Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Konflik Normatif Antara Non-Refoulement Dan Kedaulatan Negara: Tinjauan Filosofis Dan Hukum Dalam Kasus Pengungsi Rohingya Dari Bangladesh Putri, Nabila Riana; Natamiharja, Rudi; Sujadmiko, Bayu
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4078

Abstract

State sovereignty as the exclusive right to regulate domestic affairs often clashes with international obligations to respect the principle of non-refoulement in refugee protection, especially Rohingya refugees. The conflict between sovereignty and international legal obligations poses a complex normative dilemma, where the state must balance national interests, security, and the protection of human rights. Restrictions on the application of the principle of non-refoulement can be done proportionally and in accordance with international legal norms and universal moral principles in natural law theory. International cooperation and strengthening domestic laws are key in managing such restrictions so as not to violate refugee rights. With a wise and harmonious approach, states can ensure the protection of refugees without compromising national stability, security and sovereignty, thus creating a more responsive and humane international legal system.
Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Doktrin Fair Use dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Indonesia dan Implikasinya terhadap Pengembangan Software Muhammad Habibi; Rohaini; Bayu Sujadmiko
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.860

Abstract

The application of the fair use doctrine in software development in Indonesia still faces significant challenges, both in terms of regulation and law enforcement. The absence of specific arrangements in the Copyright Law leads to legal uncertainty that can hamper innovation in the technology sector. In the digital era, a balanced copyright policy is needed to support the growth of the creative industry while protecting the rights of creators. This article analyzes the problems of fair use regulation in Indonesia, especially in the context of software development, by comparing it with policies in other countries such as the United States. The results show the need to develop a more detailed evaluation framework to ensure a balance between copyright protection and technological innovation. In addition, education and socialization related to the concept of fair use is a strategic step to increase public understanding and industry players. With policies that support innovation, Indonesia can strengthen its global competitiveness while promoting sustainable economic development.
Community participation as a human right: Perspective of Indonesia's nickel downstream on the natural resource curse phenomenon Daryanti Daryanti; Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto; Bayu Sujadmiko
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 16 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jhn.v16i1.29453

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: Various controversies over Indonesia's nickel downstreaming policy as a government move to add economic value to mining products are important issues that need to be studied. This problem is mainly because Indonesia is a developing country that has abundant natural resources, but has not been able to improve welfare and development for communities in mining areas, especially in the aspect of community participation. This research then highlights the perspective of the Natural Resource Curse (NRC) phenomenon for Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) countries in the paradox of development stemming from the exploitation of natural resources. Purpose/Study Objectives: Community involvement in mining and other industrial activities is needed. This is related to decision making. For example, in Environmental Impact Assessment/ Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan (AMDAL) and other activities related to the lives and livelihoods of communities around mining activities. The basis of public participation is part of human rights as stated in the Constitution and International Conventions that have been ratified by Indonesia. Design/Methodology/Approach: This research uses legal normative research by examining legislation regarding nickel downstreaming as stated in Law No. 30 of 2020 on the Second Amendment to Law No. 4 of 2009 On Mineral and Coal Mining and Law No 6 of 2023 on Cipta Kerja, Findings: The findings in this study show the lack of community involvement in mining and other industrial activities in Indonesia. The existence of community participation as a human right is necessary to achieve a balance of economic growth and environmental protection as an anti-thesis to the curse of natural resources. In addition, governance and enforcement and supervision by the government in the mining sector need to be carried out effectively. Paper Type: Research Article
Modelling Shared Assets in Indonesia’s Forfeiture Bill: International Collaboration and Digital Networks Bayu Sujadmiko; Rohaini Rohaini; Nobuhide Otomo; Ikhsan Setiawan; Nurul Azizah
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.10606

Abstract

Article 54, paragraph 3, of the UN Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) encourages countries to implement efforts to confiscate assets resulting from crimes committed without a criminal conviction, often known as in rem. Indonesia is one of the countries that ratified the UNCAC with Law No. 7 of 2006. Further implementation of in rem forfeiture is outlined in the Asset Forfeiture Bill, which regulates the mechanism for in rem forfeiture of assets in detail. The bill also regulates asset sharing, previously only accommodated by Article 57 of Law No. 1 of 2006 concerning Mutual Assistance. Aside from being a solution to overcoming the cost of forfeiture, which tends to be large, asset sharing is also intended to prevent the interference of other forces that cause the forfeiture process not to run effectively. This mechanism also precludes different parties from sharing burdens and benefits (a win-win solution). Asset sharing is practiced in some countries, such as the United States, Switzerland, and Canada.