forms رحمة and رحمت, which derive from the same root (ر-ح-م) but differ in orthographic realization and syntactic construction, to identify their contextual distribution and semantic functions in the Qur'an. A qualitative descriptive corpus linguistics approach was employed using AntConc to analyse 108 Qur'anic occurrences, comprising رحمة (n = 71) and رحمت (n = 37). The analysis focused on frequency, collocation, and concordance patterns to examine differences in contextual usage. The findings indicate that رحمة occurs across a wider range of semantic contexts referring to divine mercy in a general sense, whereas رحمت predominantly appears in iḍāfah constructions that express possession and constrain meaning according to the surrounding context. These findings demonstrate that the distinction between the two forms is primarily distributional and functional rather than merely lexical or orthographic. This study contributes to Qur'anic lexical semantics by providing corpus-based evidence of contextual variation in near-synonymous expressions and demonstrates the usefulness of corpus linguistics for context-sensitive semantic analysis. The findings also offer pedagogical implications for teaching Qur'anic Arabic by enabling learners to understand lexical meaning through authentic patterns of Qur'anic usage.
Lexical bundles in accepted and rejected Scopus-indexed hard science research article introductions Eri Kurniawan; Cicih Permatasari
Studies in English Language and Education Vol 12, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/siele.v12i2.38505

Abstract

Lexical bundles are essential components of academic discourse, contributing to linguistic fluency in written and spoken communication. Their role is particularly crucial in publishing research articles in high-impact international journals. While previous studies have explored lexical bundle usage across various sections of research articles, little research has compared their use in accepted versus rejected introductions. This study aims to address this gap by examining the similarities and differences in lexical bundle usage within the introductions of accepted and rejected hard science research articles written by Indonesian scholars. This study employs a mixed-methods comparative research design. It analyzes 30 research article introductions from a hard science Scopus-indexed journal based on Bibers structural (noun/prepositional phrase-based) and Hylands functional (research-oriented, text-oriented, participant-oriented) frameworks. The findings indicate that accepted introductions contain a higher frequency of four-word lexical bundles. Structurally, both datasets are dominated by noun/prepositional phrase bundles and research-oriented bundles, but accepted introductions feature more structurally complete units. Functionally, research-oriented bundles are the most prevalent in both groups, emphasizing research processes and results in hard science writing. However, distinct differences in structural and functional subcategories suggest that proficiency in formulaic expressions may influence manuscript acceptance. This study contributes to understanding lexical bundle use in academic writing and provides practical implications for writing pedagogy, particularly for non-native scholars seeking publication in international journals.
A Metadiscourse Analysis of Research Article Abstracts Across English, Indonesian, and Arabic Authored by Indonesian Islamic Higher Education Scholars Rully Agung Yudhiantara; Eri Kurniawan; Mohamad Zaka Al Farisi
Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol 10 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan Islam
Publisher : The Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training associated with PSPII

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpi.v10i2.39165

Abstract

This study examines the use of metadiscourse in English, Indonesian, and Arabic research article abstracts from the Studia Islamika journal, published between 2014 and 2023. Focusing on enhancing cross-cultural academic communication, the research analyzes how authors affiliated with Islamic higher education institutions employ metadiscourse to engage readers and position their work within the scholarly field. Using Hyland's (2005) metadiscourse framework, the study identifies distinct patterns in the distribution and realization of interactive and interactional metadiscourse elements across the three languages. Transitions are the most frequently employed interactive feature, with a stronger reliance on frame markers in Indonesian and Arabic abstracts. However, the absence of self-mentions and engagement markers across all three languages suggests a shared preference for a formal academic tone. These findings provide valuable insights into metadiscourse practices in Islamic studies abstracts, offering guidance for scholars in preparing manuscripts for publication. Additionally, this research underscores the importance of focusing on metadiscourse in academic writing within language education departments at Islamic higher education institutions, enhancing scholars’ writing skills and promoting awareness of cultural and linguistic nuances when addressing a global audience.
Makna Ujaran Azmi Farahdiba Lestaluhu sebagai Fakta Ujaran Kebencian Ridwan Amsyah; Eri Kurniawan; Mahmud Fasya
Leksikon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): LEKSIKON: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, & Budaya
Publisher : UPT Publikasi dan Penerbitan Universitas San Pedro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59632/leksikon.v1i2.134

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan makna ujaran Azmi Farahdiba Yang menghina etnis Buton di Seluruh Indonesia. Penelitian merupakan penelitian deskripti kualitatif. Sedangkan data dalam penelitian ini adalah ujaran pada postingan facebook Azmi Farahdiba. Untuk mendapatkan data ujaran, peneliti memotret ujaran pada media sosial facebook milik Azmi. Data yang telah dipotret selanjutnya ditranskripsikan. Setelah data berhasil ditranskip, selanjutnya data dipilah berdasarkan kata, kalimat, dan faktor lain yang mengacu pada makna. Usai dipilah data kemudian dianalisis dengan kajian teori-teori makna. Hasil dari penelitian ini Ujaran Azmi Farahdiba mengandung makna semantik dan pragmatik. Dalam kajian semantik ujaran yang dikaji adalah frasa yang merupakan pengetahuan umum yang sama-sama diketahui antara penutur dan petutur. Dalam kajian pragmatik data dikaji dengan implikatur, ada dua data implikatur yang terdapat pada ujaran Azmi Farahdiba. Terakhir, ujaran Azmi Farahdiba merupakan bentuk kalimat ujaran kebencian dengan jenis penghinaan.
Co-Authors Aan Komariah Achmad Hufad Ahmad Sugianto Aji Budi Rinekso Alfira Veronica Mangana Ananta Buana Nurcik Andika Dutha Bachari Anggia Lyana Julieta Arif Husen Lubis Asep Dedeh Permana Asih Prihandini Athirah Jihan Khairani Ayu Intan Harisbaya Bilhaq Ariwayat Budi Hermawan Cicih Permatasari Cicih Sutarsih Dallyono, Ruswan Danny Meirawan Dedy Achmad Kurniady Didi Suherdi Didi Sukyadi Ernie D. A. Imperiani Fadlila Ghifarina Gani Fajar Rohandy Fathia Maharani Putri Fauzan Novaldy Pratama Fidia Ditazam Malik Firman Suryadi Rahman Fnu Meilani Fuji Nurizka Amalia Gunawan, Wawan Hakim, Mohammad Andi Harry Ramadan Putra Hermawan, Budi Husnul Qodim, Husnul Ivani Noviarani Khinanti Giantari Kholifatul Husna Asri Lubis, Arif Husein Lulu Laela Amalia M. Arief Ramdhany Mahmud Fasya Mobit Mobit Mohamad Zaka Al-Farisi Mohammad Andi Hakim Muhammad Ibnu Mustofa Muhammad Ibnu Pamungkas N R Thiffanah Thuffailah Nani Sutarni Ni Kadek Heny Sayukti Noflin Wenas R. Dian Dia-an Muniroh Ramadani Refi Aksep Sativa Retty Isnendes Rialita Kusuma Shinta Dewi Ridawati Sirait Ridwan Amsyah Rifanny Zahra Septiani Rizki Eka Putra Rully Agung Yudhiantara Rusdiansyah Rusdiansyah Sahira Nurul Luthfianda Salma Nabilla Satrio Aji Pramono Shifa Hendariyunisha Siti Sopiah Sri Rahayu Sudana, Dadang Suherdi, Didi Supriadi, Rinaldi Sururi . Syifa Fauzia Qurratu’aini Syifa Fauzia Qurratu’aini Syifa Nanda Pratiwi Tri Nurhasanah Triarisanti, Risa Wida Mulyanti Yayah Rahyasih, Yayah Yuli Rahmawati Dewi Zahra Fadillah Haerunisa Zainul Muttaqin