Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

CONFLICT RESOLUTION PATTERNS IN INDIGENOUS COMMUNITIES OF INDONESIA: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE CUSTOMARY LAWS OF BADUY, KAJANG, AND ANAK DALAM IN JAMBI Yulia, Rena; Huda, Chairul; Romdoni, Muhamad; Cholidin, Achmad; Nunna, Bhanu Prakash
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v6i2.4671

Abstract

This study examines the conflict resolution practices of Baduy, Kajang, and Suku Anak Dalam (SAD) Jambi communities, all of whom continue to apply customary law to address violations within their territories. Using a combination of normative and empirical methods with snowball data collection, the research identifies the traditional mechanisms through which these communities maintain social order. Baduy resolve disputes through Silih Hampura, carried out via the Ngabokoran process and guided by Pikukuh, an unwritten code defining customary violations and their resolutions. Kajang apply Pasang Ri Kajang, an oral system that uses oaths, crowbar-burning, or incense-burning rituals in conflict settlement. The SAD Jambi follow a customary framework consisting of four primary and four secondary principles and dua belas categories of violations. Conflict resolution in Kajang and SAD communities typically involves customary fines, while the Baduy impose banishment rather than imprisonment. Across the three groups, the central aim of customary dispute resolution is the restoration of cosmic religious balance, benefiting not only the parties involved but the community and the wider natural order.
Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Melalui Pengembangan Camilan Puding Herbal Dalam Mendukung Program Asman TOGA Suyani, Sri; Elis Meyana, Yulanda; Aprilia, Rini; Romdoni, Muhamad; Pratolo, Sapto
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol 4 No 1 (2026): Vol. 4 No. 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Teknik Multimedia Internasional Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Program Asuhan Mandiri Tanaman Obat Keluarga (Asman TOGA) merupakan upaya strategis dalam meningkatkan kemandirian kesehatan keluarga melalui pemanfaatan tanaman obat. Namun, implementasi program ini di masyarakat masih terbatas pada penanaman dan pemanfaatan sederhana. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk memberdayakan masyarakat melalui pengembangan camilan puding herbal berbasis TOGA sebagai inovasi pangan sehat yang mendukung keberlanjutan Program Asman TOGA. Kegiatan dilaksanakan di wilayah Jl. D. Genali, Kelurahan Sawojajar, Kota Malang dengan metode sosialisasi, pelatihan, praktik langsung, dan evaluasi. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pengetahuan dan keterampilan masyarakat dalam memanfaatkan TOGA menjadi produk olahan bernilai tambah. Peserta mampu memproduksi puding herbal dari bahan TOGA seperti jahe, kunyit, dan daun kelor yang diterima dengan baik secara organoleptik. Kegiatan ini berkontribusi pada peningkatan kesadaran hidup sehat serta membuka peluang ekonomi keluarga berbasis potensi lokal
Corruption in Infrastructure Projects: Case Studies and Juridical Analysis Anis Noviya; Samsidar Samsidar; Muhamad Romdoni
Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): JOSI - MAY
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/gzfyp749

Abstract

The infrastructure sector in Indonesia is one of the most vulnerable arenas to corruption because of its capital-intensive, complex, and multi-year characteristics. Projects such as the construction of toll roads, bridges, and other public facilities are often abused through budget mark-ups, fictitious procurement, and collusion in auctions. This study aims to analyze the application of Article 2 and Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 in tackling corruption in infrastructure projects. Using a normative juridical approach and case studies, this study highlights that corruption in infrastructure projects is systemic, involves many actors, and is difficult to dismantle due to weaknesses in the procurement, oversight, and legal proofing systems. The results of the study show that the effectiveness of these articles is greatly influenced by the context of implementation in the field, including the understanding of law enforcement officials of the project corruption modus operandi. In addition, weak surveillance systems, low transparency, and technical and political obstacles exacerbate the situation. Therefore, legal reform is not enough if it is not accompanied by institutional reform and digitalization of accountable procurement. In conclusion, the eradication of infrastructure corruption must be carried out through a comprehensive, interdisciplinary, and adaptive legal approach to the complexity of project governance in the public sector.