Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.16
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah QIJIS (Qudus International Journal Of Islamic Studies) Pembaharuan Hukum The 2nd Proceeding Indonesia Clean of Corruption in 2020" Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) JHCLS JURNAL DISCRETIE Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Law and Justice Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum
Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Corporate Liability of Airline Service Business Actors in Indonesia: An Islamic Law Perspective Hartono, Teguh; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Suwadi, Pujiono
Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v40i2.36986

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of the corporate liability arrangements of airline service business actors for consumer protection in the perspective of Islamic law in Indonesia. Legal research in the form of prescriptive, with statutory, case, conceptual and comparative approach. Comparative legal studies were conducted with Malaysia, Singapore and Australia supported by the theory of maqashid shariah, welfare state theory and justice theory. The research shows that; First, there are weaknesses in the regulation of liability of business actors in the Consumer Protection Law and the Aviation Law, which have not been able to reach the liability. Beside that, it is not fulfilled the principle of Al-adl because of justice, balance, and equality that describe the horizontal dimension. Second, there is prescription for future arrangements in the corporate liability of airline business actors in the perspective of Islamic law. The position of consumers and business actors should be equal based on the maqashid shariah. Aviation Service Business Actors must be responsible for consumer losses whose rights are violated as regulated in the Qur'an and Hadith. Based on the principle of Al-adl in maqashid shariah, it is necessary to reconstruct the regulation of aviation law and consumer protection law.
Islamic Law and the Blasphemy Debate in Contemporary Indonesia Mufidah, Mufidah; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Isharyanto, Isharyanto; Wardi, Musa
AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Vol 24, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v24i2.41287

Abstract

Blasphemy is a sensitive and complex issue in Indonesia, the largest Muslim-majority country in the world. This article examines the regulation of blasphemy, which often clashes with Indonesia's social, cultural, and political dynamics. It evaluates the reconstruction of blasphemy laws through the lens of maqāṣid al-‘uqūbāt in Islamic law. The study concludes that reconstructing the blasphemy law is necessary as part of legal reform that aligns with Indonesia's constitutional principles of the rule of law and democracy. This reconstruction should integrate Islamic legal principles based on maqāṣid al-‘uqūbāt in several key areas, including defining the legal subjects of blasphemy, providing clarification as part of the resolution process by considering shubhāt and al-dan ta'wīl, and developing mechanisms for resolving blasphemy cases. The urgency for reform arises from several critical factors: the ambiguous formulation of blasphemy norms, which significantly impacts court decisions; the absence of consistent justice-based law enforcement mechanisms; disparate treatment toward certain groups; and the tendency to generalize blasphemy cases as criminal acts due to a lack of alternative measures. These issues reflect legal uncertainty and the potential misuse of blasphemy laws for political purposes.AbstrakPenistaan agama merupakan isu yang sensitif dan kompleks di Indonesia, negara berpenduduk mayoritas Muslim terbesar di dunia. Artikel ini mengkaji pengaturan penodaan agama yang sering kali berbenturan dengan dinamika sosial, budaya, dan politik di Indonesia. Artikel ini mengevaluasi rekonstruksi hukum penodaan agama melalui lensa maqāṣid al-'uqūbāt dalam hukum Islam. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa rekonstruksi undang-undang penodaan agama diperlukan sebagai bagian dari reformasi hukum yang selaras dengan prinsip-prinsip konstitusional Indonesia tentang negara hukum dan demokrasi. Rekonstruksi ini harus mengintegrasikan prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam berdasarkan maqāṣid al-'uqūbāt di beberapa bidang utama, termasuk mendefinisikan subjek hukum penodaan agama, memberikan klarifikasi sebagai bagian dari proses penyelesaian dengan mempertimbangkan syubhat dan al-ta'wīl, dan mengembangkan mekanisme penyelesaian kasus penodaan agama. Urgensi reformasi muncul dari beberapa faktor kritis: rumusan norma penodaan agama yang ambigu, yang secara signifikan berdampak pada putusan pengadilan; ketiadaan mekanisme penegakan hukum yang berbasis keadilan yang konsisten; perlakuan yang tidak adil terhadap kelompok-kelompok tertentu; dan kecenderungan untuk menggeneralisasi kasus-kasus penodaan agama sebagai tindakan kriminal karena kurangnya upaya-upaya alternatif. Isu-isu ini mencerminkan ketidakpastian hukum dan potensi penyalahgunaan undang-undang penodaan agama untuk tujuan politik.
The Legal Substance of Normative Ambiguity in Corporate Criminal Liability for Corruption Mochamad Ananda Wyman Wahid; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/prosemnasipi.v1i2.60

Abstract

The corporate criminal culpability concept is point by point in Article 20, passage (1) of Law Number 31 of 1999 on the Annihilation of Debasement, as revised by Law Number 20 in 2001. Concurring to this article, on the off chance that a enterprise locks in in debasement, both the organization and/or its administration can confront criminal charges. The term "and" implies a cumulative approach, holding both the corporation and its management accountable simultaneously, whereas "or" implies an alternate method, holding either the corporation or its management answerable. The usage of "can" generates ambiguity because its application is dependent on the interpretation of prosecutors and judges. Authoritative, conceptual, and case think about techniques were utilized to conduct the investigate. The information infer that Article 20, passage (1) of the PTPK Law is subject to numerous elucidations, coming about in regulating equivocalness. This is aggravated by the absence of precise standards for determining criminal responsibility for either the organization, its management, or both. This leads to conflicting legal applications by judges, resulting in legal confusion. Hence, it is required to reexamine the corporate risk demonstrate for debasement charges beneath Article 20, passage (1) of the PTPK Law.
Strengthening Commercial Court Judges’ Knowledge in Handling Patent Claim Disputes: A Comparison Between Japan and Indonesia. Sulistyono, Joko; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi; Katagiri, Kazuaki
Susbtantive Justice International Journal of Law Vol 8 No 1 (2025): Substantive Justice International Journal of Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/substantivejustice.v8i1.320

Abstract

This study aims to identify the substantive challenges that Commercial Court judges face when making decisions in patent claim disputes within the Indonesian Commercial Courts. These difficulties arise from the close link between patent claims and novel technological inventions. In Indonesia, However, the performance of Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanisms for patent disputes has been underwhelming, and they do not appear poised to become the primary resolution approach. The research primarily relies on a literature review, but also includes interviews with Commercial Court judges in Central Jakarta, and Japanese Judges in Japan IP Court, and patent Examiner in Japan Patent Office, to confirm the findings. From this study, Japan's system, which involves Court Researchers and an Expert Committee, has been found to provide judges with greater confidence and expertise in handling patent disputes. The Japanese model incorporates technical experts who assist the court in understanding the complexities of patent claims and novel technological inventions, which helps the judges make more informed decisions. This paper will explore the key features of the Japanese patent litigation system and examine how they could be adapted to address the challenges faced by the Indonesian Commercial Courts.
Optimizing the use of Digital Forensics and Information Technology in Proving Criminal Acts of Electronic Document Forgery in Indonesia Edwin Setiawan; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i2.587

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has significantly changed cybercrime, especially electronic document forgery. This re-search examines the utilization of digital forensics and information technology in proving the crime of electronic document forgery in In-donesia through a normative legal research approach. The research uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the ef-fectiveness of digital forensic methods in uncovering electronic crimes based on certain evaluation criteria including technical feasibility, legal acceptability, and procedural compliance with Indonesian law. The findings show that digital forensics has an important role in in-vestigating electronic document forgery, but faces complex implementation challenges. Key barriers include limited human resources, with only 147 certified digital forensics experts in Indonesia according to verified 2023 data from the Indonesian Digital Forensics Association (AFDI), and legal regulations that have not fully accommodated the evolving digital technology landscape. The research identifies signifi-cant technical barriers, such as the complexity of forensic technology, the volatility of digital evidence, and the rapid advancement of cyber-crime techniques. Through an examination of recent case studies including the Tokopedia data breach of 2023 and the Jakarta Administra-tive Court electronic document forgery case of 2022, this research demonstrates the practical application of digital forensics in Indonesian courts. The research proposes a balanced approach that fulfills both evidentiary and human rights protection requirements in digital inves-tigations. Strategic recommendations include strengthening the capacity of forensic laboratories, harmonizing legal regulations, and im-proving the competence of human resources in technology and law. This research contributes to the conceptual framework of cyber law enforcement by offering a comprehensive perspective on the evidentiary challenges of e-crime in the digital age.
Harmonization of Artificial Intelligence (Ai) in Indonesia: Exploration of Technology And Ethics in Islam Mufidah, Mufidah; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Isharyanto, Isharyanto
Law and Justice Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Law and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/laj.v9i1.5190

Abstract

Indonesia is one of the countries that agrees that AI (Artificial Intelligence) has a positive influence on human life.The presence of AI (Artificial Intelligence) as a form of technological progress simultaneously also raises various ethical challenges such as issues of privacy, justice, uneven social impacts and even ignoring the decline in moral values. Therefore, in this article we will explore how AI (Artificial Intelligence) can influence human dignity and freedom, then also how technology can influence human relationships with the universe and its creator which is developed through a regulatory framework that takes into account religious ethical values ​​in the Islamic view so that they have a guide to the use of AI (Artificial Intelligence). This research is normative legal research, the author uses three approaches which include: (a) philosophical approach, (b) statutory approach, (c) conceptual approach. . The primary data for this research are: (1) Primary legal materials consisting of: the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, ITE Law no. 11 of 2008 along with government regulation no. 71 of 2019 concerning PSTE as well as the Koran, Hadith and Ijtihad (2) Secondary legal materials consisting of: books, legal journals, expert opinions. The results of this research show two things, namely: (1) The blurring of privacy protection due to the application of AI systems in various aspects of life so that AI artificial intelligence accompanied by technological advances needs to be evaluated. (2) There must also be someone who ensures the security of the system, and establishes an appropriate responsibility framework.   Indonesia adalah salah satu negara yang percaya bahwa AI (artificial intelligence/kecerdasan buatan) dapat meningkatkan kehidupan manusia. Sebagai salah satu bentuk kemajuan teknologi, AI memunculkan dilema etika seperti privasi, keadilan, dampak sosial yang tidak merata, dan mengabaikan kemerosotan moral. Artikel ini akan mengkaji bagaimana AI dapat mempengaruhi martabat dan kebebasan manusia, serta bagaimana teknologi dapat mempengaruhi hubungan manusia dengan alam semesta dan Tuhan, yang dikembangkan melalui kerangka peraturan yang mempertimbangkan nilai-nilai etika agama Islam untuk memandu penggunaan AI. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif, penulis menggunakan tiga pendekatan yang meliputi: (a) pendekatan filosofis, (b) pendekatan perundang-undangan, (c) pendekatan konseptual. Data dalam, penelitian ini terdiri: (1) Bahan hukum primer yang terdiri dari: Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Undang-Undang ITE No. 11 Tahun 2008 beserta Peraturan Pemerintah No. 71 Tahun 2019 tentang PSTE serta Al-Qur'an, Hadist dan Ijtihad (2) Bahan hukum sekunder yang terdiri dari: buku-buku, jurnal-jurnal hukum, pendapat para ahli. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin kaburnya perlindungan privasi akibat penggunaan sistem AI di berbagai sektor kehidupan mengharuskan adanya tinjauan ulang terhadap AI, dan kemajuan teknologi.  
Pemanfaatan Digital Forensik dan Teknologi Informasi Dalam Proses Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Elektronik Edwin Setiawan; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum,
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/prosemnashuk.v1i2.39

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has brought significant changes, particularly in the area of cybercrime, such as electronic document forgery. This research explores the role of digital forensics and information technology in proving electronic document forgery crimes in Indonesia, using a normative legal research approach. The study employs both a statute approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the effectiveness of digital forensics in uncovering electronic crimes. The findings show that while digital forensics plays a crucial role in investigating electronic document forgery, there are several complex challenges in its implementation. One of the major obstacles is the limited number of certified digital forensic experts in Indonesia, with only 147 professionals qualified in this field. Additionally, the existing legal regulations have not kept pace with the rapid advancements in digital technology, which poses significant challenges to enforcement efforts. The study identifies various technical barriers, such as the complexity of forensic technologies, the volatile nature of digital evidence, and the ever-evolving techniques used by cybercriminals. These factors complicate the process of proving electronic crimes and pose difficulties for investigators. In response to these challenges, the research recommends strategic measures such as strengthening the capacity of forensic laboratories, harmonizing legal regulations with technological advancements, and improving the competency of human resources in both technological and legal fields. The study contributes to the development of a conceptual framework for cyber law enforcement, providing a comprehensive perspective on the challenges faced in proving electronic crimes in the digital age. The research aims to inform policymakers in crafting more effective and adaptive law enforcement strategies.
The Sustainable Peace Towards Legal Deradicalization Reform Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues (JSDERI) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jsderi.v3i2.115

Abstract

Indonesia’s national stability and long-term development face serious threats from terrorism and radicalism. Despite introducing anti-terrorism laws and deradicalization programs, efforts mostly rely on repressive strategies. They often fail to address the ideological roots of the problem. This research aims to assess the need for reforming deradicalization policies within a framework of sustainable peace. Such a framework emphasizes the balance between security, social justice, and human rights. Using a juridical-normative and comparative policy approach, the research looks at Indonesia and Malaysia. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s deradicalization efforts are fragmented, lack inter-agency coordination, and lack a comprehensive, multidimensional foundation. In contrast, Malaysia offers a more cohesive model, characterized by institutional synergy and moderate religious education, achieved through partnerships with Islamic authorities. These findings underscore Indonesia’s need for reforms in deradicalization. Such reforms should integrate structural and psychological interventions, enhance institutional accountability, promote cross-sector collaboration, and encourage public engagement. Achieving sustainable peace against evolving radical threats requires human-centered, law-based approaches to promote long-term resilience and inclusivity.
Implementasi Peraturan Presiden (PERPRES) No. 22 Tahun 2017 Tentang Rencana Umum Energi Nasional (RUEN) Najicha, Fatma Ulfatun; Manumayoso, Bambang; Waluyo, Waluyo; Adi, Elizabeth Ayu Puspita; Permatasari, Wulan; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/hqpd7f91

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis implementasi Peraturan Presiden No. 22 Tahun 2017 tentang Rencana Umum Energi Nasional (RUEN) sebagai kebijakan strategis untuk mencapai ketahanan energi dan mempromosikan energi terbarukan. RUEN menetapkan target ambisius meningkatkan porsi energi terbarukan dalam bauran energi nasional hingga 23% pada tahun 2025. Melalui analisis komprehensif, penelitian ini mengevaluasi efektivitas implementasi kebijakan, mengidentifikasi tantangan yang dihadapi, dan memberikan rekomendasi strategis. Tantangan utama meliputi keterbatasan infrastruktur, resistensi industri energi konvensional, kompleksitas regulasi, dan ketergantungan tinggi terhadap bahan bakar fosil. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa meskipun RUEN memberikan kerangka kerja yang jelas, implementasinya memerlukan strategi yang lebih efektif dan koordinasi antar sektor untuk mencapai target. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada upaya Indonesia mewujudkan ketahanan energi berkelanjutan dan ramah lingkungan.
The Rights of Victims of Environmental Crimes in Indonesia: Challenges for Legal Reform Tarigan, Fransisco; Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih; Rustamaji, Muhammad; Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur; Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno
Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice
Publisher : Ius et Ambientis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62264/jlej.v3i2.130

Abstract

Environmental crimes in Indonesia pose significant risks to both the ecosystem and human welfare. Notwithstanding established legal frameworks, the rights of victims of these offences frequently remain insufficiently addressed. This essay analyzes the current state of victim rights regarding environmental crimes in Indonesia, emphasizing the challenges in their enforcement and suggesting pathways for legal reform. Utilising a green victimology framework, it examines the legislative stipulations for victim compensation, restitution, and rehabilitation, juxtaposing them with international benchmarks. This study employs a normative juridical methodology, complemented by case study analysis and an examination of current regulatory instruments, to identify various structural deficiencies, including normative gaps, ineffective law enforcement mechanisms, and the absence of formal procedures for compensation and substantial victim involvement in legal proceedings. The research identifies key obstacles, including insufficient law enforcement, challenges in establishing causation and quantifying damages, restricted access to justice for marginalized groups, corporate influence, and inadequate support systems for victims. The essay ultimately presents policy proposals aimed at strengthening the legislative framework, enhancing enforcement capabilities, advocating for restorative justice, increasing access to justice, and fostering community empowerment to achieve more sustainable environmental justice in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Adi Kusuma, Hanif Adi, Elizabeth Ayu Puspita Aminuyati Andri Winjaya Laksana, Andri Winjaya Anis Mashdurohatun Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur Bambang Santoso Budi Setyanto Danendra, Ravi Dian Esti Pratiwi Diana Lukitasari, Diana Dyah Kusumawati, Erna Edwin Setiawan Fendi Nugroho Ginting, R. Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno Hari Purwadi, Hari Hartono, Teguh I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Isharyanto Isharyanto Katagiri, Kazuaki Manumayoso, Bambang Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad Mochamad Ananda Wyman Wahid Mufidah Mufidah Muhammad Nur Muhammad Rustamaji Najicha, Fatma Ulfatun Padmarini, Maria Rosa Lunetta Parwitasari, Tika Andarasni  Permatasari, Wulan Pramidazzura Alifa Rifqi R Ginting Rachmawaty Rachmawaty, Rachmawaty Raya, Bella Cinu Riska Andi Fitriono Subekti Subekti Subekti Subekti Sulistyanta Sulistyanta SULISTYONO, JOKO Supanto Supanto Suwadi, Pujiono Tarigan, Fransisco Torodji, Rais Waluyo Waluyo Wardi, Musa Winarno Budyatmojo