Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hukum Islam Jurnal Asy-Syari'ah Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Hikmah Al-Muamalat : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Al-Manahij : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam West Science Social and Humanities Studies Taushiah: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan
Faizal, Enceng Arif
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Criminal Sanctions for the Sale of Human Organs Under Article 124 Paragraph 3 of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health Muhammad Zulfikri Mustakim; Enceng Arif Faizal; Didi Sumardi
Taushiah: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol 16, No 1 (2026): Taushiah: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Kemasyarakatan
Publisher : Fakultas Agama Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30743/taushiah.v16i1.13647

Abstract

Human organ trafficking is a form of crime that contradicts humanitarian principles, positive law, and Islamic values. As an evolving criminal phenomenon, this offense requires a comprehensive legal analysis, including from the perspective of Islamic criminal law. This study aims to analyze the constituent elements of the crime of human organ trafficking and examine the classification of sanctions applicable under Islamic criminal law. The research employs a normative juridical method using both statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through a library research method encompassing legislation, legal literature, scholarly journals, and other relevant sources, which were subsequently analyzed using a descriptive-analytical technique. The findings indicate that human organ trafficking fulfills the elements of criminal liability and, from the perspective of Islamic criminal law, is classified as jarimah taʿzir because no specific sanction for this offense is explicitly prescribed in the Qur’an or Hadith. Furthermore, the study finds that sanctions imposed on offenders may be classified according to the consequences arising from the offense, namely taʿzir, qisās-diyāt, or hudūd, when the crime is accompanied by other offenses that satisfy the legal elements of each respective jarimah. These findings demonstrate the flexibility of Islamic criminal law in responding to the development of contemporary forms of crime.
Bjorka’s Cybercrimes from the Perspective of Fiqh Jinayah Zaky Anggara; Mohamad Sar'an; Enceng Arif Faizal; Muhammad Akbar Khan
Alhurriyah Vol 11 No 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/al-hurriyah.v11i1.10837

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Bjorka’s cybercrimes from the perspective of Islamic criminal law (fiqh jināyah) by examining the concept of criminal liability (al-mas’ūliyyah al-jinā’iyyah) and formulating a classification of sanctions (ʿuqūbāh) applicable to contemporary cyber offenses. The study employs normative legal research using a descriptive-analytical approach through the examination of primary sources of Islamic law, classical and contemporary fiqh literature, statutory regulations, and relevant academic publications, which are analyzed qualitatively to construct a legal framework for addressing cybercrime. The findings reveal that Bjorka’s cyber activities constitute jarīmah taʿzīr because no explicit textual provisions prescribe specific punishments for hacking and related cyber offenses, although such acts embody prohibited elements of al-kadhib (falsehood), akhdh al-māl bi ghayr ḥaqq (unlawful appropriation of property), tajassus (unauthorized surveillance), and violations of the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah). The study further classifies taʿzīr sanctions into light, moderate, and severe categories based on the nature of the offense, the degree of harm, and its impact on individuals, society, and state security. The study concludes that the principles of fiqh jināyah provide a flexible normative basis for addressing contemporary cybercrimes through proportional taʿzīr sanctions while maintaining justice, deterrence, and public welfare. This research contributes a systematic framework for assessing criminal liability and classifying sanctions for cybercrime within fiqh jināyah, thereby strengthening the theoretical development of Islamic criminal law in responding to emerging digital crimes and supporting future cybercrime policy formulation.
Co-Authors Atep Mastur Dadang Syaripudin Deden Najmudin Dewi Sulastri Didi Sumardi Hasana, Nurul Jaenudin Jaenudin Jauhari, Moh. Ahsanuddin Mastur, Atep Mohamad Sar'an Muhammad Akbar Khan Muhammad Fauzan Januri Muhammad Zulfikri Mustakim Mustopa Mustopa Mustopa Mustopa Najib, Moh Najmudin, Deden Najmudin, Deden Nasrullah Nasrullah Neng Yani Nurhayani Neni Nuraeni Nurul Hasana Nurwijayanti Pahlevi, Mohamad Syahreza Sadira, Allian Salsabila, Adzanah Mariska Sita Jahrotun Nisa Syahrul Anwar Syamsul Falah Syamsul Falah Syaripudin, Dadang Uu Nurul Huda, Uu Nurul Zaky Anggara Zulbaidah