Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.615
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Media Hukum Rechtsidee AMANNA GAPPA Sriwijaya Law Review JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Simposium II UNIID 2017 Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Constitutional Review Bina Hukum Lingkungan Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Berdikari: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia WAJAH HUKUM Cakrawala: Jurnal Litbang Kebijakan Jurnal Jatiswara Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Media Iuris JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia) JUSTISI Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences INNOVATION RESEARCH JOURNAL Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Yuridika Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum PATTIMURA Legal Journal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Mimbar Hukum Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Bina Hukum Lingkungan Room of Civil Society Development Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Room of Civil Social Development POLITICO
Radian Salman
Departemen Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 47 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 47 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
The Implementation of Tax Monitoring System in Local Tax Collection in Sidoarjo District: Implementasi Tax Monitoring System (Taxmon) dalam Pemungutan Pajak Daerah di Kabupaten Sidoarjo Listiawan, Hermadi; Salman, Radian
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024): January
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/ijins.v26i1.964

Abstract

This article aims to explain and analyze the implementation of tax monitoring system to local tax collection in Sidoarjo Regency. The electronic collection of local taxes is a strategy utilized by Sidoarjo Regency to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and transparency in collecting local taxes, one of them is Tax Monitoring System. This writing reviews the benefits and impacts of the implementation adopted by the local government in implementing tax monitoring system, the advantages of it, and the resulting effects on the local tax revenue of Sidoarjo Regency. Highlights : Enhanced Efficiency: The Tax Monitoring System in Sidoarjo Regency streamlines tax collection processes, reducing manual efforts and expediting transactions. Increased Transparency: This system promotes accountability and transparency in local tax operations, building trust among taxpayers. Revenue Impact: The implementation of the Tax Monitoring System has positively influenced the local tax revenue, indicating improved compliance and collection rates. Keywords : Implementation, Local Tax Revenue, Electronicization, Tax Collection, Efficiency
Judicial Independence sebagai Syarat Good Governance dalam Demokrasi Konstitusional Ali Mannagalli; Radian Salman; Rosa Ristawati; Dri Utari Christina Rachmawati
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.5973

Abstract

Independensi kekuasaan kehakiman (judicial independence) merupakan elemen kunci dalam mewujudkan good governance di dalam sistem demokrasi konstitusional. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana judicial independence berkontribusi terhadap indikator utama good governance, serta mengevaluasi tantangan struktural dan kelembagaan yang dihadapi oleh sistem peradilan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif yang diperkuat dengan data sekunder dari putusan pengadilan, laporan lembaga internasional, serta studi komparatif terhadap praktik negara lain. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara normatif Indonesia telah menjamin kemandirian kekuasaan kehakiman, dalam praktiknya masih terdapat berbagai hambatan, antara lain kesenjangan antara norma dan praktik, ketergantungan administratif terhadap eksekutif, intervensi politik dalam rekrutmen hakim, dan lemahnya pengawasan etik. Ketiadaan judicial independence berdampak langsung pada menurunnya akuntabilitas, transparansi, serta efektivitas pemerintahan. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan reformasi menyeluruh yang meliputi aspek regulatif, institusional, dan kultural agar peradilan dapat berfungsi secara optimal sebagai pilar demokrasi dan pengawal tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik.
The Implications of Government Disobedience in Carrying Out Constitutional Court Decision No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 on Forest Areas Muhamad Zainal Arifin; Radian Salman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6021

Abstract

The implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 resulted in the determination of forest areas as the legal basis for forest areas. Forest areas in the designation stage can no longer serve as a foundation for legal authority. Since the Forestry Law became law, the Decree on the Designation of Forest Areas across Indonesia has been changed. This means the legal reason for designating forest areas under the Transitional Provisions of Article 81 of the Forestry Law is no longer valid. The Government continues to use the Decree on the Designation of Forest Areas as a foundation for convicting individuals, imposing administrative penalties, restricting civil rights, and issuing permits. The Government's noncompliance with the Constitutional Court Decision infringes upon individuals' constitutional rights and results in environmental degradation due to the lack of oversight in forested regions. This research is normative juridical research (doctrinal research)
THE CONSTITUTIONALLY OF THE DPR’SSUPERVISORY FUNCTION OVER CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUSTICE AND INDEPENDENT INSTITUTION Avany Mahmudah; Salman, Radian; Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara Islam, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/qaumiyyah.v6i2.250

Abstract

The constitutionality of the DPR's supervisory authority over Constitutional Court judges and independent state institutions raises serious problems in the Indonesian constitutional system, especially after the ratification of Article 228A of DPR Regulation Number 1 of 2025 concerning Amendments to DPR RI Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Rules of Procedure. This provision grants the DPR the authority to evaluate officials it previously nominated, with evaluations deemed binding. However, such authority lacks a legal foundation in either the 1945 Constitution or the MD3 Law, rendering it potentially ultra vires and contrary to the principle of Separation of Powers and judicial independence. The removal of Constitutional Court Justice Aswanto illustrates a clear example of legislative interference and politicization of the judiciary. Similar threats extend to independent institutions such as the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Judicial Commission (KY), both of which require functional and institutional autonomy. This study employs a normative legal method. Findings confirm that Article 228A poses a constitutional threat and should be repealed to restore institutional equilibrium. Legal reform and regulatory safeguards are urgently needed to protect the integrity and independence of judicial and independent bodies within Indonesia’s democratic rule of law framework. Abstrak Konstitusionalitas kewenangan pengawasan DPR terhadap Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dan lembaga negara independen menimbulkan persoalan serius dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia, terutama pasca disahkannya Pasal 228A Peraturan DPR Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan DPR RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Tertib. Pasal ini memberikan kewenangan evaluatif terhadap pejabat negara yang diangkat atas usul DPR, dengan hasil yang bersifat mengikat. Ketentuan tersebut tidak memiliki dasar konstitusional dalam UUD 1945 maupun dasar legal dalam Undang-Undang tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3), sehingga berpotensi melampaui kewenangan yang sah (ultra vires) dan mencederai prinsip pemisahan kekuasaan serta independensi kekuasaan kehakiman. Kasus pemanggilan dan pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi Aswanto menunjukkan bukti konkret politisasi dan intervensi legislatif terhadap lembaga yudikatif. Evaluasi yang bersifat mengikat ini juga berpotensi diterapkan terhadap lembaga independen seperti KPK dan KY, yang semestinya bebas dari tekanan politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 228A harus ditinjau ulang dan dihapus, karena berpotensi merusak sistem checks and balances dan menggeser hubungan antarlembaga negara menjadi subordinatif. Reformasi peraturan dan penguatan jaminan independensi lembaga yudikatif dan lembaga negara independen menjadi langkah penting menjaga prinsip negara hukum yang demokratis.
Analysis of Work Environment and Stress Management on Work Productivity Nasution, Dony Orlando; Salman, Radian; Winarsi, Sri
Jurnal Ilmiah Sumber Daya Manusia Vol 6 No 2 (2023): JANUARI, JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia)
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/JJSDM.v6i2.27588

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the work environment and stress at work on employees' work productivity in a company. Illustrate for the community in general and the company, and several factors can cause the increase and decrease in work productivity. This study uses quantitative research with exploratory, descriptive data presentation by taking a sample at a university in East Java. With multiple linear regression techniques can be seen the relationship that occurs to these problems. The results of this study indicate that the Work Environment (X1) and Stress at Work (X2) influence Work Productivity (Y). This research also includes suggestions for improvement to increase work productivity
Rekonstruksi Program Adipura sebagai Instrumen Good Environmental Governance dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Daerah Permanasari, Tyasning; Wijoyo, Suparto; Rahmah, Mas; Salman, Radian
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 2, Februari 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i2.496

Abstract

ABSTRAK Program Adipura selama ini diposisikan sebagai instrumen kebijakan nasional untuk mendorong peningkatan kinerja pengelolaan sampah dan kualitas lingkungan perkotaan oleh pemerintah daerah. Namun, dalam praktiknya Adipura masih beroperasi sebagai kebijakan administratif yang bersifat lunak, sehingga belum memiliki kekuatan mengikat dan mekanisme akuntabilitas hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi posisi hukum Program Adipura agar berfungsi sebagai instrumen tata kelola lingkungan yang efektif dan berkelanjutan dalam pengelolaan sampah daerah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan pendekatan konseptual, melalui analisis deduktif dan preskriptif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan serta teori hukum lingkungan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan normatif Adipura terletak pada tiga aspek utama, yaitu ketiadaan dasar hukum yang kuat dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, tumpang tindih kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah, serta terbatasnya mekanisme akuntabilitas dan partisipasi publik. Berdasarkan kerangka tata kelola lingkungan yang baik dan teori efektivitas hukum, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan status hukum Adipura dari peraturan menteri menjadi peraturan pemerintah atau peraturan presiden, integrasi indikator kinerja Adipura ke dalam sistem akuntabilitas kinerja pemerintahan dan indeks kinerja lingkungan hidup, serta pembentukan mekanisme pengawasan independen berbasis partisipasi publik. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa transformasi Adipura tidak hanya memerlukan reformasi regulasi, tetapi juga perubahan paradigma hukum menuju sistem tata kelola lingkungan yang transparan, partisipatif, dan akuntabel. Dengan demikian, rekonstruksi hukum Adipura diharapkan mampu memperkuat pelaksanaan hukum lingkungan dan mewujudkan keadilan ekologis di tingkat lokal maupun nasional. Kata kunci: adipura; efektivitas hukum; good environmental governance; keadilan ekologis; partisipasi masyarakat.   ABSTRACT Article 1 the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation Number 76 of 2019 concerning Adipura states that Adipura is an instrument for monitoring the performance of regional governments in organizing waste management and green open spaces in realizing a clean, shady and sustainable environmental quality. This research aims to reconstruct the legal status of the Adipura Program so that it functions as an instrument of Good Environmental Governance in sustainable local waste management. The study is grounded on the weakness of Adipura’s normative foundation, which remains a soft law instrument without binding authority in Indonesia’s legal hierarchy. Methodologically, it employs a normative juridical and conceptual approach, using deductive–prescriptive analysis of environmental law, governance theories, and regulatory frameworks. The findings reveal three main normative weaknesses: (1) the absence of strong legal authority, (2) overlapping institutional mandates between central and local governments, and (3) limited mechanisms for public accountability. Based on GEG and the theory of legal effectiveness, the study proposes integrating Adipura into the national legal system by elevating its legal status to a Government Regulation, aligning its indicators with Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) and Environmental Performance Indeks (IKLH), and establishing an independent oversight body grounded in public participation. The study concludes that the transformation of Adipura requires not only regulatory reform but also a shift in legal paradigm toward a transparent, participatory, and accountable environmental governance system. Ultimately, the reconstruction of Adipura’s legal framework strengthens the implementation of the rule of environmental law and promotes ecological justice at both local and national levels. Keywords: adipura; community participation; ecological justice; good environmental governance; legal effectiveness
Rekonstruksi Program Adipura sebagai Instrumen Good Environmental Governance dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Daerah Permanasari, Tyasning; Wijoyo, Suparto; Rahmah, Mas; Salman, Radian
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 2, Februari 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i2.496

Abstract

ABSTRAK Program Adipura selama ini diposisikan sebagai instrumen kebijakan nasional untuk mendorong peningkatan kinerja pengelolaan sampah dan kualitas lingkungan perkotaan oleh pemerintah daerah. Namun, dalam praktiknya Adipura masih beroperasi sebagai kebijakan administratif yang bersifat lunak, sehingga belum memiliki kekuatan mengikat dan mekanisme akuntabilitas hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi posisi hukum Program Adipura agar berfungsi sebagai instrumen tata kelola lingkungan yang efektif dan berkelanjutan dalam pengelolaan sampah daerah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan pendekatan konseptual, melalui analisis deduktif dan preskriptif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan serta teori hukum lingkungan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan normatif Adipura terletak pada tiga aspek utama, yaitu ketiadaan dasar hukum yang kuat dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, tumpang tindih kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah, serta terbatasnya mekanisme akuntabilitas dan partisipasi publik. Berdasarkan kerangka tata kelola lingkungan yang baik dan teori efektivitas hukum, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan status hukum Adipura dari peraturan menteri menjadi peraturan pemerintah atau peraturan presiden, integrasi indikator kinerja Adipura ke dalam sistem akuntabilitas kinerja pemerintahan dan indeks kinerja lingkungan hidup, serta pembentukan mekanisme pengawasan independen berbasis partisipasi publik. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa transformasi Adipura tidak hanya memerlukan reformasi regulasi, tetapi juga perubahan paradigma hukum menuju sistem tata kelola lingkungan yang transparan, partisipatif, dan akuntabel. Dengan demikian, rekonstruksi hukum Adipura diharapkan mampu memperkuat pelaksanaan hukum lingkungan dan mewujudkan keadilan ekologis di tingkat lokal maupun nasional. Kata kunci: adipura; efektivitas hukum; good environmental governance; keadilan ekologis; partisipasi masyarakat.   ABSTRACT Article 1 the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation Number 76 of 2019 concerning Adipura states that Adipura is an instrument for monitoring the performance of regional governments in organizing waste management and green open spaces in realizing a clean, shady and sustainable environmental quality. This research aims to reconstruct the legal status of the Adipura Program so that it functions as an instrument of Good Environmental Governance in sustainable local waste management. The study is grounded on the weakness of Adipura’s normative foundation, which remains a soft law instrument without binding authority in Indonesia’s legal hierarchy. Methodologically, it employs a normative juridical and conceptual approach, using deductive–prescriptive analysis of environmental law, governance theories, and regulatory frameworks. The findings reveal three main normative weaknesses: (1) the absence of strong legal authority, (2) overlapping institutional mandates between central and local governments, and (3) limited mechanisms for public accountability. Based on GEG and the theory of legal effectiveness, the study proposes integrating Adipura into the national legal system by elevating its legal status to a Government Regulation, aligning its indicators with Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) and Environmental Performance Indeks (IKLH), and establishing an independent oversight body grounded in public participation. The study concludes that the transformation of Adipura requires not only regulatory reform but also a shift in legal paradigm toward a transparent, participatory, and accountable environmental governance system. Ultimately, the reconstruction of Adipura’s legal framework strengthens the implementation of the rule of environmental law and promotes ecological justice at both local and national levels. Keywords: adipura; community participation; ecological justice; good environmental governance; legal effectiveness
Co-Authors Achmad Afandi, Zanuar Akbar, Haeril Ali Mannagalli Amalia Fitriany, Shafyra amalina, zaskiya Annisa, Fadila N. Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arsyad, Syaif Artyo, Yovereld Alexetty Avany Mahmudah Bimantara, Arya Christina Rachmawati, Dri Utari Dodi Jaya Wardana Dony Orlando Nasution Dri Utari Christina Rachmawati Eduardo Saratoga Wrahatnala Eko Widiarto Eko Widiarto, Eko Enrico Benedictus Silagen Erni Agustin Fadhlullah, M. R. Faizal Kurniawan Fauzia, Ana Fitriany, Shafyra Amalia Giza'a Jati Pamoro Giza’a Jati Pamoro Hamdi, M. Adib Akmal Hardt, Sascha Ilhami Ginang Pratidina Indrawati Indria Wahyuni Jati Pamoro, Giza'a Joeni Arianto Kurniawan Listiawan, Hermadi M. Hadi Subhan Mannagalli, Ali Mas Rahmah, Mas Maulana, Muhammad Asrul Mohammad Syaiful Aris Muchamamd Ali Safa’at Muhamad Zainal Arifin Muhammad Padol Muhshi, Adam Muklis Al'anam Nasution, Dony Orlando Ni Made Sukartini Noventri, Ardhana C. Nur Annisa, Fadila Nur Annisa Pangastuti, Inagatha Setyarahma Permanasari, Tyasning Pratiwi, Tria Dina Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Rafi Al Malik Rosa Ristawati Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah Safa'at, Muchamamd Ali Salma, Fairus Dhea Saputro, Aries Sembiring, Rinawati Sihombing, Uli Parulian Singarimbun, Bernard Nicholas Solly Aryza Sri Winarsi Sukardi . Sukardi Sukardi Sukardi Sukardi Suparto Wijoyo Tahegga Primananda Alfath Taskesen, Suat Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Uli Parulian Sihombing Wardhani, Fitri Warit Aziz Wibawa, Wahyu APM Wilda Prihatiningtyas