Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.492
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Badamai Law Journal Jurnal Akta Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Pengabdian Sumber Daya Manusia Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology Jentera Hukum Borneo West Science Law and Human Rights Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Journal of Nafaqah Sultan Adam : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal (IERJ) Journal of Nafaqah Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law
Indah Dewi Megasari
Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia Di Kuala Lumpur: Literasi Kontrak Kerja Digital Dan Bukti Digital Dalam Menghadapi Permasalahan Kerja Hanafi Arief; Hidayatullah Hidayatullah; Akhmad Munawar; Indah Dewi Megasari; Adriansyah Adriansyah
Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : PT. Sharia Journal and Education Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ierj.v4i2.2035

Abstract

Pekerja migran Indonesia menghadapi hubungan kerja lintas negara yang semakin bergantung pada dokumen dan komunikasi digital. Dalam kondisi tersebut, perlindungan hukum tidak cukup hanya dipahami sebagai keberadaan aturan, tetapi juga sebagai kemampuan pekerja membaca kontrak, mengenali hak dan kewajiban, menjaga dokumen, serta menggunakan bukti digital ketika muncul masalah kerja. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Internasional ini dilaksanakan oleh Program Pascasarjana Program Studi Magister Hukum Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Banjarmasin di Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pada 13–18 April 2026. Sesi penyuluhan berfokus pada pengertian dan syarat sah perjanjian kerja, kewajiban pekerja dan pemberi kerja, bagian penting dalam kontrak, keabsahan kontrak kerja digital, jenis bukti digital, cara penyimpanan bukti, serta langkah praktis ketika terjadi perselisihan kerja. Metode kegiatan menggunakan penyuluhan hukum partisipatif yang dipadukan dengan diskusi kasus, identifikasi dokumen, dan evaluasi reflektif. Peserta terdiri atas tim akademik Program Magister Hukum dan beberapa pekerja migran Indonesia yang bekerja di Malaysia. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa materi hukum lebih mudah dipahami ketika disusun dari persoalan konkret seperti upah tidak dibayar, pekerjaan tidak sesuai kontrak, pemutusan hubungan kerja sepihak, dan perlakuan tidak adil. Kegiatan menghasilkan kerangka praktis lima langkah, yaitu membaca kontrak secara teliti, memahami isi pokoknya, menyimpan dokumen, mengumpulkan bukti digital, dan mencari bantuan melalui saluran yang berwenang. Program ini menegaskan bahwa literasi kontrak dan literasi bukti digital merupakan keterampilan preventif yang relevan untuk memperkuat kesiapan hukum pekerja migran.
Perbandingan Hukum Pelayanan Publik Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Ratih Pandan Sari; Fahrunnisa Fahrunnisa; Muhammad Ihsan Hanifa; Teguh Widodo; Harisnor Harisnor; Indah Dewi Megasari
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Agustus : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v3i3.1860

Abstract

Public service constitutes one of the principal indicators in achieving good governance. The state bears a constitutional obligation to guarantee citizens' rights to accessible, transparent, accountable, effective, and high-quality public services. Indonesia and Malaysia, as neighboring Southeast Asian countries with legal systems influenced by both common law and civil law traditions, demonstrate different approaches to regulating and implementing public service governance. This study aims to examine the similarities and differences between Indonesian and Malaysian public service regulations, evaluate their implementation, and formulate recommendations for strengthening Indonesia's public service system. The research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials consist of legislation, legal doctrines, scholarly publications, and previous studies, which are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that Indonesia has a comprehensive legal framework but continues to face challenges related to bureaucratic complexity, regional disparities in service quality, fragmented digital governance, and limited performance evaluation. In contrast, Malaysia has established a more integrated administrative framework through digital government services, streamlined procedures, strong institutional coordination, and performance-based management. The study concludes that Indonesia should strengthen public service reform through integrated digital transformation, regulatory simplification, institutional coordination, civil servant capacity building, and performance-oriented evaluation while adopting relevant best practices from Malaysia.
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam Menunjang Keberlakuan Asas-Asas Peradilan di Era Digital Yusandi Rakhman; Ahmad Sauki; GT.Imanuddin; Indah Dewi Megasari
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Agustus : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v3i3.1912

Abstract

The rapid advancement of information and communication technology has significantly transformed judicial systems across many countries. The integration of digital technology into judicial administration has become essential to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, transparency, and accessibility of legal services. Indonesia, which follows the civil law tradition, and the United States, which adopts the common law system, demonstrate different approaches to incorporating digital innovation within their respective judicial frameworks. This study examines and compares the legal systems of both countries in supporting the implementation of fundamental judicial principles in the digital era, including the principles of simple, prompt, and affordable justice, judicial transparency, judicial independence, and equal access to justice. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and comparative law approaches. The analysis reveals that Indonesia has continuously strengthened judicial digitalization through the implementation of the e-Court and e-Litigation systems administered by the Supreme Court. In contrast, the United States introduced judicial digitalization at an earlier stage through the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) and Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) platforms. Despite the differences between their legal traditions, both countries demonstrate that digital technology can effectively reinforce the realization of modern judicial principles. However, several issues, including cybersecurity, unequal technological infrastructure, and the protection of litigants' rights, remain significant challenges. Accordingly, continuous improvement of digital governance, legal regulations, and technological infrastructure is necessary to establish a fair, effective, and sustainable judicial system in the digital age.
Co-Authors ABDUL HAMID Abdul Hamid Abdul Hamid Adriansyah Adriansyah Ahmad Sauki Akhmad Munawar Fahrunnisa Fahrunnisa GT.Imanuddin H.Maksum H.Maksum Hanafi Arief Harisnor Harisnor Hastati Pujisari Heriani, Istiani Hidayatullah Hidayatullah hidayatullah, Hidayatullah hidayatullah Hidayatullah, Rahmad Ade Imam Syafa'i Istiana Heriani Jayantara, I Made Dwi MAKSUM Muhammad Aini, Muhammad Muhammad Ihsan Hanifa Muthia Septarina MUTHIA SEPTARINA Nahdhah Nahdhah Noor Azizah Nurul Listiyani Owen Hutagalung Rahman, Rojali Ratih Pandan Sari Royan Hanapi Setyawan Setyawan Setyawan, Setyawan Siti Nurbadaliah Syafa'i, Imam Teguh Widodo Widi Susanto Yusandi Rakhman