Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.115
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal J-PAI: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Jurnal Humaniora Teknologi Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research Jurnal Humaniora Teknologi Ma'alim: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Journal of Islamic Education Studies Quality : Journal of Education, Arabic and Islamic Studies Diplomasi : Jurnal Demokrasi, Pemerintahan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Moral : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam PESHUM Aslama Advances In Education Journal
Bina Prima Panggayuh
Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Metode Berpikir Deduktif dan Induktif dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam: Studi Literatur Muhamad Rifai; Muhammad Hafiz Rivaldi; Hanifah Nurul Izzati; Azkia Aulia Rahmah; Raka Syahputra; Bina Prima Panggayuh
Advances In Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): Advances In Education Journal (Juni)
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Afif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The deductive method moves from general concepts to specific conclusions, while the inductive method builds generalizations from specific facts. Both are important for developing students’ logical and systematic thinking in Islamic Religious Education (PAI). This study aims to examine the use of deductive and inductive methods in PAI through a literature review. It uses a qualitative approach based on relevant journal sources, with descriptive-analytical techniques to evaluate their roles and effectiveness. The findings show that the deductive method is effective for teaching normative materials such as creed and sharia because it provides clear and structured understanding. In contrast, the inductive method supports the development of critical thinking and contextual understanding through real-life experiences. Therefore, combining both methods in PAI learning can create a more comprehensive, balanced, and adaptive approach that aligns with current educational needs and helps form rational and reflective religious character in students.
Relevansi Paradigma Thomas Kuhn terhadap Perkembangan Penelitian Modern Dzaki Prayogo; Aulia Fahrunnisa; Amalia Najiha; Sean Rahayaan; Bina Prima Panggayuh
Advances In Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 6 (2026): Advances In Education Journal (Juni)
Publisher : Yayasan Al-Afif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines the continuing relevance of Thomas Kuhn's paradigm theory for understanding how modern research develops, and offers a critical assessment of where the framework still holds and where it has been challenged. The problem addressed is whether Kuhn's concepts of normal science, anomaly, and paradigm shift still explain contemporary scientific practice across the natural sciences, social sciences, and Islamic studies. Using a qualitative library research method that synthesizes twenty primary and secondary sources published between 1959 and 2026 from Scopus-indexed journals and Google Scholar, the study traces Kuhn's core arguments and evaluates their application and critique in current scholarship. The results show that Kuhn's framework remains influential in explaining scientific communities and knowledge integration, including in Islamic education, although recent bibliometric and philosophical studies suggest that progress is often more cumulative than revolutionary and that incommensurability has been substantially revised. The article argues that Kuhn's paradigm remains a valuable, though contested, analytical lens, and it proposes that Islamic Religious Education research adopt a post-normal, integrative reading of Kuhn rather than a literal revolutionary one.
Co-Authors A. F. Mawardi Sufyan Adia Safitri Adzra Aliya Sidqi Ahmad Naufal Akh. Syaiful Rijal Akh. Syaiful Rijal, Akh. Syaiful Akmal Nurullah Alvira Syahila Amalia Najiha Ana Mulyana Annur Hafifah El Firdausy Asri Aryu Ningsih Aulia Fahrunnisa Azkia Aulia Rahmah Berliana Roisanti Chika Novianti Putri Lestari Dhia A’isy Putri Dwi Ramadan Dzaki Prayogo Dzaki Prayogo Elsa Fitriani Evi Fatimatur Rusydiyah Faizatunnisa Fiantika Iswandari Az-Zahra Firman Aditiya Fitriyah Maharani Hanifah Nurul Izzati Hanun Asrohah Ikhsan Maulana Fauzi Intan Mariska Ismail Hamdi Jaffan Faiz Ijjudan Kahleil Ryner Muharam Kairu Alfa Kayla Baskya Aurelia Keysha Ayu Pradiameka Lintang Akbari Afsyal Luthfiyah Ananta Asmadi Marfiasya Ayu Khairunisa Moh. Rifqi Rahman Muhamad Jacky Al Malvin Muhamad Rifai Muhammad Alhamrah Adam Muhammad Hafiz Rivaldi Muhammad Raditya Rizky Ramadhan Muhammad Ridwan Muhammad Wahidin Annaba Nabila Mutiarawat Nadira Putri Emma Najwa Syarifah Nasywa Nabilla Hakim Nayla Putri Muzdalifah Novita Maulia Harliyani Pramita Dianni Rahayu Rafif Akhdan Arasyi Raka Syahputra Rehan Fikri Al Ghazali Rezy Az Zahra Sapiudin Sean Rahayaan Sevila Maulida Ayogi Siti Khotijah Ayu Siti Salwa Syasya Anasaskia Syifa Hafifah Nufus Thalita Hanasyifa Prasetya Tri Suryani Zahra Hanan Maulid Zahra Tian Nur Alifa