Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Judicial Independence sebagai Syarat Good Governance dalam Demokrasi Konstitusional Ali Mannagalli; Radian Salman; Rosa Ristawati; Dri Utari Christina Rachmawati
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.5973

Abstract

Independensi kekuasaan kehakiman (judicial independence) merupakan elemen kunci dalam mewujudkan good governance di dalam sistem demokrasi konstitusional. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana judicial independence berkontribusi terhadap indikator utama good governance, serta mengevaluasi tantangan struktural dan kelembagaan yang dihadapi oleh sistem peradilan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis-normatif yang diperkuat dengan data sekunder dari putusan pengadilan, laporan lembaga internasional, serta studi komparatif terhadap praktik negara lain. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun secara normatif Indonesia telah menjamin kemandirian kekuasaan kehakiman, dalam praktiknya masih terdapat berbagai hambatan, antara lain kesenjangan antara norma dan praktik, ketergantungan administratif terhadap eksekutif, intervensi politik dalam rekrutmen hakim, dan lemahnya pengawasan etik. Ketiadaan judicial independence berdampak langsung pada menurunnya akuntabilitas, transparansi, serta efektivitas pemerintahan. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan reformasi menyeluruh yang meliputi aspek regulatif, institusional, dan kultural agar peradilan dapat berfungsi secara optimal sebagai pilar demokrasi dan pengawal tata kelola pemerintahan yang baik.
The Implications of Government Disobedience in Carrying Out Constitutional Court Decision No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 on Forest Areas Muhamad Zainal Arifin; Radian Salman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i1.6021

Abstract

The implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 45/PUU-IX/2011 resulted in the determination of forest areas as the legal basis for forest areas. Forest areas in the designation stage can no longer serve as a foundation for legal authority. Since the Forestry Law became law, the Decree on the Designation of Forest Areas across Indonesia has been changed. This means the legal reason for designating forest areas under the Transitional Provisions of Article 81 of the Forestry Law is no longer valid. The Government continues to use the Decree on the Designation of Forest Areas as a foundation for convicting individuals, imposing administrative penalties, restricting civil rights, and issuing permits. The Government's noncompliance with the Constitutional Court Decision infringes upon individuals' constitutional rights and results in environmental degradation due to the lack of oversight in forested regions. This research is normative juridical research (doctrinal research)
THE CONSTITUTIONALLY OF THE DPR’SSUPERVISORY FUNCTION OVER CONSTITUTIONAL COURT JUSTICE AND INDEPENDENT INSTITUTION Avany Mahmudah; Salman, Radian; Mohammad Syaiful Aris
Qaumiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara Islam, Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/qaumiyyah.v6i2.250

Abstract

The constitutionality of the DPR's supervisory authority over Constitutional Court judges and independent state institutions raises serious problems in the Indonesian constitutional system, especially after the ratification of Article 228A of DPR Regulation Number 1 of 2025 concerning Amendments to DPR RI Regulation Number 1 of 2020 concerning Rules of Procedure. This provision grants the DPR the authority to evaluate officials it previously nominated, with evaluations deemed binding. However, such authority lacks a legal foundation in either the 1945 Constitution or the MD3 Law, rendering it potentially ultra vires and contrary to the principle of Separation of Powers and judicial independence. The removal of Constitutional Court Justice Aswanto illustrates a clear example of legislative interference and politicization of the judiciary. Similar threats extend to independent institutions such as the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) and the Judicial Commission (KY), both of which require functional and institutional autonomy. This study employs a normative legal method. Findings confirm that Article 228A poses a constitutional threat and should be repealed to restore institutional equilibrium. Legal reform and regulatory safeguards are urgently needed to protect the integrity and independence of judicial and independent bodies within Indonesia’s democratic rule of law framework. Abstrak Konstitusionalitas kewenangan pengawasan DPR terhadap Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dan lembaga negara independen menimbulkan persoalan serius dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia, terutama pasca disahkannya Pasal 228A Peraturan DPR Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan DPR RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Tertib. Pasal ini memberikan kewenangan evaluatif terhadap pejabat negara yang diangkat atas usul DPR, dengan hasil yang bersifat mengikat. Ketentuan tersebut tidak memiliki dasar konstitusional dalam UUD 1945 maupun dasar legal dalam Undang-Undang tentang Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, Dewan Perwakilan Daerah, dan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah (UU MD3), sehingga berpotensi melampaui kewenangan yang sah (ultra vires) dan mencederai prinsip pemisahan kekuasaan serta independensi kekuasaan kehakiman. Kasus pemanggilan dan pemberhentian Hakim Konstitusi Aswanto menunjukkan bukti konkret politisasi dan intervensi legislatif terhadap lembaga yudikatif. Evaluasi yang bersifat mengikat ini juga berpotensi diterapkan terhadap lembaga independen seperti KPK dan KY, yang semestinya bebas dari tekanan politik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 228A harus ditinjau ulang dan dihapus, karena berpotensi merusak sistem checks and balances dan menggeser hubungan antarlembaga negara menjadi subordinatif. Reformasi peraturan dan penguatan jaminan independensi lembaga yudikatif dan lembaga negara independen menjadi langkah penting menjaga prinsip negara hukum yang demokratis.
Analysis of Work Environment and Stress Management on Work Productivity Nasution, Dony Orlando; Salman, Radian; Winarsi, Sri
Jurnal Ilmiah Sumber Daya Manusia Vol 6 No 2 (2023): JANUARI, JENIUS (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia)
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/JJSDM.v6i2.27588

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the work environment and stress at work on employees' work productivity in a company. Illustrate for the community in general and the company, and several factors can cause the increase and decrease in work productivity. This study uses quantitative research with exploratory, descriptive data presentation by taking a sample at a university in East Java. With multiple linear regression techniques can be seen the relationship that occurs to these problems. The results of this study indicate that the Work Environment (X1) and Stress at Work (X2) influence Work Productivity (Y). This research also includes suggestions for improvement to increase work productivity
Disparities in Norms and Practices of Authority for Managing Public Street Lighting Muhammad Syarifi Qolbi; Radian Salman; Rosa Ristawati
The Innovation of Social Studies Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2025): The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/issj.v7i1.16435

Abstract

This study examines the legal legitimacy of the delegation of authority for managing Public Street Lighting (PJU) from the provincial government to district/city governments. This delegation often occurs without the support of clear legal norms, thus giving rise to issues of legality, accountability, and clarity of the authority structure between levels of government. This study uses a socio-legal approach with normative analysis techniques based on the legitimacy theory of French and Raven and the systemic legal theory of H.L.A. Hart. The research location focused on Pasuruan Regency. The results of the study indicate that the district government's authority in handling PJU is still functional without adequate legal legitimacy, and is not supported by a strong system of coordination and institutional recognition. This condition reflects the weak integration between the legal structure and administrative implementation, which impacts the effectiveness of services and legal certainty in PJU governance.
Rekonstruksi Program Adipura sebagai Instrumen Good Environmental Governance dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Daerah Permanasari, Tyasning; Wijoyo, Suparto; Rahmah, Mas; Salman, Radian
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 2, Februari 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i2.496

Abstract

ABSTRAK Program Adipura selama ini diposisikan sebagai instrumen kebijakan nasional untuk mendorong peningkatan kinerja pengelolaan sampah dan kualitas lingkungan perkotaan oleh pemerintah daerah. Namun, dalam praktiknya Adipura masih beroperasi sebagai kebijakan administratif yang bersifat lunak, sehingga belum memiliki kekuatan mengikat dan mekanisme akuntabilitas hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi posisi hukum Program Adipura agar berfungsi sebagai instrumen tata kelola lingkungan yang efektif dan berkelanjutan dalam pengelolaan sampah daerah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan pendekatan konseptual, melalui analisis deduktif dan preskriptif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan serta teori hukum lingkungan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan normatif Adipura terletak pada tiga aspek utama, yaitu ketiadaan dasar hukum yang kuat dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, tumpang tindih kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah, serta terbatasnya mekanisme akuntabilitas dan partisipasi publik. Berdasarkan kerangka tata kelola lingkungan yang baik dan teori efektivitas hukum, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan status hukum Adipura dari peraturan menteri menjadi peraturan pemerintah atau peraturan presiden, integrasi indikator kinerja Adipura ke dalam sistem akuntabilitas kinerja pemerintahan dan indeks kinerja lingkungan hidup, serta pembentukan mekanisme pengawasan independen berbasis partisipasi publik. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa transformasi Adipura tidak hanya memerlukan reformasi regulasi, tetapi juga perubahan paradigma hukum menuju sistem tata kelola lingkungan yang transparan, partisipatif, dan akuntabel. Dengan demikian, rekonstruksi hukum Adipura diharapkan mampu memperkuat pelaksanaan hukum lingkungan dan mewujudkan keadilan ekologis di tingkat lokal maupun nasional. Kata kunci: adipura; efektivitas hukum; good environmental governance; keadilan ekologis; partisipasi masyarakat.   ABSTRACT Article 1 the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation Number 76 of 2019 concerning Adipura states that Adipura is an instrument for monitoring the performance of regional governments in organizing waste management and green open spaces in realizing a clean, shady and sustainable environmental quality. This research aims to reconstruct the legal status of the Adipura Program so that it functions as an instrument of Good Environmental Governance in sustainable local waste management. The study is grounded on the weakness of Adipura’s normative foundation, which remains a soft law instrument without binding authority in Indonesia’s legal hierarchy. Methodologically, it employs a normative juridical and conceptual approach, using deductive–prescriptive analysis of environmental law, governance theories, and regulatory frameworks. The findings reveal three main normative weaknesses: (1) the absence of strong legal authority, (2) overlapping institutional mandates between central and local governments, and (3) limited mechanisms for public accountability. Based on GEG and the theory of legal effectiveness, the study proposes integrating Adipura into the national legal system by elevating its legal status to a Government Regulation, aligning its indicators with Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) and Environmental Performance Indeks (IKLH), and establishing an independent oversight body grounded in public participation. The study concludes that the transformation of Adipura requires not only regulatory reform but also a shift in legal paradigm toward a transparent, participatory, and accountable environmental governance system. Ultimately, the reconstruction of Adipura’s legal framework strengthens the implementation of the rule of environmental law and promotes ecological justice at both local and national levels. Keywords: adipura; community participation; ecological justice; good environmental governance; legal effectiveness
Rekonstruksi Program Adipura sebagai Instrumen Good Environmental Governance dalam Pengelolaan Sampah Daerah Permanasari, Tyasning; Wijoyo, Suparto; Rahmah, Mas; Salman, Radian
Bina Hukum Lingkungan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026): Bina Hukum Lingkungan, Volume 10, Nomor 2, Februari 2026
Publisher : Asosiasi Pembina Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia (PHLI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24970/bhl.v10i2.496

Abstract

ABSTRAK Program Adipura selama ini diposisikan sebagai instrumen kebijakan nasional untuk mendorong peningkatan kinerja pengelolaan sampah dan kualitas lingkungan perkotaan oleh pemerintah daerah. Namun, dalam praktiknya Adipura masih beroperasi sebagai kebijakan administratif yang bersifat lunak, sehingga belum memiliki kekuatan mengikat dan mekanisme akuntabilitas hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi posisi hukum Program Adipura agar berfungsi sebagai instrumen tata kelola lingkungan yang efektif dan berkelanjutan dalam pengelolaan sampah daerah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan pendekatan konseptual, melalui analisis deduktif dan preskriptif terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan serta teori hukum lingkungan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelemahan normatif Adipura terletak pada tiga aspek utama, yaitu ketiadaan dasar hukum yang kuat dalam hierarki peraturan perundang-undangan, tumpang tindih kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah, serta terbatasnya mekanisme akuntabilitas dan partisipasi publik. Berdasarkan kerangka tata kelola lingkungan yang baik dan teori efektivitas hukum, penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan status hukum Adipura dari peraturan menteri menjadi peraturan pemerintah atau peraturan presiden, integrasi indikator kinerja Adipura ke dalam sistem akuntabilitas kinerja pemerintahan dan indeks kinerja lingkungan hidup, serta pembentukan mekanisme pengawasan independen berbasis partisipasi publik. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa transformasi Adipura tidak hanya memerlukan reformasi regulasi, tetapi juga perubahan paradigma hukum menuju sistem tata kelola lingkungan yang transparan, partisipatif, dan akuntabel. Dengan demikian, rekonstruksi hukum Adipura diharapkan mampu memperkuat pelaksanaan hukum lingkungan dan mewujudkan keadilan ekologis di tingkat lokal maupun nasional. Kata kunci: adipura; efektivitas hukum; good environmental governance; keadilan ekologis; partisipasi masyarakat.   ABSTRACT Article 1 the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation Number 76 of 2019 concerning Adipura states that Adipura is an instrument for monitoring the performance of regional governments in organizing waste management and green open spaces in realizing a clean, shady and sustainable environmental quality. This research aims to reconstruct the legal status of the Adipura Program so that it functions as an instrument of Good Environmental Governance in sustainable local waste management. The study is grounded on the weakness of Adipura’s normative foundation, which remains a soft law instrument without binding authority in Indonesia’s legal hierarchy. Methodologically, it employs a normative juridical and conceptual approach, using deductive–prescriptive analysis of environmental law, governance theories, and regulatory frameworks. The findings reveal three main normative weaknesses: (1) the absence of strong legal authority, (2) overlapping institutional mandates between central and local governments, and (3) limited mechanisms for public accountability. Based on GEG and the theory of legal effectiveness, the study proposes integrating Adipura into the national legal system by elevating its legal status to a Government Regulation, aligning its indicators with Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) and Environmental Performance Indeks (IKLH), and establishing an independent oversight body grounded in public participation. The study concludes that the transformation of Adipura requires not only regulatory reform but also a shift in legal paradigm toward a transparent, participatory, and accountable environmental governance system. Ultimately, the reconstruction of Adipura’s legal framework strengthens the implementation of the rule of environmental law and promotes ecological justice at both local and national levels. Keywords: adipura; community participation; ecological justice; good environmental governance; legal effectiveness
Indonesia's Involvement in the Paris Agreement on Low Carbon Development Agenda in Indonesia: A Social Legal Study Thoriq Al Hakim Faizy; Radian Salman; Arif Rahman Hakim
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Rechtenstudent August 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i2.343

Abstract

Indonesia's participation in the Paris Agreement has created opportunities for international cooperation that can support the progress of low-carbon development at the national level. The participation, along with the strong global commitment to help developing countries achieve their emission reduction targets under the Paris Agreement, brings several benefits for Indonesia in obtaining international support for climate change adaptation and mitigation, including climate finance, technology transfer, and capacity building. This research aims to analyse the strategic role of the Paris Agreement towards a low-carbon development agenda in the energy sector in Indonesia. This research is based on regime theory and neoliberal institutionalism paradigm as the theoretical framework for analysing the issues addressed. Furthermore, this research applies the literature study method by using sociolegal approach. The findings of this research indicate that the Paris Agreement has contributed to the progress of low-carbon development in Indonesia particularly in the energy sector. However, its implementation has been sluggish in meeting the targets for climate change mitigation and adaptation.
THE PESANTREN WAY IN CREATING LEADERS Novianti, Lelly Lailiyah; Wijoyo, Suparto; Rahmah, Mas; Thalib, Prawita; Salman, Radian; Ristawati, Rosa; Fauzia, Ficky Dahliana
JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Vol 19, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/JIIS.2025.19.2.363-388

Abstract

Pesantren or Islamic traditional boarding school is one the unique institution within Indonesian Islam. Serving a comprehensive education with emphasis on the internalization of Islamic values is the main purpose of pesantren. Additionally, since they also serve the society safeguarding and leadership, Pesantren promote the emergence of new leadership. This study explores how pesantren cultivates leadership by integrating spiritual depth with intellectual rigor highlighting 5 pesantrens across East Java. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) from Scopus, WoS, and Semantic Scholar, the findings identify five leadership development categories in pesantren: moral and character-based, entrepreneurial, humanist and inclusive, spiritual and religious, and transformational and innovative leadership. As a result, Pesantren provides a strong foundation for leadership education, grounded in moral, spiritual, and local wisdom. This model has been proven effective in shaping character, integrity, and responsibility, making it a relevant framework for fostering the nation's moral and leadership development. Their alumni show strong leadership skills that beneficial for their role in society.
Constitutional Protection of Cultural Heritage in Indonesia: The Role of Museums in Preserving National Identity and Public Welfare Rosa Ristawati; Radian Salman; Shafyra Amalia Fitriany; Suat Taskesen
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3348.pp49-70

Abstract

Cultural heritage is a fundamental asset in promoting cultural diversity and facilitating access to education, social values, science, technology, and tourism. Museums play a pivotal role in preserving cultural heritage and fulfilling constitutional obligations, as enshrined in the Indonesian Constitution. Protecting cultural heritage is essential for maintaining national identity and upholding citizens' constitutional rights, particularly in education and cultural participation. This study analyses the constitutional framework and government policies related to cultural heritage protection, with a specific focus on museums in Indonesia. Employing a statute-based and comparative approach, the research examines constitutional provisions such as Article 18B(1) of the Indonesian Constitution, which mandates the state’s responsibility to preserve cultural heritage and safeguard indigenous communities' rights. Despite this constitutional obligation, challenges such as limited financial resources, inadequate maintenance, and institutional constraints hinder the effective operation of museums. The findings emphasize that strengthening museums is not only necessary for heritage conservation but also for fostering national and local values that define Indonesia’s constitutional identity. The study argues that the government must implement more comprehensive policies and allocate sufficient resources to enhance museums’ role in cultural preservation, ensuring their sustained contribution to public welfare and national development.
Co-Authors Achmad Afandi, Zanuar Akbar, Haeril Ali Mannagalli Amalia Fitriany, Shafyra amalina, zaskiya Annisa, Fadila N. Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arsyad, Syaif Artyo, Yovereld Alexetty Avany Mahmudah Bimantara, Arya Christina Rachmawati, Dri Utari Dodi Jaya Wardana Dony Orlando Nasution Dri Utari Christina Rachmawati Eduardo Saratoga Wrahatnala Eko Widiarto Eko Widiarto, Eko Enrico Benedictus Silagen Erni Agustin Fadhlullah, M. R. Faizal Kurniawan Fauzia, Ana Fauzia, Ficky Dahliana Fitriany, Shafyra Amalia Giza'a Jati Pamoro Giza’a Jati Pamoro Hamdi, M. Adib Akmal Hardt, Sascha Haris Sanjaya Ilhami Ginang Pratidina Indrawati Indria Wahyuni Jati Pamoro, Giza'a Joeni Arianto Kurniawan Listiawan, Hermadi M. Hadi Subhan Mannagalli, Ali Mas Rahmah, Mas Maulana, Muhammad Asrul Mohammad Syaiful Aris Muchamamd Ali Safa’at Muhamad Zainal Arifin Muhammad Padol Muhammad Syarifi Qolbi Muhshi, Adam Muklis Al'anam Nasution, Dony Orlando Ni Made Sukartini Noventri, Ardhana C. Novianti, Lelly Lailiyah Nur Annisa, Fadila Nur Annisa Permanasari, Tyasning Pratiwi, Tria Dina Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Rafi Al Malik Rahmah, Mas Rosa Ristawati Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah Safa'at, Muchamamd Ali Salma, Fairus Dhea Saputro, Aries Sembiring, Rinawati Shafyra Amalia Fitriany Sihombing, Uli Parulian Singarimbun, Bernard Nicholas Solly Aryza Sri Winarsi Suat Taskesen Sukardi . Sukardi Sukardi Sukardi Sukardi Suparto Wijoyo Tahegga Primananda Alfath Taskesen, Suat Thalib, Prawita Thoriq Al Hakim Faizy Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Uli Parulian Sihombing Wardhani, Fitri Warit Aziz Wibawa, Wahyu APM Wilda Prihatiningtyas