Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia

Copyright Protection of Songwriters in Indonesia Imelda Martinelli; Fricila Anggitha Sugiawan; Kevin Anandita Rukmana
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): July 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i2.658

Abstract

Intellectual property is an object resulting from human intellectual activity, which is expressed in the form of copyrighted works or inventions. The issue of intellectual property for Indonesian songwriters has never been a good thing. This study uses a prescriptive legal method and examines law as a norm with misconceptions about legal protection. Secondary data becomes the main data. The specifications used are descriptive specifications. Copyright owners enjoy legal protection from the moment their work is transformed into a concrete form that complies with the Declarative Principles. Even if a work is protected because it can be clearly identified, the copyright owner must register the work in the Copyright Register for formal verification. There are two ways to resolve copyright disputes: litigation and non-litigation. Settlements outside the court include advice, mediation, negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. On the other hand, there are two pathways in litigation, one of which is the civil route. Violations can be subject to sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines as stipulated in the copyright law.
Polemic over the Rejection of the Presence of the Israeli National Team which Led to the Cancellation of Indonesia as the Host of the U-20 World Cup Imelda Martinelli; Gilbert Winata; Ilhan Pasha Islamy Trisnadi
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): July 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i2.745

Abstract

Football is one of the biggest sports in the world, until now it has become a very large industry and involves a lot of money, including the large salaries of players in work agreements, and Indonesia is no exception. This phenomenon attracts attention not only for sponsors in terms of business, but for political actors as well as part of the political media for them. Football for some political elites is considered as a medium or a tool for them to communicate with audiences in the electoral politics sphere. This is done by conveying political information through a popular medium for many people, namely football. In this way, it can be understood that football also has its own spirit in the process of political constellation in Indonesia. The rapid development of football has made this sport a source as well as a tool to achieve certain goals. The goals can vary, ranging from the acquisition of capital capital to power, existence and ideologicalization. The goals desired through football were carried out by propaganda techniques that made it possible to achieve a desired goal. In essence, football and politics are two things that are identical but not the same. These two things are two battles to fight over something that has high intrinsic value. The rejection of the presence of the Israeli national team in the U-20 World Cup which led to the cancellation of Indonesia as the host led to various legal polemics and involved complex legal aspects. In this journal, we will discuss aspects of civil law using applicable laws in Indonesia regarding the cancellation.
WTO Dispute Settlement Body Ruling on Export Ban of Indonesian Raw Nickel Ore: Private International Law Review Imelda Martinelli; Vito Jonathan Octavo; Aristoteles G. F Siregar
AURELIA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Vol 2, No 2 (2023): July 2023
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/aurelia.v2i2.747

Abstract

The decision of the WTO Dispute Settlement Organs regarding the ban on the export of crude nickel by Indonesia has significant implications for international trade law. This ban was opposed by the European Union because it could hamper the development of their electric-powered automotive industry which requires nickel ore as a raw material for electric vehicle batteries. Provisions in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) allow export restrictions in certain situations, such as for the protection of health, safety, sanitation, or the preservation of natural resources. However, import and export bans and other non-tariff measures are not permitted. The WTO provides exceptions to quantitative restrictions that meet certain criteria. In this dispute, Indonesia was declared to have violated GATT provisions by the WTO panel. The impact of this decision is important for Indonesia, because nickel is a non-renewable natural resource and is very much needed in the country's development. Indonesia's defeat in this dispute could have a significant impact on the supply of nickel ore and its domestic use. Developed countries with high consumption already use most of the world's natural resources, while developing countries use only about 10%. WTO decisions can also affect international trade policies and relations between countries. Indonesia's defeat could reduce state revenues, discourage investment, and affect relations with the European Union. In addition, this policy may also affect the electric power automotive industry and the development of electric vehicles in the European Union. Therefore, this decision has broad and important implications in the context of international trade and bilateral relations.