Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

Legal Accountability of Police Members Affected by Criminal Cases Hadi Purnomo
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v20i2.3802

Abstract

Criminal cases involving members of the National Police often raise concerns regarding the professionalism, integrity and image of the police institution. Therefore, this research will explore the legal aspects that underlie the responsibility of Polri members in the context of criminal cases. The responsibility of members of the National Police who commit criminal acts includes responsibility for the code of ethics and criminal responsibility. This research methodology involves normative law regarding the laws and regulations that regulate the legal responsibilities of Polri members. The research results show that legal accountability for Polri members involved in criminal cases has significant implications for the integrity of law enforcement agencies. Criminal cases involving members of the National Police can harm the image of the institution in the eyes of the public, and therefore, law enforcement must be carried out firmly, transparently and in accordance with applicable legal norms. Research also reveals that the concept of the rule of law and the balance between criminal law, Disciplinary Regulations, and the Police Professional Code of Ethics play an important role in maintaining the honor of the institution and providing justice to the community. The research conclusions highlight the need for professionalism of the apparatus, adequate facilities and infrastructure, positive public perception of the law, and the formation of a strong legal culture to create an effective and fair legal environment in maintaining security and public order.
MEMBANGUN MODEL BUDAYA PENEGAKAN HUKUM YANG BERBASIS ANTI KORUPSI: (Studi Kasus Polrestabes X) Hadi Purnomo; Siti Rosimah; Ciavi Adinda Giantri Katim; Nina Kurniasari
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 4 No 10 (2023): Tema Filsafat Hukum, Politik Hukum dan Etika Profesi Hukum
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Law enforcement should ideally uphold the values of human rights, transparency, non-discrimination, anti-corruption. In fact, the opposite, so created a corrupt legal culture in the law enforcement process. The research aims to explore the various dominant factors created by a corrupt culture in the law enforcement process. The results of the study, namely the conditions of the existing legal culture of the police environment in the law enforcement process, showed a tendency opposite to the one that should be in the legal process. The driving factors include hedonism, low incomes, permissive police leadership, lack of sovereignty, pressure from various sides. The ideal legal culture model is to change the sanctioning of violations of the law enforcement process through disciplinary sanctions.
Legal Protection for Patients of Online Healthcare Service: Analysis of Risks and Challenges of Healthcare Services in Digital Era Purnomo, Hadi
Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Vol 19 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Volume 19 Nomor 3 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35879/jik.v19i3.688

Abstract

The use of online healthcare services has the potential to generate various legal issues. The formulation of the problem in this research is how legal protection for patients in online healthcare services is provided, what risks and challenges are faced in providing legal protection for patients in healthcare services in the digital era, and how health law should adapt to the development of digital technology. This research employs a normative legal research method. The research findings show that legal protection for patients in online healthcare services is crucial to ensure that patients' rights are protected in the rapidly evolving digital era. Based on Philipus M. Hadjon's theory of legal protection, both preventive and repressive legal protections must be applied synergistically in the regulation of online healthcare services. Although digital healthcare services offer many benefits, such as easier and faster access, there are significant risks and challenges in providing legal protection for patients. The legal vacuum concerning regulations on telemedicine, the potential misuse of personal data, the limitations of service quality standards, and the lack of effective supervision are major issues that need to be addressed immediately. Furthermore, issues in dispute resolution between patients and online healthcare providers also worsen the situation. Health law must adapt to the rapid development of digital technology to ensure adequate protection for patients and maintain the quality and fairness of healthcare services. This legal adaptation is essential in regulating telemedicine practices, ensuring ethical and professional standards for medical personnel providing digital services, and protecting patients' personal data from potential misuse or breaches. Therefore, health law must balance technological innovation and the protection of patients' fundamental rights, creating a legal framework that is adaptive and responsive, enabling the healthcare sector to develop safely and fairly in the digital era.
Settlement Of Defaults In Restructuring Efforts In Credit Agreements At Bank Pasar Rembang (Case Study Decision Number: 7/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Rbg) Riza Zulfikar; Novi Prisela Putri; Hadi Purnomo
Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 02 (2023): Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum dan Politik, October 2023
Publisher : Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum dan Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Engagements or agreements through credit transactions carried out by banks are bound by a credit agreement, so that a legal relationship arises between the binding parties. Because there is an imbalance between creditors and debtors, the weaker party is unable to fulfil the agreement, and ends up causing problems between the two parties. For this reason, credit restructuring is carried out to resolve problem loans. However, in this case, not only debtors can default, but also creditors, who violate the restructuring agreement. Which led to the issuance of the Rembang District Court decision Number 7/PDT.G/2021/PN Rbg. Through the trial of the debtor's lawsuit whose restructuring agreement was rejected by the creditor. The method used in this case study is juridical research where this research examines the applicable legal provisions. The data source used is secondary data, both secondary and tertiary legal materials using library data collection techniques, namely document study by collecting and studying legal books, literature, laws and regulations related to the object of research and other reading related to writing. This case study and the documents examined are court decisions. Data analysis uses qualitative juridical methods. The results of this research can be concluded that in the case study of this research, bank credit restructuring is a step taken by the debtor because he is still cooperative, always maintains a relationship with the bank, and has good faith and has the opportunity to fulfil his obligations, but the bank as a creditor commits an act of default. by denying the restructuring efforts proposed by the debtor which had also been agreed upon by the creditor by referring to Bank Indonesia Regulation number 14/15/PBI/2012 and the bank's internal procedures, in the process of which the creditor conducted an auction of the collateral objects listed in the credit agreement clause without notification and agreement with the debtor. This problem resulted in a lawsuit filed by the debtor with the Rembang District Court. The judge's consideration in the decision in this case was that the judge stated that the debtor's credit restructuring was cancelled. The refusal (drop) is the correct action based on the verstek decision. However, the judge must also consider first looking at the Derivative of the credit agreement, namely credit restructuring.
Drug Smuggling Within Correctional Facilities: Modus Operandi, Regulatory Gaps, and Legal Reform Purnomo, Hadi; Prasetyo, Edi; Edi Wibowo , Dwi
LITIGASI Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.29584

Abstract

Drug smuggling in Indonesian correctional institutions remains a complex issue caused by multidimensional factors, hindering the goal of rehabilitation. Despite strict regulations, the involvement of officers and external networks persists. This study aims to identify smuggling modus operandi, assess the impact of weak supervision and officer integrity, and formulate legal solutions. Using a normative juridical method with statute and conceptual approaches, this research reveals that smuggling commonly occurs through family visits, couriers, and illegal communication devices. This study contributes novelty by integrating modus operandi analysis with the gap between legal norms (das sollen) and institutional practice (das sein) in Indonesian correctional law. The findings highlight that current regulations lose effectiveness due to a lack of legal culture and integrity. Consequently, proposed solutions include strengthening internal supervision, enforcing strict sanctions for involved officers, and reforming the correctional legal culture.
Implikasi hukum diskresi birokrasi terhadap penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi (studi kasus Thomas Trikasih Lembong dan La Nyalla Mattalitti) Nurman Sadam Bawono; Hadi Purnomo; Nugraha Pranadita
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/vh4jp671

Abstract

Penelitian ini berjudul Implikasi Hukum Diskresi Birokrasi terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi : Studi Kasus Thomas Trikasih Lembong dan La Nyalla Mahmud Mattalitti. Fokus penelitian adalah mengidentifikasi mengapa terdapat disparitas implikasi hukum antara dua kasus tersebut dan menentukan faktor-faktor dominan yang memengaruhi perbedaan itu. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi kasus, analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan kajian literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan implikasi disebabkan oleh perbedaan penafsiran norma (legal interpretation), pembuktian unsur mens rea dan kerugian negara, paradigma penegakan hukum (formalistik vs. substantif-proporsional), konteks kelembagaan-politik, serta peran ahli dan media dalam membentuk opini publik. Kasus Tom Lembong cenderung dikualifikasikan sebagai penyalahgunaan wewenang dengan dampak kerugian negara, sementara kasus La Nyalla diputus bebas karena tidak terpenuhinya unsur niat jahat dan kerugian aktual. Kesimpulannya, penelitian merekomendasikan harmonisasi norma administrasi dan pidana, penguatan prinsip ultimum remedium, dan pedoman teknis bagi penegak hukum untuk mencegah kriminalisasi kebijakan administratif.
Penegakan hukum penyimpangan bantuan dana sosial dikaitkan dengan Undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2001 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Kabupaten Karawang Munib Munib; Hadi Purnomo; Syahrul Machmud
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/hm888e09

Abstract

Penelitian ini berangkat dari maraknya praktik penyimpangan dalam penyaluran bantuan dana sosial (bansos) di Kabupaten Karawang, seperti manipulasi data penerima, pemotongan dana tanpa dasar hukum, dan adanya penerima fiktif. Fenomena tersebut menunjukkan lemahnya sistem pengawasan dan akuntabilitas dalam pengelolaan dana sosial, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian negara serta menurunkan kepercayaan publik terhadap pemerintah daerah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis implementasi prosedur penegakan hukum terhadap penyimpangan penyaluran dana sosial di Kabupaten Karawang serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor dominan yang memengaruhi efektivitas penegakan hukum dalam konteks tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan data empiris (law in action), melalui studi literatur terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, putusan pengadilan, serta wawancara dan laporan lembaga pengawas seperti KPK dan Ombudsman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi penegakan hukum atas penyimpangan dana bansos di Kabupaten Karawang belum berjalan secara optimal. Hal ini disebabkan oleh lemahnya koordinasi antarinstansi penegak hukum, kurangnya transparansi dalam proses distribusi bansos, serta rendahnya kesadaran hukum aparat dan masyarakat. Faktor dominan yang memengaruhi penegakan hukum antara lain faktor aparat penegak hukum, faktor peraturan yang belum diterapkan secara konsisten, dan faktor budaya hukum masyarakat yang masih permisif terhadap praktik korupsi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya perbaikan sistem pengawasan, peningkatan integritas aparat, serta penerapan sanksi yang tegas sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 untuk mewujudkan tata kelola dana sosial yang bersih dan berkeadilan.
Reframing Medical Malpractice Resolution: Restorative Justice between Indonesian Criminal Law and Iṣlāḥ in Contemporary Islamic Law Hadi Purnomo; Widhi Handoko; Murad Altwaiqat
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13100

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Criminal Code marks a shift in Indonesia’s criminal justice paradigm from retributive punishment toward restorative justice, emphasizing victim recovery, proportional accountability, and substantive justice. This transformation is particularly relevant to medical malpractice cases, which involve complex intersections of professional standards, medical ethics, and patient rights. Conventional punitive approaches have often failed to ensure victim restoration while risking excessive criminalization of medical practitioners. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal law system to resolve medical malpractice cases and to comparatively examine its conceptual convergence with the principle of iṣlāḥ in contemporary Islamic law, a peace-oriented dispute-resolution mechanism. This research employs a normative juridical approach by analyzing statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and contemporary Islamic legal scholarship related to restorative justice and iṣlāḥ. The analysis focuses on the philosophical foundations, normative structures, and practical implications of both legal frameworks. The findings reveal that the post-reform Indonesian Criminal Code provides a broader normative space for integrating restorative justice principles into criminal policy, including in the handling of medical malpractice disputes. Meanwhile, iṣlāḥ in contemporary Islamic legal thought emphasizes reconciliation, deliberation, proportional responsibility, and restoration of rights, grounded in Qur’anic values and Prophetic traditions. Comparatively, both frameworks demonstrate a shared restorative orientation that prioritizes balanced protection of victims and practitioners, social harmony, and sustainable conflict resolution, despite differences in epistemological foundations and normative sources. This study contributes to the development of an integrative restorative model by demonstrating the normative compatibility between Indonesian criminal law reform and Islamic legal principles, offering a more equitable, proportionate, and human-centered approach to resolving medical malpractice disputes in contemporary Indonesia.