Articles
EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIATION AS A TYPOLOGY OF CIVIL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT (ADR) AT DISTRICT COURT OF BALI
I Ketut Tjukup;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra;
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
KERTHA WICAKSANA Vol. 12 No. 2 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/kw.12.2.2018.104-111
Mediation has been a typology of civil dispute settlement through negotiation process to obtain agreement from the parties assisted by mediator. The Court implements mediation which is a process of civil disputes settlement that must be taken as an instrument to fulfill the four purposes of the Supreme Court, such as addressing the problem of the accumulation of cases; faster and cheaper dispute resolution; expanding access for the parties to a sense of justice; and strengthening and maximizing the function of the courts in dispute settlement. The focus of this study lies in the investigation of the extent to which effective mediation is applied as an alternative of civil disputes settlement at the District Court of Bali. The method used is empirical law research method. The nature of this research is descriptive. There are two types of data, namely primary data and secondary data with the location of research is the District Court in Bali Province. Data collection was done by using interview techniques; Data processing and analysis were carried out by applying qualitative data analysis method. The result of the research shows that the implementation of mediation in the District Court in Bali has been in accordance with the legislation and has been capable of decomposing cases. However, obstacles in the implemention are still other significant problems that need concern of resolution. The obstacles are those relating to legal substance, legal structure and legal culture.
Eksistensi Fetor dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat di Fefetoran Bikomi
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra;
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
KERTHA WICAKSANA Vol. 13 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/kw.13.2.2019.131-139
Konflik selalu mewarnai kehidupan, berawal dari permasalahan yang mengiringi setiap aktivitas dalam kehidupan manusia. Bervariasinya permasalahan yang menimbulkan konflik tentunya tidak selalu dapat diselesaikan dalam waktu yang sesingkat-singkatnya dengan hasil dari pemecahan masalah yang dapat diterima bagi para pihak yang berselisih bahkan tidak jarang berujung pada munculnya sengketa. Masyarakat adat pada Kafetoran Bikomi yang dipimpin oleh seorang fetor memiliki cara tersendiri dalam menyelesaikan sebuah sengketa. Penyelesaian dilakukan dengan upaya mediasi, yaitu dengan proses perundingan atau tawar menawar dalam permasalahan yang timbul di tengah masyarakat. Pokok pembahasan dari penelitian ini adalah peranan seorang Fetor dalam menyelesaikan sengketa yang terjadi pada Kafetoran Bikomi, Kabupaten Timor Tengah Utara, Kupang dan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa di Kafetoran Bikomi yang dilakukan oleh seorang Fetor. Conflict always colors life, starting with problems that accompany every activity in human life. The variety of problems that lead to conflict certainly cannot always be resolved in the shortest possible time with the results of solving acceptable problems for parties who disagree or even rarely lead to the emergence of disputes. The indigenous people in the Bikomi Office led by a fetor have their own way of resolving a dispute. The settlement is done by mediation efforts, namely by the negotiation process or bargaining on problems that arise in the community. The main topic of this research is the role of a Fetor in resolving disputes that occur in the Bikomi Office, North Central Timor District, Kupang and the dispute resolution mechanism in the Bikomi Cafeteria conducted by a Fetor.
Socialization of Role of LPM in Sustainable Village Development in Satra Village Klungkung Regency
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan;
I.P. R. A. Putra;
I. D. G. D. Sugama
KERTHA WICAKSANA Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (526.283 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/kw.14.1.2020.16-20
This study aims to analyze the role of Community Empowerment Institutions (LPM) in supporting development that is not optimal. This study uses normative legal method with the aim of outlining the problem for further discussion based on legal theory. Then, the data were analyzed descriptively. The results of this study show that the Satra Village Community, Klungkung District, Klungkung Regency, generally do not understand the duties, functions and authority of the LPM including its existence as a work partner of the village head. Community understanding, village officials and LPM management are still not optimally related to work programs and positions as partners of village heads in implementing and planning development in the short, medium and long term. Thus, the existence of the LPM is currently limited to completing the organizational structure in the village administration and does not know the purpose why it was formed, what are its duties and authorities as village apparatus partner, thus, this condition can be ensured there is a gap between LPM and other organisation in the village administration, which until now has not been regulated even there are no regulations that explicitly regulate the benefits as LPM administrators. This caused many LPM officials who did not appear to be enthusiastic about managing LPM.
Penguatan Karakter Sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Kenakalan Remaja (Juvenile Delinquency)
I Ketut Tjukup;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra;
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan;
Jimmy Z. Usfunan
KERTHA WICAKSANA Vol. 14 No. 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (661.48 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/kw.14.1.2020.29-38
Juvenile delinquency is an act or behavior of adolescents that is contrary to the law, religion, and norms of society, which harms others, public peace and himself. This study aims to examine juridically about juvenile delinquency as a crime, and how appropriate countermeasures can be done. This study uses normative juridical method by using interview techniques in collecting data. The results showed that juvenile delinquency is something that disturbs the security of the community in which they live, because juvenile delinquency is a crime that is an act that violates legal norms, decency and even religious norms. In addition, juvenile delinquency is a deviant act that is contrary to the applicable laws and regulations and can damage the future of adolescents, it is necessary to overcome them. Belimbing Village Government, Pupuan Subdistrict, Tabanan Regency has made a breakthrough in tackling juvenile delinquency crime by making preventive countermeasures with a religious-communal approach.
Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasanah Atas Penyelenggaraan E-Payment Berbasis QR-Code
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra;
Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
KERTHA WICAKSANA Vol. 16 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22225/kw.16.2.2022.99-107
The development of an e-payment system that uses QR-Code as an effective payment method and is proven to have efficiency, but the efficiency and effectiveness offered raises problems in the community related to security regarding this QR-Code method. Analyzing legal protection to customers in the use of the QR-Code method in transactions is the goal of this research. This study uses a normative method, using a statutory approach and a legal concept analysis approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials that are systematically collected and traced by documentation studies and supplemented with supporting data. All legal materials collected were analyzed by descriptive analysis technique. This study found several regulations governing e-payment and QR-Code which are still scattered in several regulations, this of course confuses customers as consumers regarding legal protection. So that in the application of e-payment in which there is a QR-Code as one of the methods, special rules need to be made, besides that customers as consumers are expected to educate themselves related to payment technology so that they are not harmed materially or immaterially if in practice the implementation of the QR-Code does not heed consumer rights. It can be concluded that with a study on legal protection against the implementation of QR-Code-based e-payments, customers can protect their rights as consumers.
TANGGUNG JAWAB PELAKU USAHA DALAM PENJUALAN PRODUK MASKER WAJAH ORGANIK TANPA PENCANTUMAN TANGGAL KEDALUWARSA
Dewa Ayu Nadia Swari;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 3 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i03.p15
Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen pengguna masker wajah organik dan tanggung jawab pelaku usaha masker wajah organik tanpa pencantuman tanggal kedaluwarsa. Mencantumkan tanggal kedaluwarsa pada masker wajah organik adalah suatu yang wajib dilakukan oleh seorang pelaku usaha, dikarenakan konsumen dapat dimudahkan dalam memilih suatu produk apakah masih layak dipergunakan bagi konsumen dan pencantuman tanggal kedaluwarsa tersebut telah diatur pada Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Akan tetapi kini masih ada konsumen yang menemui produk masker wajah organik tanpa pencantuman tanggal kedaluwarsa masih diperdagangkan. Artikel ini ditulis dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini ialah perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen pengguna masker wajah organik telah diatur didalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Pasal 4 huruf c yang mengatur bahwa konsumen berhak atas informasi yang jelas mengenai kondisi suatu barang serta Pasal 7 huruf b yang mengatur bahwa pelaku usaha wajib memberikan informasi yang jelas dan jujur mengenai kondisi barang serta memberi penjelasan. Tanggung jawab pelaku usaha bagi konsumen pengguna masker wajah organik tanpa pencantuman tanggal kedaluarsa ini dilakukan dengan ganti rugi berupa pengembalian uang, menggantikan barang, dan membiayai biaya berobat konsumen akibat produk dari pelaku usaha. The purpose of this article is to know and understand legal protection for consumers who use organic face masks and the responsibilities of organic face mask businesses without including expiration dates. Listing the expiration date on organic face masks is something that must be done by a business actor, because consumers can be facilitated in choosing a product whether it is still suitable for consumers to use and the inclusion of the expiration date has been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. However, now there are consumers who find that organic face mask products without an expiration date are still being traded. This article is written using normative legal research methods with a statutory approach. The results of this study are that legal protection for consumers who use organic face masks has been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection in Article 4 letter c which regulates that consumers have the right to clear information regarding the condition of an item and Article 7 letter b which stipulates that business actors are required to provide clear and honest information regarding the condition of goods and provide explanations. The responsibility of business actors for consumers who use organic face masks without including an expiration date is carried out with compensation in the form of refunds, replacing goods, and paying for consumer medical expenses.
Transnational Smuggling of Migrant Workers from International Law Perspective
Ni Nengah Adiyaryani;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra
Lampung Journal of International Law Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Lampung
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25041/lajil.v5i1.2917
Migrant worker smuggling is a transnational organized crime that harms countries of origin, transit, and destination countries. The smuggling of migrant workers in Southeast Asia, from Southeast Asia and heading to Southeast Asia is largely due to economic factors that cause the Immigration of workers to more economically advanced countries. Weak regulations and restrictions on border control and law enforcement also exacerbate this. The scope of this research regards international legal provisions related to migrant worker smuggling as an organized transnational crime and the legal obligations of each country, which becomes the object of migrant worker smuggling against smuggling based on an international legal perspective. This type of research uses a case approach and statutory normative legal research. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were used as legal material, then compiled for analysis to answer legal problems. The results of the research, which are findings related to the legal provisions of migrant worker smuggling as a transnational organized crime, are the United Nations conventions ratified by United Nations members, one of which is the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNCATOC). Migrant workers are carrying out cooperation capacity building along the smuggling route to sharpen data to obtain a more accurate picture of the situation at home, in the region, and globally.
Eksistensi Nilai Keadilan Persidangan Perkara Pidana Secara Elektronik
Ni Nengah Adiyaryani;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra;
Ni Ketut Ngetis Megi Megayani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 12 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : University of Udayana
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2023.v12.i01.p06
This research is legal research that discusses the nature of the trial of criminal cases electronically during the COVID-19 pandemic and the existence of the value of justice as the legal ideal of the Indonesian nation in the trial of criminal cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. The writing uses a normative research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The study results show that the first is essentially the implementation of electronic criminal case trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, which is an embodiment of protection and fulfillment of human rights regarding the right to obtain justice through judicial institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, regarding the existence of the value of justice, in the trial of criminal cases electronically during the COVID-19 pandemic, the value of justice still exists or is realized by the legal ideals of the Indonesian nation. PERMA No. 4 of 2020 has procedurally guaranteed the realization of a judiciary that can accommodate the interests of justice seekers in fulfilling their human rights in the form of obtaining justice through judicial institutions. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yang membahas mengenai bagaimana hakikat persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19 dan bagaimana eksistensi nilai keadilan sebagai cita hukum bangsa Indonesia dalam persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Penulisannya menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual appoarch). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, yang pertama secara hakikat persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19 adalah sebuah perwujudan perlindungan dan pemenuhan hak asasi manusia mengenai hak untuk memperoleh keadilan melalui lembaga peradilan pada masa pandemi COVID-19. Kedua, mengenai eksistensi nilai keadilan, pada persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik pada masa pandemi COVID-19, bahwa persidangan perkara pidana secara elektronik adalah untuk menjaga agar nilai keadilannya tetap eksis atau terwujud sesuai dengan cita hukum bangsa Indonesia. PERMA RI No. 4 Tahun 2020 secara prosedural telah menjamin terwujudkna peradilan yang mampu untuk mengakomodir kepentingan para pencari keadilan dalam memenuhi hak asasinya berupa memperoleh keadilan melalui lembaga peradilan.
KORELASI ASAS OPORTUNITAS SEBAGAI PENERAPAN PENGESAMPINGAN PERKARA DEMI KEPENTINGAN UMUM (DEPONERING) DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENEGAKAN HUKUM
Kadek Devia Dewisyara Cahyani;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 12 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i12.p01
Tujuan studi ini untuk mengkaji mengenai parameter penerapan Asas Oportunitas yang menjadi dasar pertimbangan dalam pengesampingan perkara (deponering) demi kepentingan umum terhadap kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh Jaksa Agung dan juga relevansi penerapan penegakan Hukum terhadap kewenangan pengesampingan perkara (deponering) oleh Jaksa Agung demi kepentingan umum dalam studi kasus Abraham Samad dan Bambang Wijayanto. Penelitian ini tergolong dalam metode penelitian hukum normatif karena ingin menelaah lebih dalam apakah norma yang diberlakukan sudah jelas aturannya atau terjadi kekaburan norma hukum di dalamnya. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam Penelitian ini ialah pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dalam hal ini sebagai sumber hukum primer dan didukung dengan menganalisis jurnal ilmiah, artikel, skripsi, putusan pengadilan, peraturan undang-undang maupun literatur lainnya. Hasil penelitian ini adalah deponering merupakan pelaksanaan asas oportunitas yaitu penyampingan perkara demi kepentingan umum yang dimaksud adalah kepentingan bangsa dan negara dan/atau kepentingan masyarakat luas yang pengaturannya terdapat dalam Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan. Dalam pasal 35 huruf c Undang-Undang Kejaksaan pada pengaturannya terdapat kekaburan norma dimana tidak memiliki kualifikasi batasan perkara yang dapat dikesampingkan, namun hanya menjelaskan indikatornya saja yaitu demi kepentingan umum yang ditakutkan dapat menyebabkan multitafsir kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh Jaksa Agung. Penulis menyarankan agar dapat segera diatur lebih spesifik dan konkret mengenai kualifikasi batasan perkara dan kepentingan umum serta kewenangan dari Jaksa Agung dalam UU Kejaksaan agar tidak menimbulkan multitafsir dan kesewenang-wenangan dalam keberlangsungan kebijakan pelaksanaan penegakan hukum di Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to examine the parameters of the application of the Opportunity Principle which form the basis for consideration in deponering cases in the public interest for the authority possessed by the Attorney General and also the relevance of implementing law enforcement against the authority of deponering cases by the Attorney General for the public interest. case studies of Abraham Samad and Bambang Wijayanto. This research belongs to the normative legal research method because it wants to examine more deeply whether the norms that apply are clear or there is ambiguity in the legal norms in it. The approach used in this study is a statute approach in this case as the primary source of law and is supported by analyzing scientific journals, articles, theses, court decisions, laws and other literature. The results of this study are that deponering is an implementation of the principle of opportunity, namely the exclusion of cases for the sake of the public interest. What is meant is the interests of the nation and state and/or the interests of the wider community, the provisions of which are contained in Law no. 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law no. 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office. In article 35 letter c Prosecutor's Law in the regulation there is a blurring of norms which do not have the qualifications of case limits that can be set aside, but only explain the indicators, namely in the public interest which is feared to cause multiple interpretations of the powers possessed by the Attorney General. The author suggests that more specific and concrete arrangements can be made regarding the qualifications of case boundaries and the public interest as well as the authority of the Attorney General in the Prosecutor's Law so as not to cause multiple interpretations and arbitrariness in the sustainability of law enforcement implementation policies in Indonesia.
ANALISIS KEPUTUSAN TATA USAHA NEGARA FIKTIF POSITIF SEBAGAI OBYEK SENGKETA PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA
Raden Anggeridho Alta Wardana;
I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 11 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/KS.2022.v11.i11.p02
Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk menganalisis mekanisme penyelesaian perkara fiktif positif sebagai obyek sengekta tata usaha negara dan sikap hakim dalam menyelesaiakan kasus tersebut. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah mekanisme dari penyelesaian sengketa fiktif positif ini menyesuaikan dengan ketentuan yang ada dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan khususnya pada pasal 53. Mekanisme nya melakukan pengajuan terlebih dahulu ke pengadilan, kemudian melengkapi seluruh berkas permohonan untuk selanjutnya diproses dan dibuatkan jadwal persidangan. Pada mekanisme persidangan inilah sikap hakim ditentukan, harus bisa dengan baik dan teliti mencari kebenaran-kebenaran materiil yang berkaitan dengan penyelesaian sengketa fiktif positif ini. Putusan fiktif positif ini masih termasuk kedalam golongan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara, karena para pihaknya sendiri masih melibatkan badan dan/atau pejabat pemerintahan. This research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the mechanism of settlement of positive fictitious cases as objects of state administrative disputes and the attitude of judges in resolving these cases. The author uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The results of this study are that the mechanism for resolving positive fictitious disputes conforms to the provisions contained in the Government Administration Act, especially in Article 53. The mechanism is to first submit an application to the court, then complete all application files for further processing and a trial schedule is made. It is in this trial mechanism that the judge's attitude is determined, he must be able to properly and thoroughly search for material truths related to the resolution of this positive fictitious dispute. This fictitious positive decision is still included in the category of State Administrative Decisions, because the parties themselves still involve government agencies and/or officials.