Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.441
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jambe Law Journal Berumpun: international journal of social, politics and humanities Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bhinneka Jurnal Karya Abdi Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mentari Joong-Ki Decisio: Journal of Judicial Law and Procedure
Andi Najemi, Andi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Quo Vadis of the Constitutional Court in Resolving Disputes Over Regional Election Results After Constitutional Court Decision No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 Yarni, Meri; Najemi, Andi; Suhermi, Suhermi; Davega Prasna, Adeb; Rizki Amanda, Khofifah
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5287

Abstract

The research aims to determine and analyze the Legal Politics of the Constitutional Court in deciding disputes over the results of regional election disputes in Indonesia. The authority of the Constitutional Court in resolving disputes over the results of Regional Election has yet to be regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The authority of the Constitutional Court to decide disputes over the results of general election described in Article 24C paragraph (1) is different from regional election. This has been explained in the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97/PU U-XI-2013, which states that the election and regional election regimes are different and the authority to decide disputes over election results is not the authority of the Constitutional Court but the authority of a particular judicial body. This research used normative juridical research methods, where library law was studied by examining library materials. Then, the collected materials are analyzed in a descriptive qualitative manner. The study results concluded that the Constitutional Court has the authority to permanently examine, decide, and resolve disputes over election results by the Constitutional Court Number 85 / PUU-XX / 2022 decision. There is no longer a distinction between the election regime and the election. With the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 85 / PUU-XX / 2022, the authority of the Constitutional Court becomes more precise and more substantial because of the binding legal certainty.
Proses Penyelesaian Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Terhadap Masyarakat Mudung Darat Kabupaten Muaro Jambi Najemi, Andi; Hafrida, Hafrida; Monita, Yulia; Erwin, Erwin; Prasna, Adeb Davega
Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mentari Vol. 2 No. 9 (2026): April
Publisher : Amirul Bangun Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59837/jpmm.v2i9.267

Abstract

Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) semakin banyak terjadi. Sehingga diperlukan tindakan dan  perhatian khusus, karena kasus ini  bukan lagi  persoalan individu (privasi) tetapi telah menjadi persoalan negara (public). Tingginya kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang terjadi di dalam Masyarakat  seperti kekerasan fisik, seksual dan psikis.  Hal tersebut tidak terlepas dari dari  masih sedikit korban yang berani untuk melaporkan kasusnya kepada aparat penegak hukum,  adanya perasaan takut, ketidaktahuan, serta struktur budaya yang masih belum dipahami sebagian masyarakat dan juga mereka beralasan tidak mau tersebar karena menganggap adalah aib keluarga,  dianggap sebagai urusan yang privat yang masih ditutup-tutupi yang mana orang lain tidak berhak ikut campur permasalahan keluarganya. Oleh karena itu salah satu upaya yang dilakukan dalam pencegahan KDRT adalah melalui penyuluhan hukum,  Dari kondisi yang ada  masyarakat  belum mengetahui bahwa siapa saja yang dapat melaporkan dan selain itu belum mengetahui bentuk kekerasan dalam rumah tangga itu apa saja yang dapat dilaporkan. Sehingga sebagai akademisi yang memiliki kewajiban untuk mengupayakan kesejahteraan keluarga perlu melakukan upaya pencegahan bersama dalam meminimalisir adanya kasus KDRT di lingkungan sekitarnya melalui penyuluhan hukum. Program pengabdian ini  dilakukan guna memberikan bekal kepada mitra    agar mitra dapat mengetahui pencegahan perbuatan KDRT dan cara penyelesaiannya melalui Restorative Justice apabila terjadi kasus KDRT di lingkungan sekitarnya.
The Concept of Substantive Justice in Islamic Criminal Adjudication: A Doctrinal Analysis Najemi, Andi; Fathoni, M. Kamal
Decisio: Journal of Judicial Law and Procedure Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Gemini Littera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66882/decisio.v1i1.39

Abstract

Crimes against life represent the most serious violations of legal and moral order, demanding judicial reasoning that transcends procedural legality. In Islamic law, the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) constitutes a core objective of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, positioning homicide not merely as a criminal offense but as a profound ethical and social transgression. This article examines judicial reasoning in adjudicating crimes against life from an Islamic law perspective, focusing on how substantive justice is constructed through judicial interpretation. Employing a normative legal research method with a judicial decision based approach, the study analyzes two Indonesian Supreme Court decisions, Decision No. 1282 K/Pid/2020 and Decision No. 813 K/Pid/2023 as primary legal materials. These rulings are examined to explore how judges assess intent, betrayal, and moral blameworthiness within the framework of positive criminal law. The findings reveal that judicial reasoning operates as a critical site of legal meaning-making, where statutory provisions are mediated through evaluative judgments concerning ethical gravity, relational harm, and proportional punishment. While Decision No. 1282 K/Pid/2020 demonstrates a stronger orientation toward substantive justice by incorporating moral considerations such as betrayal, Decision No. 813 K/Pid/2023 reflects a more restrained, procedural approach. From an Islamic law perspective, these variations highlight the normative potential of ijtihād qaḍāʾī in aligning adjudication with ethical responsibility and social justice. This study contributes to Islamic legal studies and judicial scholarship by positioning court decisions as arenas for substantive justice formation and by offering normative insights to strengthen value-oriented adjudication in cases involving the fundamental right to life.
Co-Authors Adri, Nadita Ahmad Nur Budi Utama Amir, Diana Arsyad Arsyad Azhari Ritonga, Yudhy Davega Prasna, Adeb Dwi Suryahartati Erwin Erwin Fathoni, M. Kamal Fitriani, Nurlinda Hafrida Haryadi - Herry Liyus imanuel, imanueljeremypane Indriya Fathni Kabib Nawawi Khoiru Ummah, Padillah Kuntum Lilik Purwastuti Liyus, Herry M, Maryati M, Musyayidah Meri Yarni Mohamad Rapik Munandar, Tri Imam Nys Arfa Pahlefi, Pahlefi Prasna, Adeb Davega Prayudi, Aga Hanum Rapik, Muhamad Retno Kusniati Rizki Amanda, Khofifah Rosmidah Rosmidah Sahuri Lasmadi Samsiar, Samsiar Sasmiar, Sasmiar Sidiq, Muhamad Siregar, Elizabeth Suhermi, Suhermi Taufik Yahya Umar Hasan Usman Usman Windarto Yulia Monita Yulia, Yulia Monita