Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.455
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Indonesian EFL Journal Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature TRANS-KATA: Journal of Language, Literature, Culture, and Education Lingua JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION Joong-Ki : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Research Review: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah EJOIN : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nanggroe: Journal Of Scholarly Service Nanggroe: Journal of Scholarly Service Joong-Ki SEAQIL Journal of Language Education Joong-Ki AJCD Journal of Advance in Language, Literature, and Education
Jefriyanto Saud
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION

 1 
Analisis Strategi Linguistik Richard Eliezer: Penggunaan Frasa "Tidak Tahu" dan "Saya Rasa" di Pengadilan. Saud, Jefriyanto; Anwar, Miftahulkhairah; Prihantoro, Prihantoro
Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education Vol. 5 No. 4 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION, Volume 5 Nomor 4, Desember 2024
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/jige.v5i4.3506

Abstract

Language serves as a strategic tool for managing legal and emotional pressures during trials. This study focuses on the use of the phrases "tidak tahu" and "saya rasa" in Richard Eliezer's testimony in the Brigadier J case, reflecting defensive communication strategies. The issues examined are how these phrases are used to evade legal responsibility and how emotional pressure influences speech patterns. Using a descriptive quantitative and qualitative approach, the results indicate that the phrase “tidak tahu" (used 41 times) is employed to avoid accountability, while "saya rasa" (used 4 times) reflects subjective opinions aimed at risk mitigation. These findings reveal a close relationship between the emotional pressure experienced by the witness and their language choices, as well as the importance of linguistic analysis in understanding legal communication.
Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Pertanyaan Interogasi BAP: Kajian Linguistik Forensik dan DampakPsikologis pada Saksi Saud, Jefriyanto; Lustyantie, Ninuk; Murtadho, Fathiaty
Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION, Volume 6 Nomor 2
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/jige.v6i2.4124

Abstract

The language in the Police Investigation Report (BAP) is very important, yet interrogations in Indonesia often neglect politeness, resulting in suggestive and intimidating questions that can pressure witnesses, damage their "face," and disrupt memory accuracy. This research fills the gap in studies in Indonesia that have not yet holistically integrated pragmatic politeness theory (Brown & Levinson, Leech) with psycholinguistic and cognitive impacts (Sweller's cognitive load, Gernsbacher & Levelt's disfluency) on BAP witnesses. The aim is to identify the forms and violations of politeness in BAP questions, evaluate their psychological impact on witnesses, and formulate recommendations for fairer interrogations. This descriptive qualitative research analyzes BAP data using the politeness theory of Brown & Levinson and Leech (modified with "mitigation tools" for forensic contexts), as well as Sweller's cognitive load theory and Gernsbacher & Levelt's psycholinguistics to analyze witness responses (focusing on disfluency and lexical access). A layered analysis scheme is used to link politeness violations with the intensity of cognitive load. Validity is ensured through theory triangulation, peer debriefing, member checking, and audit trail. It is expected that this research will produce a multidimensional evaluation model and practical recommendations for fairer and more effective interrogation practices
Co-Authors Abdul Hafid Achmad Hidir Achmad Naufal Irsyadi Ahmad Hariyadi Ahmad Munawir Amiruddin Azhariah Rachman Bredyna Agnesiana Cicilia Tantri Suryawati Dama, Siti Destian Apriliani Dona Tihnike Elfrida Ratnawati Everhad Markiano Solissa Faizin Fathiaty Murtadho Hanisah Hanafi Haris Danial Harto Malik Indra Tjahyadi Indri Wirahmi Bay Ishak Bagea Julhadi Latingara, Nurullah Hairunnisa Lela Susanty M. Syahrul Izomi Miftahulkhairah Anwar Mohamad Syahrun Ibrahim Muta'allim Muta'allim Muziatun Mukadji Ninuk Lustyantie Novriyanto Napu Nurul Ain Halada Nurullah Hairunnisa Latingara Petrus Jacob Pattiasina Prihantoro Prihantoro Rafislam Dilapanga rahmi setiawati Rini Jayanti Harja Saepulloh Saepulloh Sasabone, Carolina Satriani Sunani, Inang Regita Cahyani SURYANTI Usman Pakaya Wajnah Weldemina Yudit Tiwery Weldemina Yudit Tiwery Zainal Rafli, Zainal Zulkifli La Samidi