Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Anayasa

LEGAL ANALYSIS OF PAWNBROKING IN FIQH MUAMALAH AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN ISLAMIC FINANCE PRACTICE Nurlaela, Nurlaela; Mafaza, Arsya; Andhini, Andhini; Jamilah, Siti; Malik, Muhamad Ibnu
ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): ANAYASA
Publisher : PT. Altin Riset Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61397/ays.v3i2.462

Abstract

Rahn (Sharia pawning) is a crucial instrument for mitigating collateral-based financing risk in Fiqh Muamalah, founded on the principles of ta'awun (mutual help) and justice. This study aims to analyze the normative basis of rahn, compare it with conventional pawning, and critically evaluate the implementation of Rahn Bi Ujrah in Islamic Financial Institutions (LKS) using a normative-comparative literature review approach. The findings indicate that while Rahn Bi Ujrah is jurisprudentially permissible, provided the ujrah (fee) is based on real costs and separated from the loan contract, structural contradictions exist in the practice of Sharia Banks. The determination of ujrah percentages correlating with the loan amount suggests that the fee functions as the price of capital usage, potentially violating the DSN-MUI Fatwa. Conversely, OJK regulations enforce Maqashid Syariah principles during the execution phase, mandating the return of surplus funds from collateral auctions to the customer. The study concludes that stricter regulatory standardization of ujrah is essential to ensure comprehensive compliance and maintain the credibility of the Islamic financial system.
PRACTICE OF CONSIGNMENT SERVICES IN ONLINE TRANSACTIONS: FIQH MUAMALAH ANALYSIS OF THE AGREEMENT AND ITS MECHANISM Sukaesih, Iis; Ulum, Mifathul; Alfarizi, M. Salman; Setiawan, Erik; Malik, Muhamad Ibnu
ANAYASA : Journal of Legal Studies Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): ANAYASA
Publisher : PT. Altin Riset Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61397/ays.v3i2.474

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital commerce has encouraged the emergence of personal shopper services (jastip) as a form of online transaction involving third-party intermediaries. This phenomenon raises questions regarding the validity of contracts and transaction mechanisms from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh muamalah). This article aims to analyze the practice of online jastip by examining the types of contracts applied and their conformity with fiqh muamalah principles. The study employs a qualitative approach through library research, analyzing classical and contemporary fiqh literature, journal articles, and relevant fatwas concerning digital transactions. The findings reveal that the jastip practice predominantly applies the wakalah bil ujrah contract, in which consumers authorize service providers to purchase goods on their behalf in exchange for a service fee. This practice is considered permissible under Islamic law provided that the essential elements of the contract such as clarity of parties, object, consent, and remuneration are fulfilled. However, the study also finds that lack of transparency and unclear contractual terms may lead to gharar, affecting the validity of the transaction. Therefore, it is concluded that the permissibility of online jastip depends not on its digital form, but on the fulfillment of fiqh muamalah principles in its contractual mechanism.