Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.607
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Prosiding PESAT Jurnal Mentari Toleransi: Media Ilmiah komunikasi Umat Beragama Menara Ilmu Jurnal Rekayasa, Teknologi, dan Sains Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Menara Pengabdian Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory
Khairiyah Khairiyah
Jurusan Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Gunadarma
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisis Normatif Pengabulan Isbat Nikah Tanpa Kemaslahatan Mendesak: Tinjauan Maqashid Al-Ghazali dan Teori Tujuan Hukum Radbruch Khairiyah, Khairiyah; Nasaruddin, Nasaruddin; Jumat, Gani
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/7q6cqe27

Abstract

This study examines the Decision of the Palu Religious Court Class IA Number 199/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Pal, which granted an application for isbat nikah (marriage legalization) despite the fact that Applicant II was only 16 years and 7 months old at the time the marriage took place—far below the minimum age limit of 19 years as stipulated in Law Number 16 of 2019—without explicit elaboration regarding urgent public benefit (kemaslahatan mendesak) in the legal reasoning. Using an empirical juridical approach with a qualitative method, data were collected through in-depth interviews with two informants and document analysis of the court decision. The analysis employed two theoretical frameworks: Al-Ghazali’s theory of maslahah and Radbruch’s theory of the objectives of law. The findings reveal three normative failures in the judges’ legal reasoning: negligence in age verification resulting in three different age data versions within a single decision; disregard for the hierarchy of norms, where Law Number 16 of 2019 was not mentioned even once; and the absence of an assessment of urgent public benefit as the material threshold for isbat nikah. From the perspective of Al-Ghazali’s maqashid, three of the five essential objectives of sharia at the dharuriyyah level were not fulfilled. From the perspective of Radbruch’s theory, the decision suffers deficits in all three fundamental legal values: justice, utility, and legal certainty. This study concludes that Islamic law and Indonesian positive law are not contradictory but rather complementary in their shared orientation toward protecting vulnerable parties.
Co-Authors Didi Rahmadi Dwi Putri, Tesha Elni Yakub Fitriyani Fitriyani Hadiansyah, Yudi Herliani, Yulia Hidayat, Robi Indah yandri, Lara Jumat, Gani Kusteja, Nadya Fauzia Madinah, Nuril Mahdum Mardes, Siska Mariah, Kiki Masduki Masduki Miftahul Jannah Nasaruddin Nasaruddin Nur Syaima Annisa, Nur Syaima Oktary, Dian Putri, Tesha Dwi Rahma Dewi Riko Riyanda, Riko Ruslan Ruslan Sairazi, Abdul Hafiz Saputri, Dika Idha Sufyan, Muhammad Arif Ulfah, Putri Rahmaida Yandri, Lara Indah