Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pendekatan Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama (Studi Putusan Nomor 445/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS) Afdhalia Mahatta; Muhammad Irfan AD; Elfia Elfia; Zulfan Zulfan
MAHAKIM Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 9 No 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/mahakim.v9i2.587

Abstract

Kajian ini dimaksudkan untuk menelaah keberhasilan pendekatan mediasi sebagai opsi alternatif dalam penyelesaian perselisihan harta bersama (gono-gini) pada Pengadilan Agama, dengan penekanan khusus pada Putusan Nomor 445/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS. Masalah pokok yang diangkat dalam kajian ini adalah seberapa jauh mediasi mampu berfungsi sebagai mekanisme yang adil, efisien, serta berkeadilan bagi pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam sengketa. Kajian ini menerapkan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif serta analitis, melalui studi kasus terhadap putusan pengadilan dan analisis terhadap peraturan Mahkamah Agung mengenai mediasi. Temuan kajian mengindikasikan bahwa mediasi terbukti efektif dalam mengatasi perselisihan harta bersama, sebab mampu merealisasikan lima aspek krusial, yaitu: (1) tercapainya kesepakatan damai yang berprinsip win-win solution; (2) penerapan asas keadilan dan keseimbangan bagi kedua belah pihak; (3) terbangunnya kembali hubungan interpersonal antara pihak yang bersengketa; (4) kepatuhan terhadap hasil kesepakatan yang dituangkan dalam putusan pengadilan; serta (5) efisiensi waktu dan biaya proses penyelesaian. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa mediasi tidak hanya berperan sebagai prosedur formal dalam sistem peradilan agama, tetapi juga sebagai mekanisme keadilan restoratif yang mengedepankan perdamaian, kemaslahatan, dan nilai-nilai humanis dalam penyelesaian sengketa harta bersama.
Efforts to Resolve Waqf Disputes at the Payakumbuh Religious Court Case Number: 159/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pyk Hafizul Mahfuzh; Zulfan Zulfan; Elfia Elfia
Al Mashaadir : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : IAI Ummul Ayman, Meureudu, Pidie Jaya, Aceh, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52029/jis.v6i1.209

Abstract

This study discusses the process of resolving a waqf dispute at the Payakumbuh Religious Court in case No. 159/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pyk, which did not reach an agreement during the mediation stage, resulting in the lawsuit being granted. Mediation, as an important part of dispute resolution in court, aims to resolve disputes and reach a peaceful agreement between the parties. This study uses a normative legal research method. The data used in this study are secondary data, namely the decision in Case No. 159/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Pyk and legislation on waqf. To support the research, the legal materials used in this study are books, journals, and other reference sources. The data analysis used is qualitative legal analysis. The resolution of waqf disputes through mediation has legal implications for the parties, enabling them to obtain a swift decision, incur lower costs, avoid further legal proceedings, and have a decision that accommodates the interests of all parties and ensures they receive their rights fairly.
Penalaran Hukum Hakim Dalam Memberikan Izin Poligami (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi Nomor 575/Pdt.G/2024/Pa.Bkt) Rifan Saputra; Nurus Shalihin; Elfia Elfia; Aulia Rahmat
AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies Vol 7 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : IDRIS Darulfunun Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58764/j.im.2026.7.187

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning employed by judges in granting permission for polygamy in the Decision of the Bukittinggi Religious Court Number 575/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bkt. The research focuses on the judges' interpretation of the legal provisions governing polygamy, their considerations in assessing the first wife's consent, the applicant's financial capability, and personal character, as well as the forms of rechtsvinding (judicial law-finding) and legal reasoning applied in the decision-making process. This research adopts a qualitative approach using a case study design. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with the judge who examined and decided the case, while secondary data were collected from the court decision, statutory regulations, the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam), and relevant scholarly literature. Data were collected through interviews, document analysis, and library research, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and SaldaƱa, which consists of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the judges' legal reasoning was not limited to the literal application of statutory provisions but involved systematic, teleological, and sociological interpretation by considering the facts established during the trial, the principles of justice, public benefit (maslahah), and the protection of wives and children. The first wife's consent was not regarded as the sole basis for granting permission for polygamy but was evaluated alongside the applicant's financial capacity, responsibility, and personal integrity. Financial capability was assessed contextually without applying a fixed income threshold, while the applicant's character was evaluated through evidence concerning moral conduct, responsibility, and social behavior. The study concludes that the judges' reasoning reflects the implementation of rechtsvinding by integrating legal certainty, justice, and expediency to produce decisions that prioritize family protection and substantive justice.