Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH TERHADAP BAGI HASIL: Antara Pemilik Usaha dan Investor Urban Cafe Cabang Lampriet Banda Aceh. Sandi, fahrizal; Sa’dan, Saifuddin; Husnul, Muhammad
Al-Iqtishadiah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Al-Iqtishadiah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract Profit sharing is a crucial aspect of business management across various scales of enterprise. This research is motivated by the limited understanding among business owners regarding profit-sharing mechanisms that align with Sharia economic principles. Conducted in Aceh, a region that upholds comprehensive Sharia values, this descriptive qualitative study evaluates the implementation of business contracts at Urban Cafe. Through observation and in-depth interviews with the owner and investors, the study reveals that Urban Cafe employs a mudharabah mutlaqah contract with a profit-sharing ratio of 30% : 30% : 40%, where 30% is allocated to the investor and 40% to the manager. The analysis indicates that these practices have fulfilled the essential pillars (rukun) of mudharabah and are in full compliance with Sharia economic law regulations. Keyword : Profit Sharing, Mudharab Agreement, Business Management Abstrak Sistem pembagian keuntungan (profit sharing) merupakan aspek krusial dalam manajemen bisnis pada berbagai skala usaha. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh rendahnya pemahaman pelaku usaha mengenai mekanisme bagi hasil yang sesuai dengan prinsip ekonomi syariah. Berlokasi di Aceh yang menjunjung tinggi nilai syariat, penelitian kualitatif deskriptif ini mengevaluasi penerapan akad pada Urban Cafe. Melalui observasi dan wawancara mendalam dengan pemilik serta investor, ditemukan bahwa Urban Cafe menerapkan akad mudharabah mutlaqah dengan proporsi bagi hasil 30% : 30% : 40%, 30% untuk investor dan 40% untuk pengelola. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa praktik tersebut telah memenuhi rukun-rukun mudharabah dan selaras dengan regulasi hukum ekonomi syariah. Kata Kunci : Pembagian Hasil, Akad Mudharabah, Pengelolaan Usaha
Ikrah (Marital Coercion) and Divorce Before Dukhul in Turun Ranjang Marriage: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Jantho Sharia Court Decision No. 277/Pdt.G/2024/Ms.Jth Yuspita Sari, Delvina; Djawas, Mursyid; Husnul, Muhammad
Al-Risalah VOLUME 26 NO 1, MAY (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/al-risalah.vi.64678

Abstract

Previous studies on turun ranjang marriage such as those by Ihsan (2019), Siti Rif’ah (2022), and Ridhai Saifirai (2021 primarily focus on normative Islamic law and Acehnese customary perspectives, emphasizing its permissibility and social function. However, these works do not specifically examine how judicial institutions assess coercion (ikrah) in such marriages, nor do they analyze the legal consequences of divorce before dukhul through a concrete court decision. This study addresses that gap by providing a socio-legal analysis of coercion and pre-consummation divorce in turun ranjang marriage based on Jantho Sharia Court Decision No. 277/Pdt.G/2024/MS.Jth. This research employs qualitative field research using a case and statutory approach. Data were collected through document analysis of the court decision and in-depth interviews conducted between February and August 2025 with four key informants: one panel judge of the Jantho Sharia Court, one Head of KUA Indrapuri, one village imam, and one village secretary of Gampong Lampanah Tunong. The data were analyzed using an Islamic legal framework that operationalizes the concepts of ikrah (coercion), ridha (free consent), ‘urf sahih (legitimate custom), and the objectives of marriage (sakinah, mawaddah, rahmah) as analytical parameters for assessing marital validity. The findings demonstrate that although turun ranjang marriage is formally valid under Islamic and Indonesian law, the presence of psychological coercion fundamentally undermines its ethical legitimacy. The couple never cohabited nor consummated the marriage, and persistent conflict arose from the outset. The court granted divorce on the basis of continuous disputes and proven emotional pressure, and ordered the return of half of the dowry in accordance with Qur’an Surah Al-Baqarah (2:237) and Article 35(1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 due to the divorce occurring before dukhul. This study contributes a novel perspective by integrating doctrinal Islamic principles with empirical judicial analysis, demonstrating that marital validity is not determined solely by compliance with formal pillars (rukun), but by the substantive presence of ridha and the absence of ikrah.
Pemahaman Masyarakat Gampong Cot Trieng terhadap Taklik Talak Pasca Akad Nikah dalam Perspektif KHI Ridhayani Ridhayani; Hasnul Arifin Melayu; Muhammad Husnul
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9713

Abstract

Although taklik talak has been normatively regulated in the Kompilasi Hukum Islam as an instrument for protecting wives’ rights in marriage, community practice and understanding of its implementation still show various problems. Studies that specifically discuss community understanding of taklik talak after the marriage contract, particularly in the practice where the sighat taklik talak is not recited but signing in the marriage book is still carried out, remain limited, especially in the Aceh region. This study aims to analyze the understanding of the people of Gampong Cot Trieng regarding taklik talak after the marriage contract from the perspective of the Kompilasi Hukum Islam and to identify the factors affecting this low level of understanding. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical empirical juridical method. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation involving 15 participants consisting of gampong officials and married couples with marriage durations of 5, 10, and 20 years, who were selected using a purposive sampling technique. The data were analyzed by relating the empirical findings to legal awareness theory. The findings showed that the practice of taklik talak in Gampong Cot Trieng was generally carried out only through signing without recitation of the sighat taklik talak, so that taklik talak was understood merely as an administrative formality rather than as a binding legal agreement. The level of public legal awareness remained at a minimal knowledge stage and had not reached substantive understanding, which was influenced by the lack of institutional socialization and the dominance of ritual social practices. These findings emphasize the importance of a sociological approach in assessing the effectiveness of Islamic family law norms and provide practical implications for strengthening the role of the Office of Religious Affairs and gampong officials in improving public understanding of the substance of taklik talak.