Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Relocation Policy in Indonesia to Achieve Sustainable Community Life: in Review Westi Utami
Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education (June Edition)
Publisher : Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/sjdgge.v10i1.742

Abstract

The occurrence of natural disasters frequently results in the impairment of settlements, thus rendering relocation the optimal course of action. The present study aims to review relocation policies and recovery efforts following the Aceh tsunami, the eruptions of Mount Merapi in Yogyakarta and Mount Sinabung, and the disaster in Central Sulawesi. The research was conducted using a descriptive qualitative approach. The research findings highlight significant challenges in relocation, including the difficulty of securing land that is physically and legally clean and clear. In order to address these issues, land provision was carried out using village land, state land, land with cultivation rights, and the release of production forest areas. The review also indicates that in order to support livelihood sustainability, the government implemented several strategies, including the provision of agricultural land in Sinabung, the utilisation of KRB III land as a livelihood source in Yogyakarta, and the facilitation of new job opportunities for the community. This review underscores that the challenges associated with relocation extend beyond the mere procurement of land and the establishment of settlements, encompassing the imperative of restoring community livelihoods. The findings of this study are expected to provide a foundation for the formulation of appropriate relocation policies in the future, ensuring that communities are safe from disasters and able to live more prosperously.
Social Forestry for Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis Westi Utami
Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan Vol 24, No 2 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro Univer

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jil.24.2.484-496

Abstract

Social forestry can be defined as a strategy for resolving forest tenure conflicts, reducing poverty, and maintaining the sustainability of forest ecosystems/environments. Nevertheless, studies that address the subject of social forestry literature reviews are extremely scarce. This condition has the potential to impede a comprehensive understanding and limit prospects for future social forestry research initiatives. The present study aims to analyse the role of social forestry in achieving social, economic and environmental sustainability. The present study utilised the Scopus database, which encompasses 429 manuscripts, and employed R-Studio and Vosviewer for the purpose of data analysis. The research findings indicate that Forest and Society is the most productive publisher. The three institutions with the highest number of publications are Hasanuddin University, Gadjah Mada University, and Bogor Agricultural University. This analysis demonstrates that Indonesia is the nation with the most prolific number of publications in the domain of social forestry. Social forestry studies have undergone substantial development. In the 2000s, the majority of studies were related to the sub-themes of deforestation, biomass, and participation. Concurrently, in 2010, the study sub-themes exhibited a stronger correlation with livelihoods and community forestry. In the 2020s, the focus shifted towards conservation, climate change, and sustainable forest management. The implementation of social forestry is encumbered by a number of challenges and problems. In certain regions, the implementation of social forestry initiatives has successfully addressed tenurial conflicts, thereby ensuring legal clarity with respect to land tenure. Nevertheless, the implementation of this policy has not yet resulted in significant improvements to people's lives or achieved environmental sustainability, including in terms of forest ecosystems. It is evident that inadequate mentoring, inadequate funding, limited community participation, and limited structured monitoring and evaluation of social forestry policies have collectively impeded this policy from achieving the desired levels of social, economic, and environmental sustainability.
Co-Authors Abdul Muzil Ahmad Haris Hadi Ahmad Haris Hadi Aji, Kuna Andari, Dwi Titik Wulan Anggi Widyastuti Annisa Nur Aisyah Ardhi Arnanto Arfiana, Mariska Widya Arga Yugan Ndaru Arif Sudarto Ayu Wahyuningtyas Aziz Arisanto Baskara Suprojo Berlian Imani Putri Bunga Mareta Dwijananti Catur Sugiyanto D. Tantja, Nurul Azmy Danang Dwi Wijayanto Deny Andriawan Dewi, Asih Retno Diah Retno Wulan Dian Aries Mujiburohman Dian Pranata Tampubolon Diffa Alifia Nabila Dihien Nurcahyanto Dwi Wulan Pujiriyani Dyah Rahmawati Hizbaron Eko Budi Wahyono Eni Susanti Estuning Tyas Wulan Mei Fajar Buyung Permadi Fajar Buyung Permadi Fajar Buyung Permadi Febsy Niandyti Feris Adisca Nugraha Fitria Nur Faizah Ekawati Fuadina , Lutfia Nursetya I Gede Kusuma Artika I Gede Kusuma Artika I Made Alit Swardiana Iswari Nur Hidayati Kholfa Anisa Kistie Lendra Octora Kusmiarto, Kusmiarto Lestari, Novita Dian Lutfia Nursetya Fuadina Luthfi Adela Saraswati M. Nazir Salim Made Yuda Indrawan Marini . Maryono Dwi Saputra Millennia Duta Ramadhana Muhamad Afiq Mujiati Mujiati Mujiati Mujiati Noorhadi Rahardjo Nugraha, Feris Adisca R. Deden Dani Saleh Rahardjo , Noorhadi Rahman, Azimur Rohmat Junarto Rosye C. Vilanova Sarjita, Sarjita Slamet Muryono Sudibyanung Sudibyanung Sukmo Pinuji Sutaryono Tatag Bagus Narendra Taufik Nur Rokhman Trisnanti Widi Rineksi Try Saut Martua Siahaan Wasyilatul Jannah Weni Yolanda Ratnasari Wijayanti, Tri Ida Wulansari, Harvini Yendi Sufyandi Yuli Ardianto Wibowo Yuli Ardianto Wibowo Yuli Ardianto Wibowo