Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Limits of Authority and Competence of General Practitioners in Aesthetic Practice Nazliyah, Inayatun; Putera, Andika Persada; Zamroni, Mohammad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i3.1679

Abstract

The rapid development of medical aesthetic services that is not matched by the creation of governing regulations has become one of the most important issues in the field of aesthetic medicine, namely competency issues related to authority because there are still gray areas regarding the authority of general practitioners in aesthetic practice. This research aims to analyze the authority of general practitioners in aesthetic practice and legal protection for general practitioners in aesthetic practice. The research methodology used in writing this thesis is normative juridical. This approach uses a statue approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. The authority and competence of general practitioners in aesthetic services are limited to primary care, non-invasive, minimally invasive procedures and are only allowed to perform medical procedures in accordance with what has been obtained during the education process, and are advised to conduct additional training and make referrals to specialists if not their authority and competence. Legal protection for general practitioners in aesthetic medicine services, general practitioners must apply professional standards and standard operating procedures in carrying out aesthetic medical services is widely regulated in laws and regulations.
Dekonstruksi Pengawasan Hakim Melalui Aliansi Strategis Komisi Yudisial dan Mahkamah Agung Zamroni, Mohammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art3

Abstract

The dual oversight of judges conducted internally by the Supreme Court and externally by the Judicial Commission has not yielded the expected results but has instead given rise to conflicts of interest between institutions that not only reduce the quality of oversight of judges, but also reduce the quality of judges. Therefore, it is important to examine the system of oversight of judges involving two independent state institutions within the scope of judicial power. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. Research materials were collected through literature studies and analysed critically and systematically to reach conclusions. This study offers a solution for a collaborative system of oversight of judges in the form of a strategic alliance. The purpose of this study is to analyse two issues: (1) the urgency of a strategic alliance between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in the oversight of judges; and (2) the strategic alliance model between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in the oversight of judges. The results of this study found that the urgency of a strategic alliance is based on the fact that there is an institutional conflict which is a logical consequence of the dual oversight carried out by two independent institutions separately, the disharmony of laws and regulations governing the oversight of judges, and limited resources. The Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court should collaborate using a strategic alliance model to oversee judges, integrating the judicial oversight system without compromising their respective independence.
Your Finger, your Tiger: Netiquette Violations of the Microcelebrity Parody Content on Social Media Astuti, Yanti Dwi; Zamroni, Mohammad
MediaTor (Jurnal Komunikasi) Vol 15, No 2 (2022): (Accredited Sinta 2)
Publisher : Unisba Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/mediator.v15i2.10322

Abstract

Netiquette is still lacking among Indonesian netizens. One of the netiquette violations was carried out by micro-celebrities Tri Suaka and Zinidin Zidan, who virally recorded and distributed mocking parody videos of Andika Kangen Band. This research aims to uncover the phenomenon of the practice of violating netiquette by microcelebrities using the constructivism paradigm with qualitative content analysis methods in order to draw a conclusion from the meaning of a text in the video. The audience here plays two roles at once, namely consumers and producers. The theories used are of Digital Literacy, Social Media and Netiquette. The results of the study reveal that internet ethics violations occur due to the anonymous and confidential nature of digital media resulting in no recognition of identity, misinterpretation of digital rights related to unlimited freedom of expression, and excessive use of social media time by netizens. Research has also found that netizens more easily show attitudes and opinions that are usually hidden from others due to social and economic conditions that make them anxious and frustrated, consumption of and belief in hoaxes, low awareness of ethics and morality, and lack of understanding about sanctions for ethical violations related to digital media.
Association between risky dietary behaviors and academic achievement among adolescent girls: a cross-sectional study in Surabaya, Indonesia Pipitcahyani, Tatarini Ika; Husni, Ervi; Isfentiani, Dina; Primasari, Nina; Sa'diyah, Halimatus; Zamroni, Mohammad
International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS) Vol 15, No 1: March 2026
Publisher : Intelektual Pustaka Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11591/ijphs.v15i1.26877

Abstract

Risky dieting is an unbalanced eating pattern increasingly practiced by adolescent girls and has the potential to impact cognitive function and academic achievement. However, previous research has focused more on the impact of risky dieting on nutritional status and physical health, while empirical evidence regarding its relationship with academic achievement in adolescent girls is still limited, particularly in the context of higher education. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between risky dieting and academic achievement in adolescent girls. The study used a quantitative design involving 70 adolescent girls. Data were collected through a peer counselor-based questionnaire to measure risky dietary habits and academic achievement. Data analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test. The results showed p-values of 0.05 and 0.023, respectively, indicating a significant relationship between risky dieting and academic achievement. Adolescent girls who engaged in risky dieting tended to have lower semester GPAs (11%) and cumulative GPAs (4%). The study concluded that risky dieting contributes to decreased academic achievement. This study contributes by expanding empirical evidence regarding the impact of risky dieting on academic achievement and emphasizes the importance of integrating nutrition interventions and health education in strategies to improve academic achievement in adolescent girls.