p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.626
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humaniora Dialektika Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya Litera Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) BAHASTRA BAHASA DAN SASTRA Lingua Cultura LITERASI: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora Semantik : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Arbitrer Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia KEMBARA Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra Jurnal Gramatika Indonesian Language Education and Literature International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) Jurnal Orientasi Baru Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Aksara RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Diglosia Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Kandai Adabiyyat: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni Linguistik Indonesia Metalingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa SALINGKA Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Missio Suar Betang Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Bahtera Indonesia; Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Imajeri: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia SCAFFOLDING: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES) Jurnal Pena Indonesia Loa : Jurnal Ketatabahasaan dan Kesusastraan TANDA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa dan Sastra Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran BAHASTRA Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Aksara JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN MISSIO Majalah Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra Sawerigading
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Gramatika

INTEGRATING SOCIAL, SOCIETAL, CULTURAL, AND SITUATIONAL CONTEXTS TO DEVELOP PRAGMATICS COURSE LEARNING MATERIALS: PRELIMINARY STUDY (INTEGRASI SOSIAL, SOSIAL, BUDAYA, DAN KONTEKS SITUASIONAL UNTUK MENGEMBANGKAN MATERI PEMBELAJARAN PRAGMATIK: STUDI AWAL) Rahardi, R. Kunjana
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 5, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (446.212 KB) | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2019.v5i2.3572

Abstract

The industrial revolution 4.0 clearly demands language learners to keep evolving to adapt to the environmental development. The learning of Pragmatics in the higher education cannot be based on the pragmatic concepts as what has happened recently, but it must be integrated with the fundamental research findings in the relevant fields of Pragmatics. This R & D raises the issue of: How the research findings on the situational and socio-cultural contexts are integrated in the material development of the Pragmatics course. The development of the Pragmatics course learning materials which integrates research findings in the pragmatic contexts is based on R & D model. The development output is then validated by experts, and piloted restrictively to several students. In the next step, the product output of the material development is revised to improve, which then will be published and disseminated. Due to the time constraint, this paper limits the scope of discussion only on the result of preliminary study. The other steps belong to the scope of different papers.
MODAL QUALIFIERS AS BOOSTER IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING OF THE THESIS DISCUSSION SECTION (MODAL QUALIFIERS SEBAGAI BOOSTER DALAM TULISAN ARGUMENTATIF PADA BAGIAN PEMBAHASAN TESIS) Yuliana Setyaningsih; R. Kunjana Rahardi; Refa Lina Tiawati
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 9, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2023.v9i1.6316

Abstract

The importance of using modal qualifiers as a component of argumentative writing in the discussion section of student theses has not been fully realized by students. In fact, this component greatly determines the level of strength of the argument as a vehicle for conveying scientific truth. Scientific truth can be tested through the strength of the argument that appears in the selection of the types of modal qualifiers that accompany the position statement. This study aims to describe the manifestation of the form and function of the modal qualifier as a booster in argumentative writing for thesis discussion. The research data is in the form of excerpts of claims which contain boosters from the thesis discussion section of students of the Indonesian Language Education Master’s Program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. Data was collected by listening method with note-taking technique. Furthermore, the stages of classification and typification of data are carried out. The analytical method used in this study is the distributional analysis method and the content analysis method. The results of this study are the following forms of capital qualifiers as boosters: (1) definitely, (2) necessary, (3) must, (4) certainly, and variations in form. This study also found seven booster functions as follows: (1) affirming by showing confidence, (2) affirming by giving recommendations, (3) affirming by confirming something, (4) affirming by confirmation of clarity, (5) affirming by inferring purpose, (6) affirming of intent by ensuring, (7) affirming by suggesting something.