Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

Analisis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan dana Desa Di Desa Gentungan Kecamatan Bajeng Barat Kabupaten Gowa (Studi Putusan No.1/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2022/Pn.Mks) Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi; Arybandi; Musafir
Pledoi Law Jurnal Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): Pledoi Law Jurnal
Publisher : Pledoi Law Jurnal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Misuse of village funds allows the court to hand down a criminal sentence because it is included in the crime category of corruption for purely personal interests. So this research was carried out with the objectives: 1). What are the factors causing misuse of village funds in decision number 1/Pid Sus TPK/2022/PN.Mks 2). What are the judge's considerations regarding law enforcement regarding misuse of village funds in decision number 1/Pid.Sus TPK/2022/PN Mks.   ABSTRAK: Penyalagunaan dana desa memungkinkan pengadilan menjatuhkan vonis pidana karena masuk dalam kelompok kejahatan tindak pidana korupsi untuk kepentingan pribadi semata. Sehingga penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan: 1). Bagaimana factor-faktor penyebab penyalahgunaan dana desa dalam putusan nomor 1/Pid Sus TPK/2022/PN.Mks 2). Bagaimana pertimbangan hakim terkait penegakan hukum atas penyalahgunaan dana desa pada putusan nomor 1/Pid.Sus TPK/2022/PN Mks.
The Creditor's Position After the Constitutional Court's Decision on the Examination of Article 15 of the Fiduciary Guarantee Law Wulandari, Andi Sri Rezky; Dewi, Mira Nila Kusuma; Nurmiati, Nurmiati
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4294

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 provides a transformation regarding the process of execution of fiduciary guarantees by creditors against debtors by changing the substance of the regulation that cannot be carried out unilaterally without permanent legal standing. The purpose of this research is to look further after the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the position of execution on financing that provides loans to creditors. This research method is a normative research that examines the decision of the Constitutional Court regarding the execution of fiduciary guarantees. The results of this study show that first, the essence of the Constitutional Court's decision is that execution by financing institutions cannot be carried out unilaterally before the court gives an official decision. Secondly, that the decision only shows specifically between debtors and creditors so that this decision cannot be used as a legal argument related to other auction processes and including as a basis for changes in legislation related to auctions outside the problems between debtors and creditors. The implication of this decision is that the institution cannot take actions outside of the court decision.
Analysis of the Legal Substance of Indonesia's Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT): Balance of Rights and Obligations Based on National Interest Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi; Nurul Miqat; Sahlan; Sunardi Purwanda
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 002 (2024): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5619

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Indonesia's Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) Law: Protection of National Interests and Balance of Rights and Obligations of Investors. This research is a type of normative research that will examine and analyze the Bilateral Investment Treaty which provides a balance between rights and obligations based on Indonesia's national interests. The data collection technique through primary legal materials, secondary and tertiary legal materials that have been collected is invertarily, processed and studied in depth so that an overview of the legal issues being studied is obtained. Data analysis is legal material that has been processed and then analyzed using qualitative methods with content analysis techniques. The results of this study conclude that Indonesia's BIT which is in force until now generally still uses the old BIT model which often causes problems with other parties in the agreement, one of which is a lawsuit through ICSID filed by investors from countries that are partners in the Agreement. Sometimes the value of claims sued by investors is sometimes too large to burden the state's finances. This is what encourages the Indonesian side to review the content of the BIT that has been made. Many BITs have been stopped and some have been amended to avoid an imbalance of rights and obligations between investors and the state. Indonesia's BIT that will be created or is currently in force can be amended by including clauses that contain human rights values, environmental protection, sustainability and economic benefits
The Influence of Islamic Jurisprudence on Modern Commercial Law Abdul Ghoni; Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi; Sandra Dewi; Awaluddin; Yusep Ginanjar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6110

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the influence of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) on the development of modern commercial law, focusing on the principles of Islamic law that contribute to the contemporary legal system, both in Muslim-majority countries and within the framework of international law. Through a qualitative approach with literature studies and normative-comparative analysis, this study explores how the basic concepts in fiqh muamalah, such as the prohibition of usury, the principle of contractual justice, transparency, and the prohibition of gharar, have influenced the formation of legal norms in Islamic banking, Islamic insurance (takaful)), and other financial instruments. The findings show that despite the methodological differences between Islamic law and the Western positive legal system, there are significant common ground that allows the integration of Islamic jurisprudence values into modern commercial legal frameworks. The implications of this study show the importance of understanding across legal systems to create more inclusive, ethical, and sustainable economic regulation globally.
Differences and Points of Reference of Ood in the Perspective of Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court and Civil Procedure Law Elfran Bima Muttaqin; Gracesy Prisela Christy; Yusep Ginanjar; Andi Sri Rezky Wulandari; Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6349

Abstract

This study aims to examine the differences and tangents related to the Object of Dispute (OOD) in the perspective of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) Procedural Law and the Civil Procedure Law. In judicial practice, the determination of OOD is crucial because it concerns absolute authority between two different judicial regimes. This research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative and conceptual approach, and is analysed qualitatively. The results of the study show that although the PTUN and the civil courts both handle legal disputes, the fundamental differences lie in the type of legal subject, the nature of the object of the dispute, and the underlying principles. On the other hand, there are potential tangents in the case of objects that are civil in nature but are issued by state administrative bodies or officials, which gives rise to jurisdictional overlaps. Therefore, it is necessary to affirm norms and harmonize the regulation of absolute authority to avoid legal dualism that is detrimental to justice seekers. This research makes a theoretical and practical contribution in strengthening the boundaries of the absolute competence of the judiciary in Indonesia
The Role of International Cooperation in the Enforcement of Anti-Terrorism Laws Gracesy Prisela Christy; Wahyudi; Tomi Apra santosa; Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6500

Abstract

This study examines the role of international cooperation in anti-terrorism law enforcement in response to the complexity of terrorism threats that are transnational and transnationally organized. Using normative research methods that focus on the analysis of laws and regulations and international legal instruments, this study examines the effectiveness of cooperation mechanisms between countries in strengthening law enforcement and preventing acts of terrorism. The findings of the study show that international cooperation, through intelligence exchange, legal harmonization, extradition, and technical capacity building of law enforcement officials, makes a significant contribution to strengthening the effectiveness of anti-terrorism law enforcement. However, challenges in the form of differences in political interests, domestic legal constraints, and state sovereignty issues are still the main obstacles. This study recommends strengthening inclusive cooperation mechanisms based on respect for international norms as a strategic step to deal with the dynamics of terrorism threats globally. Thus, international cooperation is not only a tool of law enforcement but also a key element in terrorism prevention strategies.
Rekonstruksi Teori Hukum dalam Masyarakat Modern A. Hans Tayeb Adrian; Mira Nila Kusuma Dewi; Nur Wahyu Hidayat; Khidir
Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Al-Istinbath : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71242/4k3y5h80

Abstract

The reconstruction of legal theory in modern society has become a crucial agenda to address the challenges of rapid social change, the penetration of digital technology, and the increasingly complex relations between the state, society, and individuals. Law can no longer be maintained as a static normative instrument, but must be understood as a dynamic system that both shapes and is shaped by social reality. This reconstruction emphasizes the need for a paradigm shift that shifts the orientation of law from a mere set of rules to a transformative force capable of delivering substantive justice. In the context of modernity, law is required to be more sensitive to the diversity of values, societal needs, and universal principles of human rights. The reconstruction process includes strengthening philosophical foundations that place human dignity at the center of orientation, developing an interdisciplinary approach that integrates sociological, ethical, political, and technological perspectives, and restructuring law enforcement methods to be more transparent, accountable, and adaptive to changing times. Through this reconstruction, law not only functions to regulate but also plays a role in protecting society from abuse of power, ensuring certainty in social interactions, and encouraging the creation of a more just and humane life. Law becomes an instrument that balances individual and collective interests, strengthens social cohesion, and accommodates cultural and value plurality. Thus, the reconstruction of legal theory is not merely an academic project, but also a civilizational strategy for building a legal system that is inclusive, progressive, and relevant to the dynamics of modern society. This effort is expected to produce a legal order that is responsive, visionary, and capable of serving as the foundation for a just civilization. Abstrak Rekonstruksi teori hukum dalam masyarakat modern menjadi agenda penting untuk menjawab tantangan perubahan sosial yang cepat, penetrasi teknologi digital, serta semakin kompleksnya relasi antara negara, masyarakat, dan individu. Hukum tidak lagi dapat dipertahankan sebagai perangkat normatif yang statis, melainkan harus dipahami sebagai sistem dinamis yang membentuk sekaligus dibentuk oleh realitas sosial. Rekonstruksi ini menekankan perlunya pembaruan paradigma yang menggeser orientasi hukum dari sekadar seperangkat aturan menuju kekuatan transformatif yang mampu menghadirkan keadilan substantif. Dalam konteks modernitas, hukum dituntut untuk lebih sensitif terhadap keragaman nilai, kebutuhan masyarakat, dan prinsip-prinsip universal tentang hak asasi manusia. Proses rekonstruksi mencakup penguatan fondasi filosofis yang menempatkan martabat manusia sebagai pusat orientasi, pengembangan pendekatan interdisipliner yang mengintegrasikan perspektif sosiologi, etika, politik, dan teknologi, serta penataan kembali metode penegakan hukum agar lebih transparan, akuntabel, dan adaptif terhadap perkembangan zaman.Melalui rekonstruksi ini, hukum tidak hanya berfungsi mengatur, tetapi juga berperan melindungi masyarakat dari penyalahgunaan kekuasaan, memastikan kepastian dalam interaksi sosial, serta mendorong terciptanya kehidupan yang lebih adil dan manusiawi. Hukum menjadi instrumen yang menyeimbangkan kepentingan individual dan kolektif, memperkuat kohesi sosial, serta mengakomodasi pluralitas budaya dan nilai. Dengan demikian, rekonstruksi teori hukum tidak sekadar merupakan proyek akademik, tetapi juga strategi peradaban untuk membangun sistem hukum yang inklusif, progresif, dan relevan dengan dinamika masyarakat modern. Upaya ini diharapkan mampu melahirkan tatanan hukum yang responsif, visioner, dan mampu menjadi fondasi bagi peradaban yang berkeadilan