Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

Pengalihan Hak Atas Tagihan Atas Nama atau Cessie yang Berkepastian Hukum Lemta , Benjamin; Iryani, Dewi; Aji , Puguh
Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Advokasi Hukum & Demokrasi (AHD)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Prof Gayus Lumbuun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61234/ahd.v2i1.53

Abstract

Debt and credit transactions are common occurrences in business activities. Often, debtors are unable or have not yet fulfilled their obligations, while creditors need immediate funds even before the due date of their receivables. In such cases, Civil Law provides a solution through the institution of "cessie," which is the Transfer of Rights to a Claim. However, the legislation governing cessie is still limited, as it is only addressed in Article 613 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), and even that does not comprehensively regulate the matter, leading to disputes that may escalate to court. Article 613 of the Civil Code lacks sufficient provisions for the implementation of cessie, as it only states that the transfer of cessie must be done through an authentic deed or a private document and will only be legally effective against the debtor if it has been notified to them. However, it does not specify who should make the notification, when it should be made, and how it should be done, resulting in legal uncertainty. This research adopts the Juridical Normative method, utilizing two approaches: the Statute Approach, which examines all relevant laws, and the Conceptual Approach, which involves studying legal doctrines and opinions from experts in law. The Transfer of Rights to a Claim (Cessie) transaction has not provided legal certainty for all parties involved, including the cessus (debtor), cedent (transferor), and cessionaris (transferee). This is evident from court decisions in various cases that show inconsistency in how notification is made to cessus. Whether of whether notification is sufficient when done by the cedent or the cessionaris, whether through regular mail or the Court Bailiff's writ, remains unsettled.
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Asuransi Jiwa yang Berkepastian Hukum Oscar, Gomulia; Hari Setiawan, Puguh Aji; Iryani, Dewi
Jurnal sosial dan sains Vol. 4 No. 9 (2024): Jurnal Sosial dan Sains
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsosains.v4i9.3170

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Asuransi jiwa memegang peranan penting dalam menyediakan perlindungan finansial bagi individu dan keluarga di Indonesia, tetapi kompleksitas industri asuransi dan potensi konflik antara pemegang polis dan perusahaan asuransi menuntut kerangka hukum yang kuat. Meskipun telah ada Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian dan peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), masih ada tantangan dalam implementasi dan penegakan hukum, serta ruang untuk perbaikan dalam mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa dan edukasi konsumen. Tujuan : Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang polis asuransi jiwa dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Metode : Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif Hasil: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang polis diatur oleh Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 dan peraturan OJK, namun masih ada kelemahan dalam pemahaman masyarakat, pengawasan OJK, mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa, dan penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran oleh perusahaan asuransi. Kesimpulan : Perusahaan asuransi perlu meningkatkan transparansi informasi kepada pemegang polis. Ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman pemegang polis, efektivitas mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa, dan pengawasan oleh OJK, dengan tujuan akhir meningkatkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap industri asuransi di Indonesia.
Vertical Land Consolidation For Handling Urban Housing And Slum Settlement Arrangements Nurmawati, Bernadete; Herman, KMS; Iryani, Dewi; Darmawansyah, Adi; Butarbutar, Russel
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.3233

Abstract

The proliferation of slums in cities with limited land availability calls for regulation on how best to utilize and control Land and initiatives to streamline and improve land use in metropolitan areas through land consolidation. Therefore, the government can use land consolidation to ensure the quality of the urban environment and the social functions of Land. Land consolidation itself is mainly carried out on city properties due to the high concentration of people and lack of planning that characterizes many urban environments. In urban slum programs, vertical land consolidation is an alternative land supply to reorganize slums. By reorganizing who owns what, where it can be used, and how it can be used, land consolidation is carried out to enhance natural resource conservation and improve environmental quality through community involvement and public use of previously privately owned Land. Community participation is a major part of the framework for improving the quality and quantity of land functions. Vertical land consolidation can serve as a useful solution to urban problems such as housing affordability and density. By consolidating Land vertically, more housing units can be built in a smaller area, providing more affordable housing options for residents. In addition, vertical land consolidation helps reduce urban sprawl and results in more sustainable and livable cities. This paper uses normative legal research techniques, including research into applying positive law and legal principles or norms.
Legal Protection on Pharmaceutical Product Patents by the Government on Covid-19’S Remdevisir and Favipiravir Nurmawati, Bernadete; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari; Herman, KMS
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Regular Issue
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v2i2.338

Abstract

Background: The implementation of patents by the Government for pharmaceutical products can be carried out in terms of very urgent needs for the benefit of the community, such as medicines that are still protected by patents to overcome Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) in Indonesia. Aim: To analyze the implementation of Patents by the Government according to Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents and legal protection for pharmaceutical product patent holders for the Implementation of Patents by the Government against remdevisir drugs and favipiravir. Method: Research method based on normative juridical approach from various legal materials through literature studies. Findings: To overcome the Covid-19 disease in Indonesia, the government needs to establish an access policy for pharmaceutical products as stated in Presidential Regulation Number 100 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Patents by the Government against Remdesivir Drugs and Presidential Regulation Number 101 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Patents by the Government against the Favipiravir Drug, on November 10, 2021. Patent holders of Remdevisir and Favipiravir medicinal pharmaceutical products are entitled to legal protection for the exercise of exclusive rights and payment of compensation during the Implementation of Patents by the Government in the amount of 1% of the net selling value of Remdesivir and Favipiravir drugs.
Lex AI sebagai Tata Kelola Kecerdasan Buatan Sui Generis di Indonesia Lisaldy, Ferdinand; ,, Ismail; Iryani, Dewi
Technology and Economics Law Journal
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kecerdasan Buatan atau Artificial Intelligence (AI) secara perlahan menjadi bagian dari kehidupan manusia di dekade ketiga abad ini. Berkembangnya inovasi-inovasi berbasis AI dalam bidang-bidang tertentu seperti perangkat lunak pembantu navigasi, rekayasa gambar, chatbot serta perangkat keras berbasis AI seperti yang digunakan perangkat yang memampukan orang lumpuh dapat berjalan kembali adalah bukti-bukti nyata perkembangan pengunaan AI dalam kehidupan. Seiring perkembangannya, dapat muncul pula masalah-masalah hukum terkait penggunaan AI seperti misalnya masalah etika, keadilan hukum, proses hukum yang adil, kekayaan intelektual, hingga keamanan data pribadi. Untuk memitigasi masalah hukum, perlu dikembangkan suatu tata kelola atas kecerdasan buatan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan metode pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Adapun teknik analisis hukum yang digunakan adalah teknik analisis argumentatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mengingat hakekat AI adalah suatu suatu sistem dinamis yang dibentuk oleh jaringan algoritma yang meniru jaringan saraf biologis yang karenanya sangat berbeda dibandingkan koding program, sehingga dibutuhkan pendekatan dan tata kelola hukum berbeda yang dapat disebut sebagai Lex AI. Karena keunikannya pula, maka tata kelola AI tidak dapat menggunakan tata kelola publik maupun privat secara ekslusif. Lex AI perlu dihadirkan sebagai tata kelola sui generis dengan karakteristik pengaturan tersendiri, dan dapat diparalelkan dengan hukum lain sebagai hukum komplementer.
LEGAL CERTAINTY AND JUSTICE FOR NON-FISCAL CREDITORS IN TAX CONFISCATION AND BANKRUPTCY PUBLIC CONFISCATION CONFLICTS Natalia, Rachel; Suhariyanto, Didik; Iryani, Dewi
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1782

Abstract

Bankruptcy as a mechanism for collective debt settlement aims to realize a fair and proportionate distribution of debtors' assets based on the principle of pari passu prorata parte. However, the existence of the state's right of precedence in tax collection, as stipulated in Law Number 19 of 2000 concerning Tax Collection by Compulsory Letter, often causes conflicts with the principle of bankruptcy in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. This normative conflict creates legal uncertainty, especially for non-fiscal creditors whose rights have the potential to be marginalized. The Supreme Court Decision Number 557 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2018 is important to examine because it illustrates the tension between the position of tax confiscation and general confiscation in bankruptcy, as well as the extent to which the principle of distributive justice and the principle of creditor equality can be applied. This research is a normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and case approaches. The research data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through literature studies, then analyzed descriptively-analytically using the theory of legal certainty and the theory of distributive justice. The focus of the study is directed at legal certainty for non-fiscal creditors in tax seizure and public confiscation conflicts, as well as the application of the principle of distributive justice and the principle of pari passu prorata parte in bankruptcy practice in Indonesia. The results of the study show that Supreme Court Decision Number 557 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2018 provides significant legal protection for non-fiscal creditors by rejecting the absolutism of the state's right of precedence, while reaffirming the principle of distributive justice in the distribution of bankruptcy assets. However, the legal certainty that was born was still formal because the inconsistency between the Bankruptcy Law and the Tax Law had not been fully harmonized. Therefore, regulatory reconstruction is needed to unify norms related to tax confiscation and general confiscation, as well as the consistency of Supreme Court jurisprudence in order to create fair and balanced legal certainty for all creditors.
LEGAL CERTAINTY FOR CONSUMERS IN GOOD FAITH DUE TO THE DEVELOPER COMPANY BEING DECLARED BANKRUPT Hie, Hengky Himawan; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i1.1929

Abstract

The issue of legal certainty for consumers in good faith in buying and selling houses becomes even more important when the developer company is declared bankrupt. Consumers who have carried out their obligations, whether in the form of down payment, installments, and repayment, are often only positioned as concurrent creditors in the bankruptcy settlement process. This study uses normative juridical legal methods with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The source of research data was obtained through literature studies which include primary legal materials in the form of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Civil Code, Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, as well as several Supreme Court decisions related to developer bankruptcy cases. Secondary legal materials are derived from books, legal journals, and the results of previous research. Data analysis is carried out by interpreting laws in a systematic, contextual, and comparative manner to obtain the right legal construction. The results of the study show that there is a legal disharmony between the Consumer Protection Law and the Bankruptcy Law. Consumers in good faith are often only placed as concurrent creditors so that they do not get optimal legal protection. In fact, Article 28H of the 1945 Constitution guarantees the right of everyone to live and live properly. Therefore, there is a need for legal reconstruction that places consumers as preferred creditors or given a special position in developer bankruptcy, in order to realize legal certainty, justice, and utility. The author recommends that regulatory reform be carried out through amendments to the Bankruptcy Law by accommodating the legal protection of consumers in good faith as a form of implementation of the principles of social justice.
Irony: The Gap Between Occupational Risks and Nurse Wages from a Legal Perspective Legi, Arfi Nofri; Ismail; Iryani, Dewi
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 7 No 4 (2025): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v7i4.1571

Abstract

Nurses, as the backbone of healthcare services in Indonesia, face high multidimensional occupational risks, encompassing biological, physical, psychosocial, and legal hazards. Ironically, these high risks are not compensated with fair wages, as many nurses still receive remuneration below feasibility standards. This research aims to analyze the fundamental gap between occupational risks (Das Sein) and wage justice (Das Sollen) from a legal perspective. Using a normative-juridical method supported by the Theory of Distributive Justice and the Theory of Legal Protection, this study dissects the regulatory architecture of the healthcare sector’s wage system. The findings identify three primary juridical obstacles: First, the current wage system fails to apply a fair principle of proportionality between the level of risk and the amount of remuneration. Second, a crucial operational norm vacuum exists due to the absence of a Ministry of Health Regulation, which is mandated by Government Regulation (PP) No. 28 of 2024 to technically implement risk factor calculations. Third, wage justice is hampered by institutional weaknesses, including the limitations of PPNI as a professional organization lacking the formal bargaining power of a trade union, and insufficient state supervision.
Optimalisasi Fungsi Bakamla Sebagai Indonesian Coast Guard: Antara Regulasi Dan Realita Umra, Alieffandy; Iryani, Dewi; Setiawan, Puguh Aji Hari
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4394

Abstract

The Indonesian Maritime Security Agency (Bakamla) plays a strategic role in ensuring security, safety, and law enforcement within Indonesia’s maritime jurisdiction. Although its authority is normatively stipulated through regulations such as Law No. 32 of 2014, Presidential Regulation No. 178 of 2014, and Government Regulation No. 13 of 2022, in practice Bakamla has yet to fully function as an ideal Indonesian Coast Guard. The absence of a specific law, overlapping authorities with other agencies, and limited resources hinder its operational effectiveness. This study aims to analyse Bakamla’s legal position and authority within the national legal system, identify discrepancies between regulation and operational reality, and formulate institutional strengthening strategies. Using a normative juridical approach, this research concludes that establishing a dedicated Coast Guard Law is an urgent step to develop a unified, professional, and effective national maritime security system