p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.753
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Al Ishlah Jurnal Pendidikan INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Indonesian EFL Journal BASIS (BAHASA DAN SASTRA INGGRIS) Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan Pendekar : Jurnal Pendidikan Berkarakter VISION PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PROGRAM PASCASARJANA JET (Journal of English Teaching) Adi Buana EJI (English Journal of Indragiri) : Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan Jurnal Basicedu EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics Faktor Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan ELITE Journal: Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Getsempena English Education Journal JURMA : Jurnal Program Mahasiswa Kreatif Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics Al-Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan AR-RIAYAH : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan ELECTRUM: The English Language and Education Spectrum Tarling : Journal of Language Education PEMA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of English Teaching Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature Studies Jurnal Basicedu Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching EJI (English Journal of Indragiri) : Studies in Education, Literature, and Linguistics Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching Inspiration : Instructional Practices in Language Education
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics

Does Pictionary Game Effective for Students’ Speaking Skill? Sholihatul Hamidah Daulay; Yani Lubis; Emeliya Sukma Dara Damanik; Rora Rizky Wandini; Fazar Azriani Putri
Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 6(1), April 2021
Publisher : Yayasan Visi Intan Permata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21462/jeltl.v6i1.486

Abstract

Several problems of speaking in SMAN 6 Medan attracted researchers to conduct the research as an effort to help the students in language learning. Researchers attempted to see the effectiveness of Pictionary game toward English speaking skill. This Pictionary game is a simple game and applicable for all levels of students. The main function of this game is building of creative thinking, increasing of grammar, vocabulary and pronunciation, developing student’s bravery in expression of the ideas and creating of responsibility and cooperative towards the students. Because of this advantage, many researchers conducted this game on language learning such as the effect of Pictionary game on vocabulary mastery and researchers decided to see whether Pictionary game is effective for student speaking skill. This study is conducted by using an experimental design. In collecting of the data, researcher took pre-test and post-test from experimental and control class and examined them to see whether Pictionary game is effective or not. After analyzing of the data using of three tests, researchers found that the students’ score in experimental group was higher than control group in post-test. The calculation showed tobserved was 2.07. The degree of the freedom was 70 (df= n1 + n2 – 2) that means (df= 36 + 36 – 2) at the significance level 0.05, thus the critical score was 1.97. It can be concluded ttable was 1.97. then, the calculation of students’ scores shown that tobserved > ttable that means (Ha) was accepted, and (H0) was rejected. It means there is significance effect of the students’ speaking skill after treated by Pictionary game.