Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pro-Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya Lailam, Tanto
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 4 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (484.586 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1247

Abstract

The Pro’s – Con’s of the Constitutional Court in the review of law in a regulated of the authority, since, it was a conflicting of procedural principles between “ius curia novit” with “nemo judex idoneus in propria causa”. Morever, the background by implication of Constitutional Court decisions, sometimes Constitutional Court making a “rule breaking”,  for examples: nullify of some of law if had reduction of  the authority, addition of constitutional authority to review of law before the 1945 Constitution amendment, additional authority to review of Government Regulation in lieu of law, and used non-constitution as a standard in the formal review, and others. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court also sometimes to choose a   legal logic doesn’t precise and anti-accountability principle. The Conflicts of the procedural principles can  be  resolved  by  understanding  philosophy  of  purposes of law (justice value, legal certainly, utility principle), so that, the Court will have been prioritizing to “ius curia novit” principle and it ignored “nemo judex idoneus  in propria causa”principle, it is intended that the enforcement of the constitution (values) and the state of the Indonesian rule of law, as well as for the Court to aims decided of constitutional issues and to aim the protection of constitutional rights.
Konstruksi Pertentangan Norma Hukum dalam Skema Pengujian Undang-Undang Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (986.866 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1112

Abstract

The study elaborated on the construction of “conflict of legal norms” in constitutional review scheme. There are eleven problems as result of this study, which include: The ideology of the state “Pancasila” as a standard review of “conflict of legal norms” act against 1945 constitution; Constitutional court has a review of act passed before and after 1945 Constitution amendment with standard of 1945 constitution; 1945 constitution is “the living constitution” for the enforcing of law and justice; Constitutional court has authority to review of act against 1945 constitution by vertical and horizontal perspective; enforceability aspect of constitutional review is a part of material review, not formal review; the meaning of “conflict of legal norms” must be comprehend elaborated in the decisions to enforcing of law and justice; Constitutional Court does not used priority of the original intent interpretation and remained unfulfilled of other model interpretation if original intent interpretation caused ineffectiveness of constitution; non constitution be permitted for the formal review, but in material review is not implement; “nemo judex idoneus in propria causa” of procedural law principle can remained unfulfilled by “ius curia novit” principle to promote of the 1945 constitution; the formal review of “conflict of legal norms” can remained unfulfilled by utility principle to priority of legal substance; the retroactive decision caused legal  uncertainly.
Open Legal Policy dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pembentukan Undang-Undang Iwan Satriawan; Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 16, No 3 (2019)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (466.55 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1636

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-XIV/2016 yang menolak perluasan makna zina yang ada dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana menjadi topik yang ramai diperdebatkan. Sebagian masyarakat berpendapat bahwa seharusnya Mahkamah Konstitusi berani melakukan terobosan hukum dalam isu yang sangat penting tersebut. Namun, Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi berpendapat perluasan makna zina tersebut bukan ranah kewenangan mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji lebih jauh argumentasi hukum (ratio decidendi) putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang bersifat open legal policy dan bagaimana implikasinya terhadap pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan studi kasus terhadap beberapa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mengandung argumentasi open legal policy. Secara konseptual penelitian ini juga akan membahas bagaimana implikasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang mengandung open legal policy tersebut terhadap sistem legislasi nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertama, konsepsi open legal policy dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi belum memiliki batasan yang jelas sehingga pengertian positive legislator dan negative legislator sering dikacaukan dalam praktik pembentukan dan pengujian undang-undang. Kedua, putusan yang bersifat open legal policy tersebut juga menunjukkan bahwa di antara hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi telah terjadi tarik menarik penggunaan paradigma judicial activism dan judicial restraints sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum di tengah masyarakat. Penelitian ini merekemomendasikan perlunya kajian yang lebih mendalam tentang disain open legal policy dalam putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi dan sistem legislasi nasional Indonesia.The Constitutional Court Decision No. 46/PUU/XIV/2016 which rejected the petition of petitioners to broaden the meaning of zina (fornication) in the Criminal Code of Indonesia has been becoming an interesting issue to be discussed. Some argue that the Constitutional Court must use its authority to conduct a break-through in responding the crucial legal issue. On the other hand, the Court asserted that widening the meaning of zina in the Criminal Code of Indonesia is not its authority. The research aims at discussing further the ratio decidendi of the Constitutional Court Decision which contains the element of open legal policy and its implication to national legislation system. The research is a normative legal research which uses statute approach and case law approach. The result of research shows that firstly, the concept of open legal policy in the Constitutional Court decisions does not have a clear limitation which implies uncertainty of its implementation in the Court decisions and the national legislation system. Secondly, the Decision of the Constitutional Court with open legal policy also shows that on one hand, there is a trend of using judicial activism among the constitutional judges. On the other hand, some constitutional judges also use judicial restraint approach as their reasons which results uncertainty of law in Court decision. The research recommends that there should be a further study on design model of open legal policy in the Constitutional Court decisions and its implication to national legislation system.
Pro-Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 4 (2015)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (484.586 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1247

Abstract

The Pro’s – Con’s of the Constitutional Court in the review of law in a regulated of the authority, since, it was a conflicting of procedural principles between “ius curia novit” with “nemo judex idoneus in propria causa”. Morever, the background by implication of Constitutional Court decisions, sometimes Constitutional Court making a “rule breaking”,  for examples: nullify of some of law if had reduction of  the authority, addition of constitutional authority to review of law before the 1945 Constitution amendment, additional authority to review of Government Regulation in lieu of law, and used non-constitution as a standard in the formal review, and others. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court also sometimes to choose a   legal logic doesn’t precise and anti-accountability principle. The Conflicts of the procedural principles can  be  resolved  by  understanding  philosophy  of  purposes of law (justice value, legal certainly, utility principle), so that, the Court will have been prioritizing to “ius curia novit” principle and it ignored “nemo judex idoneus  in propria causa”principle, it is intended that the enforcement of the constitution (values) and the state of the Indonesian rule of law, as well as for the Court to aims decided of constitutional issues and to aim the protection of constitutional rights.
Penataan Kelembagaan Pengujian Norma Hukum di Indonesia Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 15, No 1 (2018)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (445.482 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk15110

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas tentang penataan kelembagaan pengujian norma hukum di Indonesia, yang diawali dengan pembahasan problematika kelembagaan dan praktik pengujian norma hukum saat ini dan gagasan penataaan lembaga kedepan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa beberapa persoalan, meliputi (1) kelembagaan yang tidak ideal dan tidak sesuai dengan checks and balances system, hal ini terbukti banyaknya lembaga yang terlibat dalam pengujian norma, yakni MK, MA, dan Mendagri–Gubernur (Wakil Pemerintah Pusat); (2) persoalan objek pengujian yang tidak memiliki batasan yang jelas; (3) dalam praktik, persoalan tolok ukur pengujian terjadi kerumitan, terutama dalam penggunaan tolok ukur dalam menilai pertentangan norma hukum. Gagasan penataan kelembagaan ini di desain untuk kelembagaan satu atap pada MK, yang didasari argumentasi bahwa: MK sebagai pengawal Pancasila dan UUD 1945, dalam rangka penataan kelembagaan yang berbasis pada mekanisme checks and balances system, mewujudkan hierarkisitas peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkelanjutan, implementasi pengujian formil dalam praktik pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang, penataan regulasi menjadi lebih tersistem, pengujian produk hukum tertentu merupakan pintu masuk untuk melihat semua persoalan pertentangan normanya pada setiap hierarki. Pada sisi yang lain, objek dalam sistem pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan juga belum terintegrasi menurut konstitusi dan belum mengarah pada penataan sistem heirarki norma hukum dan upaya harmonisasi norma hukum. Sistem konstitusi dengan paradigma “the supreme law of the land” mengharuskan seluruh peraturan dibawahnya harus bersumber dan tidak boleh bertentangan, dengan berpijak pada prinsip “tidak boleh satu detik pun ada peraturan perundang-undangan yang berpotensi melanggar konstitusi tanpa bisa diluruskan atau diuji melalui pengujian yudisial”.This article is discussed the institutional arrangement of regulation reviews in Indonesia. It’s begins with a discussion of the institutional problems and practice of regulations review and the design of institutional arrangement in the future. The results of the study shows several issues including: (1) institutions which are not ideal and contradicted with checks and balances system, it’s proofed by amount of institutions has authority about the functions, namely: Judicial review (Constitutional Court, Supreme Court), and Executive Review (Minister of Home Affairs and Governor; (2) the object of review doesn’t clear boundaries; (3) in practice, the problems of standard reviews is complicated, especially in the use of judging standard in the conflict of legal norm. The idea of institutional arrangement is designed for one institutionalization at the Constitutional Court, which is based on the argument: The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the Pancasila (ideology of state) and the 1945 Constitution, in the framework of institutional arrangement based on checks and balances system, realizing the sustainable in the heirarchy of regulation, in practice of formal review to reviewing regulations under a law, arrangements of regulations more systematic and comprehsnsive, regulations review is the entrance to see all the issues of it’s conficting in each hierarchy. On the other hand, the object in the system of regulation reviews is also not integrated according by the constitution, and it’s not in accordance with the arrangement system in hierarchy of the regulation and efforts to harmonize the legal norms. The constitutional system with the “supreme law of the land” paradigm requires that all the regulations below should be sourced and not be contradictions, with the principle of “no regulations may be conflict againts the constitution without judicial review.
Model Rekrutmen Penyelenggara Pemilu yang Independen dan Berintegritas di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Suranto Suranto; Nasrullah Nasrullah; Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 17, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (360.771 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1713

Abstract

This study aims to find a model for the recruitment of election administrators with integrity and independence in the Special Region of Yogyakarta using qualitative research. The underlying problem is the large number of reports on election organizers who are not independent and have not integrity in various regions. To uncover these problems, the qualitative research with statutory, analytical, and case approaches is used. The results show that the recruitment model in the Law Number 12 Year 2008 still involves executive power (Governor or Regent/ Mayor), while the Law Number 15 Year 2011 and the Law Number 7 Year 2017 have better recruitment model and measurable process. The recruitment system contained in the Law Number 7 of 2017 is quite ideal, among the advantages of this system is that there is public involvement in the recruitment process, so the recruitment results are more accountable. Moreover, the current system is through the formation of a Selection Team consisting of academics, professionals, and community leaders who have integrity. However, some weaknesses still need to be fixed, namely: (1) the recruitment of the Selection Team must be conducted openly, (2) the integration of the CAT system in writing to ensure that candidates for election management have good theoretical and practical capabilities; (3) involvement of Provincial KPU and Provincial Bawaslu to select and determine candidates for election at Regency/ City level; (4) increasing public awareness that the Electoral Management Body (EMB) is an independent and professional institution so that political preferences can be eliminated.
Membangun Constitutional Morality Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia Tanto Lailam
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 20, No 4 (2020): Edisi Desember
Publisher : Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (5100.376 KB) | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.511-530

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengenai constitutional morality hakim konstitusi pasca reformasi di Indonesia yang menimbulkan persoalan independensi, imparsialitas dan akuntabilitas peradilan. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah memberikan desain konstruksi moralitas konstitusi, sekaligus membongkar dan menata kembali constitutional morality dalam putusan MK dan perilaku hakim konstitusi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan mengutamakan data sekunder, dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bangunan moralitas terkandung dalam Pancasila dan UUD 1945, baik dalam kategori nilai (nilai hukum dan moral), asas/ prinsip, kategori norma/ kaidah (norma hukum dan norma moral). Dalam putusan MK, moralitas konstitusi digunakan sebagai tolok ukurnya, sekalipun faktanya ada beberapa putusan yang kering dari moralitas konstitusi. Dalam konteks perilaku hakim, beberapa kasus terjadi, kasus kategori pelanggaran ringan, seperti: kasus Hakim Konstitusi Arsyad Sanusi, kasus Hakim Konstitusi Arief Hidayat. Kasus pelanggaran berat, seperti: kasus Akil Mochtar dan kasus Hakim Konstitusi Patrialis Akbar. Sehingga kedepan, perlu penguatan moralitas konstitusi dalam proses rekrutmen dan akuntabilitas hakim konstitusi dengan mempertajam dimensi moralitas konstitusi, misalnya syarat bertakwa kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa, syarat integritas hakim dan syarat berakhlak mulia.
Pengawasan Yuridis dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Sistem Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Konstitusional Tanto Lailam
KEADILAN PROGRESIF Vol 2, No 1 (2011): Maret
Publisher : Universitas Bandar Lampung (UBL)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2047.298 KB)

Abstract

Juridical control in order to realizirrg constilutional gorerhmehtal system, Juridical control by cohslitution court is juridical control form to prolecling indonesia people eokstitutional right,jutidical conttol to good democracy prccess (president and vice- president electioh, legislative election) also local election, juridical contrcl aboul state organ dispute, and Juridical control of president and vice presidenl of impeachment process. Juridical control functiok by cohstitution courl gtves opportunity lor cohstitulional govenmenld I system based on constitution. Juridical control by Juslice Cont about judicial reviev in this case Juslice Courl as lhe legitb&te inlerpreter ofthe ldw andjuslice, and administr.tlioh coultjuridical conlrcl isjuridical co lrol institution thal has authority to evaluates administration decision oppose against regulation and general basisso fgood, clean, strong government
Analisis Praktik Penguman Formil Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Tanto Lailam
PRANATA HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2011): Juli
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v6i2.104

Abstract

The standard to examine formal verification (forinale toetsingrecht) of law against 1945 Constitution in the Constitutional Court, covering : First, Pancasila and Articles of 1945 Constitution. The contrary can be assessed by value  of Fourth Article of Pancasila and legal substance of Article 5 paragraph (1), Article 20, Article 21, Article 22A of 1945 Constitution. Second, non-1945 constitution, for example is the general principles of law making process (algemene beginselen van behoorlijke wetgeving), the principles to assessed fact of legislation process (example: law making process in House of Representatives of Indonesia). Third, criminal court decisions, the decisions to assessed criminal offense at law making process, for example: corruption, bribery, and others.
PEMBERDAYAAN PIMPINAN CABANG NASYIATUL ‘AISYIYAH NGAMPILAN DAN KOMITE INDEPENDEN SADAR PEMILU DALAM MELAWAN HOAX DAN NEGATIVE CAMPAIGN PADA PEMILU TAHUN 2019 Tanto Lailam; Awang Darumurti
Panrita Abdi - Jurnal Pengabdian pada Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Jurnal Panrita Abdi - Januari 2021
Publisher : LP2M Universitas Hasanuddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/pa.v5i1.7596

Abstract

Abstract. Elections are a leadership succession agenda to determine the future life of the society, but sometimes elections are affected by the hoaxes and negative campaigns that have a profound influence on people's voices. To assume this community service in the hope that both partners have a good understanding of hoaxes and negative campaigns in the election, and both partners have the attitude and success of accepting negative campaigns for the public. The method of community service is carried out by visiting institutional studies to the KPU and Bawaslu, focus group discussions, talk shows, and declarations of anti-hoax and negative campaigns. The results of the activity show that the community service has been successful, this can prove by increasing the ability of PCNA and KISP about KPU and Bawaslu, increasing electoral understanding and the dangers of hoax and negative campaigns. The main success was the two partners who were able to fight deception and negative campaigns openly by campaigning for smart and integrity elections through various talk shows, discussions, and others. Also, success was marked by voters' attitudes that were anti-deception and negative campaigns that were clear and decisive and conducted oversight of them.     Abstrak. Pemilu adalah agenda suksesi kepemimpinan untuk menentukan masa depan kehidupan negara dan bangsa kedepan, namun kadang pemilu terciderai dengan banyaknya hoax, negative campaign yang memberikan pengaruh besar terhadap suara masyarakat. Untuk itulah pengabdian ini dilakukan dengan harapan kedua mitra memiliki pemahaman yang baik mengenai dampak hoax dan negative campaign dalam pemilu, serta kedua mitra memiliki sikap dan keberanian menyampaikan bahaya hoax dan negative campaign kepada masyarakat umum. Metode pengabdian dilakukan dengan kunjungan Studi kelembagaan ke KPU dan Bawaslu, focus group discussion, talkshow, dan deklarasi sikap anti hoax dan negative campaign. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa pengabdian berhasil dengan baik, hal ini dapat dibuktikan dengan peningkatan kemampuan PCNA dan KISP dalam memahami kelembagaan penyelenggara pemilu (KPU dan Bawaslu), peningkatan pemahaman persoalan kepemiluan dan bahaya hoax dan negative campaign. Keberhasilan yang utama adalah kedua mitra mampu melawan hoax dan negative campaign secara terbuka dengan mengkampanyekan pemilu yang cerdas dan berintegritas melalui berbagai talkshow, diskusi, dan lainnya. Selain itu, keberhasilan juga ditandai dengan sikap pemilih yang anti hoax dan negative campaign yang jelas dan tegas, serta melakukan pengawasan terhadap nya.