Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search
Journal : MATHEdunesa

Mathematical Communication Skills Of Senior High School Student In Solving Mathematical Problem Based On Adversity Quotient Cahyadi, Hasbiansyah; Susanah, Susanah
MATHEdunesa Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 14 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v14n1.p85-103

Abstract

Mathematical communication skills are useful for students to understand mathematical language. This research aims to describe student’s mathematical communication skills with type AQ climber, camper, and quitter in solving mathematical problems. This research is a descriptive study. Data collection techniques include questionnaires, assignments, and interviews. Data analysis techniques include data reduction, data display, and conclusions. The results of this study show that: a) At the stage of understanding the problem, climber and camper students wrote of all the necessary mathematical information, while quitter students wrote of some the necessary mathematical information. Climber and quitter students use mathematical language in the form of precise numbers and symbols, while camper students don’t use precise mathematical symbols. b) At the stage of devising a plan three of them make mathematical models and write down calculation operations that correspond to the question. Climber and camper students present and explain their ideas with clear reasons, while quitter students give less clear reasons. c) At the stage of carrying out the plan climber and camper students use mathematical language in the form of numbers, variables, symbols and logical connections appropriately, while quitter students uses a symbol that is not properly used. d) At the stage of looking back climber and camper students use mathematical language in the form of appropriate numbers and symbols, while quitter students don’t use mathematical language.
Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Kontekstual Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Bachrudin, Faizal; Susanah, Susanah
MATHEdunesa Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Mathedunesa Volume 14 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v14n2.p483-496

Abstract

This study aims to describe the profile of students' critical thinking in solving contextualised mathematics problems in terms of adversity quotient. This research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects consisted of 3 grade IX students who were selected based on high (Climber), medium (Camper), and low (Quitter) Adversity Quotient (AQ) levels by considering equal mathematics ability (based on End Of Year Summative Assessment Mathematics scores) and the same gender. Data on students' critical thinking profiles in solving contextualised mathematics problems were collected by task-based interviews on contextualised mathematics problems. The data collected from the task-based interviews were then transcribed and reduced which were used for interpretation and inference. The results of this study show that climber students think critically evidenced by interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation at each stage of problem solving, namely the stage of understanding the problem, the stage of developing a solution plan, the stage of implementing the solution plan, and the stage of checking back. Camper students think critically, as evidenced by interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation, but at the stage of preparing a solution plan, they do not explain the reasons for the steps used and do not review their answers, so they doubt the answers stated. Quitter students think critically evidenced by interpretation, analysis, evaluation, inference, explanation, and self-regulation, but do not realise that their work is wrong.