Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

The Legal Substance of Normative Ambiguity in Corporate Criminal Liability for Corruption Mochamad Ananda Wyman Wahid; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/prosemnasipi.v1i2.60

Abstract

The corporate criminal culpability concept is point by point in Article 20, passage (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Annihilation of Debasement, as revised by Law Number 20 in 2001. Concurring to this article, on the off chance that a enterprise locks in in debasement, both the organization and/or its administration can confront criminal charges. The term "and" implies a cumulative approach, holding both the corporation and its management accountable simultaneously, whereas "or" implies an alternate method, holding either the corporation or its management answerable. The usage of "can" generates ambiguity because its application is dependent on the interpretation of prosecutors and judges. Authoritative, conceptual, and case think about techniques were utilized to conduct the investigate. The information infer that Article 20, passage (1) of the PTPK Law is subject to numerous elucidations, coming about in regulating equivocalness. This is aggravated by the absence of precise standards for determining criminal responsibility for either the organization, its management, or both. This leads to conflicting legal applications by judges, resulting in legal confusion. Hence, it is required to reexamine the corporate risk demonstrate for debasement charges beneath Article 20, passage (1) of the PTPK Law.
Strengthening Commercial Court Judges’ Knowledge in Handling Patent Claim Disputes: A Comparison Between Japan and Indonesia. Sulistyono, Joko; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi; Katagiri, Kazuaki
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.320

Abstract

This study aims to identify the substantive challenges that Commercial Court judges face when making decisions in patent claim disputes within the Indonesian Commercial Courts. These difficulties arise from the close link between patent claims and novel technological inventions. In Indonesia, However, the performance of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms for patent disputes has been underwhelming, and they do not appear poised to become the primary resolution approach. The research primarily relies on a literature review, but also includes interviews with Commercial Court judges in Central Jakarta, and Japanese Judges in Japan IP Court, and patent Examiner in Japan Patent Office, to confirm the findings. From this study, Japan's system, which involves Court Researchers and an Expert Committee, has been found to provide judges with greater confidence and expertise in handling patent disputes. The Japanese model incorporates technical experts who assist the court in understanding the complexities of patent claims and novel technological inventions, which helps the judges make more informed decisions. This paper will explore the key features of the Japanese patent litigation system and examine how they could be adapted to address the challenges faced by the Indonesian Commercial Courts.
Optimizing the use of Digital Forensics and Information Technology in Proving Criminal Acts of Electronic Document Forgery in Indonesia Edwin Setiawan; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i2.587

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has significantly changed cybercrime, especially electronic document forgery. This re-search examines the utilization of digital forensics and information technology in proving the crime of electronic document forgery in In-donesia through a normative legal research approach. The research uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the ef-fectiveness of digital forensic methods in uncovering electronic crimes based on certain evaluation criteria including technical feasibility, legal acceptability, and procedural compliance with Indonesian law. The findings show that digital forensics has an important role in in-vestigating electronic document forgery, but faces complex implementation challenges. Key barriers include limited human resources, with only 147 certified digital forensics experts in Indonesia according to verified 2023 data from the Indonesian Digital Forensics Association (AFDI), and legal regulations that have not fully accommodated the evolving digital technology landscape. The research identifies signifi-cant technical barriers, such as the complexity of forensic technology, the volatility of digital evidence, and the rapid advancement of cyber-crime techniques. Through an examination of recent case studies including the Tokopedia data breach of 2023 and the Jakarta Administra-tive Court electronic document forgery case of 2022, this research demonstrates the practical application of digital forensics in Indonesian courts. The research proposes a balanced approach that fulfills both evidentiary and human rights protection requirements in digital inves-tigations. Strategic recommendations include strengthening the capacity of forensic laboratories, harmonizing legal regulations, and im-proving the competence of human resources in technology and law. This research contributes to the conceptual framework of cyber law enforcement by offering a comprehensive perspective on the evidentiary challenges of e-crime in the digital age.
Harmonization of Artificial Intelligence (Ai) in Indonesia: Exploration of Technology And Ethics in Islam Mufidah, Mufidah; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Isharyanto, Isharyanto
Law and Justice Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Law and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/laj.v9i1.5190

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries that agrees that AI (Artificial Intelligence) has a positive influence on human life.The presence of AI (Artificial Intelligence) as a form of technological progress simultaneously also raises various ethical challenges such as issues of privacy, justice, uneven social impacts and even ignoring the decline in moral values. Therefore, in this article we will explore how AI (Artificial Intelligence) can influence human dignity and freedom, then also how technology can influence human relationships with the universe and its creator which is developed through a regulatory framework that takes into account religious ethical values ​​in the Islamic view so that they have a guide to the use of AI (Artificial Intelligence). This research is normative legal research, the author uses three approaches which include: (a) philosophical approach, (b) statutory approach, (c) conceptual approach. . The primary data for this research are: (1) Primary legal materials consisting of: the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, ITE Law no. 11 of 2008 along with government regulation no. 71 of 2019 concerning PSTE as well as the Koran, Hadith and Ijtihad (2) Secondary legal materials consisting of: books, legal journals, expert opinions. The results of this research show two things, namely: (1) The blurring of privacy protection due to the application of AI systems in various aspects of life so that AI artificial intelligence accompanied by technological advances needs to be evaluated. (2) There must also be someone who ensures the security of the system, and establishes an appropriate responsibility framework.   Indonesia adalah salah satu negara yang percaya bahwa AI (artificial intelligence/kecerdasan buatan) dapat meningkatkan kehidupan manusia. Sebagai salah satu bentuk kemajuan teknologi, AI memunculkan dilema etika seperti privasi, keadilan, dampak sosial yang tidak merata, dan mengabaikan kemerosotan moral. Artikel ini akan mengkaji bagaimana AI dapat mempengaruhi martabat dan kebebasan manusia, serta bagaimana teknologi dapat mempengaruhi hubungan manusia dengan alam semesta dan Tuhan, yang dikembangkan melalui kerangka peraturan yang mempertimbangkan nilai-nilai etika agama Islam untuk memandu penggunaan AI. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, penulis menggunakan tiga pendekatan yang meliputi: (a) pendekatan filosofis, (b) pendekatan perundang-undangan, (c) pendekatan konseptual. Data dalam, penelitian ini terdiri: (1) Bahan hukum primer yang terdiri dari: Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Undang-Undang ITE No. 11 Tahun 2008 beserta Peraturan Pemerintah No. 71 Tahun 2019 tentang PSTE serta Al-Qur'an, Hadist dan Ijtihad (2) Bahan hukum sekunder yang terdiri dari: buku-buku, jurnal-jurnal hukum, pendapat para ahli. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin kaburnya perlindungan privasi akibat penggunaan sistem AI di berbagai sektor kehidupan mengharuskan adanya tinjauan ulang terhadap AI, dan kemajuan teknologi.  
Pemanfaatan Digital Forensik dan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Proses Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Elektronik Edwin Setiawan; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v1i2.39

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has brought significant changes, particularly in the area of cybercrime, such as electronic document forgery. This research explores the role of digital forensics and information technology in proving electronic document forgery crimes in Indonesia, using a normative legal research approach. The study employs both a statute approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the effectiveness of digital forensics in uncovering electronic crimes. The findings show that while digital forensics plays a crucial role in investigating electronic document forgery, there are several complex challenges in its implementation. One of the major obstacles is the limited number of certified digital forensic experts in Indonesia, with only 147 professionals qualified in this field. Additionally, the existing legal regulations have not kept pace with the rapid advancements in digital technology, which poses significant challenges to enforcement efforts. The study identifies various technical barriers, such as the complexity of forensic technologies, the volatile nature of digital evidence, and the ever-evolving techniques used by cybercriminals. These factors complicate the process of proving electronic crimes and pose difficulties for investigators. In response to these challenges, the research recommends strategic measures such as strengthening the capacity of forensic laboratories, harmonizing legal regulations with technological advancements, and improving the competency of human resources in both technological and legal fields. The study contributes to the development of a conceptual framework for cyber law enforcement, providing a comprehensive perspective on the challenges faced in proving electronic crimes in the digital age. The research aims to inform policymakers in crafting more effective and adaptive law enforcement strategies.
The Sustainable Peace Towards Legal Deradicalization Reform Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v3i2.115

Abstract

Indonesia’s national stability and long-term development face serious threats from terrorism and radicalism. Despite introducing anti-terrorism laws and deradicalization programs, efforts mostly rely on repressive strategies. They often fail to address the ideological roots of the problem. This research aims to assess the need for reforming deradicalization policies within a framework of sustainable peace. Such a framework emphasizes the balance between security, social justice, and human rights. Using a juridical-normative and comparative policy approach, the research looks at Indonesia and Malaysia. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s deradicalization efforts are fragmented, lack inter-agency coordination, and lack a comprehensive, multidimensional foundation. In contrast, Malaysia offers a more cohesive model, characterized by institutional synergy and moderate religious education, achieved through partnerships with Islamic authorities. These findings underscore Indonesia’s need for reforms in deradicalization. Such reforms should integrate structural and psychological interventions, enhance institutional accountability, promote cross-sector collaboration, and encourage public engagement. Achieving sustainable peace against evolving radical threats requires human-centered, law-based approaches to promote long-term resilience and inclusivity.
The Rights of Victims of Environmental Crimes in Indonesia: Challenges for Legal Reform Tarigan, Fransisco; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad; Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur; Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno
Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice
Publisher : Ius et Ambientis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62264/jlej.v3i2.130

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia pose significant risks to both the ecosystem and human welfare. Notwithstanding established legal frameworks, the rights of victims of these offences frequently remain insufficiently addressed. This essay analyzes the current state of victim rights regarding environmental crimes in Indonesia, emphasizing the challenges in their enforcement and suggesting pathways for legal reform. Utilising a green victimology framework, it examines the legislative stipulations for victim compensation, restitution, and rehabilitation, juxtaposing them with international benchmarks. This study employs a normative juridical methodology, complemented by case study analysis and an examination of current regulatory instruments, to identify various structural deficiencies, including normative gaps, ineffective law enforcement mechanisms, and the absence of formal procedures for compensation and substantial victim involvement in legal proceedings. The research identifies key obstacles, including insufficient law enforcement, challenges in establishing causation and quantifying damages, restricted access to justice for marginalized groups, corporate influence, and inadequate support systems for victims. The essay ultimately presents policy proposals aimed at strengthening the legislative framework, enhancing enforcement capabilities, advocating for restorative justice, increasing access to justice, and fostering community empowerment to achieve more sustainable environmental justice in Indonesia.
Rethinking Subsidiary in Corruption Cases: Indonesian Experiences Nugroho, Fendi; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.714

Abstract

The imposition of additional penalties in the form of restitution in corruption cases in Indonesia continues to reveal significant conceptual and practical weaknesses. A primary issue is the tendency of convicted individuals to opt for subsidiary imprisonment rather than paying restitution, which undermines the effective recovery of state financial losses. Furthermore, inconsistencies in interpretation between prosecutors and judges, weak asset tracing mechanisms, and ambiguities in existing regulations exacerbate the problem. This study examines the legal significance of restitution in corruption cases, identifies the shortcomings in its current implementation, and proposes a ius constituendum model to reconstruct the restitution system to enhance substantive justice and improve state financial recovery. The research employs a normative juridical method, combining statutory analysis, doctrinal review, and case studies, complemented by a comparative study of legal frameworks in the United States and the United Kingdom to highlight gaps in Indonesia’s asset recovery mechanisms. The findings indicate that first, current regulations fail to provide adequate deterrence; second, there is insufficient alignment between state interests and the rights of convicts; and third, existing mechanisms for asset tracing and execution are ineffective. Accordingly, this study recommends legal reconstruction through strengthening the prosecutorial role in execution, ensuring consistency between prosecution demands and judicial decisions, and incorporating the time value of money in determining restitution amounts.
THE WESTERN LEGAL SYSTEM IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL LAW REFORM: A GLOBALIZATION AND LEGAL POLITICS PERSPECTIVE Santoso, Bambang; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i2.30488

Abstract

In the field of law, the influence of globalization is reflected in the legal politics of procedural law reform, which is currently still in the form of legislation draft. This study aims to analyze the influence of globalization on the reform of Indonesian criminal procedural law in relation to national legal politics. This research is normative legal research, which focuses on studying library materials. Based on the results of a comprehensive study is known, the Draft Criminal Procedure Code includes a new system originating from the western legal system such as adversary system in court trial. Adopting the adversary system into the Draft Criminal Procedure Code is a very revolutionary legal political reform of the criminal procedural law. Various challenges will be faced along with the adoption of the new legal system.  Changes in the legal culture of law bearers is also a key variable in the success or failure of a western legal system implementation. Although the concept of the Criminal Procedure Code is colored by the western legal system, it does not conflict with national legal politics because it reflects universal legal principles, namely equality.
The Price of Corruption on State Losses Policy Rahmadi, Aji; Karjoko, Lego; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14813

Abstract

Legal instruments and law enforcement agencies have actively pursued efforts to eradicate corruption; however, empirical evidence indicates that the recovery of state financial losses remains disproportionate to the magnitude of economic harm incurred. This study seeks to reformulate the concept of state economic loss in corruption cases to establish a legal framework that is fairer, proportionate, and grounded in legal certainty. The research uses a normative juridical method, analyzing secondary data through three distinct approaches: the statutory approach, which examines the consistency of legal norms; the conceptual approach, which investigates relevant doctrines and theoretical frameworks; and the case study approach, which identifies judicial practices and jurisprudence relevant to the topic. The findings reveal two principal insights. First, the application of the economic loss element in state corruption cases encounters significant challenges, including ambiguous interpretations, the absence of clear normative boundaries, reliance on potential rather than actual loss calculations, and the lack of a standardized methodology. Second, reformulating this element is necessary by clarifying its normative definition, incorporating actual losses, recognizing systemic impacts, and standardizing the methodology for calculating losses. This reformulation enhances the quality of evidence, reduces disparities in legal interpretation, and promotes harmonization across laws and regulations. Moreover, this policy framework is expected to improve coordination among law enforcement agencies, strengthen public trust, and ultimately foster a more effective, transparent, and corruption-free governance environment.