Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.233
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Psikologi Jurnal EMPATI Jurnal Psikologi Tabularasa Anfusina: Journal of Psychology Jurnal Darma Agung PAEDAGOGY : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi Buletin Psikologi Fathana: Jurnal Psikologi Ar-Raniry Developmental and Clinical Psychology
Prasetyo Budi Widodo
Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Prof. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang Semarang, Indonesia, 50275
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 41 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
ADAPTASI DAN EVALUASI PSIKOMETRIK LAKAEV ACADEMIC STRESS RESPONSE SCALE-2 (LASRS-2) DALAM BAHASA INDONESIA Muhammad Yassar Aryasena; Muhammad Indra Astrawan; Prasetyo Budi Widodo
PAEDAGOGY : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Psikologi Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia (P4I)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/paedagogy.v6i4.15956

Abstract

Psychological test adaptation requires more than literal translation because construct equivalence and psychometric evidence must be examined before an instrument is used in a new cultural setting. This study aimed to adapt the Lakaev Academic Stress Response Scale-2 (LASRS-2) into Indonesian and to examine preliminary evidence of its reliability and construct validity among undergraduate students. The adaptation involved forward translation, translation synthesis, back-translation, expert review, readability testing, pilot testing, and psychometric evaluation. ThePilot study involved 172 undergraduate students from the Faculty of Psychology at University X, with data collected using convenience sampling.. The original 26-item instrument represents four domains: affective, behavioral, cognitive, and physiological. Overall internal consistency was high, with omega of 0.920 and alpha of 0.919. However, the four-factor confirmatory factor analysis did not demonstrate adequate model fit (χ² = 491.843; df = 293; CFI = 0.892; TLI = 0.880; RMSEA = 0.063; SRMR = 0.063). These findings indicate strong internal consistency but insufficient evidence for construct validity and discriminant validity. The Indonesian LASRS-2 should therefore be considered a preliminary adaptation requiring item refinement, replication in a more heterogeneous sample, and further factor-analytic investigation before use in confirmatory research. ABSTRAK Adaptasi alat ukur psikologis ke dalam konteks bahasa dan budaya baru memerlukan lebih dari sekadar penerjemahan, karena kesetaraan konstruk dan bukti psikometrik perlu dipastikan sebelum instrumen digunakan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengadaptasi Lakaev Academic Stress Response Scale-2 (LASRS-2) ke dalam Bahasa Indonesia dan mengevaluasi reliabilitas serta validitas konstruknya pada mahasiswa program sarjana. Adaptasi dilakukan melalui forward translation, sintesis terjemahan, back-translation, expert review, uji keterbacaan, pilot testing, dan evaluasi psikometrik. Uji coba melibatkan 172 mahasiswa program sarjana di Fakultas Psikologi Universitas X dengan teknik pengambilan data menggunakan convenience sampling. Instrumen awal terdiri atas 26 butir yang merepresentasikan empat domain, yaitu afektif, behavioral, kognitif, dan fisiologis. Reliabilitas internal keseluruhan menunjukkan koefisien omega 0.920 dan alpha cronbach 0.919. Namun, model empat faktor yang diuji melalui confirmatory factor analysis belum menunjukkan kecocokan yang memadai (χ² = 491.843; df = 293; CFI = 0.892; TLI = 0.880; RMSEA = 0.063; SRMR = 0.063). Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa LASRS-2 versi Bahasa Indonesia memiliki konsistensi internal yang kuat, tetapi bukti validitas konstruk dan diskriminasi antar dimensinya masih belum memadai. Versi ini lebih tepat dipandang sebagai instrumen adaptasi awal yang memerlukan penyempurnaan item, replikasi pada sampel yang lebih heterogen, serta pengujian faktor lanjutan sebelum digunakan untuk penelitian konfirmatori.
Co-Authors Adi Dinardinata, Adi Adistiya Nanda Agustina, Yanuar Putri Ajeng Mustika Sari Al Karim, Chamilul Hikam Amalia Ikhlatunnisa Islami Musthafa Anisia Fauziah Anita Listiara Annisa Hidayati, Annisa Damar Anggiafitri Yulissusanti Diana Rusmawati Dinie Ratri Desiningrum Ediwan Farid Fahmadi Endah Mujiasih Erwin Prasetio Raharjo Indartono Fajriati Nurhidayah Fitria Susanti Heni Sulistiowati Hyoscyamina, Darorsy Endah I Kadek Darmo Suputra Ika Febrian Kristiana Indrawansyah, Elvan Juli Jannah, Siti Miftahul Jati Ariati Jessica Florentina Tutupoly, Jessica Florentina Kunthi Zahra Pradita Mahardikha Adhi Nugroho Mahruzar Susan Wijaya Marianty, Dewi Melia Fortunela Muhammad Indra Astrawan Muhammad Yassar Aryasena Nada Febriani, Nada Nadya Ariyani Hasanah Nuriyyatiningrum Nofiar Aldriandy Putra Novita Pebriani Nuha‘ Azizah Mas’ud Nur Indah Margareni Putri Paulina Raras Adyarini Raharjo, Alim Panggih Rahayu Putranti Utami S Siswati, S Selsia Kartika Sari Siswati Siswati Siti Nur Azizah Sri Qomaria Fajriyah Suparno Suparno Syani Masinta Suri Tri Kurniati Amrilah Yunita Ikka Pramastuti