Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.97
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Daulat Hukum NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Syntax Transformation Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Prosiding Seri Seminar Nasional QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Education Technology Information Social Sciences and Health Jurnal Serina Abdimas
Tundjung Herning Sitabuana
Dosen Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Pemenuhan Asas Keadilan Dalam Penerapan Parliamentary Threshold Pada Pemilihan Umum Legislatif di Indonesia Patrick Winson Salim; Tundjung Herning Sitabuana
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10907

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and find out the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7 of 2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 and evaluate whether its application meets the principles of justice. This is motivated by the application of the parliamentary threshold regulated in Law No. 7 of 2027 on General Elections and reaffirmed through Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 which is considered not fulfilling the principle of justice and violating the 1945 Constitution. The urgency of this research is to provide legal clarity regarding the parliamentary threshold, which is intended to maintain the quality of representation in parliament, but in practice creates problems of injustice for parties that are unable to meet the threshold. The novelty in this author's research is to show that the application of the parliamentary threshold can reduce the diversity of political choices and affect the fairness of representation. The research method used in this study is the normative method. The results show that the application of the parliamentary threshold in Law No. 7/2017 and Constitutional Court Decision Number 116/PUU-XIX/2023 reflects the Court's efforts to consider the principle of justice. Stating that the threshold is still needed, but it must be reviewed to ensure more proportional and democratic representation. This is in line with the concept of justice according to philosophers who view that the review of the threshold also aims to provide opportunities for underrepresented parties, support the principle of justice as fairness, and achieve justice that allows future parliamentary thresholds to be determined based on popular sovereignty. Tujuan pada penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dan mengetahui penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 serta mengevaluasi apakah penerapannya memenuhi asas keadilan. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penerapan ambang batas parlemen yang diatur dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2027 tentang Pemilihan Umum dan ditegaskan kembali melalui Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 yang dianggap tidak memenuhi asas keadilan dan melanggar Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945. Urgensi penelitian ini ialah memberikan kejelasan secara hukum mengenai parliamentary threshold yang dimaksudkan untuk menjaga kualitas representasi di parlemen dalam praktiknya justru menciptakan permasalahan ketidakadilan bagi partai-partai yang tidak mampu memenuhi ambang batas tersebut. Kebaruan dalam penelitian penulis ini adalah menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dapat mereduksi keberagaman pilihan politik dan memengaruhi keadilan representasi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan parliamentary threshold dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 dan Putusan MK Nomor 116/PUU-XIX/2023 mencerminkan upaya MK mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Menyatakan ambang batas tetap diperlukan, tetapi harus ditinjau untuk memastikan representasi yang lebih proporsional dan demokratis. Hal tersebut sejalan dengan konsep keadilan menurut filsuf-filsuf yang memandang peninjauan ambang batas juga bertujuan memberi kesempatan bagi pihak yang kurang terwakili, mendukung prinsip justice as fairness serta mencapai keadilan yang memungkinkan parliamentary threshold masa depan ditetapkan berdasarkan kedaulatan rakyat.
Co-Authors Ahmad Redi Ardhelia Putri Salsabila Asnita Tresia Sitompul Aurelia Meagan Tan Carissa Patricia Hong Chanandika Dafri Widagdo Dixon Sanjaya Dixon Sanjaya Dixon Sanjaya Elisabeth Sihaloho Endang Lestari Evelyn Septiana Fakhrana Izazi Hanifati Gerald Febrian Setyawan Glen Clifford Mambo Jr Intan Kurnia Safitri Jeane Neltje Saly Jelita Safitri Ananda Jhoni Lie Kelvin Chandra Kevin Halomoan Luverne Pujian Quinn Mendy Cevitra Michael Conrad Nada Dwi Azhari Nadya Frisca Najma Syamila Omega Kharisma Patricia Kimberly Elias Patrick Winson Salim Priska Khairunnisa Putri Hasian Silalahi Putri Nabila Kurnia Arsyad Rasji Rieven Yehezkiel Nasari Rieven Yehezkiel Nasari Sandrarina Hertanto Silvia Cahyadi Stefany Febiola Tatang Ruchimat Tiyas Asri Putri Valen Nainggolan Viona Widjaja Yonikken Gautami Pundarika