Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.149
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INFORMASI Kertha Semaya Islam Futura Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Jurnal Dakwah: Media Komunikasi dan Dakwah Yustitiabelen Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Halu Oleo Law Review Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Indonesian Journal of Global Health research Jurnal Askopis Jurnal Locus Penelitian dan Pengabdian Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Perspektif Hukum Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Humaniora Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Mohammad Zamroni
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
The Government's Responsibility in Resolving Contract Disputes Between Pharmacy Facility Owners and Pharmacists Sulistiyowati, Deny; Zamroni, Mohammad; Putera, Andika Persada
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i3.1662

Abstract

Contract disputes between owners of pharmaceutical facilities (PSAs) and pharmacists in charge (APAs) often arise due to an imbalance in the rights and obligations stipulated in cooperation agreements. These contracts are often onerous for pharmacists, such as requiring them to find a replacement before resigning, without providing adequate protection. In some cases, pharmacists do not even receive the salary to which they are entitled. This research aims to analyze the legal protections available to pharmacists facing contract disputes and the government's responsibility in resolving such issues. This research uses a normative legal study method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The research findings show that legal protection for pharmacists is divided into two aspects: internal (through contracts) and external (through government regulations). However, many contracts do not have adequate dispute resolution mechanisms, and the implementation of government responsibilities is still not optimal. The study concludes that there is a need to improve cooperation agreements between PSAs and APAs by adopting the principles of equality and fairness. The government should improve supervision and law enforcement to protect pharmacists from violations of their rights. In addition, dispute resolution mechanisms, both litigation and non-litigation, should focus more on efficiency and effectiveness.
Limits of Authority and Competence of General Practitioners in Aesthetic Practice Nazliyah, Inayatun; Putera, Andika Persada; Zamroni, Mohammad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Publisher : CV. Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v6i3.1679

Abstract

The rapid development of medical aesthetic services that is not matched by the creation of governing regulations has become one of the most important issues in the field of aesthetic medicine, namely competency issues related to authority because there are still gray areas regarding the authority of general practitioners in aesthetic practice. This research aims to analyze the authority of general practitioners in aesthetic practice and legal protection for general practitioners in aesthetic practice. The research methodology used in writing this thesis is normative juridical. This approach uses a statue approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. The authority and competence of general practitioners in aesthetic services are limited to primary care, non-invasive, minimally invasive procedures and are only allowed to perform medical procedures in accordance with what has been obtained during the education process, and are advised to conduct additional training and make referrals to specialists if not their authority and competence. Legal protection for general practitioners in aesthetic medicine services, general practitioners must apply professional standards and standard operating procedures in carrying out aesthetic medical services is widely regulated in laws and regulations.
Dekonstruksi Pengawasan Hakim Melalui Aliansi Strategis Komisi Yudisial dan Mahkamah Agung Zamroni, Mohammad
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art3

Abstract

The dual oversight of judges conducted internally by the Supreme Court and externally by the Judicial Commission has not yielded the expected results but has instead given rise to conflicts of interest between institutions that not only reduce the quality of oversight of judges, but also reduce the quality of judges. Therefore, it is important to examine the system of oversight of judges involving two independent state institutions within the scope of judicial power. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. Research materials were collected through literature studies and analysed critically and systematically to reach conclusions. This study offers a solution for a collaborative system of oversight of judges in the form of a strategic alliance. The purpose of this study is to analyse two issues: (1) the urgency of a strategic alliance between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in the oversight of judges; and (2) the strategic alliance model between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court in the oversight of judges. The results of this study found that the urgency of a strategic alliance is based on the fact that there is an institutional conflict which is a logical consequence of the dual oversight carried out by two independent institutions separately, the disharmony of laws and regulations governing the oversight of judges, and limited resources. The Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court should collaborate using a strategic alliance model to oversee judges, integrating the judicial oversight system without compromising their respective independence.
Co-Authors Abidah, Nabila Farah Adriano Adriano Adriano, Adriano Aisyah, Rasyidah Nur Andika Persada Putera Asmuni Bharata, Yoseph Budi Pramono Devi Melinda, Evelyn Diansyah, Mohammad Rival Handayani, Baiq Yulia Hosnol Wafa, Hosnol I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Indra Tjahyadi Katmini, Katmini KHOMSIYAH Lestari, Baiq Winarti Nanda Lufsiana, Lufsiana M. Khoirul Huda, M. Khoirul Made Agus Suanjaya Mokhamad Khoirul Huda Mulyono, Sugeng Edy Muzakki Afifuddin Nazliyah, Inayatun Neisyiah, Devana Nur Ninis Nugraheni Nirbowo, Mesakh Januarta Nisa', Ayu Khotimatun Noor, M. Tauchid Noor, Tauchid NURIL HIDAYATI Pradita Wardhany, Lisda Putri, Ruri Eka Septianto, Finly Sukma, Findwicha Kharisma Sulistiyowati, Deny Sutarno Sutarno Utama, Merry Sonia Yanti Dwi Astuti, Yanti Dwi