Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

ANALISIS IMPLIKASI WEWENANG MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MELAKUKAN PENGUJIAN KONSTITUTIONAL TERHADAP RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL PADA KELEMBAGAAN DAN PUTUSAN Ihsanudin, Muhammad; Firdaus, Sunny Ummul
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Mei - Agustus 2019
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v3i2.45644

Abstract

This study analyzes and examines the implications of the authority of the Constitutional Court in conducting constitutional review of international agreements on institutions and verdict. This research is a doctrinal research that is of a nature perspective, with a statute approach, a comparative approach and a conceptual approach. The type of data collected consists of primary legal material and secondary legal material. The data collection technique used is library research. The technical analysis used is a syllogism method that uses a deductive mindset. The results showed that the implications of constitutional review of international treaties by the Constitutional Court were adjustments to the authority of the Constitutional Court, with several alternative constitutional compalint constructions, constitutional previews and statements explicitly in the constitution, the construction of which could be formed in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. review of international agreements if deemed unconstitutional are acts of denunciation through internal procedures.
KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH KABUPATEN KUDUS DALAM PENARIKAN RETRIBUSI TERMINAL TIPE C SEBAGAI PELAKSANAAN OTONOMI DAERAH Maylani, Fita Fiana; Firdaus, Sunny Ummul
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Mei - Agustus 2018
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v2i2.45502

Abstract

Regional autonomy demands local independence in governing its government one of them is the authority to form a Regional Regulation in managing the finances that can be seen from the size of the role of local revenue. This study analyzes and assesses the authority of the local government of Kudus District in the retribution of terminal type c as the implementation of regional autonomy. This research is a descriptive-qualitative legal research. Data collection techniques were conducted through field interviews. The results of this study indicate that the authority of the local government of Kudus District in the withdrawal of terminal type c retribution as the implementation of regional autonomy is implemented by the mechanism of levy withdrawal through stage (1) planning, (2) organizing, (3) , and (3) controlling. The mechanism has been adjusted to the provisions of Local Regulation of Kudus number 6 Year 2011 on Terminal Retribution. The mechanism of withdrawal of type c terminal retribution in Kudus district becomes an authority of the local government of Kudus Regency as the implementation of regional autonomy.
ANALISIS LEGAL STANDING PEMOHON GUGATAN DALAM PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PILKADA DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DENGAN KEPESERTAAN CALON TUNGGAL Rahmat, Enggar; Firdaus, Sunny Ummul
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 3, No 1 (2019): Januari - April 2019
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v3i1.45595

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal status governing a single candidate’s Regional Head Election Results Dispute in the Constitutional Court. This study uses legal research (doctrinal) that is prescriptive. The approach used is the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. Research uses primary and secondary legal sources obtained through library studies to be further analyzed through the method of deductive reasoning (syllogism). The results of the study show ow the arrangement of the Regional Head Election Results Dispute had dynamics of changes in competence from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court. Election of Single Candidates is a new problem for election democracy. With the existence of a single candidate there are also questions regarding anyone as a party as an applicant who can sue the results of a single candidate election. This study examines the Legal Arrangement of Single-Candidate Election Results Disputes in the Constitutional Court. And the Petitioner’s Legal Standing stipulated in the Constitutional Court Regulation No. 2 of 2016
ANALISIS BATASAN KEWENANGAN PRESIDEN DALAM MEMBENTUK PERATURAN PRESIDEN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Abdurrahman, Rizal; Firdaus, Sunny Ummul
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 2, No 3 (2018): September - Desember 2018
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v2i3.45845

Abstract

This legal research analyzes and examines the limits of the Presidential power in the establishment of the Presidential Regulation according to Law Number 12 of 2011 Concerning the Establishment on Laws and Regulations. This research is a normative research viewed from prescriptive characteristic by statute and conceptual approach. The types of data collected include primary and secondary legal materials through library research. The data is analyzed by deductive method. The results indicates that the Presidential Regulation can only be established within the framework of (1) enjoined the establishment of both expressly (mentioned forms and institutions) as well as unambiguous (only mentioned institutions) by the Act; (2) as the implementing regulation on the Government Regulation either delegated directly or according to the needs of further regulation; and (3) as an autonomous regulation in order to organize the power of state government. The form of autonomous presidential regulation can only be established if (a) is really a technical, and (b) solely for the internal purpose of administration in order to enforce the provisions of the laws and regulations. In addition, Presidential Regulations may also be established to the extent of providing public benefit and in accordance with the Good Governance Principles.
Peran Dissenting Opinion Hakim Konstitusi dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional Sunny Ummul Firdaus; Putri Anjelina Nataly Panjaitan; Rizky Kurniyanto Widyasasmito
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 20 No 1 (2020): Edisi Maret
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.1-10

Abstract

Dalam kultur hukum di peradilan saat ini, hakim memiliki kebebasan dalam melaksanakan aktivisme yudisial, termasuk berselisih pendapat dengan hakim lainnya yang membentuk putusan. Tidak sedikit putusan yang diambil tanpa aklamasi, karena terdapat hakim yang mengajukan dissenting opinion. Tulisan ini menguraikan mengenai dissenting opinion sebagai alternatif referensi bagi hakim, khususnya hakim konstitusi, dalam melakukan pembaharuan hukum. Hal ini diperlukan agar dissenting opinion sebagai narasi hukum alternatif dapat memperkaya dan memberikan dorongan perkembangan hukum di masa depan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa dissenting opinion merupakan produk penafsiran hakim konstitusi yang keberadaannya memberikan jaminan bahwa suatu putusan lahir dari perdebatan yang futuristik. Kendati tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum, dissenting opinion dapat dijadikan sebagai alternatif referensi bagi hakim konstitusi dalam memeriksa perkara yang relatif sama. Hal ini dikarenakan persoalan konstitusionalitas merupakan isu yang terus berkembang, bahkan seringkali menjadi acuan dalam pembaharuan hukum yang signifikan, sehingga hakim konstitusi harus menggali hukum dari berbagai perspektif yang relevan, termasuk di dalamnya menjadikan dissenting opinion sebagai alternatif referensi. Telaah ini diharapkan mampu menjadi kompas yang dapat menunjukan arah pembaharuan hukum kedepannya.