Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.245
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmu Informasi Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Humanus: Jurnal ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Humaniora JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ROKANIA Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Journal Of World Science Tsaqofah: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia YASIN: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya ARZUSIN: Jurnal Manajemen dan Pendidikan Dasar Journal of Creative Student Research TELL - US JOURNAL Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Educaniora: Journal of Education and Humanities Persona: Kajian Bahasa dan Sastra Bersatu: Jurnal Pendidikan Bhinneka Tunggal Ika BAHASTRA Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan Sains JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Wissen: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Scinary : Science of Information and Library Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan
Nurizzati Nurizzati
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 115 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS

 1 
The Information Literacy Level of Students at SMAN 1 Kubung and SMAN 1 Junjungsirih: A Comparative Study Fadhilah, Rahmi; Nurizzati, Nurizzati
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i2.10054

Abstract

The growing importance of information literacy as a twenty-first-century competency has strengthened the need for students to identify information needs, search for relevant information, evaluate information credibility, and use information effectively and responsibly. However, information literacy skills among senior high school students remain varied, particularly across schools with different library management conditions. This study aims to analyze and compare the information literacy levels of eleventh-grade students at SMAN 1 Kubung and SMAN 1 Junjungsirih based on The Big6 framework. A quantitative approach with a descriptive-comparative research design was employed. The study population consisted of 401 students, from which 80 respondents were selected using proportionate stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a closed-ended questionnaire developed based on six indicators of The Big6 model: task definition, information-seeking strategies, location and access, use of information, synthesis, and evaluation. The validity test showed that all instrument items were valid, with correlation coefficients exceeding the r-table value of 0.361, while the reliability test produced a Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of 0.971, indicating excellent reliability. The findings revealed that students’ overall information literacy level was categorized as high, with a grand mean score of 3.45. SMAN 1 Kubung obtained a higher average score of 3.58 than SMAN 1 Junjungsirih, which obtained a score of 3.36. The highest score was found in the task definition indicator, whereas the lowest score was identified in the synthesis indicator. The study concludes that differences exist in students’ information literacy levels between the two schools, influenced by learning environments, information resource management, and school library support systems. These findings contribute to the literature on school-based information literacy and provide practical implications for strengthening information literacy programs, optimizing the role of school librarians, and developing literacy-based learning strategies to enhance students’ critical and analytical thinking skills.
Perceptions of 2022 Library and Information Science Students on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Completing Academic Assignments Putri, Azzahra Fermi; Nurizzati, Nurizzati
Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Science: MIKAILALSYS
Publisher : Darul Yasin Al Sys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/mikailalsys.v4i2.10055

Abstract

The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed how students access, manage, and use academic information. The use of AI in completing academic assignments has increased substantially because it is perceived to offer efficiency, convenience, and speed in learning activities. However, the increasing adoption of AI also raises concerns regarding technological dependency, information validity, and academic ethics. This study aims to analyze the perceptions of 2022 cohort students in the Library and Information Science Program at Universitas Negeri Padang regarding the use of AI in completing academic assignments. A quantitative approach with a descriptive research design was employed. The population consisted of 78 active students from the 2022 cohort, all of whom were selected as respondents using saturated sampling. Data were collected through a four-point Likert-scale questionnaire developed based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework, covering performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with the assistance of SPSS version 26.0. The findings reveal that students’ perceptions of AI utilization were categorized as very good, with an achievement level of 90.44%. Among the indicators, facilitating conditions obtained the highest average score of 3.74, followed by effort expectancy and social influence, each with a score of 3.67, while performance expectancy obtained a score of 3.58. These findings indicate that AI is perceived as capable of enhancing effectiveness, efficiency, productivity, and convenience in completing academic assignments. Social environments and technological infrastructure also support students’ adoption of AI technologies. The study concludes that AI has become an important component of students’ academic activities; however, its use must be accompanied by strong digital literacy, critical thinking skills, and academic ethical awareness to ensure responsible and meaningful utilization. These findings provide practical implications for higher education institutions in formulating ethical AI policies and strengthening technology-based learning systems.
Co-Authors Abadi, Rahmat Riwayat Abel Hakimi Yarta Adinda Syafitri, Adinda Afnita Afnita Agustina Ahmad Nusi Ainim Liusti, Siti Ali Djamhuri Amril Amir Anti, Afni Arsah, Kurnia Atika Batubara Awory, Wafi Paradisa Azwar, Rezi Bakhtaruddin Nasution Bakhtaruddin Nst. Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Cahyani, Putty Amalia Regita Cahyani, Vera Intan Deded Palma Putra Desman, Nurul Safira Devi Yenhariza Dimas Muhammad Pambudi Dina, Gustia Efdilla, Tasya Efendi, Aidah Febriani Eldys, Donna Ellya Ratna Elpalina, Srimutia Erizal Gani Fadhilah, Rahmi Fadhla Hayati Faiska, Alodia Fani, Sevta Fariza, Nurul Fauzi Ahmad Muda Fauzi Anwar Fauziah, Husnil Fepi Mariani Ghani, Erizal Hafifahreza, Riskia Hafshah, Siti Hairunnisa Hairunnisa Hamidin Hamidin Handayani, Guswira Handra, Arici Hanifah Yulia Sari Harris Effendi Thahar Hasanuddin WS Hasanuddin WS Hasanuddin WS Hayuni, Rahimah Helvira Helvira Helwina Aysha Putri Herlina Boru Regar I Ketut Suada Ida Ayu Putu Sri Widnyani Jayandri Jayandri Kurnia, Rahmat Rizki Lathifah Octhaviony Leo Fandi Lilis Suryani Linda Fitri Yeni Lismarni Lismarni Mac Aditiawarman Marwati, Novi Maryuni, Maryuni Masviva, Nadiah Mifta, Mifta Monicha Ardi Mudinillah, Adam Muhammad Adek, Muhammad Muhammad Ismail Nasution Nani Kurniasih Nasution, Annio Indah Lestari Nelvi Putri Netri Netri Nofrizon, Anggi Novia Juita Nst, Muhammad Ismail Nst., Muhammad Ismail Odi Satri Permana Okta Mahendra Oktafrian, Antoni Putera, Harya Sastra Putra AF, Marzon Putra, Adidtia Perdana Putri Nadia Afri Putri, Azzahra Fermi Putri, Cici Anjelina Putri, Regina Ferani Rafiulillah, Susan Rahayu, Ririn Rahman, Khiratul Rahmat Syauqi Deswin Rahmawita Rahmawita Rahmayeni, Roza Ria Martisa Ridha, Fadhlina Kurnia Rikasari, Fauzia Rina BR Simanjorang Rina Novita Rio Samudro Sahputra, Rio Santiva, Indah Yunia Saputri, Riva Sari, Tri Kurnia Sari, Yulvina Permata Sasmi, Sinta Wira Sefridanita Sefridanita Shafira Awaluddin Sharlino, M. Zacky Siska Afriani Siska Darma Sari Sofiarti, Liza Sopia Erni Suci Dwi Lestari Suwella, Titi Fitri Syafridon Syafridon Syofiani, Lidya Taranita, Desi Tressyalina Tressyalina Tri Wahyuni Putri Vivi Wulandari Widya Arieska Wilda Afriani Winda Fatmalia A Yanto, Andi Frizal Yasnur Asri Yeki Febrianto Yenni Hayati Yenti, Nadia Putri Yuantisya, Mutia Yudha, Feizal Mandala Yulia Delfita Yuliarti, Lidya Noftu Yullya Kartika Ayu Zahara, Pipin Zainal Ruma Zamzami, Mutiara Zikri, Atika Zulfadhli Zulfadhli Zulfadhli Zulfadhli Zulfikarni Zulfikarni