Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

The Model of Appointing Judges of the Constitutional Court in a Constitutional Democracy Prastiwi, Dian Eka; Yusdiansyah, Efik
Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): May 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/jlca.v3i2.9381

Abstract

The very existence of the Constitutional Court is interpreted as a constitutional tribunal, which then becomes a new branch of power included in the judicial power. The model for appointing judges to the Constitutional Court may affect the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. In order to implement changes and improvements in the appointment of judges in Indonesia, we need to look at the model of appointment of constitutional judges in other countries. The aim of this research is to analyse the model of constitutional judges' appointment in Indonesia and compare it with the models of constitutional judges' appointment in other countries. The research method used is normative legal research by examining primary and secondary legal materials related to the appointment of constitutional judges. The research results show that there are several models of constitutional judge appointments in different countries, namely models involving the executive and legislative branches, models involving only the legislative branch, models involving all three branches of government, and models conducted by special institutions. Indonesia itself uses a model involving all three branches of government. This research also compares the system for appointing constitutional judges in Indonesia with other countries such as Germany, Austria and South Korea. The conclusion of this research is that the mechanism for appointing constitutional judges must be carried out in a transparent, independent and accountable manner in order to guarantee the independence of the Constitutional Court.
Law Enforcement and Liability of Government Officials for Spatial Planning Violations at PIK-2 Area Tangerang Regency Chadijah, Siti; Yusdiansyah, Efik; Jamilah, Lina
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v12i2.46666

Abstract

Determination Project National Strategic Area in the Pantai Indah Kapuk-2 (PIK-2) area, Tangerang Regency, has caused polemic Because suspicion spatial planning violations and lack of analysis impact environment as well as social for public around. Research This aim analyze policy determination of PIK-2 as Project National Strategic and enforcement justice in implementation regulations the method law normative used with reviewing secondary data in the form of regulation legislation and documents related. Findings main show that determination of PIK-2 not in accordance with Constitution Number 26 of 2007 concerning Spatial Planning and Banten Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2023. Regulatory process done without notice spatial planning regulations and impacts environment in a way comprehensive and minimal involvement community. Impact identified concrete covering damage environment coast and loss access public to land productive. Research propose giving sanctions in the form of enforcement law strict to the issuing official regulations No in accordance rules to avoid violations in the future. The implication is that enforcement more laws strong and evaluation repeat PIK-2 Project National Strategic policy is important done with involving community and stakeholders interests so that development walk sustainable, fair, and maintain sustainability environment as well as social.
Legal Certainty in Resolving Medical Malpractice Issue in Indonesia: A Review of the 2023 Health Law Purwanto, Agus; Yusdiansyah, Efik; Kurrohman, Taufik; Ginting, James Davidta
Sinergi International Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Sinergi Kawula Muda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/law.v4i1.810

Abstract

Medical malpractice disputes can occur in health services, treatments, actions, and care when patients feel disadvantaged or do not get the results they expected. It often arises when there are patients who are sick or unhealthy, then receive medical/medical actions that cause their illness to not heal or even become sicker or can also cause disability to the patient and even death or death. Medical malpractice disputes are disputes about bad practices, namely doing what should not be done or not doing what should be done. This incident often occurs in health services, both in hospitals, health centers, clinics, and even in independent practice places that end up in court. The purpose of the study is to understand and analyze the implementation of health law in Indonesia in resolving medical malpractice disputes with a legal certainty approach based on Law Number 17 of 2023 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 20 of 2024, to understand, analyze, and seek proposals on what government policy should be in regulating the settlement of medical malpractice. The research method used is descriptive analysis with a normative legal approach through library and field research with data collection techniques through literature studies. Results of the study show that the policies contained in Law Number 17 Year 2023 still lack clarity because the law has yet to establish a precise and authoritative definition of medical malpractice which results in there being no legal certainty.
Edukasi Pencegahan Stunting sebagai Pemenuhan Hak Anak Berdasarkan UUD 1945 di Desa Peuteuycondong Rini Irianti Sundary; Efik Yusdiansyah; Hasyim Adnan; Dewi Kartikasari; Eyu Elya
Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Empowerment Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/jise.v4i3.140

Abstract

Stunting dan gizi buruk masih menjadi permasalahan serius di Indonesia, khususnya di wilayah pedesaan seperti Desa Peuteuycondong, Kecamatan Cibeber, Kabupaten Cianjur. Kondisi ini tidak hanya berdampak pada pertumbuhan fisik dan kognitif anak, tetapi juga secara fundamental melanggar hak-hak dasar anak yang dijamin oleh Pasal 28B ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, yaitu hak untuk tumbuh dan berkembang serta berhak atas perlindungan dari kekerasan dan diskriminasi. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pengetahuan dan kesadaran masyarakat Desa Peuteuycondong mengenai pencegahan stunting dan gizi buruk melalui edukasi komprehensif. Jenis m etode yang digunakan adalah metode Community Participatory Research (CBPR)  yaitu pendekatan yang melibatkan kolaborasi antara tim pengabdi dan peneliti  dengan  masyarakat dalam seluruh proses pengabdian, meliputi sosialisasi interaktif, penyuluhan gizi seimbang, demonstrasi pengolahan makanan bergizi lokal, serta pendampingan langsung kepada keluarga berisiko. Partisipasi aktif masyarakat, terutama ibu hamil, ibu menyusui, dan orang tua, menjadi kunci keberhasilan program ini.  Diharapkan, dengan peningkatan pemahaman dan perubahan perilaku positif, angka stunting dan gizi buruk di Desa Peuteuycondong dapat menurun secara signifikan, sehingga hak anak untuk tumbuh kembang optimal dan sehat dapat terpenuhi, sejalan dengan amanat konstitusi.
APPLICATION OF THE NON-RETROACTIVE PRINCIPLE BY JUDGES IN DISPUTES REGARDING TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AFTER THE ELIGIBILITY OF THE JOB LAW AS A MANIFESTATION LEGAL CERTAINTY Muhammad Mahendra Maskhur Sinaga; A. Harits Nu’man; Efik Yusdiansyah; Dini Dewi Heniarti
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i3.2870

Abstract

This study examines the application of the principle of non-retroactivity by judges in Indonesian industrial relations courts, specifically in cases of termination of employment (PHK) arising after the enactment of the Job Creation Law (UU Cipta Kerja). The research analyzes how courts balance the application of the new law with the legal principles protecting workers' rights and ensuring legal certainty. By examining relevant court decisions and legal doctrines, the study finds that judges generally adhere to the principle of non-retroactivity, applying the labor laws in effect at the time the cause of action arose (the PHK event). This adherence upholds constitutional rights and prevents unfair application of the Job Creation Law to pre-existing disputes. However, challenges remain in ensuring consistent application and interpretation, highlighting the need for clear guidelines and ongoing judicial education to promote legal certainty and fairness in industrial relations disputes.