Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

TEORI OPENED LEGAL POLICY DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Darmawan, Dwiky Arief; Wijaya, Andy Usmina
Gorontalo Law Review Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Gorontalo Law Review
Publisher : Universitas Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32662/golrev.v7i1.3355

Abstract

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 yang mengabulkan sebagian dalam  penentuan batas syarat usia capres dan cawapres  menjadi  topik  yang ramai diperdebatkan. Sebagian masyarakat berpendapat bahwa Mahkamah Konstitusi harus berani mengambil kepastian hukum, sebagaimana Mahkamah Konstitusi disebut sebagai penjaga konstitusi UUD 1945. Namun, Hakim Mahkamah  Konstitusi memberikan putusan dengan penambahan pemaknaan norma yang berbeda, yang justru menjadi perdebatan dalam pandangan Masyarakat. artikel  ini  bertujuan  untuk  mengkaji  lebih  jauh  argumentasi  hukum  (ratio  decidendi)  putusan  Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 yang bersifat open legal policy dan bagaimana wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap penambahan norma dengan teori open legal policy, dengan konsepsi open legal policy yang menjadi Batasan dalam putusan yang diambil oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP WACANA PERUBAHAN MASA JABATAN PRESIDEN MENURUT KETENTUAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Muhammad Nabil Naufal; Andy Usmina Wijaya
HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/hukmy.2025.v5i1.857-867

Abstract

In many countries, including Indonesia, the issue of presidential term limits is significant. In the current context of the constitutional debate, one of the provisions being discussed is the presidential term, which faces opposition from both supporters and opponents of change. The topic of presidential term limits often arises in political and legal discourse in Indonesia. The purpose of changing presidential terms is to provide greater opportunities for successful leaders in governing the country. However, because it can erode fundamental principles of democracy and potentially lead to tyranny, this discourse has also received various criticisms. This research falls under normative research, also known as library research. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct legal analysis of this study, taking into account the constitution and observing the current applicable laws.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Bullying dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Anak dan Keadilan Restoratif melalui Diversi di Indonesia Dini Fitria Arifah; Andy Usmina Wijaya
Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 5 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Desember 2025 - Januari 2026)
Publisher : Green Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jim.v4i5.1515

Abstract

Penelitian ini untuk menyelidiki bentuk tanggung jawab hukum terhadap anak yang melakukan tindak kejahatan bullying berdasarkan prinsip pelindungan anak dan penerapan keadilan pemulihan melalui mekanisme diversi di Indonesia. Kasus bullying yang melibatkan anak semakin sering terjadi dan menimbulkan dilema hukum, karena pelaku masih dianggap di bawah umur dan berhak atas perlakuan yang sesuai dengan prinsip perlindungan anak. Metode hukum normatif diterapkan dalam studi dengan memanfaatkan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, menggunakan bahan hukum utama seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak, serta aturan terkait lainnya. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa anak pelaku bullying dapat dituntut pertanggungjawaban secara hukum, namun penerapan hukuman terhadap mereka harus mempertimbangkan aspek pendidikan, rehabilitasi, dan perlindungan hak anak. Diversi dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak memainkan peran krusial sebagai alat penerapan keadilan restoratif yang fokus pada pemulihan, bukan pembalasan. Dengan demikian, penerapan keadilan restoratif melalui diversi dinilai mampu menyeimbangkan kepentingan hukum dengan kemanusiaan serta mencegah stigmatisasi terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana.
ANALISIS YURIDIS KRIMINALISASI LIVING TOGETHER DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK PRIVASI WARGA NEGARA Ayu Wulandari; Andy Usmina Wijaya
HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/hukmy.2026.v6i1.1126-1139

Abstract

In the context of protecting citizens' right to privacy, this study discusses the criminalization of living together behavior as regulated in Article 412 of the new Criminal Code (KUHP). In this research, the limits of the state's authority to regulate the private sphere are examined through a normative legal approach, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of the analysis show that the policy of criminalizing living together creates tension between the protection of public morals and respect for individual freedom. Since it does not meet the requirements of the harm principle, this provision potentially violates the principles of proportionality and the ultimum remedium doctrine. Therefore, the policy must be revised to align with the Constitution, the principles of Pancasila, and international human rights standards.
PERLINDUNGAN ANAK TERHADAP PRAKTIK KEKERASAN PADA POLA ASUH ANAK DI MASYARAKAT ADAT MANGGARAI NTT (PERSPEKTIF UNDANG UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN ANAK) Helmi Daiyati; Andy Usmina Wijaya
HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35316/hukmy.2026.v6i1.1170-1184

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection for children from violent practices in the parenting patterns of the Manggarai indigenous community, East Nusa Tenggara. Violent practices in these parenting patterns are still often considered part of the tradition of educating children, thus contradicting the principles of child protection in Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning “Child Protection”. By applying normative legal research methods, this study highlights the tension between customary legal norms and national law. The results show that the implementation of child protection is not optimal due to the strong influence of local culture. Legal harmonization measures are needed that integrate customary values ​​with the principles of child protection to realize justice and legal balance in society.
Transparency Principle in Local Revenue Governance: An Administrative Law Perspective Athaya Faiz Wijayanti; Muh. Ali Masnun; Andy Usmina Wijaya
NOVUM : JURNAL HUKUM Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025): Law as Normative Rationality: Ontological Foundations of Rights, Governance, a
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.2674/novum.v12i4.74956

Abstract

This study offers an integrated normative empirical assessment of transparency implementation in local revenue governance, highlighting the structural gap between legal standards and administrative capacity. This study also analyzes the implementation of the principle of transparency in the management of Local Revenue (PAD) by the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency (BPKAD) of Surabaya City as a manifestation of the application of the General Principles of Good Governance (AAUPB). Using a sociological legal empirical research method, this study combines primary data from interviews with the Head of the Treasury and Accounting Division of BPKAD Surabaya City with secondary data in the form of laws and regulations, official documents, and scientific literature. The results of the study show that BPKAD Surabaya City has implemented the principle of openness through proactive publication, an integrated information system, public information request services, and an SPBE-based data security mechanism. However, implementation still faces significant challenges, including normative aspects (interpretation of the boundaries between open and exempt information, legal timeframe inconsistencies), technical aspects (digital human resource limitations, system downtime, data integration), and institutional aspects (political pressure, information sensitivity, bureaucratic culture). This study concludes that although the regulatory framework is comprehensive, implementation of the principle of openness requires harmonization of legal norms with empirical capacity, strengthening of digital infrastructure, improvement of human resource competencies, and a sustained commitment to realizing transparent and accountable regional financial management.
Protection of the Land Rights of the Paser Indigenous Tribe in the National Capital Region Nusantara Andy Usmina Wijaya; Fikri Hadi; Muhamad Chaidar
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v4i2.1471

Abstract

Abstract: The regulation regarding the relocation of the new capital city has sparked pros and cons within the community across various categories; one pertains to the land occupied, maintained, and nurtured by the indigenous Paser tribe residing in the area. Their land has provided sustenance for their survival and that of their descendants. The relocation of the capital city to their territory raises questions concerning the land they have cared for all this time. Article 18B, paragraph 2 of the 1945 Constitution acknowledges the importance of customary law in developing national law. Purpose: This paper will explain the protection to Paser Indigenous Tribe regarding the Land Rights after the relocation of the capital city. Design/Methodology/Approach: The type of research is normative law, The approaches used are the statute approach and the conceptual approach. Findings: The main results or discoveries of the research presented briefly. Present the article’s findings based on the analysis and discussion done in the paper. Originality/value: The background of the object being studied is the same Indigenous communities affected by national-scale strategic projects. The difference in this context is that it focuses on the indigenous communities affected by the development project of the National Capital in Nusantara.
Yuridiksi Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Radikalisme Di Indonesia Heri Siswahyulianto; Andy Usmina Wijaya
JATISWARA Vol. 41 No. 1 (2026): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jtsw.v41i1.1291

Abstract

Radicalism in Indonesia has evolved from merely an ideological perspective into a tangible threat to national stability, particularly in line with the digital transformation that accelerates the spread of propaganda and online recruitment. This situation creates a need for legal clarity regarding the jurisdiction and authority of authorities in handling pre-terror actions, such as the dissemination of extremist teachings, digital financing, and ideological training without physical violence. The revision of Law Number 5 of 2018 concerning the Eradication of Terrorism Crimes expands the authority of officials by emphasizing a preventive approach, yet it presents challenges in balancing national security with the protection of human rights. This study employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze the effectiveness of jurisdictional regulations in countering radicalism, as well as to assess the synergy among law enforcement agencies such as the Indonesian National Police, Densus 88, the National Counter Terrorism Agency (BNPT), and the Prosecutor's Office. The research results indicate that although the national legal system has been relatively comprehensive, overlaps in authority and weak coordination among agencies are still evident, potentially reducing the effectiveness of law enforcement. Therefore, the strengthening of law enforcement jurisdiction should be directed towards regulatory harmonization, the establishment of inter-agency coordination forums, and the enhancement of institutional transparency and accountability. Legal system reform based on institutional collaboration and the reinforcement of human rights principles constitutes a strategic step in building a jurisdictional system that is adaptive to modern radicalism threats.
KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN SATU SAKSI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG Sekaring Ayumeida Kusnadi; Andy Usmina Wijaya; Fifin Dwi Purwaningtyas
Wijaya Putra Law Review Vol 1 No 1 (2022): April
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Putra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38156/wplr.v1i1.64

Abstract

Perdagangan orang kini telah menjadi permasalahan yang mendunia dan terjadi di seluruh belahan dunia. Hal ini menjadi permasalahan yang serius untuk dicegah dan diselesaikan secara luar dan mendalam karena perdagangan orang menghancurkan kehidupan masa depan setiap korban praktiknya. Perdagangan orang adalah bentuk manusia modern dari “perbudakan manusia”. Saat ini tindak pidana perdagangan orang semakin terselubung. Banyak tindak pidana perdagangan orang ini dilakukan dengan memanfaatkan kecanggihan teknologi. Saat ini tindak pidana perdagangan orang banyak dilakukan oleh korporasi dengan berbagai modus bisnis untuk tujuan mengeksploitasi seseorang baik eksploitasi ekonomi dan seksual. Hal ini menjadikan tindak pidana perdagangan orang termasuk dalam tindak pidana khusus dimana dalam penyelesaiannya harus terdapat bukti yang kuat sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Tetapi, dalam UUTPPO menyatakan satu saksi adalah cukup sebagai alat bukti. Hal ini bertentangan dengan asas unus testis nullus testis. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana perlindungan terhadap saksi dan kekuatan pembuktian dalam tindak pidana perdagangan orang ditinjau dari UUTPPO
TANGGUNG JAWAB RUMAH SAKIT TERHADAP KELALAIAN MALPRAKTIK Bella Natalia Toumahuw; Andy Usmina Wijaya; Rahmadi Mulyo Widianto
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra Vol 1 No 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Putra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38156/jihwp.v1i2.84

Abstract

Malpraktik merupakan suatu jenis kelalaian dalam menjalankan suatu profesi yang mengakibatkan kerugian bagi seseorang. Malpraktik di bidang kesehatan sangat marak terjadi di Indonesia yang mana dalam hal ini pasien seringkali mengalami kerugian akibat tindakan kesalahan medis yang dilakukan oleh dokter atau tenaga kesehatan rumah sakit, sehingga dalam hal ini membebankan kewajiban pertanggungjawaban bagi dokter atau rumah sakit yang telah melakukan malpraktik tersebut. Secara hukum malpraktik diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1992 tentang Kesehatan maupun Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran. Penelitian ini membahas tentang tanggung jawab rumah sakit terhadap kelalaian malpraktik dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa rumah sakit bertanggung jawab atas tindakan kelalaian tenaga kesehatan di rumah sakit yang menyebaban kerugian pada seseorang/pasien dengan mengacu pada Pasal 1367 KUHPerdata, Pasal 46 UU Rumah Sakit, dan standart profesi dan akreditasi pelayanan kesehatan secara internasional, namun pada faktanya pasien tidak mudah dalam melakukan gugatan ganti kerugian kepada rumah sakit atas tindakan malpraktik, sebab tidak semua kelalaian tenaga kesehatan merupakan tanggungjawab pihak rumah sakit.