Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.212
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Nagari Law Review Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Pamulang Law Review Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum & Keadilan JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) PENGABDIAN SOSIAL International Journal of Integrative Sciences Sinergi International Journal of Law RechtIdee Indonesian Journal of Law Research Legalis : Journal of Law Review International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Law Analytic Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Nani Widya Sari
Universitas Pamulang
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Impartial Law Enforcement By The Indonesian Criminal Justice System In The Civil Law System Sari, Nani Widya; Ekawati, Dian; Prayitno, Isnu Harjo; Munalar, Sri Siti; Purgito, Purgito
Nagari Law Review Vol 7 No 3 (2024): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.7.i.3.p.544-554.2024

Abstract

This writing aims to understand law enforcement by the existing criminal justice system and to understand the existing legal system models in the world and Indonesia along with their characteristics. The method used in this writing is normative legal research through literature study with data collection methods in the form of secondary data. The results of the research show that law enforcement has not been implemented optimally, so it is very important that the existing criminal justice system can work well to create and realize a sense of justice in society. In this world, there are two models of the rule of law concept that have been developed, namely the Continental European model called rechstaat and the Anglo Saxon model called the rule of law. The concept of rechtsstaat was born from a struggle against absolutism so that it is revolutionary in nature. The concept of rechtsstaat relies on the Continental Law system called civil law. Meanwhile, the concept of the rule of law develops evolutionarily, which is based on a legal system called common law.
The Better Law Construction of Justice in the Implementation of Restorative Justice Yanto, Oksidelfa; Dadang, Dadang; Alzagladi, Hasan; Widodo, Guntarto; Sari, Nani Widya
International Journal of Law Analytics Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): November 2024
Publisher : MultiTech Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59890/ijla.v2i4.2659

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify and understand a new legal design to create better justice while implementing restorative justice. Then, understand and comprehend the urgency of synchronization and synergy of law enforcement for the implementation of restorative justice in a criminal act. The research method used in this study uses a normative legal research method using secondary data obtained through literature studies. The study's findings suggest that in order to improve justice for everyone, a new legal framework pertaining to the application of restorative justice must be developed in the future. All of the criminal justice system's subsystems, including the police, prosecutors, and court institutions, are subject to guidelines when the ideas of restorative justice are institutionalized and put into practice as standards in legislation. This can serve as a solid legal foundation for the application of restorative justice, ensuring that legal certainty is attained as the ideals of a state of law in accomplishing the objectives of law that is fair and advantageous in Indonesia.
Criminal Responsibility of Corporations in Criminal Acts of Corruption Nani Widya Sari; Oksidelfa Yanto; Suhendar; Samuel Soewita; Henny Nuraeny
IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): IJOLARES : Indonesian Journal of Law Research
Publisher : CV Tirta Pustaka Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60153/ijolares.v3i1.122

Abstract

At this time, the existence of corporations is felt to be increasingly important and strategic, in addition to being able to help turn the wheels of the economy, corporations have also reached almost all spheres of life. Corporations do not only carry out activities that aim to achieve their goals based on the provisions of the laws and regulations that govern them but in certain cases, many corporations commit criminal acts of corruption. Corruption is developing in various sectors, including state-owned companies.  The purpose of this study is to determine the criminal liability of corporations in the crime of corruption. The research method used is normative juridical, where this research was conducted by examining library materials in the form of secondary data obtained from various legal materials. The research results show the law must be interpreted as a regulation that is real and applies to all humans without exception. All acts of corruption committed by corporations must be subject to sanctions if they are contrary to applicable legal regulations. So that the law will function in order to achieve the objectives of the law, namely certainty, justice and benefit.  That that corporations are responsible as legal subjects in criminal acts of corruption. Legal subjects are not only individuals or individuals but legal entities such as corporations that can be held accountable. The existence of an error is an absolute element that can result in a corporation being held criminally responsible.
Relationship Between Money Laundering Crime and Corruption Crime as Originate Crime From the Criminal Perspective Nani Widya Sari; Henny Nuraeny; Oksidelfa Yanto; Guntarto Widodo; Bhanus Prakash Nunna
International Journal of Integrative Sciences Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): December 2023
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/ijis.v2i12.6956

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to understand and analyze an act that can be categorized as a money laundering crime complete with all its elements. Then also understand and analyze the relationship between money laundering crimes and corruption crimes. The research method used is the normative legal research method through literature study with the data source, namely secondary data. The research results show that the crime of money laundering cannot be separated from the original act, namely the crime of corruption. In processing a money laundering crime, it is not necessary to prove the predicate crime first, because the object of the money laundering crime is the assets resulting from the predicate crime
Urgensi Konstruksi Hukum Pengaturan Contempt of Court dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Nani Widya Sari; Oksidelfa Yanto; Rifka Zuwanda
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 22, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v22i4.1551

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat dan menganalisis peran penegakan hukum dalam menjaga wibawa peradilan, serta ingin melihat serta menganalisis urgensi konstruksi hukum pengaturan contempt of court dalam proses peradilan pidana. Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah melalui metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Dalam melakukan penelitian yuridis normatif penulis melakukan pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka berupa data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran penegak hukum dalam menjaga wibawa peradilan sangat diperlukan sekali karena tindakan merendahkan peradilan mengancam pondasi keadilan dan kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem hukum. Karena itu, hakim, jaksa, advokat dan panitera memiliki tanggungjawab yang besar dalam menjaga integritas dan wibawa peradilan dengan cara menegakkan hukum dan keadilan. Setiap perkara diperiksa dan diputus dengan peradilan yang jujur serta tidak memihak dan yang lebih penting peradilan diselenggarakan dengan merdeka dan tidak dipengaruhi oleh kekuasaan manapun. Kemudian yang tidak kalah pentingnya perlu ada konstruksi hukum khusus yang diberlakukan dengan pasti sebagai bagian dari ikhtiar untuk menegakkan wibawa peradilan, seperti undang-undang khusus. Selama ini jika terjadi contempt of court, pelakunya dibiarkan saja tanpa ada sanksinya. Ini tidak boleh dibiarkan secara terus menerus, maka perlu ada aturan hukum yang mengatur sehingga dengan aturan hukum itu pelaku contempt of court dapat di proses dan dihukum.
Can Judges Ignore Justifying and Forgiveness Reasons for Justice and Human Rights? Oksidelfa Yanto Yanto; Imam Fitri Rahmadi; Nani Widya Sari
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 6 Issue 1, January 2022
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol6.Iss1.1054.pp122-142

Abstract

In the criminal law system in Indonesia, there are two reasons why an individual suspected of having committed a crime must be released. These two reasons are justifying and forgiveness reasons. In practice, these two reasons are linked to the elimination of criminal acts based on legal justice and human rights. This article discusses the legal consequences when the judge rejects the justifying and forgiveness reasons that can eliminate the sentence. The method used in this research is normative juridical by analysing norms, principles and rules of law with a case approach. As a result, this research shows that judges in practice have the authority given by law to determine whether an action can be categorised as justifying and forgiveness reasons that eliminate punishment by referring to the principles and legal regulations for justice and human rights. However, when the judge ignores these two reasons due to considerations of lack of justice and respect for human rights, this practice can be carried out by the judge with the consequence that this decision will cause harm, suffering and misery for the accused. This article argues that to protect the public interest from wrong decisions is necessary to reform the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) to provide objectivity, honesty, and justice that rely on legal principles and rules.
Co-Authors Abdul Azis Ahmad, Pendi Alzagladi, Hasan Bhanus Prakash Nunna Bryan Adi Indrasaputra DADANG DADANG Dian Ekawati Dian Ekawati Dian Ekawati Dyas Mulyani Benazir Erma Rusdiana Guntarto Widodo Guntarto Widodo Henny Nuraeny Imam Fitri Rahmadi Imam Fitri Rahmadi Inawati Santini Isnu Harjo Prayitno Katry Anggraini Mohamad Anwar Mohamad Anwar, Mohamad Muhamad Iqbal Mulyani Benazir, Dyas Munalar, Sri Siti Nandang Sambas Ningsih, Sri Utami Nurhayati Nurhayati Nurhayati Nurhayati Oksidelfa Yanto Pendi Ahmad Prakash Nunna, Bhanu Prayitno, Isnu Harjo Purgito, Purgito Qingqing Cindy Chen Ramadan, Tubagus Ahmad Rejeki , Henlia Peristiwi Samuel Soewita Samuel Soewita Sewaka Sewaka Showiruddin Purnama Sri Utami Ningsih Sugeng Samiyono Suhendar Suhendar Suhendar Sylvia Hasanah Thorik Thorik, Sylvia Hasanah Turkamun Turkamun Turkamun, Turkamun Widodo, Guntarto Yulita Puji lestari Zuwanda, Rifka