Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Protection for Patients of Online Healthcare Service: Analysis of Risks and Challenges of Healthcare Services in Digital Era Purnomo, Hadi
Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Vol 19 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Volume 19 Nomor 3 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35879/jik.v19i3.688

Abstract

The use of online healthcare services has the potential to generate various legal issues. The formulation of the problem in this research is how legal protection for patients in online healthcare services is provided, what risks and challenges are faced in providing legal protection for patients in healthcare services in the digital era, and how health law should adapt to the development of digital technology. This research employs a normative legal research method. The research findings show that legal protection for patients in online healthcare services is crucial to ensure that patients' rights are protected in the rapidly evolving digital era. Based on Philipus M. Hadjon's theory of legal protection, both preventive and repressive legal protections must be applied synergistically in the regulation of online healthcare services. Although digital healthcare services offer many benefits, such as easier and faster access, there are significant risks and challenges in providing legal protection for patients. The legal vacuum concerning regulations on telemedicine, the potential misuse of personal data, the limitations of service quality standards, and the lack of effective supervision are major issues that need to be addressed immediately. Furthermore, issues in dispute resolution between patients and online healthcare providers also worsen the situation. Health law must adapt to the rapid development of digital technology to ensure adequate protection for patients and maintain the quality and fairness of healthcare services. This legal adaptation is essential in regulating telemedicine practices, ensuring ethical and professional standards for medical personnel providing digital services, and protecting patients' personal data from potential misuse or breaches. Therefore, health law must balance technological innovation and the protection of patients' fundamental rights, creating a legal framework that is adaptive and responsive, enabling the healthcare sector to develop safely and fairly in the digital era.
Settlement Of Defaults In Restructuring Efforts In Credit Agreements At Bank Pasar Rembang (Case Study Decision Number: 7/Pdt.G/2021/Pn.Rbg) Riza Zulfikar; Novi Prisela Putri; Hadi Purnomo
Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum dan Politik Vol. 1 No. 02 (2023): Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum dan Politik, October 2023
Publisher : Jurnal Restorasi : Hukum dan Politik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Engagements or agreements through credit transactions carried out by banks are bound by a credit agreement, so that a legal relationship arises between the binding parties. Because there is an imbalance between creditors and debtors, the weaker party is unable to fulfil the agreement, and ends up causing problems between the two parties. For this reason, credit restructuring is carried out to resolve problem loans. However, in this case, not only debtors can default, but also creditors, who violate the restructuring agreement. Which led to the issuance of the Rembang District Court decision Number 7/PDT.G/2021/PN Rbg. Through the trial of the debtor's lawsuit whose restructuring agreement was rejected by the creditor. The method used in this case study is juridical research where this research examines the applicable legal provisions. The data source used is secondary data, both secondary and tertiary legal materials using library data collection techniques, namely document study by collecting and studying legal books, literature, laws and regulations related to the object of research and other reading related to writing. This case study and the documents examined are court decisions. Data analysis uses qualitative juridical methods. The results of this research can be concluded that in the case study of this research, bank credit restructuring is a step taken by the debtor because he is still cooperative, always maintains a relationship with the bank, and has good faith and has the opportunity to fulfil his obligations, but the bank as a creditor commits an act of default. by denying the restructuring efforts proposed by the debtor which had also been agreed upon by the creditor by referring to Bank Indonesia Regulation number 14/15/PBI/2012 and the bank's internal procedures, in the process of which the creditor conducted an auction of the collateral objects listed in the credit agreement clause without notification and agreement with the debtor. This problem resulted in a lawsuit filed by the debtor with the Rembang District Court. The judge's consideration in the decision in this case was that the judge stated that the debtor's credit restructuring was cancelled. The refusal (drop) is the correct action based on the verstek decision. However, the judge must also consider first looking at the Derivative of the credit agreement, namely credit restructuring.
Drug Smuggling Within Correctional Facilities: Modus Operandi, Regulatory Gaps, and Legal Reform Purnomo, Hadi; Prasetyo, Edi; Edi Wibowo , Dwi
LITIGASI Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.29584

Abstract

Drug smuggling in Indonesian correctional institutions remains a complex issue caused by multidimensional factors, hindering the goal of rehabilitation. Despite strict regulations, the involvement of officers and external networks persists. This study aims to identify smuggling modus operandi, assess the impact of weak supervision and officer integrity, and formulate legal solutions. Using a normative juridical method with statute and conceptual approaches, this research reveals that smuggling commonly occurs through family visits, couriers, and illegal communication devices. This study contributes novelty by integrating modus operandi analysis with the gap between legal norms (das sollen) and institutional practice (das sein) in Indonesian correctional law. The findings highlight that current regulations lose effectiveness due to a lack of legal culture and integrity. Consequently, proposed solutions include strengthening internal supervision, enforcing strict sanctions for involved officers, and reforming the correctional legal culture.
Implikasi hukum diskresi birokrasi terhadap penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi (studi kasus Thomas Trikasih Lembong dan La Nyalla Mattalitti) Nurman Sadam Bawono; Hadi Purnomo; Nugraha Pranadita
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/vh4jp671

Abstract

Penelitian ini berjudul Implikasi Hukum Diskresi Birokrasi terhadap Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi : Studi Kasus Thomas Trikasih Lembong dan La Nyalla Mahmud Mattalitti. Fokus penelitian adalah mengidentifikasi mengapa terdapat disparitas implikasi hukum antara dua kasus tersebut dan menentukan faktor-faktor dominan yang memengaruhi perbedaan itu. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi kasus, analisis peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, dan kajian literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan implikasi disebabkan oleh perbedaan penafsiran norma (legal interpretation), pembuktian unsur mens rea dan kerugian negara, paradigma penegakan hukum (formalistik vs. substantif-proporsional), konteks kelembagaan-politik, serta peran ahli dan media dalam membentuk opini publik. Kasus Tom Lembong cenderung dikualifikasikan sebagai penyalahgunaan wewenang dengan dampak kerugian negara, sementara kasus La Nyalla diputus bebas karena tidak terpenuhinya unsur niat jahat dan kerugian aktual. Kesimpulannya, penelitian merekomendasikan harmonisasi norma administrasi dan pidana, penguatan prinsip ultimum remedium, dan pedoman teknis bagi penegak hukum untuk mencegah kriminalisasi kebijakan administratif.
Penegakan hukum penyimpangan bantuan dana sosial dikaitkan dengan Undang-undang nomor 20 tahun 2001 tentang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Kabupaten Karawang Munib Munib; Hadi Purnomo; Syahrul Machmud
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/hm888e09

Abstract

Penelitian ini berangkat dari maraknya praktik penyimpangan dalam penyaluran bantuan dana sosial (bansos) di Kabupaten Karawang, seperti manipulasi data penerima, pemotongan dana tanpa dasar hukum, dan adanya penerima fiktif. Fenomena tersebut menunjukkan lemahnya sistem pengawasan dan akuntabilitas dalam pengelolaan dana sosial, sehingga menimbulkan kerugian negara serta menurunkan kepercayaan publik terhadap pemerintah daerah. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis implementasi prosedur penegakan hukum terhadap penyimpangan penyaluran dana sosial di Kabupaten Karawang serta mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor dominan yang memengaruhi efektivitas penegakan hukum dalam konteks tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan dukungan data empiris (law in action), melalui studi literatur terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen resmi, putusan pengadilan, serta wawancara dan laporan lembaga pengawas seperti KPK dan Ombudsman. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi penegakan hukum atas penyimpangan dana bansos di Kabupaten Karawang belum berjalan secara optimal. Hal ini disebabkan oleh lemahnya koordinasi antarinstansi penegak hukum, kurangnya transparansi dalam proses distribusi bansos, serta rendahnya kesadaran hukum aparat dan masyarakat. Faktor dominan yang memengaruhi penegakan hukum antara lain faktor aparat penegak hukum, faktor peraturan yang belum diterapkan secara konsisten, dan faktor budaya hukum masyarakat yang masih permisif terhadap praktik korupsi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan upaya perbaikan sistem pengawasan, peningkatan integritas aparat, serta penerapan sanksi yang tegas sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 untuk mewujudkan tata kelola dana sosial yang bersih dan berkeadilan.
Reframing Medical Malpractice Resolution: Restorative Justice between Indonesian Criminal Law and Iṣlāḥ in Contemporary Islamic Law Hadi Purnomo; Widhi Handoko; Murad Altwaiqat
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13100

Abstract

The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Indonesian Criminal Code marks a shift in Indonesia’s criminal justice paradigm from retributive punishment toward restorative justice, emphasizing victim recovery, proportional accountability, and substantive justice. This transformation is particularly relevant to medical malpractice cases, which involve complex intersections of professional standards, medical ethics, and patient rights. Conventional punitive approaches have often failed to ensure victim restoration while risking excessive criminalization of medical practitioners. This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice within the Indonesian criminal law system to resolve medical malpractice cases and to comparatively examine its conceptual convergence with the principle of iṣlāḥ in contemporary Islamic law, a peace-oriented dispute-resolution mechanism. This research employs a normative juridical approach by analyzing statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and contemporary Islamic legal scholarship related to restorative justice and iṣlāḥ. The analysis focuses on the philosophical foundations, normative structures, and practical implications of both legal frameworks. The findings reveal that the post-reform Indonesian Criminal Code provides a broader normative space for integrating restorative justice principles into criminal policy, including in the handling of medical malpractice disputes. Meanwhile, iṣlāḥ in contemporary Islamic legal thought emphasizes reconciliation, deliberation, proportional responsibility, and restoration of rights, grounded in Qur’anic values and Prophetic traditions. Comparatively, both frameworks demonstrate a shared restorative orientation that prioritizes balanced protection of victims and practitioners, social harmony, and sustainable conflict resolution, despite differences in epistemological foundations and normative sources. This study contributes to the development of an integrative restorative model by demonstrating the normative compatibility between Indonesian criminal law reform and Islamic legal principles, offering a more equitable, proportionate, and human-centered approach to resolving medical malpractice disputes in contemporary Indonesia.
PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION IN INDONESIA'S DIGITAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM Hadi Purnomo
AKSELERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Vol 8 No 1 (2026): AKSELERASI: JURNAL ILMIAH NASIONAL
Publisher : GoAcademica Research dan Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/jin.v8i1.1762

Abstract

The rapid digitalization of law enforcement in Indonesia has increased the use of personal data in investigative, intelligence, and criminal justice processes. While digital technologies improve the effectiveness and efficiency of law enforcement, they also create significant risks to privacy rights and personal data protection. The enactment of Law Number 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law) represents an important milestone in establishing a comprehensive legal framework for personal data protection. However, challenges remain in ensuring the effective implementation of personal data protection principles within digital law enforcement practices. This study aims to analyse the implementation of personal data protection in Indonesia’s digital law enforcement system, identify the challenges encountered, and formulate strategies to strengthen legal protection mechanisms while maintaining a balance between law enforcement interests and the protection of individual privacy rights. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials were collected through library research consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources and analysed qualitatively through inventorying, classifying, interpreting, and systematically examining relevant legal norms and doctrines. The findings indicate that the implementation of personal data protection remains constrained by the absence of specific technical regulations, limited institutional capacity, weak supervisory mechanisms, and the growing use of artificial intelligence, facial recognition, big data analytics, and digital surveillance technologies. The study also reveals a gap between regulatory norms and practical implementation that may undermine privacy rights and legal certainty. The novelty of this research lies in proposing an integrated strengthening model based on regulatory harmonization, independent oversight, institutional capacity building, and privacy-by-design principles to support accountable, transparent, and human rights-oriented digital law enforcement.
Legal Protection and Legal Certainty in International Electronic Contract Dispute Resolution Hadi Purnomo
INFLUENCE: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): INFLUENCE: International Journal of Science Review
Publisher : Global Writing Academica Researching and Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/influencejournal.v8i1.329

Abstract

This research analyses legal protection and legal certainty in the resolution of international electronic contract disputes through Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). The study aims to examine the legal position of electronic contracts in international trade, the implementation of ODR in cross-border dispute settlement, and the legal certainty provided to parties involved in digital transactions. This research employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary legal materials include Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law Number 19 of 2016, the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce 1996, and UNCITRAL Technical Notes on Online Dispute Resolution. Secondary legal materials were obtained from books, journals, and previous legal studies. The analysis was conducted qualitatively through the interpretation of legal norms, principles, and doctrines related to international electronic contracts and digital dispute resolution. The results indicate that ODR provides effectiveness, efficiency, and flexibility in resolving international electronic contract disputes. However, its implementation still faces challenges related to jurisdiction, recognition of electronic decisions, digital data security, and the lack of harmonized regulations. The novelty of this research lies in integrating legal protection, legal certainty, and the legitimacy of digital decisions within international electronic contract dispute resolution systems.
Psychic Causation in Indonesian Criminal Law: A Normative Study Using A Material Offense Approach Hadi Purnomo; Kamil Razak; Hana Krisnamurti
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1835

Abstract

This paper examines psychic causality in Iindonesian crimiinal law through normative legal research and a material offence approach. Classical criminal law tends to identify criminal causation through physical acts, such as stabbing, striking, oir poisoining. However, contemporary criimiinal cases increasingly involve non-physical acts, includiing verbal intimidation, psychological pressure, threats, humiliation, coercive communication, and digital harassment, which may allegedly trigger severe psychological harm or even suicide. The central legal question is whether psychological pressure may be legally constructed as a cause of a prohibited result. This paper argues that psychic causality cannot be assessed solely through the conditio sine qua noin theory because such theory is too broad when applied to psychological events. Instead, legal causation requires a coimbination of factual causation, adequate causation, objective foireseeability, and normative attribution. Indonesian law has recognized psychological suffering through several legal instruments, including the Criminal Code, the Domestic Violence Law, the Sexual Violence Crime Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and the new Criminal Code. Nevertheless, the main difficulty lies not in the existence of norms, but in proving the causal chain between the perpetrator’s conduct and the victim’s psychological condition. Therefore, forensic psychiatric expertise, psychological autopsy, medical records, digital evidence, and witness testimony are crucial to bridge legal certainty and scientific probability.
The Urgency of Strengthening International Criminal Justice in Combating Impunity of Perpetrators of International Crimes: The Perspective of the 1998 Rome Statute Sanddy Pratama Putra; Hadi Purnomo
TGO Journal of Community Development Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Trescode Green Organization

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56070/jcd.v4i1.390

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the urgency of strengthening international criminal justice in overcoming impunity for international criminals and to examine the effectiveness of the implementation of the 1998 Rome Statute as an instrument of international law in realizing criminal accountability. The research method used is normative juridical research with a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are qualitatively analyzed through legal interpretation. The results of the study show that the Rome Statute of 1998 has provided a comprehensive legal basis for the prosecution of international criminals through the application of the principles of complementarity, individual criminal responsibility, and international cooperation. However, the effectiveness of international criminal justice still faces various obstacles in the form of political intervention, limited jurisdiction, non-compliance of states with cooperation obligations, and the lack of optimal harmonization of national law with the provisions of the Rome Statute. Therefore, strengthening the ICC institution, increasing the commitment of countries in implementing international obligations, and expanding the ratification of the Rome Statute are strategic steps to reduce impunity and realize a more effective, fair, and just international criminal justice system.