Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : DE JURE

WASIAT: SOLUSI ALTERNATIF DARI PEMBAGIAN WARISAN YANG TIDAK ADIL? Mahmudi, Zaenul
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 5, No 2: Desember 2013
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (452.91 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v5i2.3002

Abstract

This article aims at conducting washiyyah institution as an alternative for distribution of inheritance as the verses of inheritance in Qur’an using the word washiyyah. It means that  washiyyah  has  important  position  in  the  distribution  of  inheritance  beside  wârits institution. It is important for Muslim to use washiyyah institution replacing wârits one in the distribution of inheritance when he sees that the shares the Islamic law of inheritance system issues defy aginst principle of justice, the ultimate principle of Islamic teachings. Washiyyah institution consisting of specific justice for specific family is to be preferred than wârits institution consisting general one for general Muslim ummah. Artikel  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengkaji  lembaga  washiyyah  sebagai  alternatif  pembagian kewarisan sebagaimana terminologi washiyyah dalam ayat-ayat Qur’an. Ini berarti bahwa washiyyah mempunyai posisi penting dalam pembagian warisan disamping lembaga wârits itu  sendiri.   Adalah  penting  untuk  seorang  Muslim  menggunakan  lembaga  washiyyah menggantikan  wârits  dalam  pembagian  kewarisan  ketika  dia  melihat  bahwa  persoalan system  pembagian  wârits  hukum  Islam  bertentangan  dengan  prinsip  keadilan,  sebagai prinsip  pokok  dalam  ajaran  Islam.  Lembaga  washiyyah  memuat  keadilan  khusus  bagi keluarga tertentu yang perlu diprioritaskan dari pada lembaga wârits yang berlaku secara umum bagi umat muslim.
Fulfillment of Women's Rights After Divorce: Dynamics and Transformation in the Legal Journey Fadil, Fadil; Mazidah, Zidna; Mahmudi, Zaenul
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 16, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v16i1.25713

Abstract

The Supreme Court has ruled that in contested divorce cases, women are entitled to receive nafkah iddah, mut'ah, and nafkah madhiyah, provided they do not act nusyuz. However, this provision is not being effectively implemented. This study examines the fulfilment of women's rights post-contested divorce in the Malang Regency Religious Court. The goal is to identify shortcomings in implementing these regulations and propose solutions for more effective enforcement. The research employs an empirical-juridical method, using secondary data from interviews and documentation with key personnel at the Malang District Religious Court. The qualitative analysis refers to Soekanto's theory. The Findings indicate that the fulfilment of women's rights in contested divorces at the Malang Regency Religious Court is ineffective. The law is clear and understandable, and officers, judges, and staff are accountable. Furthermore, the Malang District Religious Court provides sufficient infrastructure and support. However, the unmet factors—community awareness and cultural attitudes—pose significant barriers. Low legal awareness and compliance, coupled with cultural tendencies in Malang District to avoid legal processes and seek quick resolutions, hinder effective implementation. Addressing these issues is crucial for the regulations to achieve their intended impact on women's rights post-divorce.
Joint Property Division in Indonesia: A Gender Equality Viewpoint Rouf, Abd; Ch, Mufidah; Mahmudi, Zaenul
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 15, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Shariah Faculty UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v15i2.23050

Abstract

The distribution of joint property regulated under the Compilation of Islamic Law is considered very effective due to the legal certainty guaranteeing that ex-husbands and wives receive a half share. However, these provisions cannot be fully applied to estranged husbands and wives because family background conditions vary. There are certain conditions where husbands and wives have multiple roles, and this occurrence needs to be more profoundly studied. Therefore, this study is presented to analyze the distribution of joint assets according to the roles assigned in the household. This research employed a normative-legal method and statutory and conceptual approaches. The primary data in this study is the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The researcher analyzed activity profiles, access and control between husband and wife as specified in KHI norms by using a gender equity analysis tool. The results show that the fair value of the distribution of joint assets which refers to the division of roles between husband and wife contained in the KHI has set different roles between the two, in which the husband works outside the house while the wife serves as a housewife. Meanwhile, currently, all roles performed by husbands can also be performed by wives and the other way around, while unchangeable roles remain in the biological or reproductive role. So the division of roles cannot be interpreted literally because the husband or wife has flexible and fair access and control. Keywords: joint property; gender equality; spouses rights.